One of the benefits of e-hologram theory is that it allows for at least one not completely circular explanations (well it's pretty circular) for the limitation of light speed and, as promised here, is one version of how that limitation applies.
To begin, we'll go back to the beginning, the big bang, where time begins for the singularity.
It is significant that the biblical version of this even is "let there be light" instead of the correct "let there be time" because one gives evidence of the other.
The "correct" explanation of light speed as a maximum must be tied to time and the exact reason for this may or may not relate to the existence of time as a result of the universe becoming self-aware as a result of the amount of intelligence embodied without time in the singularity.
In "our" time, thought is governed by...electrical impulses. These in turn are limited by the speed of light. Hence, time based on awareness would be limited by the type of awareness in existence in the singularity.
Awareness, however, is only a "method" of arriving at the answer which is really tied to how time displays dimension which in turn yields speed. The real limitation can come from any similar feature of the singularity and our universe which self define the universe in the same fashion that this type of "awareness" does. That is, since the universe is nothing more than a display of the singularity, the singularity or time must take all of their limitations from the universe in turn if everything happens at once in the singularity (whether as potential or actual tendency) which is what separates e-hologram theory form s-hologram theory in principle.
Now that we've failed to give a Nobel prize to Bill Murray, maybe we should look to George Lucas. The reason is that the extinction of a large amount of intelligence would have an effect on the overall awareness in the universe at a specific moment. It would not affect the total awareness, however, because the singularity would embody all awareness at all time at all places in a single point since there is neither dimension nor time in the singularity. One method of changing time might involve slowing or speeding the speed of awareness in the universe although to have a measurable effect the data sample would have to be enormous, at least in theory.
Alas, since there are no "moments" in the singularity, the aberration in "the force" or "the awareness" in the universe would probably not be affected by a single planet of people in a universe filled with peopled planets, so we had best hold off in making an award, sorry George. You can find solace with Bill.
Now as to the circular nature of this argument, it can be said that "light speed" defines "awareness" and if "awareness" is a function of awareness in the singularity, light speed should fluctuate in both equally, the answer is that the speed is relative. It matters little if it speeds up in the singularity or the universe because if it speeds up in one, it speeds the other. The speed of light therefore is an artificial construction of the universe which is self limiting.
Now many of you are shaking your heads because the "awareness" factor for creating "time" within the singularity is a singular weak position. This is admittedly true. It is one "off shoot" of the theory that allows a fantastic (as in fantasy) idea like god become justifiable based on a model of pure physical theory. The awareness argument is also circular because it assumes enough potential events of awareness in the singularity to create an overall awareness to create time and this begs the question of how such awareness begins in the first place without some outside force to "create" the singularity.
The discussion of how the singularity is created must be addressed eventually, but not today. Let it be enough to acknowledge that the singularity must exist, must have come into existence and is no less plausible because we cannot comprehend evolution or combination without time or space as we understand it. Going from the universe that we have to the singularity is only one step inward into an onion that is infinitely layered in all probability and hence we must decide whether Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones should share the Nobel Prize. That will have to wait for another blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment