editing blogs

Blogs are not tweets.
They can be written and having been written can be re-written to take into account the notation of grammatical errors or new discoveries or even personal growth.  They are chapters in a book which are rewritten as the editorial whim passes.  I make no apologies for correcting a thought, even though it is completely different or taking a post accidentally published and converting it back to draft format.
That being said, I am consolidating material today and do not know when I will return to mainstream blog except to edit and reorder information.  And I may change this blog because I decide to move forward.
I am very much at a cross roads mentality today which I will not try to explain...or again I very well might.

Italian Opera

D'Annuzio was involved in Italian Opera and supported facism before withdrawing from politics for a life of drugs and debauchery.   I have not discovered whether the second abysynthian war affected this, but I need to add some opera to the second edition of "The first battlefield of wwii".
Opera was a big part of Italy during this time period. 
Italian gave us "piano"-sing, I think it means; and primavera-spring as well as phrases like "oppresso d'amor di piacere, il popol de' vivi s'addorme and l'ebbrezze perdute (not to be confused with pan perdu from the French, always with the food).
Not all Italian opera speaks to me; perhaps not much.
Some does
La luttuosa tenebra
una storia di morte
racconta alle cardenie smorte?
forse perche una pioggia
di soave rugiade
entro socchiusi petali cade
su l'ascose miserie
E su l'ebbrezze perdute,
sui muti sogni e l'ansie mute
su le fugaci giole
che il disinganno infrange
la note le sue lacrime piange
That is by Negri.

I feel like I wrote this but I did not:
E mezzanotte,
e l'ora passa frattanto,
e sola qui sulle piume
ancora veglio ed attend in van
That's by Leopardi

And this, this is something only one other would understand in context
ba iami sempre come mi baciavi
la prima volta che ti strinsi al core!
Fratelli
Oh, Su le fugaci gioie
che il disinganno infrange

Wang discusses China drones-china's weaponized economy.

Taking a break from my discussion of how I single handedly won the war with the United States, to point out the results.  Mobile Mines play a big role in World War C; the fictional book behind the Rhetoric in China's Weaponized Economy, both available on Amazon.

China's Drone Program Appears To Be Moving Into Overdrive
As you must see if only china makes miniaturized parts, only China will be in a position to make these small drones which will be used as weapons.  When the time comes to fight this war and you ask your country why it cannot fight a modern war.  When you look for allies, you will wonder why they all turn to the country that supplies all of the goods they need to maintain their standards of living.
Your technologies have allowed us to move everything to China and supply you from there.  When you became dependent on China, China owned you.   And that was done by me, B.G. Wang, "in your face" as you say in your country.
 

what is more important, time or space in defining the universe

This is a good question, but is largely answered in prior blogs.
The only thing that really matters is time because space is an illusion in this theory.
While there is much to be said for space as a practical necessity with or without time, there is no justification for this position.
I imagine the universe as coming from a singularity drop into a sea of time and burning into space more than I can see all that space somehow existing without time.
Perhaps this will be the explanation.  Instead of their being a place full of space, there is a space full of time.  There is no space as we know it, only time as we experience it.
Somehow, without space, into this sea of awareness the singularity is dropped and begins to dissolve; expanding into the universe we experience.

infinite series, infinity, dark matter, anti matter, curved space, origins and what's next

There are a number of equivalents to cover in trying to make a theory.
The beauty of "creating the illusion of space using time" is that you can neatly wrap just about everything up by making it part of the illusion. While that makes the theory easy to scoff at, the fact that the issues such as infinite series, infinity, and origin questions exist even in Newtonian (and pre-Newtonian) physics and that such illusory concepts as dark matter/energy (or something which fills the observations of dm/e), anti matter, and curved space are observed in our universe shows that to scoff at anything is only "scoffitry" (the art of scoffing) and not valid criticisms.
The only valid criticisms are those which substitute something which explains what is scoffed at.  This does not mean that the substitute has to be valid.  Any theory that doesn't fully explain Origins is doomed from the outset and everything else leaves us back at the physics equivalent of stone tools.
Origins, being the place where the universe makes sense at a fundamental level, are the penultimate questions to be answered and e-hologram theory doesn't even get close to that issue.  Origins require we default to something we call god (for now at least) and even the god-like "awareness" envisioned as a possibility of e-hologram theory only explains the type of god that we experience and not the type that would be behind the design of the singularity itself.
In fact, origins have been envisioned as an infinite series which (as will be explained later) have features which allow them to curve in on themselves in e-hologram theory (e.g 22/7; all black holes going back to the same singularity, etc).  Infinite series (other than pi) are well known, for example cutting the distance of anything in half continuously (e.g.-cross a vector half way, then cross the next half half way; define a circle by an infinite series of sides merging to becoming circular and starting at 1 (diameter), 2 (perpendicular diameters), triangle, square, etc).
And of course origins.  If the universe comes from the big bang, the big bang comes from the singularity, where does the singularity come from and once you find that, where does it originate and on and on.  In fact, the infinite series of creation justifies the circular argument of the universe existing by virtue of awareness because it comes back onitself, a snake eating its tail.  In such a universe, infinite series would be expected as reflections of creation (irregular numbers like pi for example) but that is just an observation and not a solution.  God is not a solution because you have to decide where god comes from and it is not scientific to say he was always there, because we have already established a theory where time is only a function of our universe and therefore irrelevant to g-space.
I scoffitise myself. 
So I will table origins as a thing of itself and discuss the other aspects of observed space as part of a hologram universe, but later.

what love is

I know what love is
it isn't a sunny day
it isn't a beautiful girl
it isn't you leaving
love isn't rejection
of what we care about
and I would know
for I know what love is
it isn't late night conversations
staying up till dawn
the hours spent together
talking of things which matter
and those which don't
of what we'll never know
with anyone else
it isn't the time
close friends spend apart
the poems that I write
to someone besides you
nor is it the thoughts
of what might have been
if you were not in them
it isn't the children
that we'll never have
nor the time together
which we will not spend
it isn't the missed opportunities
of moment spent with you
love isn't memories
we have of separation
it isn't the lovers we have
with whom we are not in love
it isn't even the arguments
the moral disagreement
the anger and jealousy
which we do not have
nor even the hatred
which you feel when
you think about me
all of these things
I know are not love
because I know what love is
the early morning light
that isn't in your eyes
the musky clean smell
that isn't in your hair
the soft touch
that isn't from your hands
the gentle melody
that comes off another's tongue
all of these things
are not what love is
I know what love is
and it not here without you

conservation of time as an equivalent of conservation of mass and energy

In traditional physics while you can exchange and change matter and energy, in any closed system; including the universe, there is conservation of mass and energy.
The equivalent in e-hologram theory approaches several thorny issues and one which we haven't gotten to yet and will not get to in this blog in its entirety.
I'm going to refer to this as conservation of time which is a theory, but not a stable of e-hologram theory.
First-matter and energy are tendencies to which time has attached in the singularity giving them the appearance of vectors (or dimension).  The singularity allows for everything to happen at once until time is added so in order to have conservation of mass/energy in our universe, there must be a set amount of time.  Since there is a finite amount of time, it must be conserved.
Time does, however, allow for increases in dimension which means in our universe time can stretch.  Not all time stretches the same amount and dimension requires that time stretch at different rates and without friction which is logical since friction is a function of matter rubbing against matter which cannot happen in the singularity since there is no dimension and hence contact is impossible.
Friction and all interactive forces, must be related to gravity which is the tendency of matter and energy to surrender time.
Energy has less frictional aspects, so it can be seen as (1) having less time or (2) having time which has stretch so far or retracted so far (one is just the opposite of the other to us) that it does not have the same tendency to combine with adjacent time.  This stretching or retracting requires a much deeper analysis that a Sunday afternoon blog allows so we will come back to it later.