NLT The next thing-55 THE BASIC EQUATIONS OF NLT

And so we have arrived here.  There is so much to say here.  Perhaps the first thing is to answer the question, am I a prophet or a philosopher of mathematics.  It would be wrong after so many years away from the black board to claim to be a mathematician or a physicist.  The answer is that I am not a prophet except to the extent that I speak what is forced upon me by my philosophy of mathematics.
My religion is the bane of all religions.  It forces us to accept that there is no past and no future, that our actions, being predetermined, are futile.  It suggests that to the extent there is a creator, the proverbial third grader, that our universe was designed to generate emotion.  What would the third grader say to that.  Was the idea to balance the so called "good" emotions with the "bad?"  It would be logical given the depth of love and bottomless agony of sadness, the signs of self sacrifice for the stranger and the willingness to kill, in cold blood, ones neighbors and even ones friends.  What type of god would create such a universe, and we can honestly answer, only one who created us in its own image.
Today, I said the prayer for the dead over a cat.  Perhaps my god will forgive me for that or perhaps he will require it of me.  But the cat was a loyal friend and had as much goodness as any other living thing, so the cat got the prayer for the dead.  The cat is dead now, the owner more alone than ever.  I am there for whatever purpose I find myself, self loathing, unhappy with the universe that logic and the true physicists force me to described, a prisoner to conflicting emotions that I have yet to reconcile, events refusing to let me plot the course I'd chose.
Tonight after walking through the twilight i took all of my clothes off and jumped into a pool.  It was dark and the goggles I grabbed were the dark kind for the bright sun.  I could see almost nothing.  This must be how our universe looks to the creator.  Murky, with only the impressions that are generated experienced without clarity.  The tubes to the polaris like the rubbery skeletal arms of some strange alien corpse floating just outside of my range of vision.  Let us say amen.

THE BASIC EQUATIONS OF NLT: It is axiomatic that there will be multiple equations for NLT and that the equations used herein are only preliminary to the work that is being done.  In fact, the primary method developing NLT up to the present time has been through the solution of existing equations for a non-linear time environment. 

As a preface to what follows it should be noted that this preliminary work is largely speculative.  NLT seeks to approach the universe from the opposite direction of traditional physics (TP).  TP tends to drill down towards nothing, NLT seeks to drill upward from the void.  Solving equations of traditional physics in terms of nonlinear time seems the quickest path to usable math, so you need to get to dimension and time.

1)    In the broadest sense, NLT=T+-T.  That is Non-linear time is a combination of everything happening at once and they can theoretically be separated into everything happening in one direction and in the opposite direction through the application of linearity.  Anything linear has two directions by our definition of linearity.  While we are stuck going in one direction, NLT where everything happens at once, is not stuck.  If negative time is a dead end, we merely substitute F (force) for –T.

Likewise –T may be the negative for a prior Clock Time, e.g. F(2) may be –CT(1) when CT(2) is linear.  The theory of negative times giving rise to force are merely a recognition that forces are tendency to return to non-linearity.

2)    T=CT0(T)^1/2+CT1(x-T/T)\^1/4+CT2(y-T/T)^1/8+CT3(z-T/t)^1/16+CT4(w-T)/t)^1/32  etc.  CT3 is the observed compression of energy to matter.  The last of these, CT4 being the compression experienced with black holes as alluded to earlier.  CT0-CTx are conserved so that as one increases another must decrease.  Since only time change is relevant from our perspective, when we define points in space we change it this way:

3)    P=(T)dt+(F)dt  for a point, force or dimension.  This equation reflects compression at an ever increasing scale and other features of clock time become relevant as these numbers increase.  This is the basic parameters that at some point coordinates go to zero as t approaches x,y,z (in the equation in part 2) and w (black hole CT5) sequentially, each of these being “larger” than the one before.  It allows Clock times to go to zero and to go negative.  Having forces come from a higher Clock Time (CT) state allows forces to exist alongside dimensional elements without a separate force element.   CT1-CT4 are presumably constants that have little effect on the scale.  They have dimensional characteristics that give rise to reality as we experience them.  CT4 allows us to experience standard clock time.

4)    –T=F0(-T)+F1(gravity)+F2(Photonic)+F3(EM)+F4(Nuclear).  To get an understanding of this equation we must go to the prior equation.  F0 is something of a mystery and is the force that creates non-linearity.  For purely theoretical purposes the other forces have an origin which is more imperfect being tied to the second most imperfect part of the equation.  As Clock times go negative, they give rise to forces.  CT(0) goes negative first and gives rise to gravity, which is the tendency of CT1 to go non-linear.  Next CT1 goes negative which gives rise to photonic forces, CT2 goes negative giving rise to F3, CT3 goes negative giving rise to F4, etc.  This means that the top part of the equation T and the bottom part –T may merge as time changes which is consistent with the origin and conservation of time.

5)    If the negative time of a preceding clock time is force, then the force equation can be eliminated completely in favor of a negative time in.  In terms of equation:

P=((t-y)/t)DA-(t-y/t)FA)dt=((t-y)/t)DA+((t-x)D(A-1)

This simplified equation recognizes that the Dimensional function and the Force function for state "A" would be equal to the Dimensional function for A and the negative dimensional function for the preceding dimensional coordinates.

seeing nothing

There will be nothing of significance today.
Transitions are strange things,
they took my focus away and I have very little focus.
I thought I couldn't write anything but I wrote a little anyway.
I have a gift, I know what I miss more than anything,
but only in a general way.
I am tired.
My sleep is troubled by dreams
which I am afraid to understand
My daylight hours are haunted
by a reality which I cannot ignore
My eyes, which are not in very good shape, are sore.
I have spent hours and hours fighting to see through rain.
I have strained my eyes trying to see through the fog of time
I am dizzy
the sleep, the staring, the changes
the dreams, the reality, the fear
Tomorrow things will start again
I will wake from night time dreams
and I will have the daytime nightmares
little steps
one item at a time
figure out what is important
take little steps
toward the goal
if I figure it out
random steps
if I don't

NLT The next thing-54 THE RELATIONSHIP OF CLOCK TIME SIMULTANEOUS COORDINATE CHANGES, DIMENSIONLESS TIME ORBITS AND COMPRESSION

You haven't seen any poetry lately.  It is an emotionless state that gives rise to only logic, only math.
The stories are lying dormant, waiting for a pen to scratch over a paper and bring them back to life.
It is hot again after the mountains, the last days loom hazily in the humidity.
Sleepless, I try to take what is already written and breath some life into it by putting it forth, knowing the strangest aspects of this are yet to come, this being NLT, life, and more.

THE RELATIONSHIP OF CLOCK TIME SIMULTANEOUS COORDINATE CHANGES, DIMENSIONLESS TIME ORBITS AND COMPRESSION

All that has been discussed so far brings us down to an explanation of how time orbits have no dimension and how exponential compression, and acceleration come together.
The transition from CT0 to CT1 is confusing because it goes from a non-linear state to a linear state creating gravity.  We know that there is a compression of some form, but it is unlike anything else.  More importantly, all three coordinate sets come into place, with only one way to go, back to non-linearity.  It is either the highest or the lowest of the time states.  If it is the highest, then we seen the subsequent energy states moving further and further back to non-linearity.  While counter-intuitive in some way, this appears likely.
First, we see energy as a higher state than matter, so why shouldn't a pure gravity environment be higher than energy.
Second, we see the lower energy states returning steadily towards a non-linear state (especially at CT5) or black holes.
Third we have more concentration which seems to be comparable to a less energetic state.
The speed of coordinate change decreases.
NOW AVAILABLE ON AMAZON:

This is why in the equations we have just seen and those which follow we will largely be looking at 1/(factor of 10) which is exponentially smaller
CT1 is the first "orbital" state we fully understand.  Only one coordinate can change at a time and using the logic above we can say this is because the time state is so high that there is too much active time for accumulation or diversification of time change.  CT1(x,y,z) but only one of the three can change at once, but it can change very quickly.
At CT2(x,y,z) two of the three can change but much slower.   This slower change is exponentially slower, but it not easily seen since it goes from 10^2 to 10^4 only.  The rate of compression is reflected in the rate at which two changes can occur in various combinations vs one changing.  This is a function of the number of changes which can occur with only two coordinate changes at a time.
CT2 to CT3 has a compression of 10^8 and this change should be easier to observe. At this point in time there are three dimensional changes at one time and the number of potential combinations allows than any one change will be slower.  This allows for further compression.
This process continues in the more recognizable time changes which will be the subject of future entries.

NLT the next thing 53: Rate of Change

The next chapters will define the relationship of rate of change and time orbits.  They will get to the end game for all this discussion in a way that is somewhat spectacular.  That you have to suffer with so much ground work is only because I put together Einstein's analysis of the universe with that of several others so that the end game became apparent to me first.  Others will have taken what I've written and gotten there long before I post it, but if you prefer to wait instead of looking for it yourself, sit back, pour yourself a scotch or a glass of wine, curse me under your breath or out loud if you really think that I'm some kind of a monster, and read on or just go to a different blog, perhaps one with cats in it.

PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS Rate of Change: Instance is the prediction of NLT.  Non-linearity means that everything happens at once, but quantum linearity means that “instance” exists.  The reason your perceive that you are in a linear environment, that is that space-time exists, is because your perception is based on the linear projection of a single instant, a quantum rate change.  While you think that the instant you are in is part of a sequence, that is not a requirement.  
The “infinite universes” that traditional physics, dare I say primitive physics (I think not), tried to sell you is nothing more that the simultaneous existence of all of the instances at once.  Our "instant" could easily be shuffled and dealt out in any order and we would still have all the memories and dreams for the future that we have now even though the order they play out would be purely random.  This idea of shuffling will become very important later on.

Presumably the universe has a set rate of change, this is the minimum quantum of time that creates instance.  This is reflected in the conservation of time.  As the volume of the universe changes, the amount of change of the space coordinates and the rate of creation of quantum space (if such in fact occurs) can be estimated.  If expansion doesn’t occur this would not change the rate of change, but would change the way it would be calculated.  This "rate" appears different from different perspectives of concentration of clock time, but we know from prior entries that for our purposes it is 10^16*10^8*10^4*10^2 in terms of scale (or 10^30 for CT4).  That is we can multiply our perception of the universe by 10^-30 (1 with 30 zeros between the decimal and the starting point) and we have the minimum distance with which time changes to be perceivable in all its myriad forms (from quantum gravity to black holes).

          The rate of change is the same whether points are compressed matter or dispersed as space.  The difference lies in the speed of one set of coordinate change verses another.  This is why we must accelerate to change from matter to energy, we are eliminating Standard clock time in favor of faster dimensional coordinate changes and, presumably even faster two dimensional changes.  An interesting exercise will be to look at the different rates of compression while maintaining coordinate change.  It is, of course, predicted that coordinate change rates decrease exponentially along with compression rates and this will be discussed shortly to bring the idea of "dimensionless time orbits", "coordinate change" and "minimum quantum change" (rate of change) together in subsequent chapters.

          The exact "perceived" change rate (as opposed to quantum rate change) is complicated because every point on earth is changing relative to the spin of the earth, the spin of the solar system, the spin of the galaxy and the spin of the universe itself so it is not a clear or linear expansion equation.  The speed with which something spins to create standard clock time would affect the overall rate of change since all times are conserved.  

And so we arrive back at formulating the basic theoretical equation of NLT, subject to certain revision; but the starting point for the next stage of inquiry, the basic equations of NLT.

NLT the next thing 52: THE END OF ALL THINGS

Perhaps it is only appropriate, perhaps only possible that NLT would be the idea of someone who has lost so much, who has to blame himself for his losses, who perceives the futility of all gain and all loss.  Who understands the importance of the moment but who has nevertheless sacrificed it for nothing more than pre-programmed values and a lack of courage.  It is only fair that someone so worthless has rendered so much of lasting value, valueless.
But the invention is complete, the utilization of the concept while well underway, in the end points to a certain futility.  We will see what we can do to make the future something greater, but first we will discuss...

THE END OF ALL THINGS
NLT has debunked more than any other theory the pre-NLT concept of an infinite number of dimensions.  This "infinite dimension" concept is nothing more than a mathematically complex, and logically "primitive" attempt to explain randomness.  It denies Einstein and says instead that the universe is composed of an infinite number of dice rolls, each item being.  It is absurd, of course, but it protects the idea of self control, or more to the point of self.
Conceptually, one then says, well if NLT is the case, clearly the frontrunner in terms of logic, then NLT is an invention of absolutely nothing.  While it "allegedly" is made by putting together the statements of others, in truth it is less than the combination of Einstein and Hologram theory, because it is the creation of a projection, everything a priori by the reproducible nature of math being pre-ordained.  In this you are right and you are wrong.  You, Einstein and I are merely "actors."  While I have already done this and you have already condemned me for it, from our perspective we both "chose" to do so.
The NLT defense to crimes (both of law and passion) is totally defensible, but so are the acts of punishment, ostrasism, extinction.
Equally true, history has no true meaning.  While we can say, "I know what happened a million years ago, a thousand years ago, yesterday and today," in truth one "moment" is all that exists.  History is within a can of NLT, we can project any moment; this one , the one a million years ago and the one a million years in the future.  It is so painfully logical and necessary, even in light of what we've already proven that we cannot but strike our heads and say "do-oh!"
Which brings us back to the most dangerous part of NLT.  Once we accept it to be the case, how do we survive psychologically.  How does the projection go forward with the act of creation, with the act of building once we realize it has already been done.  The most obvious answer is that we lie to ourselves.  We know we will die, that life will come to an end; yet we go on living.  We know that heartache is possible, but we continue to hope and to love.  We are part of a program and the program demands that we act in accordance with certain rules.
The idea that the universe must be something more than NLT made linear is foolhardy.  The arguments in favor of this primitive idea such as "natural selection made us" disappear once we realize that natural selection itself is a function of the rules laid out by basic math, physics, chemistry and the like all culminating in the idea that "god doesn't play dice".  If we are going to allow that god does play dice, fine, you can have your self determination.  There is no difference between your universe and mine at this point in time, merely you are delusional and wrong and I am right...or the other way around.  We both continue to think we have self determination, we still control our acts from our limited perspectives, but only one outcome is logical and for those of you who condemn me, remember that I am only presenting what was taught before I had opened my first physics text, before I was born...although it really wasn't before anything, but time is non-linear and this moment, the last moment and the next all exist together of necessity.

NLT-the next step 51: Einstein Revisited

The mountain air has been good for me in a very temporary way.  I feel both more enlightened and freed by the distance and temporal separation from my real problems.  It is too short a time to be a vacation, and too filled with necessary events to be relaxing; but there is the different perspective that even poor travel gives.
The melancholy with which my life is filled is seen from a distance here and it allows me to see those things that are important and those that are not.
Next week is almost here and the last of my "pre-life" requirements; not that there will not be post life requirements to fill in the gaps that would otherwise be filled with freedom, if not happiness.

EINSTEIN REVISITED
NLT is a math exercise which seems to follow philosophical concepts of mysticism.  In it there are many different routes, as many as there are pre-existing, inadequate fundamental physics concepts.  While original in a sense, the basic concepts date back 2500 years and were obvious even with fundamental mathematics and the logic of early philosopher mathematicians, Parminides and Zeno being the two most common references.
If you accept all paths at once (they ar mutually exclusive in many cases) NLT includes a type of god where the concentration of all thought without dimension or time to separte them gives them a "god-like" power, perhaps enough to give linearity to the universe; the same features of time giving rise to prognosticaton and and, the subject of this chapter, predestination.
This is already supported by one concept of Einstein's philosophical rambling, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once".  But there is another, more compelling.  "God doesn't play dice with the universe."  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle has already been debunked in NLT although you may not have that chapter, it is inherent in what is already written.  While using traditional physics you are limited, severely, by using one aspect of time to view another, if you are looking fundamentally at time, there is no interference of the same form.
There is a subtle difference between prognotication and predestination.  The most basic logical formulation if a=b then b=a mandates a closer relationship if one accepts that god doesn't play dice.  This reference to god is misplaced and is unrelated to the god that Einstein was referring to or the one that is the concentrtation of thought.  God in this case refers to the fact that everything happens at once without linear time in a singularity unseparated by time and space at least in a linear format.  It refers to the force that causes this to be expressed linearally.
And if the processes of linearity are not randomized, if there is no cosmic set of dice, then one can predict, with adequate mathemtics outcomes.  And if one can predict what will happen with certainty (whether the computational equipment is available or not to actually do it) then everything is predestined from the start unless one has the ability to insert a random event which would both insert dice into the non-dice universe and make time something somewhat greater than the separation of events and therefore dimensions.

NLT the next step 50 PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Sequence:

Things are not working out as well for me as I hoped and my hopes were not too great.  I am writing a story about a partnership derailed by an imagined or perhaps abandoned love affair.  Perhaps I am living it and only think I am writing it.   You, will never see it here.  After all it is a work of fiction and this set of blogs are about facts.  Imagined, the love affair is fiction within fiction.
Since I seem to have been given some time that i did not want and sufficient agony to be creative I will wax elloquent, or what passes as eloquent for me.  I suggest skipping ahead to the physics.
First, let me discuss the relationship between agony and productivity.  As you are aware, no doubt, Sam C (Mark Twain) cemented his fame after his daughter died and did much of his work when he was near bankruptcy, if not technically, essentially in it.  I know what that's like, just like that.  Another example, one of my favorite writers, Hemmingway committed suicide despite being an accomplished writer and being relatively well off.  It is too true that one needs disaster, disquiet, disillusionment and perhaps even dishonor to create, to accomplish. Oddly, however, I believe one also needs love.  Without a deep love for someone or something, one dies, see Hemmingway.  Perhaps he did very well for a time, but in the end found himself without love.  Hence, I cannot agree to abandon love.  Oh, I tried it.  I tried to say, "yes" just 3 letters, a single word.  For one to whom words come so easy, from whom they spew like a pus-fountain, one word should have been easy.  And yes, I did sit there and perhaps I even typed it.  But if I did, and to be sure I cannot remember for whatever reason, I could not send it.  I could not lie, I could not kill myself, not yet.  When I am sure that love is no more than perhaps I will follow Hemingway, when I can understand him.  Or perhaps I will die of whatever "natural causes" are first.
Natural causes of death, what an ignorant, non-non-linear time concept. Natural in non-linearity has an entirely different meaning.  Everything is following a script.  So nothing is a "natural cause" or everything is.  In NLT, even death is not what you think it is.  Do the characters in a movie die when the movie is over, when it is sealed in its can and put on a shelf.  I think not.
We are designed, us characters to live some interesting life.  To be interesting we must take chances and we must suffer and we must be driven to insanity or creation.  My story is one of being so in love, that I cannot be happy.  I am tortured by my love.  Were I not surrounded with anxiety and all the "dis" forms outlined above; just my love would drive me to madness or accomplishment.
Where are you tonight, in what part of the world?  What are you thinking?  Do you share my feelings or do you hold them in contempt?

PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Sequence: Linearity, as we perceive it, is not required by NLT but is apparent in the rules of the perceived universe. Just as a film may be "cut up" and displayed in slide formats in any order; or as different places in digital media may be expressed in random order; so our universe can be displayed in a non-sequential fashion.

Something happens with time that allows the expression of linearity that we experience, but this "order" is not a "requirement" any more than the digitized sequential film is required to be expressed sequentially.

          While we "experience" space-time, the sequential expression of Non-linear Time; space time coordinates need not be sequential. This conjures ideas of time travel; it actually indicates just the opposite for entities trapped in NLT. The possibility of "viewing" different places in time and space without regard to separation exists. For example you can theoretically see the big bang as it happens from within the coordinates in NLT which would be a goal of NLT in terms of practical application. But you cannot change NLT any more than you could change a single frame of a film just by virtue of being able to view it as a slide.  Of course, this is theoretical construct, so we can theorize around whatever roadblocks we run into. 
When we discuss the creation of NLT as a block; the environment in which it is created, the creator(s) of it, we can discuss the ability of those who are part of the display of NLT as those who create it and we can discuss the ability to change it.  Would it not be something if we could go back and change just one decision, just one moment in time.

          This suggests that decision makers have no choice in what they do.  However, predestination is actually a higher level of freedom in terms of initiative than the alternative because your actions have already happened.  You can take any chance and do anything you want to do because you've already done it, the consequences have already been suffered, the rewards already recognized.  This was the subject of “The illusion and power of self-determination.”  That was, by the way, the most read entry in this blog.
I will edit this further or perhaps shortly and perhaps in the next entry.