Well, I've ridden my bike 3 days in a row for the majority of my exercise, my neck feels almost normal, but I haven't swam in 5 days, a record for the entire summer. It has warmed up quite a bit so perhaps tomorrow I will brave that "freezing" cold pool and see if I can take it during the warmest part of the day.
Even as I grapple with my own future (and present), I'm holding off for a while describing how to predict the future. You WILL be disappointed, but having a scientific procedure is intriguing to me even if it seems unlikely to bear edible fruit. In an NLC universe seeing the future, especially on a quantum scale, should be relatively simple.
Its worth noting that our visions of the past and the future are fairly flexible and the farther we go in either direction the more inaccurate and limited our perception tends to be. In many cases, what we call "science fiction" gives a better vision of events than our histories of past. While I don't want to offend anyone, imagine if one or more of the various representatives of god in the past could have their life scrutinized. Would the all (any of them) hold up under such scrutiny. The religions of the world seem to think that only one of them could pass muster and, predictably, they don't agree on which one.
Using Nostradamus as an example of someone who could have used the early attempts to see the future, if you accept he foresaw anything, we were unable to see it clearly enough to change it and in the system or method for predicting the future this is explained, so I won't explain it here.
And I may not include that method at any time, it could, perhaps, die with this none to healthy earthly bark which you'd claim causes you so many problems while meaning only the best, but anyone who made a study of my work could probably piece it out. In the meantime, I will talk around it.
What is the reason to predict the future? You might think it is to win the lottery but that is typical unfocused non-generalized thinking and therefore not correct although it is related to the truth. The only reason is to see if the future can be changed. The idea of predicting the future is self defeating because whatever you see is either inaccurate or is already the future whether you believe in physic or NLC. Either theory gets you to the same place.
Nevertheless, if you were able to have a point predicted in the future, the challenge to NLC would be to change it. You couldn't, of course, under NLC so the proof would be in the inability to do so.
So what does this have to do with the idea of galactic expansion? Glad you asked. As far as I can determine, only NLC figured out that all coordinate change is in one direction, not just what is called time which isn't a dimension at all it turns out (Sorry pre-NLC physicists). This is a spectacular determination, but carries quite of bit of explanatory baggage with it.
Just as NLC fixes the future, so too it prevents coordinates from occurring at the same point twice. One explanation of this is spiral expansion/contraction So how does this concept of non-repetition affect expansion? NLC indicates pretty conclusively that spin is part of the overall change that shows that you cannot put any point at the same dimensional location twice without exceeding the speed of light. Spin in turn gives rise to the spiral functions that further define the universe. This is fairly easy to envision today with a universe spinning at an enormous size, but imagine the more compact universe where all the points are very compact, spinning near the center, but unable to be at the same point twice. At the center, spin and coordinate change has to be very high under NLC theory to maintain the overall light speed change coordinates. Even though there are no actual specific "locations" but only the impression of dimension, the model still requires the impression of movement in an outward spiral without the possibility of any of these myrid interacting quantum points every coming in contact with a lower line of the spiral where they might find their previous location. There has to be a mechanism mathematically to prevent the overlap which moves information away from the center rapidly to create this faster than light phenomena, logarithmic spirals work fairly well in this regard.
Under the phenomena of NLC, all information change is at a common rate. Stacking of information (as in the example of spirals off of spirals) allows for information to change at slightly different rates, one rate changing faster than others stacked on it, so that we get the effects that led the foolish pre-NLC physicists (come on, you know who are, raise your hands) to assume that only time one uni-directional. NLC, being a fixed, time independent system proved this could not be the case so the illusion of movement had to be explained using a system that prevented duplication. In order to arrive at this state of things at our speed of rotation it was necessary for the universe to extend the movement outward at a very high rate of speed, therefore the illusion of expansion.
Hence you have the relationship of predictability (you can view the future, but not change it) is governed by the same relationship as linearity (you cannot go fast enough to reverse the direction of one way movement in the universe).
Shazaaam!
This also jives fairly well with predicting the future, but there is one piece missing to explain how this phenomena could be used to take information in the future and observe it and also why it appears easier to see the past than the future, even thought it probably isn't. What is this missing piece? Why it's the unpublished post, of course. But it remains in here, in what's published and as this is rewritten, organized and worked into the next edition, all this will be clear. Perhaps, I will clear up at least some of the other issues.
How do I finish this? Ah, here it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO1rMeYnOmM
No comments:
Post a Comment