Tell me your dreams now
that i can try to make them true
not the old dreams
that we used to have together
I dream.
Sometimes in my sleep,
answers come to me.
Sometimes questions
When I'm awake,
often times i have dreams,
day dreams they call them,
but they are rich textured.
Most people control their day dreams,
but mine are often like those in my sleep
often pleasant, usually nightmares
I have to wake up in order to stop them
from going to dark places.
I dreamt last night that I had received a package, full of things fom someone's death. Somehow they made it to a large mall, under construction, crowded and full of shops. A car was lost, where someone else, I think my brother, and I had gone to sit with someone who was ill or dead, I no longer remember. I had a child with me and somehow I had to find the car, hold the child, who was falling asleep, and carry what I could from the loose bits of the package. It had small statuary and some sort of china set that only had plates. There seemed to be a dissassembled stand for the china. None of the objects were familiar to me, but it seemed important that I take hold of them. I would look for the car, which seemed to be in a different place entirely, a neighborhood, and then go back for the package to find a woman picking through it to find the parts of value, the clerks cheerful, but not protective. I found a friend living towards one of the exits who volunteered to watch over what I carried while I went back for more, the statue of the carion bird and one other, other little bits and pieces I remember only for their bulk. I think they might have been playing some game with someone else, perhaps involving rackets.
After returning to the desk I was given a cloak for the child which seemed very rich and valuable, the child being well mannered but very tired. But on the way back the tunnels of the mall changed, the area was under construction. I was only wearing socks and there were nails and other sharp items everywhere so i had to slide my feet before I put them down. My arms were full of child, statuary and the like, but my concentration was down at my feet. Workmen were present, but moved around me without offering anything, nor being asked. At the end of this area, the place where my friend had been living was gone and the mall opened to the outside.
I awoke and though it was 5am I could not sleep so I got up to check my mail and to think about this dream. I was reminded of another I meant to write about, it had a house I lived in. A recurring dream. In the house were narrow, claustraphobic passages that had to be navigated, squirmed through, to get to or from important places like bathrooms. There were surfaces that seemed unsteady, at poor angles, without sufficient strength to provide adequate support. For whatever reason, I chose to live in this house which was falling apart and large.
It is the metaphorical house that I live in.
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
NLC-F-series: Why galaxies after the big bang
If I am going to finish my book, I plan not to write as regularly. This diversion into spiral theory has expanded the book beyond 450 pages. If you're complaining because I write too much, if you don't want to hear what's going on, then perhaps you get your wish. If you're bored, there are a few hundred older posts that go in many directions. directly or not you send me brochures for travel all over the world, you don't think that I see that. I get update letters, and that doesn't include things on the news where I search for pictures that will have one familiar face.
While I've spent entirely too much time already on F-series, occasionally, I continue to come up with "fun" reasons to talk about it further. It just works as a model.
Some of these ideas, they don't really arise to theories because the math isn't developed, have taken on something of a life of their own as I address various potentialities and force these flights of fantasy into the framework of what is seen.
After the big bang, my big bang which is the fourth or fifth intersection of colliding linear spirals, there were large enough black holes to allow for the accumulation of galaxies.
All of this new understanding is causing a major rewrite and as a special treat, given the fact that I may spend greater and greater periods of time away (the real treat) I give you one of the re-written chapters. If you type in "transitional changes" in the search bar you can see the original version of this chpater from which spiral posts originated.
FEATURES
OF TRANSITIONAL CHANGES AND
INTRODUCTION TO SPIRAL TRANSITION THEORY
While I've spent entirely too much time already on F-series, occasionally, I continue to come up with "fun" reasons to talk about it further. It just works as a model.
Some of these ideas, they don't really arise to theories because the math isn't developed, have taken on something of a life of their own as I address various potentialities and force these flights of fantasy into the framework of what is seen.
*The second is that each successive clock time type results from
slower, more coordinated collective changes to coordinates of a prior clock
time. For example, x, y and z
coordinates changing at the speed of light “gradually slow” and as they drop
below light speed changes to a state where each individual change is slower
than that previous for the faster change.
To accomplish this, as described later, informational changes are
not relative to the primary line of change but instead changes with an
information change that is changing. In
order to better envision this a system of spirals off of spirals is used where
one spiral is the primary, another is secondary and the third runs off the
secondary which is changing with the primary.*After the big bang, my big bang which is the fourth or fifth intersection of colliding linear spirals, there were large enough black holes to allow for the accumulation of galaxies.
All of this new understanding is causing a major rewrite and as a special treat, given the fact that I may spend greater and greater periods of time away (the real treat) I give you one of the re-written chapters. If you type in "transitional changes" in the search bar you can see the original version of this chpater from which spiral posts originated.
FEATURES
OF TRANSITIONAL CHANGES AND
INTRODUCTION TO SPIRAL TRANSITION THEORY
There are two aspects of NLC that represent the transition.
The first is the conservation of clock time. If two coordinates are changing, they will
change at the same rate as a single clock time change.
The second is that each successive clock time type results from
slower, more coordinated collective changes to coordinates of a prior clock
time. For example, x, y and z
coordinates changing at the speed of light “gradually slow” and as they drop
below light speed changes to a state where each individual change is slower
than that previous for the faster change.
To accomplish this, as described later, informational changes are
not relative to the primary line of change but instead changes with an
information change that is changing. In
order to better envision this a system of spirals off of spirals is used where
one spiral is the primary, another is secondary and the third runs off the
secondary which is changing with the primary.
Information can, using spirals, remain the same. Otherwise, if Clock times do not change their orientation, then
there are different clock times. CT1 and
CT2 are therefore identical except in their orientation to one another, or they
are altered in some fashion. In NLC, it
is indicated that they only change in orientation.
If they are different, either one ends when another begins, one
changes when the other begins (e.g. into a force type coordinate type), or one
continues but is drowned out in terms of perception relative to the “higher”
clock time. It is believed that all of
the information in the universe remains in place, but steadily changes in
orientation depending on what quantum moment is being examined. In this way, “traveling” back or “forward” in
time is illusory which fits well into the theory. It is also consistent with the idea of a
minimum quantum of time where things are not changing at all. What we call standard clock time is an illusion
that is explained later graphically.
Since it is uncertain how CT4 interactions with CT3, CT2 and CT1 it is important to come up
with some sort of transitional model that takes into account observed
phenomena, coordinate changes that have slowed dramatically which can be refined.
The theory chosen, Intersecting Spiral Theory, can be used to begin
to examine the relationship of different clock times, for example, to determine
if CT1 has CT2, CT3 and CT4 changes are active or dormant in terms of linearity. It gives predictions of how linearity can be
constant but still allow each quantum event to change at a constant rate even
though relative rates of change vary.
The answer may be suggested by higher Clock Time states (C4 and CT5).
The empty spaces within other forms of matter are CT1 time
coordinates under the theory, so it stands to reason that there would also be
CT2 and CT3 time states as well as space (CT1) within CT4 states. The best way to picture this is by looking at
CT5 states. This assumes that black
holes are CT5 states. To something
living within a CT5 state, the Universe would be a collection of several
fundamental “CT5 particles” which are black holes. It is clear that CT4, CT3, CT2 and CT1 states
would abound around the CT5 states in such an examination and the same should
be true from our perspective as CT4 inhabitants.
For CT4 inhabitants, we observe the presence of CT1 states, but
there are also likely CT2 and CT3 states, so called energy states, present.
The change in position of different forms of clock time (CT)
indicate that coordinate changes continue regardless. This means that in some way, there are
coordinate changes for each clock time and theory has to allow them to change
at different apparent rates while the actual rate remains the same for each.
The alternative would be to allow different rates of change for
each clock time which would take us down a different path.
Another feature of the model chosen is to allow clock time changes
of different points (P1, P2, etc) to occur more consistently with other points
(P1a, P2a, etc) at higher clock time states
allowing for greater concentration.
The model should stay consistent with a single quantum element
creating everything, as the changes get more complex and slow down they happen
closer together and you get compression.
From this we can infer that CT5 changes are incredibly slow within
Black Holes since they vary exponentially relative to the speed of light.
The effect for CT4 sub-light speed changes is standard clock time,
which spiral theory shows as movement along a spiral that runs separately from,
but connected to, the primary spiral.
Extraordinary change, equivalent to CT4 and Standard clock time,
can be forecast when matter changes to black holes. CT4 (matter) would appear to change very fast
from a CT5 perspective which might make it look more like energy looks to
us. That is, energy features are
actually just the same changes we experience happening much faster. Overlapping spirals provide a mechanism which
allows us to envision how this is perceived from static points along a spiral
of CT4 while not visible from CT3. The
model also indicates that a different time scale would be present along the 5th
intersection where 5 coordinates are changing together instead of just 4. This time need not be any different than the
time we experience, it would just be exponentially slower.
Other coordinate change features are experienced by consecutive
forms of concentration which visibly end for us at black holes (ct5).
One feature is they become the center of dimensional rotation due,
apparently, to the common line through the spirals which gives rise to
time. For both matter and black holes
this provides a rotational aspect. It
will be discussed later how at the 5th intersection of the
intersecting spirals, sufficient density becomes available for black holes to
form which allows them to serve as a core or center around which other clock
time states can exist to allow the formation of galaxies with the rest of space
spinning around them.
While there appears to be a collapse of space time at black holes,
that is unlikely. In fact NLT is a
reaction to this. If there were the
complete collapse suggested in EHT, then black holes would drop out of space
and would all go to some non-linear place.
Instead, what we appear to be seeing is coordinate change that is so
slow that it appears to not exist. Given
informational rate change consistency, we can expect the net change in a black
hole to be the same as the ultra-fast (so fast it appears invisible to us)
changes of ct1 (space).
This is a model, so it remains possible that Black holes are
something different. In EHT, for
example, support existed for a finding that they represent nothing more than a
reversal of all of the coordinate changes leading to Standard clock time. While this pre-NLC concept, now looks absurd
in the extreme, only continued analysis will answer.
If the change in coordinates is such that in black holes there is
the loss of CT1-CT4 there should be, as
a part of CT5, a type of non-movement associated with black holes that appear
dimensionless. Black holes have no
movement in the other dimensions, even Standard Clock Time appears to go to
zero. So what is CT5 that must come into play? What do black holes
experience that is one step greater in effect than Standard Clock Time? Is there a “super standard clock time” which
is available to us which would hold powers on a scale equivalent to the power
that standard clock time gives, the power of thought?
For example,
philosophers argue you cannot keep two thoughts in your head at one time.
Maybe you can with CT5. However,
the more likely suggestion of spiral coordinate analysis is that things happen
in a very similar way, just with more compression, more coordination and
relatively slower apparent time, even though net change is the same as is
observed.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
NLC How spirals change a the same rate but relatively different
I swam outside yesterday, so I could watch the unusual cloud patterns that are associated with weird weather. It was almost too cold to swim and I dropped 15 minutes from my workout but did manage to do all the hard work. The last few days leading up to this swim taught me that my heart wouldn't give out and while the cold was draining, it is, for now, a pain that can be withstood and afterwards, leaves one with a feeling of
Last night I had a class reunion. Every class has someone who writes physics, who could says the past cannot be changed and then, maybe in fiction changes it. I realized that for my class, that person was me. That doesn't mean I was the smartest one in the class, because that wasn't true; but someone has to write that stuff in every class and in my class it is me. Back to the recent past, however
I had a single drink, well most of one anyway, which was enough, to calm my nerves and having not drank very much, the coffeee I'm drinking today is invigorating and not medicinal. The touch of the past was disconcerting but the touch was gentle, almost a pet, when it could have been cruel. There is a great deal to be learned from last night, how the past should be seen and how it is, how we need to make the present so that it yields a past that is capable of kindness, howe we need to view and embrace the past to make a present, a past, that for me, rarely seemed kind at the time; but which held some measure of of stability for those who lived it which is reflected by the fact that at least some of us are still here..
And today, I think of you painting, with that unique scense of serenity that you embody and me reaping the paintings of the past.
The idea time as we experience it, is the story behind slower than light travel, that is the type of time that changes along the main spiral at a non-machine gun pace.
The best way to imagine this is that as long as the secondary spirals come off of the primary spiral they must change at the same speed. How ever if a tertiary spirals comes of the secondary spiral it is possible to imagine a scenario where it only changes along that secondary spiral so that its movement along the primary spiral is delayed or, more specifically, combined so that two spirals (one secondary and one tertiary) change at half the speed of the primary spiral
This requires a graphical reference. It requires a better reference, but for the moment we'll go back to our one example because it has labels.
It is presumed that for each quantum step out of the page that line A takes, spiral 1 changes. It is also the case that the overlap sprial moves one pont for each point that spiral A moves out of the page, but only along the thermodynamic line in this case. Relative to Spiral A, there is no direct change. While the spirals in this case are shown coming off at certain points, these are only exemplary. A mathematical process describing the entire universe from this formulation is beyond this post, anyway.
While all the changes are in one direction and all changing at the same speed, relative to at least one spiral, they change the rate of change. This relative difference would be what is mistaken for time, but the entire process remains fixed quantum movements.
I'm not sure that I'll tackle any more physics this weekend. I have some, but I'm a little unbalanced because the foundation of time to me shifts on the poor foundations that I have built. They did not have to be, but they are.
Last night I had a class reunion. Every class has someone who writes physics, who could says the past cannot be changed and then, maybe in fiction changes it. I realized that for my class, that person was me. That doesn't mean I was the smartest one in the class, because that wasn't true; but someone has to write that stuff in every class and in my class it is me. Back to the recent past, however
I had a single drink, well most of one anyway, which was enough, to calm my nerves and having not drank very much, the coffeee I'm drinking today is invigorating and not medicinal. The touch of the past was disconcerting but the touch was gentle, almost a pet, when it could have been cruel. There is a great deal to be learned from last night, how the past should be seen and how it is, how we need to make the present so that it yields a past that is capable of kindness, howe we need to view and embrace the past to make a present, a past, that for me, rarely seemed kind at the time; but which held some measure of of stability for those who lived it which is reflected by the fact that at least some of us are still here..
And today, I think of you painting, with that unique scense of serenity that you embody and me reaping the paintings of the past.
The idea time as we experience it, is the story behind slower than light travel, that is the type of time that changes along the main spiral at a non-machine gun pace.
The best way to imagine this is that as long as the secondary spirals come off of the primary spiral they must change at the same speed. How ever if a tertiary spirals comes of the secondary spiral it is possible to imagine a scenario where it only changes along that secondary spiral so that its movement along the primary spiral is delayed or, more specifically, combined so that two spirals (one secondary and one tertiary) change at half the speed of the primary spiral
This requires a graphical reference. It requires a better reference, but for the moment we'll go back to our one example because it has labels.
It is presumed that for each quantum step out of the page that line A takes, spiral 1 changes. It is also the case that the overlap sprial moves one pont for each point that spiral A moves out of the page, but only along the thermodynamic line in this case. Relative to Spiral A, there is no direct change. While the spirals in this case are shown coming off at certain points, these are only exemplary. A mathematical process describing the entire universe from this formulation is beyond this post, anyway.
While all the changes are in one direction and all changing at the same speed, relative to at least one spiral, they change the rate of change. This relative difference would be what is mistaken for time, but the entire process remains fixed quantum movements.
I'm not sure that I'll tackle any more physics this weekend. I have some, but I'm a little unbalanced because the foundation of time to me shifts on the poor foundations that I have built. They did not have to be, but they are.
Friday, October 23, 2015
entanglement
It was an interesting day today
I rode my bike to work after drinking my rationed coffee. At first I was pushing myself, one foot, one yard, one mile, but then the blood started circulating, having taken a day off to swim, my legs hurt but it was not so much as to distract me.
I took the dog for a walk in the park and saw the migratory birds.
I took a picture of a red headed woodpecker and a hawk that was hunting in the early afternoon, but too far away from either to get a good shot.
It was hot when I finished the bike ride home, a slower and more painful ride up hill. Riding a bike gives you a better feel for the steady slopes than driving or even walking. But afterward, hot as I was, with the strange sense that accompanies me whenever I have time to think, I jumped into the pool even though I had no idea what the temperature would be. Shocking. But later, after the walk, I jumped in again and swam some laps, so if it stays sunny I may do my swim from home which I'd really like.
My first day in the real pool was not bad. The pool had a person in it when I started and another came later, but both left while I was still swimming and it seemed as if much of the time I was alone with my thoughts which ran to quantum entanglement and my entanglement with you.
I feel like I solved nothing, but just thinking about dealing with these issues makes me wonder what it would be like if I was supported, and not fighting these battles alone. I spend an unhealthy amount of time alone I think sometimes, and yet I want to go into the wilderness and be further removed from other people.
As I sit here drinking water and watching the last light of the day fading, the clouds remind me that there are many who will face danger this evening, people who will wake up with their lives in turmoil and their possessions in ruins around them. This reminds me that outside of the storms in our relatively quiet hemisphere, many people without opportunity will be sleeping in the dust tonight.
And yet, when I think of them and how absurd we are that we do so little to improve our lots or those who are with us, my thoughts return to you and my own sense of loss and the peace of the evening is mixed with an anger at mankind and a melancholy that I accept as a part of my life for now.
The ship in the book I'm reading was originally named the Pandora, and the moral of the box story is the existence of hope. We survive sleeping in the dust and storms, personal and external, by hoping for something. Some hope for forgetting, but I only hope to remember.
I rode my bike to work after drinking my rationed coffee. At first I was pushing myself, one foot, one yard, one mile, but then the blood started circulating, having taken a day off to swim, my legs hurt but it was not so much as to distract me.
I took the dog for a walk in the park and saw the migratory birds.
I took a picture of a red headed woodpecker and a hawk that was hunting in the early afternoon, but too far away from either to get a good shot.
It was hot when I finished the bike ride home, a slower and more painful ride up hill. Riding a bike gives you a better feel for the steady slopes than driving or even walking. But afterward, hot as I was, with the strange sense that accompanies me whenever I have time to think, I jumped into the pool even though I had no idea what the temperature would be. Shocking. But later, after the walk, I jumped in again and swam some laps, so if it stays sunny I may do my swim from home which I'd really like.
My first day in the real pool was not bad. The pool had a person in it when I started and another came later, but both left while I was still swimming and it seemed as if much of the time I was alone with my thoughts which ran to quantum entanglement and my entanglement with you.
I feel like I solved nothing, but just thinking about dealing with these issues makes me wonder what it would be like if I was supported, and not fighting these battles alone. I spend an unhealthy amount of time alone I think sometimes, and yet I want to go into the wilderness and be further removed from other people.
As I sit here drinking water and watching the last light of the day fading, the clouds remind me that there are many who will face danger this evening, people who will wake up with their lives in turmoil and their possessions in ruins around them. This reminds me that outside of the storms in our relatively quiet hemisphere, many people without opportunity will be sleeping in the dust tonight.
And yet, when I think of them and how absurd we are that we do so little to improve our lots or those who are with us, my thoughts return to you and my own sense of loss and the peace of the evening is mixed with an anger at mankind and a melancholy that I accept as a part of my life for now.
The ship in the book I'm reading was originally named the Pandora, and the moral of the box story is the existence of hope. We survive sleeping in the dust and storms, personal and external, by hoping for something. Some hope for forgetting, but I only hope to remember.
NLC-more halloween science, spooky math, quantum intanglement and building a future viewing device
Ah Quantum entanglement. Two bodies affecting one another whether together or apart. Somehow hopelessly bound to one another no matter what intervenes. Is it anything other than another word for love?
http://time.com/4083823/einstein-entanglement-quantum/
Actually, it is. It is impossible in Pre-NLC math, but we've actually been looking at the model for it all month.
Yup, there it is. The overlap of two out of sync spirals to bring them into sync to force them to act together, (overlap spiral 1 and 2). In the NLC information based theory, space and time don't affect points which are just information. While quantum entanglement (and the F-series spiral) is certainly not necessary in NLC, QE can be theorized to be nothing more than the same process described. This works particularly well with only ct1 type overlaps, those less affected by dimensional and locational characteristics. Once you have greater overlap (ct1 and ct2 states as shown above) you begin to add shared or "tied" dimensional proximity characteristics. Spooky science is the name given to faster than light theories and the like that might be seen to "spook" Einsteinian physicists, but as has often been pointed out, Einstein envisioned NLC, he only didn't have all the tools, or perhaps all the time, to put it together.
One can understand in this model the types of energies that would be involved breaking one or multiple bonds of this type in the higher organization states and why with an orbital state (like electrons) there would, necessarily shown by the rotational speed of the particles, be fewer of these overlaps allowing for more rapid movement and at least giving the impression of a greater separation. In point of fact, it appears that the degree of overlap as well as conversion forces (can't say energy because ct1-ct2 are pre-energy models) is exponentially proportional to the amount of proximity perceived which we witness in particles. Quantum entanglement has so few overlaps, that positional identity is limited or even, as indicated, absent.
I woke this morning at 5 after nearly 9 hours of sleep, recovering from a sort of exhaustion tied into moving from my outside pool to the indoor full sized pool, perhaps. After drinking two day old coffee from a small ceramic cup, I forced myself to ignore the sluggishness I felt and rode my bike to work, still cold. But the energy of movement made me feel better.
The more I think about it, the more I think that the future is equally visible to the past. I think we are overwhelmed with our prejudices which lead us to imagine that because our brains are geared towards seeing in the past, that the future is less visible. I can explain this, but I won't because that would get into the post that I'm not ready to publish yet.
Nevertheless, I am fairly certain that we confuse our record keeping of the past with our failure to do record keeping of the future. I think we let ourselves get overwhelmed by the flow of information coming to us because it's easier for us, not necessarily everyone or everything, to see in the future.
I dare say I can prove it on a quantum level and it is certainly a part of NLC that in a fixed universe, seeing the future and the past from the right vantage point would be trivial.
If I was given resources, could I build a Nostradamus prediction machine, a machine that would have the ability to follow at least my methodology for seeing in the future? The answer is that anyone could. It's that easy of a concept. Assuming a fixed, non-linear universe, it has to be pretty easy to see into the future if you can see into the past; but it is from a series of fixed, pre-determined points and therefore "changing the future" would have to be impossible, even under traditional physics. Unfortunately, spooky math concepts might allow these type of changes under traditional physics theories, but not under NLC. What you can do with QE, however, is have early warning system of a type otherwise not possible. While a lot of you are thinking, "yeah, if this, if that," but that's not because I'm smarter than everyone else, it is only because the universe saw fit to put this crap in my head and everyone arrives at the same point eventually if it's right.
This also relates to the illusion of changing time. Quantum time means un-moving points of time and the science of predictability in physics means that pre-destination exists and if old time points disappear, where does the information go? You can argue it's easier to explain it as "changing" to the next event state, but that is actually pretty asinine if you think about it. How complicated would it be if every point had to change with every other quantum point in just such a way? It is much easier to just have a series of fixed states instead of constantly changing states. When we play a movie, we don't reorganize the whole movie every time, we merely take each scene in its turn, ignoring the scenes before.
And who is this director, if not ourselves? I can overcome myself, sometimes, and yet I cannot stop myself from falling apart inside and I don't deal with the things that ruin my entanglements. I thought I was close yesterday and perhaps I was; but today, I feel like distance exists and that I'm a million years away.
http://time.com/4083823/einstein-entanglement-quantum/
Actually, it is. It is impossible in Pre-NLC math, but we've actually been looking at the model for it all month.
Yup, there it is. The overlap of two out of sync spirals to bring them into sync to force them to act together, (overlap spiral 1 and 2). In the NLC information based theory, space and time don't affect points which are just information. While quantum entanglement (and the F-series spiral) is certainly not necessary in NLC, QE can be theorized to be nothing more than the same process described. This works particularly well with only ct1 type overlaps, those less affected by dimensional and locational characteristics. Once you have greater overlap (ct1 and ct2 states as shown above) you begin to add shared or "tied" dimensional proximity characteristics. Spooky science is the name given to faster than light theories and the like that might be seen to "spook" Einsteinian physicists, but as has often been pointed out, Einstein envisioned NLC, he only didn't have all the tools, or perhaps all the time, to put it together.
One can understand in this model the types of energies that would be involved breaking one or multiple bonds of this type in the higher organization states and why with an orbital state (like electrons) there would, necessarily shown by the rotational speed of the particles, be fewer of these overlaps allowing for more rapid movement and at least giving the impression of a greater separation. In point of fact, it appears that the degree of overlap as well as conversion forces (can't say energy because ct1-ct2 are pre-energy models) is exponentially proportional to the amount of proximity perceived which we witness in particles. Quantum entanglement has so few overlaps, that positional identity is limited or even, as indicated, absent.
I woke this morning at 5 after nearly 9 hours of sleep, recovering from a sort of exhaustion tied into moving from my outside pool to the indoor full sized pool, perhaps. After drinking two day old coffee from a small ceramic cup, I forced myself to ignore the sluggishness I felt and rode my bike to work, still cold. But the energy of movement made me feel better.
The more I think about it, the more I think that the future is equally visible to the past. I think we are overwhelmed with our prejudices which lead us to imagine that because our brains are geared towards seeing in the past, that the future is less visible. I can explain this, but I won't because that would get into the post that I'm not ready to publish yet.
Nevertheless, I am fairly certain that we confuse our record keeping of the past with our failure to do record keeping of the future. I think we let ourselves get overwhelmed by the flow of information coming to us because it's easier for us, not necessarily everyone or everything, to see in the future.
I dare say I can prove it on a quantum level and it is certainly a part of NLC that in a fixed universe, seeing the future and the past from the right vantage point would be trivial.
If I was given resources, could I build a Nostradamus prediction machine, a machine that would have the ability to follow at least my methodology for seeing in the future? The answer is that anyone could. It's that easy of a concept. Assuming a fixed, non-linear universe, it has to be pretty easy to see into the future if you can see into the past; but it is from a series of fixed, pre-determined points and therefore "changing the future" would have to be impossible, even under traditional physics. Unfortunately, spooky math concepts might allow these type of changes under traditional physics theories, but not under NLC. What you can do with QE, however, is have early warning system of a type otherwise not possible. While a lot of you are thinking, "yeah, if this, if that," but that's not because I'm smarter than everyone else, it is only because the universe saw fit to put this crap in my head and everyone arrives at the same point eventually if it's right.
This also relates to the illusion of changing time. Quantum time means un-moving points of time and the science of predictability in physics means that pre-destination exists and if old time points disappear, where does the information go? You can argue it's easier to explain it as "changing" to the next event state, but that is actually pretty asinine if you think about it. How complicated would it be if every point had to change with every other quantum point in just such a way? It is much easier to just have a series of fixed states instead of constantly changing states. When we play a movie, we don't reorganize the whole movie every time, we merely take each scene in its turn, ignoring the scenes before.
And who is this director, if not ourselves? I can overcome myself, sometimes, and yet I cannot stop myself from falling apart inside and I don't deal with the things that ruin my entanglements. I thought I was close yesterday and perhaps I was; but today, I feel like distance exists and that I'm a million years away.
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
nlc the cyclops and expansion
Well, I've ridden my bike 3 days in a row for the majority of my exercise, my neck feels almost normal, but I haven't swam in 5 days, a record for the entire summer. It has warmed up quite a bit so perhaps tomorrow I will brave that "freezing" cold pool and see if I can take it during the warmest part of the day.
Even as I grapple with my own future (and present), I'm holding off for a while describing how to predict the future. You WILL be disappointed, but having a scientific procedure is intriguing to me even if it seems unlikely to bear edible fruit. In an NLC universe seeing the future, especially on a quantum scale, should be relatively simple.
Its worth noting that our visions of the past and the future are fairly flexible and the farther we go in either direction the more inaccurate and limited our perception tends to be. In many cases, what we call "science fiction" gives a better vision of events than our histories of past. While I don't want to offend anyone, imagine if one or more of the various representatives of god in the past could have their life scrutinized. Would the all (any of them) hold up under such scrutiny. The religions of the world seem to think that only one of them could pass muster and, predictably, they don't agree on which one.
Using Nostradamus as an example of someone who could have used the early attempts to see the future, if you accept he foresaw anything, we were unable to see it clearly enough to change it and in the system or method for predicting the future this is explained, so I won't explain it here.
And I may not include that method at any time, it could, perhaps, die with this none to healthy earthly bark which you'd claim causes you so many problems while meaning only the best, but anyone who made a study of my work could probably piece it out. In the meantime, I will talk around it.
What is the reason to predict the future? You might think it is to win the lottery but that is typical unfocused non-generalized thinking and therefore not correct although it is related to the truth. The only reason is to see if the future can be changed. The idea of predicting the future is self defeating because whatever you see is either inaccurate or is already the future whether you believe in physic or NLC. Either theory gets you to the same place.
Nevertheless, if you were able to have a point predicted in the future, the challenge to NLC would be to change it. You couldn't, of course, under NLC so the proof would be in the inability to do so.
So what does this have to do with the idea of galactic expansion? Glad you asked. As far as I can determine, only NLC figured out that all coordinate change is in one direction, not just what is called time which isn't a dimension at all it turns out (Sorry pre-NLC physicists). This is a spectacular determination, but carries quite of bit of explanatory baggage with it.
Just as NLC fixes the future, so too it prevents coordinates from occurring at the same point twice. One explanation of this is spiral expansion/contraction So how does this concept of non-repetition affect expansion? NLC indicates pretty conclusively that spin is part of the overall change that shows that you cannot put any point at the same dimensional location twice without exceeding the speed of light. Spin in turn gives rise to the spiral functions that further define the universe. This is fairly easy to envision today with a universe spinning at an enormous size, but imagine the more compact universe where all the points are very compact, spinning near the center, but unable to be at the same point twice. At the center, spin and coordinate change has to be very high under NLC theory to maintain the overall light speed change coordinates. Even though there are no actual specific "locations" but only the impression of dimension, the model still requires the impression of movement in an outward spiral without the possibility of any of these myrid interacting quantum points every coming in contact with a lower line of the spiral where they might find their previous location. There has to be a mechanism mathematically to prevent the overlap which moves information away from the center rapidly to create this faster than light phenomena, logarithmic spirals work fairly well in this regard.
Under the phenomena of NLC, all information change is at a common rate. Stacking of information (as in the example of spirals off of spirals) allows for information to change at slightly different rates, one rate changing faster than others stacked on it, so that we get the effects that led the foolish pre-NLC physicists (come on, you know who are, raise your hands) to assume that only time one uni-directional. NLC, being a fixed, time independent system proved this could not be the case so the illusion of movement had to be explained using a system that prevented duplication. In order to arrive at this state of things at our speed of rotation it was necessary for the universe to extend the movement outward at a very high rate of speed, therefore the illusion of expansion.
Hence you have the relationship of predictability (you can view the future, but not change it) is governed by the same relationship as linearity (you cannot go fast enough to reverse the direction of one way movement in the universe).
Shazaaam!
This also jives fairly well with predicting the future, but there is one piece missing to explain how this phenomena could be used to take information in the future and observe it and also why it appears easier to see the past than the future, even thought it probably isn't. What is this missing piece? Why it's the unpublished post, of course. But it remains in here, in what's published and as this is rewritten, organized and worked into the next edition, all this will be clear. Perhaps, I will clear up at least some of the other issues.
How do I finish this? Ah, here it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO1rMeYnOmM
Even as I grapple with my own future (and present), I'm holding off for a while describing how to predict the future. You WILL be disappointed, but having a scientific procedure is intriguing to me even if it seems unlikely to bear edible fruit. In an NLC universe seeing the future, especially on a quantum scale, should be relatively simple.
Its worth noting that our visions of the past and the future are fairly flexible and the farther we go in either direction the more inaccurate and limited our perception tends to be. In many cases, what we call "science fiction" gives a better vision of events than our histories of past. While I don't want to offend anyone, imagine if one or more of the various representatives of god in the past could have their life scrutinized. Would the all (any of them) hold up under such scrutiny. The religions of the world seem to think that only one of them could pass muster and, predictably, they don't agree on which one.
Using Nostradamus as an example of someone who could have used the early attempts to see the future, if you accept he foresaw anything, we were unable to see it clearly enough to change it and in the system or method for predicting the future this is explained, so I won't explain it here.
And I may not include that method at any time, it could, perhaps, die with this none to healthy earthly bark which you'd claim causes you so many problems while meaning only the best, but anyone who made a study of my work could probably piece it out. In the meantime, I will talk around it.
What is the reason to predict the future? You might think it is to win the lottery but that is typical unfocused non-generalized thinking and therefore not correct although it is related to the truth. The only reason is to see if the future can be changed. The idea of predicting the future is self defeating because whatever you see is either inaccurate or is already the future whether you believe in physic or NLC. Either theory gets you to the same place.
Nevertheless, if you were able to have a point predicted in the future, the challenge to NLC would be to change it. You couldn't, of course, under NLC so the proof would be in the inability to do so.
So what does this have to do with the idea of galactic expansion? Glad you asked. As far as I can determine, only NLC figured out that all coordinate change is in one direction, not just what is called time which isn't a dimension at all it turns out (Sorry pre-NLC physicists). This is a spectacular determination, but carries quite of bit of explanatory baggage with it.
Just as NLC fixes the future, so too it prevents coordinates from occurring at the same point twice. One explanation of this is spiral expansion/contraction So how does this concept of non-repetition affect expansion? NLC indicates pretty conclusively that spin is part of the overall change that shows that you cannot put any point at the same dimensional location twice without exceeding the speed of light. Spin in turn gives rise to the spiral functions that further define the universe. This is fairly easy to envision today with a universe spinning at an enormous size, but imagine the more compact universe where all the points are very compact, spinning near the center, but unable to be at the same point twice. At the center, spin and coordinate change has to be very high under NLC theory to maintain the overall light speed change coordinates. Even though there are no actual specific "locations" but only the impression of dimension, the model still requires the impression of movement in an outward spiral without the possibility of any of these myrid interacting quantum points every coming in contact with a lower line of the spiral where they might find their previous location. There has to be a mechanism mathematically to prevent the overlap which moves information away from the center rapidly to create this faster than light phenomena, logarithmic spirals work fairly well in this regard.
Under the phenomena of NLC, all information change is at a common rate. Stacking of information (as in the example of spirals off of spirals) allows for information to change at slightly different rates, one rate changing faster than others stacked on it, so that we get the effects that led the foolish pre-NLC physicists (come on, you know who are, raise your hands) to assume that only time one uni-directional. NLC, being a fixed, time independent system proved this could not be the case so the illusion of movement had to be explained using a system that prevented duplication. In order to arrive at this state of things at our speed of rotation it was necessary for the universe to extend the movement outward at a very high rate of speed, therefore the illusion of expansion.
Hence you have the relationship of predictability (you can view the future, but not change it) is governed by the same relationship as linearity (you cannot go fast enough to reverse the direction of one way movement in the universe).
Shazaaam!
This also jives fairly well with predicting the future, but there is one piece missing to explain how this phenomena could be used to take information in the future and observe it and also why it appears easier to see the past than the future, even thought it probably isn't. What is this missing piece? Why it's the unpublished post, of course. But it remains in here, in what's published and as this is rewritten, organized and worked into the next edition, all this will be clear. Perhaps, I will clear up at least some of the other issues.
How do I finish this? Ah, here it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO1rMeYnOmM
NLC-predicting the future and the cyclops
I had pretty much decided I didn't want to look into the future. As I worked on "what's next" I didn't like what I was seeing. Perhaps the reason, which I didn't really see till just now, is because I feel if I saw the future clearly, I might see it without you in it. LIke everyone else, I have quite an imagination (complements of a pre-ordainined universe), and I can hide within it, imagining that I am doing what I need to be doing and not being borne along by forces operating according to some formula fixed billions of years before the first apes from whom I am decended were born. Unfortunately, my subconscious had other plans of me and last night I came up with a way to see the future more clearly. Perhaps it could be called a "method." I don't intend to share it right away. Perhaps I'll save it for the book (unlikely) it might actually cause one to be sold. And I don't intend to use it, by the way. If I had access to more technology it would be a temptation and I feel that one day it will actually be pursued since it is a technique in physics and not at all mystical. It would be more interesting and even more exciting if it were mystical, but it isn't. Bland science I would call it. But I am getting ahead of myself.
I realized then, sipping the small cup of coffee I allow myself, half blind and decrepit as I am, that I had become the cyclops. The story I have in my mind of the cyclops is that he was originally born with two eyes and gave one up to some god or the other in order to see the future. The first thing he saw was his own death and lived the rest of his life in misery, the same general class of information that plagues me, of course. My cyclops story may have had something to do with seeing himself being being murdered by someone else so he decided to live alone or perhaps that is embellishment. I have had my cyclops story questioned before, but I don't care, it's my story and I'm sticking to it.
I realized then, sipping the small cup of coffee I allow myself, half blind and decrepit as I am, that I had become the cyclops. The story I have in my mind of the cyclops is that he was originally born with two eyes and gave one up to some god or the other in order to see the future. The first thing he saw was his own death and lived the rest of his life in misery, the same general class of information that plagues me, of course. My cyclops story may have had something to do with seeing himself being being murdered by someone else so he decided to live alone or perhaps that is embellishment. I have had my cyclops story questioned before, but I don't care, it's my story and I'm sticking to it.
The way to read the future is really quite simple, quite elegant, even obvious in light of NLC. It may, in retrospect, be obvious period.
In fact, it has more than a little NLC in it, even in design and function, but it requires little, if any, acceptance of NLC. It does require accepting physics, but if it didn't it would be mystical and not just hard, boring science. NLC, at most, makes the concept more powerful or gives it additional grounding. At some point in the process of figuring it out, after the broad idea was fixed in place, I decided it had to be something available to Nostradamus, at least in some form and that clarified the theory behind the process, for I figured out the process for doing it first before having a concrete idea of the science behind it.
Now you do not have to rush around trying to figure out how to read the future. I've already written it up and must ponder it before I decide whether to post it or not, probably when to post it. It is tempting to save something for the book and this (irrelevant, by the way) tidbit would be just the thing. It is insightful, it may be useful, but it is more of a diversion than a useful tool at this point in time.
Moreover, it is something that Nostradamus could have used, although whether it could be thought to provide the kind of detail he is credited with in some circles is an interesting question. Oddly enough, NLC suggest that this kind of detail is at least possible working with primitive tools, however unlikely. And the theory sheds some light on how NLC works as well, not surprisingly. It may combine with an earlier idea associated with singularity theory that you can find if you search for nostradamus in my book (or earlier blog entries) but it is a method and not a scenario giving rise to a method.
It says a lot about who and what we are also which is intersting and which bothers me quite a bit given what I want out of life and the convoluted way I have had so far of getting there. I waited 30 years before, but I don't have another 30 years to invest, it is heartbreaking, death of love, inevitiable that it is, is heartbreaking. It is more than I can bear, so the idea of proving it is beyond me. Nevertheless, the idea was good enough that I allowed myself another half cup of coffee so I could write this up before I went forward with my day, and the next post which I may never publish (you won't be missing as much as you may be thinking, but it would certainly give the Nostradamus bunch something to think about and the 'mystics' something grounded to ponder).
If someone wants to write a horror story about this (the Greeks got there first, of course, and perhaps they stole it from the Sumarians) then you can add to your story that when I was writing the actual methodology down my cursor skipped all around the page and I had trouble getting it to the right place long enough to get it typed out, but my cursor is always flying over the page and occasionally blocking huge amounts of irreplacable data and deleting it.
I want to emphasis that although I think my theories are "basically" accurate, that it is much less exciting than it sounds, less exciting than my failure to post it now would indicate. If I win the lottery tomorrow, it will be with the same numbers I've been using for the last 5 years and so, perhaps, you will know it too. It does, however, suggest that the technology could be addressed scientifically and we could then, all become cyclops because it is unlikely that what we saw would be any more assuring than what was seen by the monster of Greek mythology who has come back as me.
In fact, it has more than a little NLC in it, even in design and function, but it requires little, if any, acceptance of NLC. It does require accepting physics, but if it didn't it would be mystical and not just hard, boring science. NLC, at most, makes the concept more powerful or gives it additional grounding. At some point in the process of figuring it out, after the broad idea was fixed in place, I decided it had to be something available to Nostradamus, at least in some form and that clarified the theory behind the process, for I figured out the process for doing it first before having a concrete idea of the science behind it.
Now you do not have to rush around trying to figure out how to read the future. I've already written it up and must ponder it before I decide whether to post it or not, probably when to post it. It is tempting to save something for the book and this (irrelevant, by the way) tidbit would be just the thing. It is insightful, it may be useful, but it is more of a diversion than a useful tool at this point in time.
Moreover, it is something that Nostradamus could have used, although whether it could be thought to provide the kind of detail he is credited with in some circles is an interesting question. Oddly enough, NLC suggest that this kind of detail is at least possible working with primitive tools, however unlikely. And the theory sheds some light on how NLC works as well, not surprisingly. It may combine with an earlier idea associated with singularity theory that you can find if you search for nostradamus in my book (or earlier blog entries) but it is a method and not a scenario giving rise to a method.
It says a lot about who and what we are also which is intersting and which bothers me quite a bit given what I want out of life and the convoluted way I have had so far of getting there. I waited 30 years before, but I don't have another 30 years to invest, it is heartbreaking, death of love, inevitiable that it is, is heartbreaking. It is more than I can bear, so the idea of proving it is beyond me. Nevertheless, the idea was good enough that I allowed myself another half cup of coffee so I could write this up before I went forward with my day, and the next post which I may never publish (you won't be missing as much as you may be thinking, but it would certainly give the Nostradamus bunch something to think about and the 'mystics' something grounded to ponder).
If someone wants to write a horror story about this (the Greeks got there first, of course, and perhaps they stole it from the Sumarians) then you can add to your story that when I was writing the actual methodology down my cursor skipped all around the page and I had trouble getting it to the right place long enough to get it typed out, but my cursor is always flying over the page and occasionally blocking huge amounts of irreplacable data and deleting it.
I want to emphasis that although I think my theories are "basically" accurate, that it is much less exciting than it sounds, less exciting than my failure to post it now would indicate. If I win the lottery tomorrow, it will be with the same numbers I've been using for the last 5 years and so, perhaps, you will know it too. It does, however, suggest that the technology could be addressed scientifically and we could then, all become cyclops because it is unlikely that what we saw would be any more assuring than what was seen by the monster of Greek mythology who has come back as me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)