Stuck
174 again today. Am I stuck here?
And by the way, there has to be a better blog for dieting advice; although I am the poster grown up for lifestyle change weight loss to some extent.
I did not exercise at all yesterday, the personal battles took all the exercise battle out of me, despite having no need to go further than my back yard to do something.
I did do the backexercises and a short walk; but the former was done early in the day as a way to kill 15 minutes and the second was to clear my head between rounds of psychological warfare, as it were.
Am I stuck...
Ahh, there is a question that has ramifications far down the line.
Things have gotten a little too quiet around here.
3 very probable leads have turned quiet
It is not unexpected, but it is ominous.
Around 5 weeks have gone on two, only a few days on the other, but even so.
There is a fourth undertaking, not really a lead, that is now two weeks old. The 14th day is today, one that I should probably allot 30 days. Two weeks to 30 days, it would hang in your world as suspense, Hitchcocks set of after the audience finds out there is a bomb under the card table. Hitchcock believed in suspense and not the action of the bomb exploding. I live in a Hitchcock movie, not a Scarsasy film.
That does not mean nothing is happening.
I have two articles getting ready to publish; one should be published already, but I have no link to it yet. These are, oddly enough, the same article, "Space is the same as energy." All the articles are that, of course. I am a one trick pony. Having determined what space and time are and how they operate, the universe is reduced to mush, like the cereal I made but cannot eat.
That does not mean that I am inactive on this. Indeed I am spending too much time on it. I buzzed slowly through the first 30 pages, the first 1/3 and then hit the fusion portion. I wish I coudl share the pages with you. They are covered with script. Oddly, I have only added one very simple drawing and even it seems unnecessary. The old drawings show very well how to get to fusion, a controlled fusion. That does not mean it would be easy, only that it can be done.
Having a better idea of both the structure and the process, the later being the two different fusions taught by AuT, renders the process much more logical more capable of understanding, even showing to some extent the atom printer that AuT makes possible, if unlikely.
I have been doing the lengthy write up of how to do Fusion in light of AuT and I think I have that issue licked in concept.
It will not appear here, at least not till after the next patent is filed and that may well be in June or Even July.
I lack time and resources.
Maybe a change in scenery.
I very much need to go to the mountains to finish this work; but absurdly I am here. I am Einstein working in the patent office, coming home from drudgery, not realizing that the process is allowing me to work out what is unknown without breaking things down as they do in the Patent office is helping. Knowing that I could get past relativity, general and special, to AuT if only I did not have the drudgery of work to do first so I can eat.
Tuesday, May 7, 2019
Monday, May 6, 2019
just being plain smarter
I weighed in at an even 174 today. It is not just an example of a lifestyle change, but while I do not yet have a movie stars body, despite the exercise and weight loss, without conscious effort, I appear to have one and while I continue to ignore the core work to the extent that I should; I am doing the back exercises which have a core component, although in all these things there is no single mindedness.
You want me for my fidelity and my movie stars body, but you want me to abandon the fidelity for you. It is as if you want me for what I am and what will you do with what I become?
My looks now make me nearly irrisistable to other beings of my sort, a curse over the years which has come and gone, like the hair on my head. I fear I look more of lex luther than einstein.
Just as my weight and hair is fading, so too is my mind. But it is still there.
Over the next few posts I am going to take the new model of fission and fusion and talk around them. You can find much of it in the most recent books; but in truth much of it remains hidden and will be for another year.
The connosoirs of science, like myself, can work it out from these pages, but what I am saying here is both important and immensely unsatisfying as I work through something based on results which are difficult to ignore and fully disclosed even in the shortest videos and apply them to the two types of fission, atomic fission and nuclear fission which are used more or less interchangeably pre-aut but which are deadly seriously different now; almost unrelated.
And that brings me to the subject of this blog post.
One of the problems with being smarter than everyone else is that you are constantly having to come up with terms for things that no one has ever figured out before and then you have to explain them. Indeed, sometimes you have to take terms that have been given and you have to strip them of their meanings and having done so you are stuck with the choice, maintain the nonsensical meaning or rearrange the letters so you have precharge and prephoton because the terms charge and photon no longer accurately apply.
Need I change atomic and nuclear just to satisfy lesser minds than mine?
Absorption and Spew, for example, look just like compression and decompression to the untrained, dare I say unintelligent mind, but to me they are different. (Editor`s note: I am considered the village idiot by those who know me best; and no one forces you to read this blog)
How, the unintelligent but nevertheless curious asks?
Simply put Absorption and Spew reflect the approximately balanced absorption of a lower state and spew of a higher state. But it is not so simple. There are some other features that are critical to charge and observed molecular interaction. What is that? There is a line of interaction that makes the spew of electrons something that is the same and therefore pushes against each other. The same is true of protons. So you have these same scale (ct state compression scale) of spew along common lines which drives electrons apart from one another. It is the same spew absorbed by protons. For neutrons, it is different, being similar states they pull in surrounding ct1 and spew something that pushes them apart, but the added dimensional features means the push is in a direction that is less visible than 3 dimensional push.
The exclusion principle suggests that there are orbits of spew, the proton suggests by its failure to combine with the electron that at close quarters, the spew of the proton is the same as the electron, the movement of the planets, the eliptical orbits which define the constant falling around the planets suggests the same feature on the quantum scale.
The neutron also must have the same features, operating on the same one quantum less scale as the planets with the movement reflecting some fractal qualities that you cannot fully comprehend but which Iwill make clear.
So you have folding of ct1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.3, etc; but when it is balanced against a spew type unfolding of another higher state.
In some way, the electron and proton spews need to be viewed as combined in the neutron in order to allow two neutrons to attract one another and repel one another in equal measure (approximately equal)
Compression means that from a 3 dimensional standpoint, the amount of information can increase (towards ct5) or decrease (towards ct3) without changing the relative size from the viewpoint of ct4 since ct5 increases in information are folded smaller and the ct3 changes can be viewed as increasing the speed of changes and therefor as energy even though it is nothing more than change rates within a region.
Coming up I will talk about fission and chain reactions which are different under AuT, even intent is different, and while I have covered, in the past, fusion to some extent since that was a target, the contrary in AuT works in a way that is more of the same thing in reverse than in pre-AuT physics where the increase in radiation is its own solution and the critical difference between thermodynamics on the atomic scale and fractal mathematics has to be dealt with.
You want me for my fidelity and my movie stars body, but you want me to abandon the fidelity for you. It is as if you want me for what I am and what will you do with what I become?
My looks now make me nearly irrisistable to other beings of my sort, a curse over the years which has come and gone, like the hair on my head. I fear I look more of lex luther than einstein.
Just as my weight and hair is fading, so too is my mind. But it is still there.
Over the next few posts I am going to take the new model of fission and fusion and talk around them. You can find much of it in the most recent books; but in truth much of it remains hidden and will be for another year.
The connosoirs of science, like myself, can work it out from these pages, but what I am saying here is both important and immensely unsatisfying as I work through something based on results which are difficult to ignore and fully disclosed even in the shortest videos and apply them to the two types of fission, atomic fission and nuclear fission which are used more or less interchangeably pre-aut but which are deadly seriously different now; almost unrelated.
And that brings me to the subject of this blog post.
One of the problems with being smarter than everyone else is that you are constantly having to come up with terms for things that no one has ever figured out before and then you have to explain them. Indeed, sometimes you have to take terms that have been given and you have to strip them of their meanings and having done so you are stuck with the choice, maintain the nonsensical meaning or rearrange the letters so you have precharge and prephoton because the terms charge and photon no longer accurately apply.
Need I change atomic and nuclear just to satisfy lesser minds than mine?
Absorption and Spew, for example, look just like compression and decompression to the untrained, dare I say unintelligent mind, but to me they are different. (Editor`s note: I am considered the village idiot by those who know me best; and no one forces you to read this blog)
How, the unintelligent but nevertheless curious asks?
Simply put Absorption and Spew reflect the approximately balanced absorption of a lower state and spew of a higher state. But it is not so simple. There are some other features that are critical to charge and observed molecular interaction. What is that? There is a line of interaction that makes the spew of electrons something that is the same and therefore pushes against each other. The same is true of protons. So you have these same scale (ct state compression scale) of spew along common lines which drives electrons apart from one another. It is the same spew absorbed by protons. For neutrons, it is different, being similar states they pull in surrounding ct1 and spew something that pushes them apart, but the added dimensional features means the push is in a direction that is less visible than 3 dimensional push.
The exclusion principle suggests that there are orbits of spew, the proton suggests by its failure to combine with the electron that at close quarters, the spew of the proton is the same as the electron, the movement of the planets, the eliptical orbits which define the constant falling around the planets suggests the same feature on the quantum scale.
The neutron also must have the same features, operating on the same one quantum less scale as the planets with the movement reflecting some fractal qualities that you cannot fully comprehend but which Iwill make clear.
So you have folding of ct1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.3, etc; but when it is balanced against a spew type unfolding of another higher state.
In some way, the electron and proton spews need to be viewed as combined in the neutron in order to allow two neutrons to attract one another and repel one another in equal measure (approximately equal)
Compression means that from a 3 dimensional standpoint, the amount of information can increase (towards ct5) or decrease (towards ct3) without changing the relative size from the viewpoint of ct4 since ct5 increases in information are folded smaller and the ct3 changes can be viewed as increasing the speed of changes and therefor as energy even though it is nothing more than change rates within a region.
Coming up I will talk about fission and chain reactions which are different under AuT, even intent is different, and while I have covered, in the past, fusion to some extent since that was a target, the contrary in AuT works in a way that is more of the same thing in reverse than in pre-AuT physics where the increase in radiation is its own solution and the critical difference between thermodynamics on the atomic scale and fractal mathematics has to be dealt with.
Sunday, May 5, 2019
Field prejudice
I weighed in under 174 pounds for the first time in years. I am vanishing. I have become a magician in my own right. It is cool outside. I feel a little cold drinking my coffee despite the long shirt, pants, shoes and socks. It is a beautiful day with clouds that pomise to either build or disperse later, but plenty of sun even though it is not yet warm.
AUT has a field prejudice even though it rejects classical fields. It can be called an attraction prejudice. Perhaps a better name would be a math or logic prejudice.
Using positive and minus or decompression or compression oriented or attractive or compulsive are all field terms to some extent or another. The idea of folding while particulate in nature, implies a tendency to fold. Field and tendency tend towards the same definition.
If, as I often do, i use the term opposites attract to discuss the concept of folding, i am inadvertently arguing in favor of a field quality to the particles in question.
It is hard to come up with a great explanation for this, but it makes for a good modeling feature which, of necessity, is inaccurate.
Indeed positive and negative are absolute terms and AuT does not have positive and negatives, only negatives that when properly affected yield a secondary positive result. Fpix transforms the value of the negative value, the not nothing of logic, into a positive secondary value which is not really a field, but still has substantial field value.
To make this more clear for something to have a property that affects something else is a field concept. AuT has no contact between particles, only solution order, so the idea of something that is between quantum points in contraindicated. Yet, opposites attract.
The field solution is that the underlying equations of curvature, sinpix(x), differentiated from sin by virtue of the changing compression affecting the result, are the fields. They define a way that the particles interact.
The whole model can be flushed down the toilet, because there is a mathematical field operating behind the scenes to create the reality we observe.
AuT shows the transition from Fpix to Fibonacci compression as a logical progression, indeed the trademark of AuT shows the linearity of the progression:
Even logic or math which governs this relationship and therefore transition becomes a background field of sorts.
This is the transition from g-space to o-space that makes everything irrelevant. If we an control ct1 results, we can have the power of what we have called god over our universe, we can make something, anything, in the sense that we think of things (energy, matter, etc) out of space which before AuT and after Marley and Michelson we would have called nothing.
But we have particles of space that have their own battle hardened features that defy our attempts to alter them. They are complex having the ability to change an underlying value that has its own logic that is, perhaps every bit as rich as o-space in its entirety. They are super computers to the extent they can memorize results over unimaginably large numbers. we can easily write 100^153, but we cannot comprehend it the way that particles of space do. That the universe can order these and track the changes, even according to the very simple underlying rules is staggering in concept. There are a hundred trees in my view, many more birds and bugs I can see or hear, many timess this that are hidden from me, temperature, waves (which are particulate) my coffee filling half a cup and getting cold as I type this, all controlled by fundamentally rediculous rules and a math which threatens to be defined as a field.
AUT has a field prejudice even though it rejects classical fields. It can be called an attraction prejudice. Perhaps a better name would be a math or logic prejudice.
Using positive and minus or decompression or compression oriented or attractive or compulsive are all field terms to some extent or another. The idea of folding while particulate in nature, implies a tendency to fold. Field and tendency tend towards the same definition.
If, as I often do, i use the term opposites attract to discuss the concept of folding, i am inadvertently arguing in favor of a field quality to the particles in question.
It is hard to come up with a great explanation for this, but it makes for a good modeling feature which, of necessity, is inaccurate.
Indeed positive and negative are absolute terms and AuT does not have positive and negatives, only negatives that when properly affected yield a secondary positive result. Fpix transforms the value of the negative value, the not nothing of logic, into a positive secondary value which is not really a field, but still has substantial field value.
To make this more clear for something to have a property that affects something else is a field concept. AuT has no contact between particles, only solution order, so the idea of something that is between quantum points in contraindicated. Yet, opposites attract.
The field solution is that the underlying equations of curvature, sinpix(x), differentiated from sin by virtue of the changing compression affecting the result, are the fields. They define a way that the particles interact.
The whole model can be flushed down the toilet, because there is a mathematical field operating behind the scenes to create the reality we observe.
AuT shows the transition from Fpix to Fibonacci compression as a logical progression, indeed the trademark of AuT shows the linearity of the progression:
Even logic or math which governs this relationship and therefore transition becomes a background field of sorts.
This is the transition from g-space to o-space that makes everything irrelevant. If we an control ct1 results, we can have the power of what we have called god over our universe, we can make something, anything, in the sense that we think of things (energy, matter, etc) out of space which before AuT and after Marley and Michelson we would have called nothing.
But we have particles of space that have their own battle hardened features that defy our attempts to alter them. They are complex having the ability to change an underlying value that has its own logic that is, perhaps every bit as rich as o-space in its entirety. They are super computers to the extent they can memorize results over unimaginably large numbers. we can easily write 100^153, but we cannot comprehend it the way that particles of space do. That the universe can order these and track the changes, even according to the very simple underlying rules is staggering in concept. There are a hundred trees in my view, many more birds and bugs I can see or hear, many timess this that are hidden from me, temperature, waves (which are particulate) my coffee filling half a cup and getting cold as I type this, all controlled by fundamentally rediculous rules and a math which threatens to be defined as a field.
Saturday, May 4, 2019
My search for Clartiy
"it is only heart break that finally refutes all that is ephemeral in love."Amor Towles
I weighted in under 175 today, for those of you who only read my blog to keep up with my exercise and weight routine, I also expected not to do as well today, but I managed 33 minutes on the stair machine and three mediocre sets of weights.
The ability to see surface trurhs is tied to our willingness to ignore our prejudices. That one is by me.
In a way the two are related or relatable.
There is a path in the world that I can see with great clarity, but my ability to move in a straight line towards it is limited by unseen forces that define my past, and future while leaving me somehow free and imprisoned in the present.
CT1-3 is a lot like virtual particles, unobservable, but the idea of matched anhilating pairs is just nonsense, as is the spontaneous generation of information in space, although you can see the parallels.
The information of space is generated from something; but space is not empty so things don't exist in space in the sense of these nonsensical pre-AuT theories, and yet AuT has its own type of nonsense goverened by what happens before time and what type of thing that space is for holding and answering to count.
I weighted in under 175 today, for those of you who only read my blog to keep up with my exercise and weight routine, I also expected not to do as well today, but I managed 33 minutes on the stair machine and three mediocre sets of weights.
The ability to see surface trurhs is tied to our willingness to ignore our prejudices. That one is by me.
In a way the two are related or relatable.
There is a path in the world that I can see with great clarity, but my ability to move in a straight line towards it is limited by unseen forces that define my past, and future while leaving me somehow free and imprisoned in the present.
CT1-3 is a lot like virtual particles, unobservable, but the idea of matched anhilating pairs is just nonsense, as is the spontaneous generation of information in space, although you can see the parallels.
The information of space is generated from something; but space is not empty so things don't exist in space in the sense of these nonsensical pre-AuT theories, and yet AuT has its own type of nonsense goverened by what happens before time and what type of thing that space is for holding and answering to count.
M-fker
The Jerusalem Post: New studies raise questions on fundamental theories about the universe.
https://www.jpost.com/HEALTH-SCIENCE/New-studies-raise-questions-on-fundamental-theories-about-the-universe-588396
Of course and Oh god, why does the universe torture me with this nonsense?
It is worth a little digression back to my discussion in the last post about black holes existing as pairs, stability wise and adding that they have quantum weights.
Think about this, as with all things, obvious in light of AuT, fact; the neutron, proton and electron are all quantum states, and yet planets and stars, and to a lesser extent atoms and molecues, exist in all states, sizes and combinations.
Ahhhhhh, here is the genius of AuT and Fractal mathematics in general. Indeed, my genius, not in figuring all of this out, but in hearing when other people provided a piece here and there and putting it together.
Indeed, nothing that little bit and then telling you, listen doubing mother f-ker; think about it. Adding ct4-ct5-1 and lower states to the ct5 allows for even more variation than we have at the ct4-5 level aut defines; hence we can have the quantum separation we observe, the quantum variation in the environment around us that allows a little purple flower to exist at just this place at just this time.
Yesterday I saw a single lightening bug, all of its fellow bugs were probably dead from mosquito truck spray, and this one was doomed for the same reason, but just in that one spot at that one time, the miracle existed as a result of non-miraculous forces.
Of course and Oh god, why does the universe torture me with this nonsense?
It is worth a little digression back to my discussion in the last post about black holes existing as pairs, stability wise and adding that they have quantum weights.
Think about this, as with all things, obvious in light of AuT, fact; the neutron, proton and electron are all quantum states, and yet planets and stars, and to a lesser extent atoms and molecues, exist in all states, sizes and combinations.
Ahhhhhh, here is the genius of AuT and Fractal mathematics in general. Indeed, my genius, not in figuring all of this out, but in hearing when other people provided a piece here and there and putting it together.
Indeed, nothing that little bit and then telling you, listen doubing mother f-ker; think about it. Adding ct4-ct5-1 and lower states to the ct5 allows for even more variation than we have at the ct4-5 level aut defines; hence we can have the quantum separation we observe, the quantum variation in the environment around us that allows a little purple flower to exist at just this place at just this time.
Yesterday I saw a single lightening bug, all of its fellow bugs were probably dead from mosquito truck spray, and this one was doomed for the same reason, but just in that one spot at that one time, the miracle existed as a result of non-miraculous forces.
Friday, May 3, 2019
Editing and confirmation
If a member does not master his circumstances he will be mastered by them.
This is the kind of advertising that plays off of the emotions in a way that us tough guys find repulsive.
The initial 37 pages of the patent need to be extensively changed. It shows how rough the model was even though it was essentially correct in August.
The inventive steps continue.
Express.co.uk: Dark Matter BREAKTHROUGH: Mystery substance 'EXISTS' and explains 90% of the universe. https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1121154/Dark-matter-space-discovery-dark-matter-energy-galaxies-universe
Why might this article be of any importance at all? Because AuT requires that there be net decompression galaxies, indeed expansion reflects the preponderance of expansion vrs contraction.
Like the multiple black hole collisions supports the minimum dual black hole fractal analysis of aut, matching the dual neutron design shown in the most recent books of AuT which predate and predict these results.
IEEE Spectrum: Black Holes Bumping in the Night: LIGO "Hears" Gravitational Waves With Increasing Sensitivity. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/astrophysics/black-holes-bumping-in-the-light-ligo-hears-gravitational-waves-with-increasing-sensitivity
Of course.
This is the kind of advertising that plays off of the emotions in a way that us tough guys find repulsive.
A sissy might tear up about stuff like this, but not me. Not even if I described it to someone.
The initial 37 pages of the patent need to be extensively changed. It shows how rough the model was even though it was essentially correct in August.
The inventive steps continue.
Express.co.uk: Dark Matter BREAKTHROUGH: Mystery substance 'EXISTS' and explains 90% of the universe. https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1121154/Dark-matter-space-discovery-dark-matter-energy-galaxies-universe
Why might this article be of any importance at all? Because AuT requires that there be net decompression galaxies, indeed expansion reflects the preponderance of expansion vrs contraction.
Like the multiple black hole collisions supports the minimum dual black hole fractal analysis of aut, matching the dual neutron design shown in the most recent books of AuT which predate and predict these results.
IEEE Spectrum: Black Holes Bumping in the Night: LIGO "Hears" Gravitational Waves With Increasing Sensitivity. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/astrophysics/black-holes-bumping-in-the-light-ligo-hears-gravitational-waves-with-increasing-sensitivity
Of course.
Wednesday, May 1, 2019
Summer
Futurism: SpaceX-Like Startups Think They Can Solve Fusion For Cheap.
https://futurism.com/the-byte/spacex-startups-fusion-energy-cheap
A few weeks ago the outdoor pool tottered between the high 60's and 72 degrees and I swam for the first time. Now it is about 72, typically at the 74 degree range so I no longer have to go to the gym to get exercise.
I have kept my weight at 174-176, weighing in this morning at 174.4 I have not yet set a goal for 170; if I keep lifting weights and doing the stair workouts, something that has gotten sporadic of late with all the travel I did in the last month, I need the extra weight.
I have 2 more articles coming out which are invitation pieces with no real cost to me except for time. Today I begin the process of tranfering the first 1/3 of the edits from the hard copy to the electronic copy of the patent. I look at what has been accomplished in the model as I go, just since August of last year, and it is staggering. It also requires a large number of corrections.
The appeal moves forward to what end I know not. That more than anything may define where I am in 12 months. I am waiting for responses from several places, but only a few, perhaps just 3, have shown any part of the vision which I had hoped for.
I have done it however. The amount of progress is not in a vacuum; the solutions to things like the double slit experiement, the part of the patent I am editing this morning, are there, most ofthe other mysteries of physics were decided a long time ago in the model, primarily in going from space to black holes without picking up the pen as it were, the last of the progress was categorizing transitional states, something that admittedly has some mainly grunt work to go, categorizing force, a very very recent undertaking in detail, although largely done in principle in August, working out the process of fractal change which is underway more as a consequence than anything else (the idea that hinge states may lose their relevance after ct1 for pi(1) and pi(-1) where the math shows the hinge states which is a consequence of fractal building after that point and something which makes we wish I had other mathematicians to work with and...I am not sure what else is still in the hamper. Perhaps it is the practical applications which are a part of the rewrite. Certainly the period table work out, a Christmas eve miracle of sorts, not because it was hard or magic, but because it worked as expected and shed a great deal of light which by the first of the year or shortly after had defined how the neutron functioned as a fractal of a black hole which is, again, staggering; but turning this into the practical, building floating cars adn fusion reactors will require substantial grunt work.
Which brings me to why I am up at 4 in the morning typing, editing and drinking my half cup of coffee.
I that emptiness inside of me something I can write about. Can I tell you about my hopes, my dreams, the jail bars that only exist in my mind but which I dont know how to tear down? It is hard to remember what I can and cannot say. I only know my life means almost nothing to me, it is only what I can give to other people. Were no one depending on me, I would behappiest because I would have nothing to give to anyone, like the man who had all the time in the world until his glasses broke in the twilight zone.
So perhaps I will talk about the article instead.
None of these startups have the right model which I add and yet I do not know how to reach them except to reach out. It is a step too far today, but perhaps tomorrow.
A few weeks ago the outdoor pool tottered between the high 60's and 72 degrees and I swam for the first time. Now it is about 72, typically at the 74 degree range so I no longer have to go to the gym to get exercise.
I have kept my weight at 174-176, weighing in this morning at 174.4 I have not yet set a goal for 170; if I keep lifting weights and doing the stair workouts, something that has gotten sporadic of late with all the travel I did in the last month, I need the extra weight.
I have 2 more articles coming out which are invitation pieces with no real cost to me except for time. Today I begin the process of tranfering the first 1/3 of the edits from the hard copy to the electronic copy of the patent. I look at what has been accomplished in the model as I go, just since August of last year, and it is staggering. It also requires a large number of corrections.
The appeal moves forward to what end I know not. That more than anything may define where I am in 12 months. I am waiting for responses from several places, but only a few, perhaps just 3, have shown any part of the vision which I had hoped for.
I have done it however. The amount of progress is not in a vacuum; the solutions to things like the double slit experiement, the part of the patent I am editing this morning, are there, most ofthe other mysteries of physics were decided a long time ago in the model, primarily in going from space to black holes without picking up the pen as it were, the last of the progress was categorizing transitional states, something that admittedly has some mainly grunt work to go, categorizing force, a very very recent undertaking in detail, although largely done in principle in August, working out the process of fractal change which is underway more as a consequence than anything else (the idea that hinge states may lose their relevance after ct1 for pi(1) and pi(-1) where the math shows the hinge states which is a consequence of fractal building after that point and something which makes we wish I had other mathematicians to work with and...I am not sure what else is still in the hamper. Perhaps it is the practical applications which are a part of the rewrite. Certainly the period table work out, a Christmas eve miracle of sorts, not because it was hard or magic, but because it worked as expected and shed a great deal of light which by the first of the year or shortly after had defined how the neutron functioned as a fractal of a black hole which is, again, staggering; but turning this into the practical, building floating cars adn fusion reactors will require substantial grunt work.
Which brings me to why I am up at 4 in the morning typing, editing and drinking my half cup of coffee.
I that emptiness inside of me something I can write about. Can I tell you about my hopes, my dreams, the jail bars that only exist in my mind but which I dont know how to tear down? It is hard to remember what I can and cannot say. I only know my life means almost nothing to me, it is only what I can give to other people. Were no one depending on me, I would behappiest because I would have nothing to give to anyone, like the man who had all the time in the world until his glasses broke in the twilight zone.
So perhaps I will talk about the article instead.
None of these startups have the right model which I add and yet I do not know how to reach them except to reach out. It is a step too far today, but perhaps tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


