All physics has in common theme that self determination is illusory. While there is are limits to what can be measured, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, this limitation is merely the over-complication of the process embodied in its features that require two points of inquiry in a single variable universe. The Heisenberg mistake is in focusing on size, which is illusory, instead of mathematical modeling which can be solved for any point with certainty unless the universe is truly random in which case you should close this blog and get about your business.
But all physics rejects randomness. The contribution to non-randomness, to the extent that it can be called a contribution, of AuT is that it explains the purpose of illusory self-determination.
All events or solutions to the algorithm have a common purpose. Amusingly it is nothing more glorious than to begin or end compression/expansion cycles. In the early universe, this would have been fairly obvious, but given the layers, with x of the scale over 10^100 for each quantum instant, and the offset addition of several universes each with different space characteristics and all misaligned, the simple purpose becomes more clouded, especially given the existence of temporarily stable states along with co-existent expanding and contracting 'unstable' spiral states. Having the possibility of any point being recalculated for each value of x further complicates the model, especially if it leads to high x values being present in low value pi solution models. For purpose of the current model, it is worth noting (ad nauseum) that expansion is where the solution of the two spiral sets for any point are moving apart and the contraction is where they are moving together. Another complicating feature has to do with the offset feature of the universe.
While we can be absolutely, 100% certain that two separate points are offset due to the changing solution for the space/pi equation; it is less certain whether for any one point there is an offset. While the model almost screams an offset, it remains possible, if not likely, that for individual points that they are perfectly aligned F-series intersecting spirals of the type discussed in the early model. This would mean, at the point of overlap that you'd have these particles have equal amounts of positive and negative solution and they would disappear to some extent. While this is a disturbing result in some ways, it would go a long way towards explaining why space looks like it does. In AuT, of course, the idea that space would look empty is asinine, pre AuT physicists even knew this. The only real difference is that space becomes fairly easy to understand in AuT and you can see what it looks like at least mathematically.
The problem with having aligned individual states is that it complicates a simple math model and it begs the question of why those individual points would not just collapse instead of stacking as the model requires for everything else. But I digress.
The point is that the universe has a very simple fundamental purpose and while it is elegant in its simplicity it is far from romantic. The 9/11 hijackers were not, fundamentally, making some grand statement about infidels, they were merely carrying their share of compression/decompression cycles and did nothing more horrible or glorious than the stamping machine that spit out the rivets that went into the several planes that were hijacked. To fear, glorify and hate them is the job of morons, not physicists. Physicists' jobs are to make better and better ways of achieving those cycles because the cycles demand it and, strangely, to explain why what we do is absurd.
There are some challenges here.
The first is to determine how two different state universes add up. Since they are offset, adding them together is complicated from the simple F-series model. you don't have 1,11,111, instead you have the pi' function constantly changing the angle of overlap between points so you have (geo(1),geo(1)geo(2), etc) so that the points added are offset by a geometry function which gives us the dimensional qualities of the universe we experience.
The second is to explain when compression occurs. As the geometry function gives the illusion of dimension, so too does the compression function give the illusion of solidity. While we can look at compression as the transition from 1,1,1 to 11,11,11 to 111,111,111 and so on, and while we can see the compression and decompression cycles as function of F-series algorithms, the way that they are aligned and the reason they align according to the equation (fseries(n))^2^n remains to be perfectly defined.
There are a finite number of ways for this to be solved, but the appearance of randomness in the solution is required at sufficiently high values of x only because of our observations. However, the appearance of randomness hides a relatively simple model of clear cause and effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment