infinite series, infinity, dark matter, anti matter, curved space, origins and what's next

There are a number of equivalents to cover in trying to make a theory.
The beauty of "creating the illusion of space using time" is that you can neatly wrap just about everything up by making it part of the illusion. While that makes the theory easy to scoff at, the fact that the issues such as infinite series, infinity, and origin questions exist even in Newtonian (and pre-Newtonian) physics and that such illusory concepts as dark matter/energy (or something which fills the observations of dm/e), anti matter, and curved space are observed in our universe shows that to scoff at anything is only "scoffitry" (the art of scoffing) and not valid criticisms.
The only valid criticisms are those which substitute something which explains what is scoffed at.  This does not mean that the substitute has to be valid.  Any theory that doesn't fully explain Origins is doomed from the outset and everything else leaves us back at the physics equivalent of stone tools.
Origins, being the place where the universe makes sense at a fundamental level, are the penultimate questions to be answered and e-hologram theory doesn't even get close to that issue.  Origins require we default to something we call god (for now at least) and even the god-like "awareness" envisioned as a possibility of e-hologram theory only explains the type of god that we experience and not the type that would be behind the design of the singularity itself.
In fact, origins have been envisioned as an infinite series which (as will be explained later) have features which allow them to curve in on themselves in e-hologram theory (e.g 22/7; all black holes going back to the same singularity, etc).  Infinite series (other than pi) are well known, for example cutting the distance of anything in half continuously (e.g.-cross a vector half way, then cross the next half half way; define a circle by an infinite series of sides merging to becoming circular and starting at 1 (diameter), 2 (perpendicular diameters), triangle, square, etc).
And of course origins.  If the universe comes from the big bang, the big bang comes from the singularity, where does the singularity come from and once you find that, where does it originate and on and on.  In fact, the infinite series of creation justifies the circular argument of the universe existing by virtue of awareness because it comes back onitself, a snake eating its tail.  In such a universe, infinite series would be expected as reflections of creation (irregular numbers like pi for example) but that is just an observation and not a solution.  God is not a solution because you have to decide where god comes from and it is not scientific to say he was always there, because we have already established a theory where time is only a function of our universe and therefore irrelevant to g-space.
I scoffitise myself. 
So I will table origins as a thing of itself and discuss the other aspects of observed space as part of a hologram universe, but later.