AuT and the photoelectric effect

Strangely, the book is published already. Things must be slow at Amazon.

This is the first pass by this which I'm posting in "real time" as they say so I can keep moving.  As a result it will come off a little rough, but I'll get back and edit it.

There are a couple of charts concerning the photoelectric effect and there there is the AuT version of things followed by an explanation.

Also, the proof version of the Science of Nostradmas is now available.  If you want to see what could easily be called book 7 of AuT, but in what I hope is a more entertaining format, there it is.  It has all the characters that I talk about in it from a historical perspective and it also covers the true nature of time.  That it isn't dedicated to the muse (there's no dedication because I didn't make the time to put one in) might be made up for in part by making her a lead character.  Go figure.

For this discussion we’re going to use the two figures above for the PE effect.

W=energy of photon necessary to kick out an electron

R Energy increases linearly with Frequency: E=F*H where H is Planck’s constant.

AuT Our previous discussions show that PC is a compression minimum tied to 256:27 substitution rates.

AuT-Frequency is the number of folds in two dimensions, so we can assume this is increasing the amount of dimension in the interim ct3-ct4 transitional state. The closer this transitional state approaches ct4, the more it will act like one billiard ball hitting another. But in AuT there are no billiard balls, so we’ll use the second figure to discuss what happens.

AuT-PEP (Pauli Exclusion) dictates that contact is an illusion.  Using the diagram for transitional states discussed before it can be seen that inserting ct1 states within a system destabilizes it, in this case a ct5 is shown destabilized, but it could be any state where the same net effect is given.  These drawings, are discussed in the prior volumes of AuT.

(R)  E^2=c^2P^2+m^2C^4.  E=mc^2 in this sense comes from the fact that photons and waves are seen to have no mass and hence P (momentum)=0.

(R) Momentum is defined as H/L (L is used for Lamda and is the wave length). If E=cp=HV=cH/L

AuT what we see here is that momentum is a function of H/L or the substitution constant/amount of information in each quantum moment in one dimension.   What this indicates is that the substitution rate per quantum instant decreases as the wave length increases which is what you would expect since the longer the length, the longer the same group of information has to be absorbed within the framework of the bottom drawing.

So this result must also hold for all other forms of information (ct4 collisions for example) so the first thing we have to realize is that the reason momentum is absent in ct2 (photons) is because momentum is a change in position over time and ct2 and ct3 are both time independent.  Still the same features must have the same effect.
What we're dealing with here is a unit problem.  Whenever we reduce things from the observed, 3rd dimensional view into the component parts, the inconsistencies, for example the ludicrous statement that uses momentum or the lack of it to describe light, are removed.
It is also important to remember that the person shining the light is an effect as much as the photon is, but we can ignore those aspects although its worth remembering.
All collisions regardless of state have the basic components as follows:
1) Pauli and more importantly solution order means that on a quantum level there is no actual contact.  Contact is a post AuT effect.
2) Collisions result from reduction of ct1 (space) between solutions to the point where the underlying interaction is considered more significant than the constant interactions such as gravity and more particularly the common change to the single variable.
3) What we consider significant is not significant to the universe.
In any collision the primary change lies in the ct1 variation between states which makes the photoelectric effect a particularly good one to study because it minimizes the other effects, but also involves at least a transitional ct4 state (electrons).  
The most basic of interactions is ct1 (alone) increasing between ct4 solutions (transitional solutions if you call a neutron a stable ct4 state).   Studying these results should help support one solution or the other, the primary indicator of neutrons as stable ct4 states is the neutral charge, the primary non-indicator is the size of the strong and weak forces embodied in the Neutron system.
In long wave lengths, the ct1 substitution rate is slow enough that there is time for the ct1 to go through the ct4 state in the fashion of ongoing ct1 exchanges which are constant.  One might even go so far as to call space a type of infinitely broad wave, but the limit in AuT is as things approach 1 (not zero) or as things approach the next compression state so that analysis is not perfect and it also looks at the two dimensional form instead of pure photon ct1 form.
With short enough wave lengths ct1 is being pumped into the space between the electron and the other states at a speed fast enough that it cannot just move through and the electron begins to separate as the intervening ct1 states increase.  Once other resulting forces from the sharing of ct3 states (time) is reduced sufficiently the additional acceleration is reflected in the increase in ct1 states being substituted in the electron and the substrate from which is is ejected and this high substitution rate increases the separation between the two.
More ct1 exchange can be imposed and remain with the structure of the ct4 state that it has to radiate the ct1 state or break apart, this being shown as heat.  A laser has this effect at a high enough level that the effects of the vibration increase within the substrate is more easily recognizable.

Higher state collisions are still subject to the 3 rules, but with greater substitution ratios between higher states, so that an arrow hitting a target experiences reduced ct1 separation and the rapid ct1 substitutions of the arrow and the need to add substitutions as it enters causes the expansions, heat and reformation, but fundamentally is is the same as the unobserved photoelectric effect.

You should really read the book, but it is a first draft, more of a proof than a finished book, but worth looking at.

Science of Nostradamus

Well, the proof edition is ready.
And no, I couldn't kill that character I planned on killing in the end.
Don't ask me why or why not.

Could Nostradamus see the future?  Does physics allow for this?

Time is not what you've been taught all your life, it is instead the result of the breakdown and rebuilding of the present, small blocks of information at a time, which are offset by acceleration reflected by the substitution of quantum and smaller bits of information which cannot carry a clear record of the past with them as the reassembled large blocks can.

Who were the players that led to this finding?  This book, as a work of historical fiction, discusses some of them, mostly real people who existed, perhaps even the muse.

Should be available over the weekend. Go figure.

More on this later.

The true nature of space and time-a short article

This is a summary in very few words of the 1000 pages of the Algorithm Universe Series.  It is, however, comprehensive without the background information.  The detailed mathematical computations and figures appear in those books but prove unnecessary for this discussion.

The True nature of dimension.

It is confusing to talk about space so we will call it dimension.   The universe is a true quantum universe meaning there is a single variable which increases by a single amount 1,2,3, etc.  This is the rate of change and IS NOT time; nor is it directly related to time.  It has nothing directly to do with the directional nature of time.

Space is solid in the sense that there is nothing between quantum states of space because there is no room for anything to be between them.  This requires that space be mathematical solutions from our point of reference and the relative solution order is the only separation medium possible.  Space is defined as linear solutions to the equation fpluspix, the denominator in the infinite series (increasing in degree by 2 and varying between positive and negative) of pi.  The numerator refers to the number of dimensions changing together.
Photons or the particle version of light are created by the ratio of 27 to 256 changes in space where 256 changes are aligned due to the solutions of fpluspix being positive and negative alternating noting that due to the nature of fpluspix these alignments will be temporary but will reform.
The very fast changes of space to light would only occur at either the center or extremes of the universe due to the solution order issue.  We would no see them because they would not exist long enough to reach us in higher dimension solutions nor would they last long enough to experience them since they would essentially flash on and off without a time reference.
The ether experiment did not show this feature because wave length variation requires a time based change in light waves and the exchange between quantum space and light occurs without a time reference and creates velocity in one dimension and the effect of compression at a scale we experience as gravity.  There is a prior compression scale at -1 to 1 which is a pre-space variation giving rise to fpluspix based on the original counter.  The relative difference between fpluspix and -1^x gives rise to all dimensional features of the universe; allowing a constant rate of change to vary infinitely larger and smaller although given a quantum universe, the amount of information in the universe is finite at any quantum moment or, more accurately, at any value of x.
The second dimension and all subsequent dimensions are essentially derived in the same manner but instead of 27:256 the ratio is 1:2f(x)^2^x where f(x) is the Fibonacci series number for x. Variation in this result is likely at higher states, but observational data indicates that it is slight.
Substitution requirements (27:256) requires that there be a layer of lower dimensional states outside of each higher dimensional state or it falls apart when there is a change in fpluspix net for any dimensional state.
Calling 1 dimension ct2 (the 27 of the 27:256), dimension as we experience it begins at ct2 because of the ratio of 27:256.  This light photon constantly moves through space due to the substitution at each change in x.  It can also self destruct into pre-dimensional ct1 if the internal solutions change from -/+ to -/- or +/+.   This all occurs in a time independent environment.
One can envision ct2 as a line.
Gravity and dark energy (anti-gravity) are nothing more than the net positive vs net negative values of fpluspix locally and for the universe at large.  The big bang, therefore, is (in a time free state initially and later in a time filled state) the inflection points between these constantly shifting results.
Ct3 is the quantum transition between one dimensional ct2 and two dimensional ct3.  The alignment occurs the same way, but in this case the bundles of ct2 have a net positive or negative values which correspond to magnetism in higher dimensional states and they combine in the same way but in this ratio.  This ratio a:2f(x)^2^x gives rise to the equation e=mc^2 for x=4. (2*5)^(2^4).  Black holes, therefore, are nothing more than the ratio where x=5.  Transitional states, however, are very important as will be discussed momentarily.
One can envision ct3 as the lines drawn on a piece of paper in a quantity equal to 2f(2)^2^2 for each piece of paper.  It can be seen that these lines are constantly exchanging (velocity) with one another and that they shift or fall from the paper to be substituted with free lines in space.  From the stand point of the piece of paper, no matter how many sheets of paper are combined, they exist in one dimension.  Velocity is the same for each line no matter whether they are on the paper or not because of the constant substitution rate.  Note that all values are quantum values down to space and all vary together based on a single variable, but the relative change (whether on a piece of paper or off of it, whether part of a line or independent, vary, although a high values of x, the changes of fpluspix relative to -1^n are long.
The transitional states where combinations are partial are important because they provide the bridge between states and these bridges are seen as force elements when time is introduced, but each change in x creates a quantum universe which is fixed.
When these sheets are stacked in three dimensions (x=4) the transitional states moving between the three dimensional features can carry information, these are bundles of waves for all intents and purposes.  This carrying of information between ct4 states relative to the lower replacement of ct1 states which is velocity is what we call time.  As can be seen, it has nothing directly to do with the underlying counter for the quantum universe.  We are able to discern history and time because these bundles carry the history between relatively dense collections of ct3 states.
It appears that the electron is the stable ct4 state and that protons and neutrons are transitional ct4-ct5 states, the math for this appearing in those books along with everything else.
Just as the paper cannot see in 3 dimensions, we cannot see in 4 dimensions.  If we could, then we would see black holes stretching out in a 4th dimension just as the piece of paper would see us as a stack of papers (as opposed to scattered papers) which is the reason for the perceived volume in the universe.
For this reason we know what gravity is, the relationship of gravity to other forces, what black holes are and the like. We know that the higgs boson is an effect and not a thing and we know what space and time are and their relationship.

You're welcome (ha).

How the dimensional nature of things works

so i figured out how to see how these multiple dimensions work.   draw a line on a piece of paper on the other side another going at right angles.  Now run all over the room  with it waving it.  No matter how many dimension you wave it in, the line stays on the paper and relative to the paper doesn't experience anything else.
This is ct2 (the paper) the line is ct2.
Now acordion fold it so that one line is parallel to the folds.  Doesn't matter which one, and number a billion of these using the f-series number (-3,5,-7,...up to the billionth place.  Ths part is a little more complicated and time consuming.  On another piece of paper write 1, then lay out the -3.  As it counts from 1 to 3, this one will stay in the same place but when it goes to 2 lay the 5 so that its accordion folds line up with those of the -3 so the lines are alligned.  when  you get to 4, the negative 3 one will flip and they won't be aligned anymore.   Continue this process for all billion of the pieces of paper and you get a feel for how compression works for ct2-ct3. 
It's a little messy.
anyway, if you do it right, then eventually you get me typing these notes, largely being ignored, but having actually figured out not only space, but the entirely  new version of time (associated with, but not a part of, quantum change).
It's really pretty impressive, but no one really seems to care.  We'll see, its early yet.  It would be quite a shock to the system.
I swam 3000 yards tonight, 1100 IM which surprised me since I was tired going in, but I'm not in a good mood right now and that apparently leads to both insight into physics and good workouts, at least when I can force my morose self to start.

I don't know what it all means, I am working towards something.

The new ether-part 2

Your ideas of the universe expanding are based on inaccurate interpretations.  Time is almost certainly ct3-ct4 transitional states compared to ct1 and ct2 transitional states.  The reason is that at the ct3 state, waves can carry enough information in the aggregate to see what has happened before, but to qualify as true historical time you need sufficient amounts of information to convey the actual events, hence the ct3-ct4 transitional states.
So much of the data derived, such as the Morley and Micehson experiment is based on nonsense because they represent  the ‘inaccurate interpretation of data.’  Instead of seeing the fundamental proofs, all they get is nonsense.

Only to those who don’t take time to understand AuT is the universe not a single variable algorithm driven machine.  The universe is expanding because it is in a post compression phase.  It appears to move faster as you look out because you are looking back in time and it is expanding slower, not faster.  You know it cannot go faster than the speed of light but it does.  There is only one way that is possible and that is if the amount of space is increasing.  Why?  Because it is an explosion?  There is no fuel for that.  It is compressed space falling apart, creating the illusion of entropy over anti-entropy and giving the relatively steady (although by no means completely steady) version of time we experience.  At the inflection points, time may take on a meaning difficult for us to understand, however similar its history will be to ours.

The Flaw:

The space-ether test of Michelson and Marley was flawed, every physicist but me is wrong and I've basically discovered everything or I'm wrong.  No seriously, the test is flawed.

The fixed velocity idea is incorrect because velocity includes both time and dimension.  Time is an illusion that only begins at ct3 and only at ct4 in earnest.
Light exchanges with space as a pre-time, pre-dimensional state.  Light itself has only two elements (dimensions) of time in its wave form and a time free one element (dimension) as photons.
.
Ether (the name they used for space before AuT) doesn't fill space, it is space itself and the earth doesn't move through it because it space is dimensionless.  Dimensionless things necessarily do not flow.  Solution order can exist without movement. At that level all things change at once so looking for consequent phase shifts in wavelengths is absurd.  
Lets talk about this and I'll start with a metaphor.  If I hold up a bag of sand and ask how much candy is in it and you guess 1 piece and we run it through a sieve and there is no candy you don't say that candy doesn't exist.  If you're really interested in the bag, you say we should be looking for sand and not candy in the bag.  
That is the problem with the test for the movement of light (or anything else through space).  Neither space nor light has time.  The shift due to movement through the "new" ether, doesn't occur because it is a ct2 outer shell-ct1 exchange whether in terms of waves or in terms of photons.
 We've known this since the 1920's.  Lorentz and Einstein solved for this.  Indeed, Einstein's comment that we all take our own time is the equivalent (given the proofs of AuT)of saying we take our own dimension with us.
Space has neither time nor dimension, but it still exists.  Passing through it requires that it be processed along with the higher compression states of information or everything would be stuck in place.  We have to distinguish between quantum change and time which are vastly different, the second requiring two different parts of dimension.
Light does not have time, but it does have one dimension.  However the velocity in one dimension, having no second rate of substitution has no relativity and that means that it has no time.  Looking for a time based change between space and light is like looking for candy in a bag that only has sand in it.  We know this, by the way, because acceleration to the speed of light eliminates time.  We also know that history requires sufficient information be carried from one compression state to the next to allow in a quantum state where nothing is moving the experiences of the prior states to be viewed (as history) although they cannot be "felt," at least not the way we are used to feeling things, since momentum is largely history being felt, by way of example.
The illusion of dimension in space is only because we carry our 3 dimensions with us.   It is like looking down on a sheet of drawings with two dimensions on them.  We see them in 3 dimensions even though they only have two.
Dimension arises from ratios of different dimensions and they allow us to look down on 2, 1 and 0 dimensional space with perspective which is apparent to us only because we are not total flatlanders.   Of course, compared to black hole states we are, but that is another chapter.
Are you ready to order the books yet?  They are available on amazon.  And I have not forgotten about you in case that's what your wondering about I just have to finish laying out the universe and doing my gig.

The new Ether part 1-a summary

Space is expanding because of a break down in higher compression states moreso than the increase in information although both effect expansion.
All coordinate change is in one direction, because the single variable only increases (so far), but compression, originally theorized to work according to intersecting spirals (an effect of the true cause and f-series stacking in botht the same and higher place states) is intead theorized to be the result of fseries net variations, although both are ct0/ct1 pheonomena and therefore time independent.

Time isn't a dimension at all it turns out.  Time is the ratio of ct1-ct2 exchange to ct2 and higher exchanges although what we call time may be nothing more than ct3-ct4 exchanges.
This is a spectacular determination, but carries quite of bit of explanatory baggage with it because ct1 exchange is the new ether because space is the  same stuff that all other states are comprised of, a fact so painfully, logically obvious that it can hardly be called a discovery at all.  The universe crystalizes from space mathematically.

In the early NLC version of AuT, there was a fixed future and it prevented coordinates from occurring at the same point twice.  The universe itself changes so this is impossible and it grows in terms of points from the middle so the other points are constantly moving outward except to the extent they compress.  This would appear over time to create a shell of ct1 states although at least the possiblibilty of compression at the edges with  space leaking outward (the last solutions) seems possible.  From a sci-fi standpoint, one can at least imagine a sold ct4-ct5 shell or rings at the edge of the universe.
order separates them.  

Likewise, for this same reason, every point affecting every other point, they never occupy the same relative space no matter what relative to each other point.  The gravity experienced for higher ct states always is changing with each quantum change.  This gives the illusion of rotation to the universe and prevents even the intentional movement to a prior point that would be the equivalent of standing still.

***

Spiral expansion/contraction reflects the stacking of f(x) states on the scale of (f3 or f4) 6^4, 10^8 or greater.  You cannot accelerate back to a prior state or even a prior position although we think we can move in 3 dimensions, we are only moving in one.

This concept of non-repetition affects expansion by imparting perceived movement over time which time is the ratio of ct1 exchange (memory free) to ct3 or 4 exchange which maintains enough information to allow a qunatum state to have memory of the prior state, albeit a constantly degrading memory.

Secondary phenomena are not true phenomena.  Spin, for example, requires dimensional separation and an extra axis about which revolving occurs.  Quantumm examination of spin requires adding the movement of the spinning body with all other points.

Movement at the quantumm level is not really movement, but is merely relative position changing of ct1 states due to compression and the relatively minor today (but greater in a commpressing universe) increase in total information.
The semi-paradox of moving information at different relative points and all points moving more together than apart will occur at an inflection point; but the statiscal concept of even approximate identity of solution (exact identity impossible because of the overall change of the universe) is very small.  That is, the "ct1" in the universe will compress after 7 billion years (the approximation) and things viewing the universe at that point will think of the universe as a big compression event instead of a big bang event until the next inflection point where the net fplupix solutions go positive.

In the overall change we cannot put any point at the same dimensional location twice without exceeding the speed of light due to these features.  However state is what is important at the quantum level and that shifts only between positive and negative results.
  

The universe is a giant adding machine where all the keys once pushed stay down but where there are extra keys added (one at a time)  so they can be pushed again and the level pulled to add them together to get quantum states.

The resulting movement is fairly easy to envision today with a universe spinning at an enormous size.  The initial universe is constant dimension free change.
In the middle there is a more compact universe where all the points are very compact, spinning near the center, but unable to be at the same point twice.  At the center, spin and coordinate change has to be very high under NLC theory to maintain the overall light speed change coordinates, but being time independent, the change rate is the only thing that matters and this occurs at the same speed for every point.  

There are no actual specific "locations" but only the impression, illusion or effect of dimension.
In the intersecting  model of NLC there was still the impression of movement in an outward spiral with the possibility of any of these myrid interacting quantum points every coming in contact with a lower line of the spiral where they might find some continuity.  The need for a mechanism mathematically to prevent the overlap which moves information away from the center rapidly to create this faster than light phenomena in intersecting logarithmic spirals led to an examination of the construction of dimension which, thankfully, appears to be embedded in the pi and sin equations.

Under the phenomena of both AuT and the earlier NLC, all base information change is at a common rate.  Stacking of information (as in the example of spirals off of spirals) allows for information to change at  different relative rates (e.g. 5x1 is smaller than 5x6 even though in writing them out they are not different), one rate changing faster than others stacked on it, so that we get the effects that led the pre-NLC, pre-AuT to assume that only time was uni-directional and that the other dimensions had multiple axis.  All the dimensions frunction from a single axis (albeit an increasing one) and time is an effect and not a dimenstion at all.

NLC (non linear coordinate theory), being a fixed, time independent system proved points could not be in the same place or move backwards to a pior point so the illusion of movement had to be explained using a system that prevented duplication.  In order to arrive at this state of things at our speed of rotation it appeared necessary for the universe to extend the movement outward at a very high rate of speed or rotate rapidly which give rise to the illusion of expansion, spin and angular momentum.

Space must constantly change state or the entire system would solidify.  To say that higher ct states crysalize from the lower states is true, but so must the higher states switch back.  The resulting model of NLC which is not contraindicated by the alternative model of AuT indicates that the universe is continually moving to a higher maximum compressive state, albeit as an infinite converging series, which suggests at least the possibility that at some point, compression will be so high, the universe even during the expanding phase will be mud-like.  The AuT model alone, suggests this is less likely, but with intersecting spiral effects, the end result of a very compact (ct(near infinity)) states remains a possibility.  While this would be dead to us higher dimensional logic in these increasingly stable universes might exist.
Shazaaam!

The ability of Nostradamus to predict the future accurate is tied to the ability both the preservation of the past and the method of building the future.   We have programmed in our minds the ability to examine these quantum historical states that were combined for the current quantum state.   
It is entirely logical that with the destruction and recombination according to such a rigid pattern that an equally blurred picture of the future is available if you know how to look for it.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle (a fallacy in true super-symetry) actually rears its head at this point in the examination since the ability to see the future exactly must fade with the ability to change it for paradoxical reasons and the same formulation which is tied to the relationship limitation of ct1 substitution [(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 at the ct4-ct5 level] applies.
This jives fairly well with predicting the future.  The past, being already constructed of pieces of the present is more clear.  The loose pieces of the past standing ready to come back together exist at a lower compression state so there has to be a way in which these missing pieces and their tendecy towards recombination can be sensed.  Since for practical purposes these are ct3-c4 states or at least transitional ct3-ct5 states, the ability to determine them would seem to be theoretically not only possible, but possible with such percision in a limited way to allow absolute prediction.
Before you scoff, this is exactly what happens when we predict very limited features (like chemical reactions) and very large features (like planetary orbits).  Hence, to get back to Nostradamus, his intent study of past and future planetary orbits for his almanacs is precisely the type of analysis one would engage in to predict a more human future.  This is the subject of a book (fictionally presented) coming out in March in all probability in at least a first draft form under the working title of "The Science of Nostradamus," which I have discussed previously.
One might ask, reasonably, could we predict our future and change it thereby overcoming the H-uncertainty principle. The answer, because there is no uncertain in AuT is yes at the ct4-ct5 level, no at the ct1 level.  The difference is that the speed of light is an effect and not underlying cause of supersymetry.   Hence, we can see events coming, water flooding a city when snow melts to pick an obvious example, and build a dam to stop it.  This involves logically seeing how the past will yield the future in precisely the same manner, it being understood that an earthquake or other even could alter our predictions of the future at this level, but not changing the overall ability to more precisesly predict it based on the recombination of solutions principles inherent in AuT.  Knowing the value of individual fseries solutions for the underlying states of even a very small amount of matter would involve enormous computing power, so the mind of a true reader of the future would have to be trained to evaluate the destruction of time and somehow average or evaluate the possibility of reassembly.  That chemistry and physics and political science allow us to do this with vary degrees of success makes it likely that a true fortune teller could exist.
  

More detail on all of these issues can be found in the six published books.
The next post on the new ether will document the flaws that led to the mistaken interpretation of results in the ether test of Michelson and Marley which led to developement around the correct version of solution order, compression and expansion along the dimensional model preserved in pi.

time, anti time and the proof of AuT in black hole singularities

The fleeting thorught that there is someone for everyoen and if everytihng coudl just line up just right, everyone would have the right person for themselves if even for a moment.

Book 7 weighs in (at the beginning of week 2 of the course) at 279 pages with only 38 pages having to do with the course so far.  I hope to take those 240 pages and whittle them down to 200 pages or less so that the total length of the book is 250 pages or less. Book 6 which also has a lot of extraneous, not fully edited nonsense was around 280 pages and its worth noting that most of the extraneous stuff is repetitive or of limited value.

Here is something from book 7, mind bending but simple:
How does a black hole shrinking to what is called by pre-AuT physics to a signularity prove AuT?
In order to understand this, first remember that dimensions are merely "places" in F-series solutions.  You must also remember that base 10 is irrelevant, that each number is merely another jot on the prison wall.  Also, you must remember that time is not what we thought it was, certainly it isn't a dimension, it is stephen king crap (which is covered below); and that isn't meant to be insulting.  My life is crap right now, if you don't like the language substitute something else, I for one will certainly use something else in book 7.
So let's start by talking about the 3 dimensional singularities.  Yes, we live in what a two dimensional being would see as a singularity.
2 to 3 dimensional conversion is 10^8 in scale.  What that means is that immediately before a 2 dimensional feature changes to 3 dimensions there are 10^8 of them side by side.  The space around them is shrinking precipitously but it can go either way.  In terms of place, everything is 1111, 1112,1113, etc.  This is important.  This assumes that space is ct1 even though it has no dimension because there is no ratio, so don't let me get too confusing here, since it could just as easily be 111, 112, 113 and I'll get to that specifically in book 7 and later posts.  The weird drawing covers all this in books 5 and 6 in case you don't want to wait.
Anyway...imagine a skyscraper 10^8 stories high.  In a two dimensional space (1111,1112,1113...1111x10^8) floor plans would be lined up next to each other.  When the 3rd dimension is added, you can stack them.  They all disappear except for one since the other 10^8 are stacked on top of it in the 3rd dimension.
Black holes are really big Suns (3,5,8)^(2^5)=16^16 electrons (or maybe neutrons, but probably electrons).  These appear to be in two dimensions, but we know that each electron is merely 10^8 1111,1112....states) but these have now been spread out even further in 3 dimensions (giving them a spherical effect, but of course the algorithm is dimension free and hence everyone who (and that includes just about everyone so don't feel bad of you're one of them)  rejects AuT thinks they are living in dimensional space, but they are just full of SKC as it were.  So anyway, you have these 16^16 electrons and they suddenly stack (11111,11112...11111x16^16) in this 5th space (4th dimension) and so we only see one of them.
So the pre-AuT physicists said "oh my, gravity took them to a singluarity, oh my" which is idiotic in retrospect.  The algorithm merely solves them for a 5th place and they are stacked out in this dimension.  And all the physics clowns who want to dream about worm holes in this 5th dimension are just jerking their brains because solution order still defines the relationship and no matter where you enter, you exit only on the other side of the 5th dimension, hence the reason we see quasar type rays ejecting out of the poles of the black hole.

Hence, black hole observations confirm AuT mathematical suggestions.


A note on Stephen King Crap or real time:

Here are some problems with non aut analysis of higgs results
1) time-what is it?  it comes from something and it goes somewhree.  Stephen King posited that something came along and ate it, not a terrible idea, what do they shit?  that's actually not far from the aut answer.
Fibonacci concept good, but info doesn't grow fast enough.
Time past falls apart and reassembles into time future but irreguarly so some is always together as others fall apart or reassemble relatively in higher states.
2) contact-what is it?  Fields interacting sounds good but then you have problems with wave particle duality ultimately.  Two points cannot occupy the same space at the same time in a true quantum environment, and yet they bounce?  How?
The transitional elements break up when put close together in terms of solution or go to next higher state and if not stable they break down.
suggestions that amount of info increases: 1) time 2) expansion o funiverse but the truth is more subtle.  how about entropy going both ways-we assemble stuff so we're having anti-entropy; we're misled by the net amount.  same with gravity and antigravity.

One last issue on dimension and gravity (gmM/r^2):
here are two directions for r, both having their interesting features: 
as r goes to infinity the force goes to zero, but never gets there. 
the other limit is equally interesting. as r goes to zero the force goes to infinity but never gets there 
what happens? 
We see this, by the way, almost zero at neutron stars and then at not-zero? in black holes. It also occurs (approximately) when two protons are forced together in a collider. What happens as gravity goes to zero and how is that taken into account in the results of the Higgs experiment? 
Features gravitational force, r going to zero. Velocity going in the direction of the speed of light. What features are common to both of these that allow, not infinite gravity (the limit function as r goes to zero is only not infinite gravity if it goes to some version of 1) as seen in the neutron star-black hole transition; but the features instead yield quasi newtonian billiard ball type velocity transfers (and transitions from protons to what I suspect will be called quark type objects including bozons). 
I submit there is something that prevents r going to zero (despite the collision effects) and consequent break down results.
 Imagine two charged "mass" states (I'd call them ct4-ct5 transitional states) approaching one another. R is going to zero.  The variance of electrostatic repulsion is varying as F=dq/r^2(1/dpie(0)) and gravity is changing as F = G M1xM2/r2 (from Ray below)
F= the force between the two bodies 
G = Gravitational constant 
M1 / M2 = Mass of the objects 

r2 - The distance
Let's talk about "quantum space," Planck length being the type of measurement that suggests you have this feature (which requires that space convert to an information state, otherwise you could cut it in half), going to zero.  The whole purposes of the "experiment"  we're talking about is to collide the two particles but they cannot occupy the same space at the same time.

Something has to happen as r (quantum space) goes to 1 (I'm not willing to accept 0) which results in the breakdown of one or both of the mass/charged particles. I remember that there is "space" involved in the separation of the quantum elements (as shown in the chart at the end of week 1 if you buy into that model) presumably held together by strong/weak force fields, but shouldn't those be subject to spatial separation?
Think about it, and think on this, you are reading the blog of the only person on the planet who understands time and dimension, except you, of course.  Go figure.