Field prejudice

I weighed in under 174 pounds for the first time in years.  I am vanishing.  I have become a magician in my own right. It is cool outside.  I feel a little cold drinking my coffee despite the long shirt, pants, shoes and socks.  It is a beautiful day with clouds that pomise to either build or disperse later,  but plenty of sun even though it is not yet warm.

AUT has a field prejudice even though it rejects classical fields.  It can be called an attraction prejudice.  Perhaps a better name would be a math or logic prejudice.
Using positive and minus or decompression or compression oriented or attractive or compulsive are all field terms to some extent or another.  The idea of folding while particulate in nature, implies a tendency to fold.  Field and tendency tend towards the same definition.
If, as I often do, i use the term opposites attract to discuss the concept of folding, i am inadvertently arguing in favor of a field quality to the particles in question.
It is hard to come up with a great explanation for this, but it makes for a good modeling feature which, of necessity, is inaccurate.
Indeed positive and negative are absolute terms and AuT does not have positive and negatives, only negatives that when properly affected yield a secondary positive result.  Fpix transforms the value of the negative value, the not nothing of logic, into a positive secondary value which is not really a field, but still has substantial field value.
To make this more clear for something to have a property that affects something else is a field concept.  AuT has no contact between particles, only solution order, so the idea of something that is between quantum points in contraindicated.  Yet, opposites attract.
The field solution is that the underlying equations of curvature, sinpix(x), differentiated from sin by virtue of the changing compression affecting the result, are the fields.  They define a way that the particles interact.
The whole model can be flushed down the toilet, because there is a mathematical field operating behind the scenes to create the reality we observe.
AuT shows the transition from Fpix to Fibonacci compression as a logical progression, indeed the trademark of AuT shows the linearity of the progression:

Even logic or math which governs this relationship and therefore transition becomes a background field of sorts.
This is the transition from g-space to o-space that makes everything irrelevant.  If we an control ct1 results, we can have the power of what we have called god over our universe, we can make something, anything, in the sense that we think of things (energy, matter, etc) out of space which before AuT and after Marley and Michelson we would have called nothing.
But we have particles of space that have their own battle hardened features that defy our attempts to alter them.  They are complex having the ability to change an underlying value that has its own logic that is, perhaps every bit as rich as o-space in its entirety.  They are super computers to the extent they can memorize results over unimaginably large numbers.  we can easily write 100^153, but we cannot comprehend it the way that particles of space do.  That the universe can order these and track the changes, even according to the very simple underlying rules is staggering in concept.  There are a hundred trees in my view, many more birds and bugs I can see or hear, many timess this that are hidden from me, temperature, waves (which are particulate) my coffee filling half a cup and getting cold as I type this, all controlled by fundamentally rediculous rules and a math which threatens to be defined as a field.