cat jokes

Yesterday I did my laundry, 25 minutes at a fairly hard level on the stair machine and 2.5 reps (couldn't get to all the machines) on weights.  The change in the weather eliminating swimming outside is going to put a large toll on my exercise routine; but not yesterday.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/beyond-weird-decoherence-quantum-weirdness-schrodingers-cat/573448/

That article has perhaps the best S-Cat joke.  There are some other jokes below, but Schrondinger was wrong.  Here is the AuT version:

Now you are thinking that I'm jus reacting to the article, but this figure appears much earlier (well earlier than the article, anyway) and is described in great detail in book 2 and in the latest edition of the summary article which you should all be buying instead of downloading hundreds of these blog posts and which is included at the end of book 1.

But all you care about are the jokes, so here they are:

A longer version of it is: Heisenberg and Shrodinger are driving down the highway when pulled over by a traffic cop. He walks up to the car and asks Heisenberg, do you know how fast you were going? He answers no, but I can tell you exactly where we were. The cop doesn't like the answer and thinks that it warrants a search of the car. He opens the trunk and immediately yells, do you know that there is a dead cat in here? On which Shrodinger replies, well now we do.

But here are a few others:
Dear Cat,
Schrodinger killed you. I was framed.
Love,
Curiosity

Why did the Chicken cross the road?  If a tree falls in the forest does anyone hear it?
ERWIN SCHROEDINGER:
The wording of the questions implies the absence of an observer.  Otherwise the fowl's motivation might easily be deduced and the sound determined with specificity.
It is evident that the chicken simultaneously did and did not cross the road and the tree both fell and remains standing.
In the face of this, any speculation as to the bird's purpose and tree's sound until rendered certain must be viewed as sophistry.

A lost pet sign on a telephone post says: "Lost cat; please return dead AND alive to Erwin Schrodinger.

Shcrödinger's cat goes into a bar, and doesn't.

A man walks into a library, and says to the Librarian, “I'm looking for a book that's been recommended to me… It's about Pavlov’s Dogs and Schrodinger’s Cat… Do you know it?”
The Librarian answers, “well, that rings a bell, but I'm not sure if it's here or not”

Schrödinger's Hamlet: To be, and not to be, that is the question—

Dark matter and Everyone is looking in the wrong direction and the wrong way but me

After the hard work out yesterday, I was forced inside for swimming and surpised myself by finishing 2500 yards.  It is always hard transitioning from a pure timed workout to one involving actual counting.   I don't mind telling you that the 10 i-ms were a challenge.
Afterwards I had to roll down the windows to get enough air to stay alive.

I'm working on a vc speech, not sure I like it.
Eventually I'll put it here, when I don't hate it as much as I hate it now.

For now, let's talk a bit about dark matter and AuT

Forbes: This Is The Real Reason We Haven't Directly Detected Dark Matter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/10/05/this-is-the-real-reason-we-havent-directly-detected-dark-matter/

Let's pick apart a few things in this article:

1) This article says that we haven't detected dark matter.  AuT takes a different approach.  it sees dark matter, that is missing gravity, as being integral in the gravity we see and knowing that such gravity varies regionally and over time, we mistakingly look at a narrow time range and think that tells us what gravity should look like for the universe-Awnnnk! Wrong.

2) (Exptrapolating the laws of physics) we find that there was not only a time so early when the Universe was hot enough that neutral atoms couldn’t form, but there was a time where even nuclei couldn’t form-Awnnnk!  Pre-AuT physics doesn't understand a partially compressed universe which has plent of 'stuff' at the most compressed state, indeed there is more ct5 and ct5-6 transition states at the big bang than there are today.

3) Ratios (matter-radiation-darkmatter) from cosmic background radiation.  The problem here is that these ratios change over time according to a formula not recognized by the standard model.

4)  Dark matter doesn't interact with matter.  Awnnk!  This is the stupidist part of pre-AuT physics and I don't  intend to honor it with a discussion; but I would directly you to the first book of AuT if you do not already understand why it is redonkulous, too absurd to just be rediculous.

5) Colliding galaxies provides empirecal proof of dark matter.  Dark matter is seen to pass through matter.  Semi Awnnk? Here is the rub of all of this.  First the interaction of matter and anti matter should not affect gravity since the feature that gives rise to gravity is independent of the organization of the higher states.  However, when a compressing and decompressing ct1-ct2 matrix interact what you get is a net gravity.  We happen to live in a net positive interaction planet, but if our planet were to suddenly be net negative our planet would begin to break up and float into space.  What's more is coliding galaxies represent something more than gravity and net positive gravitational results.  It represents a unwinding of the universe pulling galactic bodies together as the knotted up ct1 states they represent come unwound.  Who can even discuss what is going on there without a careful application of AuT?  

6) Look for particles to explain it?  AWNNK (ALL CAPS)!  What AuT proves mathematically is that looking at particle physics is the physics equivalent of trying to communicate with aliens using african drums.  No, its worst than that, becuase that seems sort of cool and plausible.

Anyway, the answers are all here, in these books.  Fortunately, book 2 is going better than expected.  While book one was a mess even in the first 100 pages, book 2 seems to have more typos than outright mistakes.  The summary, of course, is intuitively brilliant if you buy into this whole Greg has figured out the universe thing.

Another gem on antimatter where a prior post was fixed*

I rode my bike to the gym, did three pretty hard sets of weights and rode back again.  On the final hill; the really big one, it started pouring down rain.  I figure if god wants to kill me I'll give him ample opportunity.  Between heart attacks, pneumonia, traffic and heart break I figure if god wanted me dead right now I'd be gone.

I have been doing a little work on my speech, but mainly I've been staring at book 2 wondering when I'll pick it up and read through it.
I have a number of things I'm working on, a few Im waiting on.
I am almost sure to have some version of my christmas story published this month, despite the dearth of days.
Cheating towards 20,000 words it is long enough, although it is 6,000 words less than the old man and the sea which is considered the minimum to claim a book and not quite long enough for the serious teacher in highschool to agree to a book report.  (Hint; I you need to come up with a theme just argue that the fish is youth, you can chase it but eventually it will get away from you).

When will someone combine Trämålning; by ‎Ingmar Bergman with Hemmingways book to have someone in a fishing contest with death or perhaps playing chess with a fish?  It is only a matter of time, if no one else does I I will write it, but Christmas comes first.

You can find anything on the internet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4fdFYIFPxY

or the long version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3LDpCH3_eM

Here is the gem from book 1 (I suppose):

It is almost a certainty that all the black holes together are transitional ct6 states and this suggests that there are a large number of ct6 states and that we cannot see them but it would fit within the same pattern, that we cannot see beyond our transitional super-black hole-black hole transitional state to see the full ct6 states which are parts of ct7 transitional states.

We still need to deal with Anti-matter because it is observed.

The "destruction" of antimatter, appears to be nothing more than overwhelming it in regionally detectable amounts .

A.  Figures on Antimatter

     In the real-world environment, the anti-matter transition can be thought of as part of the transition between expanding and contracting states or related to the transitions of the hinge states.

1.          Antimatter "kicked out" of protons occurs a couple of ways that we visualize, 1) spontaneous decomposition and 2) violent destruction of the larger transitional state but both are the same thing under supersymmetry, the solutions of combined positive and negative making up a higher ct state separate into their component parts in the next lower state through the introduction of intermediate lower ct states, e.g. inserting intermediate ct1 solutions between ct2 solutions in a ct3 environment.

2.     To the extent we are in a net state environment where, of necessity given changes in ct1 states, we have unbalanced amounts of matter building hinge states and anti-matter hinge states, an even or series of events to be more precise that eliminate the amount of matter at a given point will change the balance and a temporary (or permanent) change between matter (built on matter hinges) vrs anti-matter (built on anti-matter hinges) present will occur which is what we observe and which also (along with the 256:27 or f(n)^n/(f(n)-1^n-1 sin solution) supports the 3 point hinge state analysis.

3.     A plume of antimatter coming from the black hole, is an AuT prediction as there is a massive change in states, possibly the incorporation of large amounts of matter (although the opposite can occur) freeing up the anti-matter which is not absorbed into the ct5 matrix.

4.      These might even escape propelled by anti-gravity characteristics, which are quickly absorbed into the next gravitational matrix of the galaxy to the extent they don’t become part of the overall net anti-gravity matrix of the universe at this value of x.

5.     Thunderstorm electric strike anti-matter results would be the same.  The electricity can be seen as a result in large scale ct2-ct3 changes leaving more anti-hinge state ct states than the alternative regionally where large amounts of ct3 has converted to non-dimensional ct2 and ct1.

BUY ME!

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from Facebook

Speaking engagements available. http://clean-water-inc.business.site

Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

(Although everything there is out of date).

Who thinks I should start posting chapters of the christmas story here?

Einstein and AuT

I shouldn't be having the types of personal problems and I should be better at this.
Of course, I bring all my problems on myself, unlike other people.
Here is something which I wrote to a friend of mine who asked why space did not go on forever.

I swam 2500 yards.  I'm not tired, I just confused as to why I am doing or not doing whatever it is that I am not or am doing.  Why can't you help me?
If I'm the smartest person in the world, in this one little place, why can't I help myself?

The problem is we are prejudiced by your perception.  A good understanding of this prejudice can be had by reading a book called flatlanders or by reading one of my books which I'll give you for free if you come by.

The question of what is at the edges of the universe (doesn't there have to be more universe? No is the answer) can be answered easily but only by rejecting one thing, dimension.

There is a non-dimensional environment where god lives.  Not the type of god that we think about and pray to, but a non-dimensional, time free goop of a god that can count and do addition and subtraction.  The goop also rmembers all the solutions to the simple math problems and given the scale of those (at least 10^100) that means a pretty good memory.  But there is no time there, no dimension.  Just a count and memorized solutions associated with that count to some very simple, grade school math.  Such is the kingdom of god and the sub-kingdom of man.  Alas Babylon, as they say.

So here's an interesting chapter from the books:

I dont' know for sure if its from book 1 or 2, but I think 1 which is now pretty finished and published although some of the section are not edited this go round.  I ordered some copies and I'll edit when I read through them.

Until then, I'm trying to look at Vol 2 which so far is not so terrible.

I finished my christmas story, the first 17,000 word draft, its 2/3 of the way to where it needs to be and maybe that will be enough, I do not know.

The author's Amazon page: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

ALGORITHM UNIVERSE THEORY into your youtube browser or going to this channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

First, here is something fun:

I think I'm the most like parminides.  Can you pick him out of this lineup?

1.      Einstein and AuT

Under AuT, Relativity is an effect, not an underlying feature of dimension.

There is an illusion AuT fails on a gross level because of the illusion of time.

          It is the twilight zone of physics theories and is almost irrefuably accurate.

1) All dimensions exist together

2) All change is quantum change in response to a single variable

3) Space is the same as all other states which are folded from space based on exponential compression/folding

4) Time and change are different; Time is an effect like force and dimension of the quantum change between states some of which occur without a time based reference giving rise to features like wave - particle false duality and the impression of charge among other features

6) Electrons and protons are transitional states between waves and neutrons, molecular states through neutron stars are transitional states between neutrons and black holes.

In a quantum state universe time doesn't exist.  Time is the comparison of changes between the snapshots.  There is no time, therefore no thermodynamics, within these snapshots.  Those things physics holds so dear it creates illogical systems to explain them.

          CT1 exchanges create velocity both internal and external to the matrix formed by the increasingly dense sharing regionally and overall.  Internal ct1 sharing changing the wave arrangement within a regional matrix is interpreted as time.  Since the universe is a giant matrix, there is actually a time for the universe as a whole.

          CT1 change is internal to one regional matrix and external to another of necessity.

          This is why in a larger matrix it is vibration an in a smaller it is velocity.

          Where it is velocity, it Is not time.

The universe exists as a series of "quantum snapshots" so everything happens at once only in a snapshot.

Einstein famously said "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." which was one of the foundations for this theory 5 years ago. It turns out that "everything happens at once" is different from "all histories happen together."

Everyone does not have their own time, since time is an effect, it is more accurate to say any matrix has an architecture that varies according to x which regionally is separate from other regional architectures.  

A matrix refers to a collection of adjoining compression states where, until they are separated by lower state ct changes, they share a common rate for each coordinate.

The increase in mass with velocity due to adding "energy" in the form of movement to the non-moving mass in Einstein reflects the relative changes between two Matrix states, one moving with ct1 changes, the other relatively fixed with respect to ct1 changes.

Updating Vol 1, an update

Today was exhausting, but managed to finish dimension, force and time with some satisfaction.
I'd say 60 or 70 percent of the repitition was eliminated and perhaps 80% of what really needed to be taken out.
Factually it was improved.
It is important to note that the fundaments are fairly fixed at this stage.  There are important edits, but "aha" type moments are eliminated in favor of improving slightly the selected math models and a better understanding of what happens outside of the fixed aspects of the system, e.g. hinge and entraped states.
The editing includes 200 of 330 pages that need to edited of 400 total pages; the last 70 pages being the summary which has been heavily edited already and has perhaps 80% of what it needs to fully describe the project.
Tomorrow, I need to tackle the last 130 pages which fall into diverse categories; prior art, questions answered by the theory, and the like.
These are much less important that it might sound because they have already been edited a couple of times and largely include things which are either (1) reptitious or (2) superfluous or (3) obvious in light of the rest of the theory; although there is enough material in each section as support for the rest of the book and the summary that deleting it would be counter productive.
However, it was so complete that I decided to republish the book in electronic form again.

Then realizing that any order of the hard copy would be inadequate given the number of edits, I did the same for the print copy.
The electronic copy is already available by tomorrow the paperback book will be ready with all the critical updates.  I would add that given the summary in earlier editions, the "critical" updates only prevent confusion and clean up the presentation.  This is important in advance of peer review as will the edits to the next 130 pages.
I'm happy to say the formatting required almost no modification despite the edits which include some new drawings or slight modifications of the old drawings (as well as eliminating a lot of the repetition in those drawings.

I will consider taking a short breather on this end.  Reviewing the130 pages will take some time and I have another book to finish.  I am mindful, however, that I am not ordering any hard copies and while the summary copies are adequate for using as examples, the older version of these books are essentially useless at this point.

What ho space

I have put out a 4th edition of the first vol of the compendium.  Perhaps by the end of the week I will have the 5th
The christmas story has lain fallow,  but I will get to that before the end of the week since it is written and only wants editing one last time.  It needs work too,  but there is only so much time and so much I can do right now.
I swam 2500 yards, the pool was cold, the cold seems to put my illnesses on hold.  Perhaps I should sail a small ship around the world.  It would be as good a way to die as any. But not yet, the universe says.
I am waiting, somewhat on pins and needles, to see what work remains to get formal peer review.  There are some things I would change now in the summary article, new aspects of the view of atomic arrangement after the most recent math analysisin book11.  I am now one or two days depending on how you count from expecting a publication date or some disasterish result.  I want to time the release of book 1 to that date which, already published, merely means getting the most up to date copy out there.
So far the second half of the book (vol 1 of the compendium) has not been as rough as the first part, although there are perhaps as much redundancy.  For those of you who ordered it and are panicky, the last 60 pages are the most updated information available to AuT and a summary of everything, well almost everything.  There is no summary of everything.  It is worth the price in its present form even though the last few hundred pages remain to be edited.  Imagine having one of these rare editions to show your great grandchildren proving you were indeed ahead of the curve.   I do not plan to get a hard copy of this version of book 1 preferring to wait for the completed read through.
One of the little gems is that as the universe gets more complex in terms of greater compression, the  number of abberrational states grows.
Because AuT is a system and not some witchcraft conglomeration of parts, we can look at the molecular world (between black holes and Hydrogen, essentially) and understand a little more of what lies between.
We have all kinds of stuff floating around from gas to neutron stars.  All of this represents transitional states.  What  we tend to focus on are planets, stars, neutron stars and black holes, but these different pieces of planets from a distance begin to disappear.
We can extrapolate that the pre-helium universe looks much the same, everything in wave lengths and quantum states, much less diverse but still pieces of this here and that there.
2/3 of the way to a maximum break down things are unravelled enough that we can exist like we do, right before the big bang this type of molecular diversity is probably harder to find and bathed in radiation.
But why diversity?
The reason is that as the system breaks down these increasingly dimensional elements, including the transitioning elements that we talk about in the broad range can exist transitionally as they break down.  Gas molecules are not equally spread, not because of gravity so much as they are localized from where they break down.  That being said, the intervening spatial break down ensures high levels of dispersion.
One has to imagine regions of dark matter where space spontaneously compresses to photons.  If those dont exist there has to be a reason that AuT does not supply yet.
But generally it appears accurate.
There are gems in all 3 books.  The summary for its brevity and overall accuracy.  That being said the molecular area was largely developed in Book 1 in these most recent edits and is therefore slightly advanced in specifics if  not in concept.

Book 2 advances the generalities from book1 in the first 100 or so pages to a level that is fairly unprecedented.  The last two hundred pages, however, are largely unedited, attempting  as they do to take the standard model to task it is an unsatisfying endeavor because it compares apples to fictitious and overly complex breadfruit.  Does breadfruit really exist, I ask you?

Book 1 is a work in progress.  Now, not before, it is fairly lucid.  It contains the summary at the end, but that is not its strength since the summary is self supporting.  The first 100 pages, being fully edited, are now fairly lucid and provide a texture for the summary.
The newest math modeling (operation,domain, etc) appears in it which includes some new slides which will go into the slideshow when I get to it.  It also discusses in more of a genial, old man in a rocking chair, way the details which are set out distinctly in the summary.  There are the requisite occcasional strong insights which are absent from the summary.  It vomits out what the summary carefully spitoons in distinct places.
The very end, perhaps the last 100 pages before the summary article, contains a general summary comparison to the other models, not as detailed as the unedited discussion in book 3, but probably adequate for all purposes given the limited value attached to the other models.

Waiting and Vol 1 ver 4 and questions about angular momentum*

Is all of this meaningless?

If it is why do I cry so much

What am I doing here?

I am 90 pages into these edits 

 there is so much that does not belong there.

There is a problem here 

I am not the one to be doing this

It is mine

but no one has given me the tools

But then I have done it

Now that I have done it

What comes next

It is not just about being right

it is not about peer review

it is not about speaking

Is it about capitalizing

Is it about a lifestyle

Is it a fame

Am I right 

Am I fooling myself

Where does this lead from here

It is a five year exercise

And now I am counting days

A countdown to what?

So I am waiting for news

 I have 3 more days

before  I should worry.

I have been editing Vol 1 which turned out a lot more than what I was expecting.  The last 50 pages is descriptive the first 90 pages are edited.  The middle part is still repetitious but I have no idea what they will read like other than there will be some repetition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZIM2OuXjjg

Trouble -orig

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1tRB7-aBr8

Remake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y9aLNh5jIY

I saw this little gem as I was editing, looking for a home somewhere.

Angular momentum is only the break down of ct1 decompression along a given length of compressed information corresponding to the dimension of rotation in question relative to other breakdowns.

I also saw this part about ct2 to ct1 breakdowns having an element of pi type rotation versus the other forms of breakdown (higher ct states) which reflect F-series curvature

Looking at the drawing above you can see the f-series type of compression at ct3, the dimensional form of c2 and the flat form of ct1.

Does this mean that breakdowns of ct2 to ct1 are necessary for angular momentum?
It is things of this type that require a much more in depth view of a theory which seems to hold up fairly well when faced from a long distance, and very close up; but like all theories there is a range somewhere, in the third dimension where we have rotational symmetries, where the lines get blurred.