Sunday aftermorning

I have perhaps 10 articles partially written, but I am focused on getting the next patent filed where the electron, already remodeled, is more specifically described and where the details of fusion are covered in a more direct fashion.
I swam four days in a row, yesterday being the short 2,000 yard workout; but this is not good since I should have been varying my workout more but have elected for what is easy and cool.  The water temperature is up to 82 degrees, still fine regardless of the sun angle; but noticably increasing towards being too warm when it was only weeks ago that it was marginally warm enough.
I feel pretty good about the fusion solution.  The details may require some thought, but the general model is solid now, the drawings good enough although there will be a few edits.
My original thought was to file it the first of next week, but I am calmer after the weekend, despite sleeping past 630, almost to 7 today.
I have also outlined the grant application in some detail although I seem to have misplaced my pen in the process.
Nature.com: A struggle for the soul of theoretical physics. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01171-0
This article is laughable.  It shows everything wrong with physics...and Nature magazine, those pompous jackasses (you can decide if I am talking about characters in physics or the magazine, you would probably be right in either case).
They talk about it being a math vs observation battle, then the subtle error..."without spin of the electron the periodic table of the elements does not make sense."  This is where the true battle is.  Entrenched theories vrs more elegant and predictive theories.
If you buy any of the books, the audio book or Alg. Univ. Model, at least; the periodic table is a necessary result not of electron spin bullshit, but fractal mathematics. Alright, briefly the Nature article drones about the battle between math fantasy and observational reality; but they miss the point that needs to be made.  Trying to use old math to explain new observations is as stupid as thrying to make new math explain old observations if you are not flexible in your approach.
The old math is just that, old.  Worn out and inaccurate.  It explains a periodic table based on fanciful and unrealistic time features that are not observed in nature.  If it is not observed as part of the base math of the universe, then it probably is not right.  This is why AuT was able to fix the time problem, because faster than light travel was a thing, observed in nature (not just old galactic movement or, as pre AuT calls it Newer galactic movement; but also gravity which changes in a pre-time and therefor faster than light travel).
It is the new version of the electron, which however poorly is set out in the prior books and the fractal periodic table which is more clearly set out in the prior books that bridges the gap between math and physics because they are both observed and creatures of the math, not the forced, if brilliant, math of nature magazine, feyman, einsein, schrodinger and the like; but real concrete math that fixes problems and which, when applied to complex models, like the periodic table curls up around it like a kitten a purrs.

I recently had to deal with some of the bull shit when I showed how the new math was more preditive.  The reviewer could not deny the math, this is the most recent force and range chart for those of you following along in the books.  Sputtering for lack of fact; no attempt was made to question the predictiveness of the model, instad the reviewer resorted to procedural objections which had nothing to do withphysics or math.  What does this tell us?
The world of physics, including the clowns at Nature, is so mired in trying to force the old math into the new physics that they no longer see the world around them and their work in increasingly worthless and, as shown by the absurdly expensive super colliders, wasteful.  Physics has become a garbage heep of misunderstanding mirroring, just as AuT suggests it would, the pollluted world around them, it has become one more plastic bag at the bottom on the ocean and, sadly, I am the only hope for the future.
Quite a bit of responsibility for the villiage idiot, but also foreseeable.