Pages

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Building an algorithm 15: compendium-why einstein and I were wrong...until I got it right

gravity is an effect not a cause.  All the other forces arising from gravity, all other forces are effects
the universe is not a place of events, it is a place of an algorithm being solved for a variable
the universe contracts and expands, but not because of gravity or dark energy which are effects but because the algorithm has average inflection points which spiral towards but never reaches equality or a balance of the positive and negative
the algorithm defines both a positive and negative F-series.
The algorithm allows for stacking of time states because F-series are stackable (1,1,2 is the same as 11,11,22 is the same as 111,111,222 and so on)  This qualities extends to stacks on top of stacks.
The positive and negative sides of the algorithm are required to provide for expansion and contraction about a common solution.  As the solution moves away there is expansion, as the solution stays parallel (not exactly parallel because of offsets) there is near stability, as the solution moves together there is compression.  For each solution this model holds, even as the solutions are stacked leading to an average solution about which the universe expands and contracts.
There is no relative movement in the sense of quantum change.  Relative movement instead takes into account (1) that all points must change at the same rate according to a single variable and (2) space (ct1) or some other state provides a matrix and the interaction with the matrix gives the appearance of relative change that is observed.
There is no separation, if there was, then space could be infinitely divided and would lose itself as a point of reference.  Instead, there is a finite amount of information from which the definition of pi is defined at any value of x and this information has no separation but is only a solution of yes or no which solution is divided into two separate F-series.  The amount of information varies according to the F-series as x increases incrementally.
Parminides (not Einstein, Newton or anyone else) was the father of AuT, I am the Dr. Frankenstein.
The big bang is an average inflection point, one of a very large number of those corresponding to intersecting offset spirals which approach but never achieve equal size or allignment according to the pi type infinite converging series.  It is a big bounce, but a defined big bounce.
Einstein defined space time, but failed to realize that it had been proven 2600 years before according to logic to be an illogical system.  Einstein said that the reason for time was so that everything didn't happen at once.  That led me down the wrong path in assuming that the universe arose from a finite amount of information allowing a consistent definition of pi and that any point in the universe was merely the expression of the information for a value of time.  In fact, that analysis fell apart because it required the universe collapse and that would have required that there be a fixed point of reference, a beginning which is contraindicated.
The universe must be an informational based system with lmiits or there would have to be something  beyond the universe which would create an infinite system.  In fact, the universe has no dimension.
Black holes do not define a singularity.  If they did they would all have to drop into the same place and they move in space.  Even the earliest versions of the theory recognized that all states must have gravity in order to have the amount observed, that all states were interchangeable (none could drop out of space just because of their weight) and even a cursory observation showed that each state was the exponential informational change for the preceding state.  n^2^x where the existence of 2 in the equation showed that the states (ct1-ct5 that we observe) were information states.  N, based on observation, proved to be the F-series for that state (2,3,5 for matter for example) and x the state number (4 for matter).  This made it clear that the transition observed was ct1 space, ct2 photonic energy, ct3 wave energy, ct4 matter and ct5 black hole material).  There was nothing magical about any state although the interaction of states and particularly the interaction of the states with ct1 gave rise to solutions that we call forces when they are linear.
Linearity was originally seen by me incorrectly as movement from the singularity.  It later became clear that the movement was from one solution to the F-series equation to the next.  Space itself evolved since the definition of pi is based on the changing total amount of information or the total value of x for any universes stacked to make the F-series.
If you are blinded by accepting space as a given, then you cannot see the true nature of the universe as stacked quantum states.  Without the stacking of states there would be no history possible which is why the idea of everything happening at once and any point co-existing with all others had to be abandoned, such quantum instances would not give the appearance or illusion of history.
The original use of the F-series came from a model based on gravity from looking at the end of the spectrum.  The final use of the F-series came from its value as a building block from the beginning of creation.  The curve of gravity changes.
The spiral of the universe corresponds to the spiral of information developed by the author:
o
a primitive discussion of einstein and hologram theory

Still stuck with everything happening at once but beginning to uncover the problems in the theory

A compendium of all the information developed still clinging to the wrong ideas
The first edition of the work that incorporated (along with a bunch of old information) the correct method of defining the universe, the second edition of this coming this year


No comments:

Post a Comment