I have been busier than I have thought possible which I have allowed to prevent me from doing those things which I wanted to do. I also continue to run into unexplained road blocks.
Explained problems are big enough obstacles, but those which I cannot explain are almost as significant.
Explanations are hard to come by for the more esoteric questions. I came up with a physics theory that denies control and I wonder if I am not letting that take over my thinking. I am reading about another troubled thinker, one younger and ultimately more historic than my life, but I do not know what this means to me.
I am not getting the type of feedback that would allow me to make logical decisions, instead I am being left to my own devices. It also increases the amount of work that I have to do.
The concepts that I see before me, that seem to control my thinking run into direct conflict with my creativity. Can you create your way out of creativity? I suppose that is as easy to imagine as everything else.
Book 7, the commentary on the Higgs boson class and the last 200 pages of A spiral is well underway and is expected to be completed in April. Book 7 is not expected to yield any truly "new" insights, but it will provide some clarification as the issues raised in the Higgs experiments are examined.
Here are some notes from that book.
A note on dissolving bombs (in acid):
The heat can be part of it, but I'm talking about the organization of the acid (purity reduced) and of the spring/bomb (structure eliminated) are reduced. An explosion also increases entropy of the bomb. Think of a puzzle-organized when assembled, less organized when broken up. Entropy and anti-entropy are inherent in the system.
Here is how AuT changes the equation: At the level of super-symmetry entropy is irrelevant, something else happens. The two states in their fundamental informational state only vary as results. The information locally may increase or decrease (compressional changes, the total information always increases over time and more pronounced changes in x); but all quantum points remain what they are, quantum moment solutions subject to constant sequential change, hence the film analogy: solutions at a quantum moment = single slide of film.
Entropy isn't relevant if you're only talking about a math solution, there is no more energy in the equation 2x10 than 2x50 as an equation. One number being higher than the other doesn't add any energy, but it does make one larger relative to the other and from this relationship, relativity, time (what we experience), dimension and other features can arise.
A note on Gravity:
f=gm1*m2/r^2
potential= gm1*m2/r
In looking at the gravitational force and field equations there are two directions, but having their interesting features:
There are two directions for r, both having their interesting features:
As r goes to infinity the force goes to zero, but never gets there. This will be addressed in the next post.
The other limit is equally interesting. as r goes to zero the force goes to infinity but never gets there
what happens?
We see this, by the way, almost zero at neutron stars and then at not-zero? in black holes. It also occurs (approximately) when two protons are forced together in a collider. What happens as gravity goes towards infinity and how is that taken into account in the results of the Higgs experiment? AuT says the r limit goes to 1 and doesn't go to infinity in the other direction, but instead goes to the maximum separation in the universe for the two points subject to the gravitational effect and the limit itself necessarily affects the maximum separation. The minimum amount of gravity says that the maximum separation for two points must allow for that fractional result which must, as a result, be a function of the total amount of information in the universe at any point in time and the maximum compression must change towards the ct5 compression which cannot be stable so it must change to transitional states giving rise to those higgs figments which will be discussed later.
Here are some of the Features of a particle collider: gravitational force, r going towards 1 ct1 between particles (towards zero in pre-aut discussions).
Velocity goes in the direction of the speed of light (1:256 substitution rates).
What features are common to both of these that allow, not infinite gravity (the limit function as r goes to zero is only not infinite gravity if it goes to some version of 1) as seen in the neutron star-black hole transition; but the features instead yield quasi Newtonian billiard ball type velocity transfers (and transitions from protons to what I suspect will be called quark type objects including bozons).
While you discuss field interactions, they are also quantum point interactions and cannot, therefore occupy the same place, but they can have fewer intervening ct states because ct4 must have ct3 interplay, but ct3 may work with only ct2 interplay.
At the collision the feature is this: Two transitional ct4-t5 states (protons) move towards one another. This is high ct1 substitutions along with a reduction of intervening ct1 states.
As they approach the ct4-5 with intervening ct3-ct2-ct1 begin to interact. At some point, ct1 to ct1 sharing occurs between the outer ct2 (photon) shells of the ct4-ct5 states and at the point of collision the ct4-5 transitional states become unstable and kick off ct1 states creating speed, and irregular unstable ct4-ct5 and ct3-ct4 states which are picked up. As we go on, will it be possible to predict more about these ct4-ct5 transitional radiating features which are mistakenly called bozons? The excitement is too much.
I submit there is something that prevents r going to zero (despite the collision effects) and consequent break down results. This is the requirement that there be one ct1 outside of a ct2 and this suggests two approaching limit this to one each, then one shared which results in the breakdown of both to free up internal ct1 states to allow the exchange.
Back to the original:
as r goes to infinity the force goes to zero, but never gets there.
the other limit is equally interesting. as r goes to zero the force goes to infinity but never gets there
what happens?
Quantum theory means there is an answer that can take into account two parts, one a destructive force component and the other a gravitational component? This involves two features: One is gravitational force going to a quantum minimum which, like pi, may be a minimum based on the total amount of information in the universe.
Distance does not eliminate gravity, the entire universe is held together by a well mapped gravitational matrix.
My take (not necessarily the take of traditional physics) I would posit that "goes to zero" (question 7) is a bit confusing because it envisions infinite distance. This is not accurate in our universe. The greatest distance is finite and for reasons of dimensional creation gravity is not affected by distance.
Query-what happens if you get to the end of the universe and take a step outward? Answer exits-the universe defined by info in it.
Move two objects, no matter how small, to opposite sides of the universe, and there is a finite attraction. What does this mean? The net amount of gravity in the system is a function of the total amount of gravitational states (quantum points having gravity) within the system. Every shift in a point affects all other points no matter what the position. Possible for every point to be connected to every other point only if solved together?
G(total)=sum(gp) The total gravity in the system is equal to the gravity of the points. If the points are constantly increasing how can the gravity not increase constantly? The answer has to lie in a non-gravitational feature, anti-gravity,known by its popular name, dark-energy shifting as solved together.
Gravity affects all aspects of the visible universe. Gravity bends the travel of light as well as space itself.
This says some interesting things about those two things. While they do not have mass necessarily, they have some feature that is the equivalent of mass for purposes of bending relative to gravity. Are there features of the universe that are not affected by gravity?
Is there some answer that suggested that will be applicable to the continuing discussion.
1/r as r gets large, gravity does not go to zero, but it becomes less and less.
No comments:
Post a Comment