Strangely, the book is published already. Things must be slow at Amazon.
This is the first pass by this which I'm posting in "real time" as they say so I can keep moving. As a result it will come off a little rough, but I'll get back and edit it.
There are a couple of charts concerning the photoelectric effect and there there is the AuT version of things followed by an explanation.
Also, the proof version of the Science of Nostradmas is now available. If you want to see what could easily be called book 7 of AuT, but in what I hope is a more entertaining format, there it is. It has all the characters that I talk about in it from a historical perspective and it also covers the true nature of time. That it isn't dedicated to the muse (there's no dedication because I didn't make the time to put one in) might be made up for in part by making her a lead character. Go figure.
For this discussion
we’re going to use the two figures above for the PE effect.
W=energy of photon necessary
to kick out an electron
R Energy increases linearly
with Frequency: E=F*H where H is Planck’s constant.
AuT Our previous discussions
show that PC is a compression minimum tied to 256:27 substitution rates.
AuT-Frequency is the
number of folds in two dimensions, so we can assume this is increasing the amount
of dimension in the interim ct3-ct4 transitional state. The closer this transitional
state approaches ct4, the more it will act like one billiard ball hitting another.
But in AuT there are no billiard balls, so we’ll use the second figure to discuss
what happens.
AuT-PEP (Pauli Exclusion)
dictates that contact is an illusion. Using
the diagram for transitional states discussed before it can be seen that inserting
ct1 states within a system destabilizes it, in this case a ct5 is shown destabilized,
but it could be any state where the same net effect is given. These drawings, are discussed in the prior volumes
of AuT.
(R) E^2=c^2P^2+m^2C^4. E=mc^2 in this sense comes from the fact that photons
and waves are seen to have no mass and hence P (momentum)=0.
(R) Momentum is defined
as H/L (L is used for Lamda and is the wave length). If E=cp=HV=cH/L
AuT what we see here
is that momentum is a function of H/L or the substitution constant/amount of information
in each quantum moment in one dimension. What this
indicates is that the substitution rate per quantum instant decreases as the wave
length increases which is what you would expect since the longer the length, the
longer the same group of information has to be absorbed within the framework of
the bottom drawing.
So this result must also hold for all other forms of information (ct4 collisions for example) so the first thing we have to realize is that the reason momentum is absent in ct2 (photons) is because momentum is a change in position over time and ct2 and ct3 are both time independent. Still the same features must have the same effect.
What we're dealing with here is a unit problem. Whenever we reduce things from the observed, 3rd dimensional view into the component parts, the inconsistencies, for example the ludicrous statement that uses momentum or the lack of it to describe light, are removed.
It is also important to remember that the person shining the light is an effect as much as the photon is, but we can ignore those aspects although its worth remembering.
All collisions regardless of state have the basic components as follows:
1) Pauli and more importantly solution order means that on a quantum level there is no actual contact. Contact is a post AuT effect.
2) Collisions result from reduction of ct1 (space) between solutions to the point where the underlying interaction is considered more significant than the constant interactions such as gravity and more particularly the common change to the single variable.
3) What we consider significant is not significant to the universe.
In any collision the primary change lies in the ct1 variation between states which makes the photoelectric effect a particularly good one to study because it minimizes the other effects, but also involves at least a transitional ct4 state (electrons).
The most basic of interactions is ct1 (alone) increasing between ct4 solutions (transitional solutions if you call a neutron a stable ct4 state). Studying these results should help support one solution or the other, the primary indicator of neutrons as stable ct4 states is the neutral charge, the primary non-indicator is the size of the strong and weak forces embodied in the Neutron system.
In long wave lengths, the ct1 substitution rate is slow enough that there is time for the ct1 to go through the ct4 state in the fashion of ongoing ct1 exchanges which are constant. One might even go so far as to call space a type of infinitely broad wave, but the limit in AuT is as things approach 1 (not zero) or as things approach the next compression state so that analysis is not perfect and it also looks at the two dimensional form instead of pure photon ct1 form.
With short enough wave lengths ct1 is being pumped into the space between the electron and the other states at a speed fast enough that it cannot just move through and the electron begins to separate as the intervening ct1 states increase. Once other resulting forces from the sharing of ct3 states (time) is reduced sufficiently the additional acceleration is reflected in the increase in ct1 states being substituted in the electron and the substrate from which is is ejected and this high substitution rate increases the separation between the two.
More ct1 exchange can be imposed and remain with the structure of the ct4 state that it has to radiate the ct1 state or break apart, this being shown as heat. A laser has this effect at a high enough level that the effects of the vibration increase within the substrate is more easily recognizable.
Higher state collisions are still subject to the 3 rules, but with greater substitution ratios between higher states, so that an arrow hitting a target experiences reduced ct1 separation and the rapid ct1 substitutions of the arrow and the need to add substitutions as it enters causes the expansions, heat and reformation, but fundamentally is is the same as the unobserved photoelectric effect.
You should really read the book, but it is a first draft, more of a proof than a finished book, but worth looking at.
So this result must also hold for all other forms of information (ct4 collisions for example) so the first thing we have to realize is that the reason momentum is absent in ct2 (photons) is because momentum is a change in position over time and ct2 and ct3 are both time independent. Still the same features must have the same effect.
What we're dealing with here is a unit problem. Whenever we reduce things from the observed, 3rd dimensional view into the component parts, the inconsistencies, for example the ludicrous statement that uses momentum or the lack of it to describe light, are removed.
It is also important to remember that the person shining the light is an effect as much as the photon is, but we can ignore those aspects although its worth remembering.
All collisions regardless of state have the basic components as follows:
1) Pauli and more importantly solution order means that on a quantum level there is no actual contact. Contact is a post AuT effect.
2) Collisions result from reduction of ct1 (space) between solutions to the point where the underlying interaction is considered more significant than the constant interactions such as gravity and more particularly the common change to the single variable.
3) What we consider significant is not significant to the universe.
In any collision the primary change lies in the ct1 variation between states which makes the photoelectric effect a particularly good one to study because it minimizes the other effects, but also involves at least a transitional ct4 state (electrons).
The most basic of interactions is ct1 (alone) increasing between ct4 solutions (transitional solutions if you call a neutron a stable ct4 state). Studying these results should help support one solution or the other, the primary indicator of neutrons as stable ct4 states is the neutral charge, the primary non-indicator is the size of the strong and weak forces embodied in the Neutron system.
In long wave lengths, the ct1 substitution rate is slow enough that there is time for the ct1 to go through the ct4 state in the fashion of ongoing ct1 exchanges which are constant. One might even go so far as to call space a type of infinitely broad wave, but the limit in AuT is as things approach 1 (not zero) or as things approach the next compression state so that analysis is not perfect and it also looks at the two dimensional form instead of pure photon ct1 form.
With short enough wave lengths ct1 is being pumped into the space between the electron and the other states at a speed fast enough that it cannot just move through and the electron begins to separate as the intervening ct1 states increase. Once other resulting forces from the sharing of ct3 states (time) is reduced sufficiently the additional acceleration is reflected in the increase in ct1 states being substituted in the electron and the substrate from which is is ejected and this high substitution rate increases the separation between the two.
More ct1 exchange can be imposed and remain with the structure of the ct4 state that it has to radiate the ct1 state or break apart, this being shown as heat. A laser has this effect at a high enough level that the effects of the vibration increase within the substrate is more easily recognizable.
Higher state collisions are still subject to the 3 rules, but with greater substitution ratios between higher states, so that an arrow hitting a target experiences reduced ct1 separation and the rapid ct1 substitutions of the arrow and the need to add substitutions as it enters causes the expansions, heat and reformation, but fundamentally is is the same as the unobserved photoelectric effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment