Graphic representation of spirals Tying into other spirals
I consider it very unlikely that you will understand what transpires because you are being unnecessarily pig-headed. I may be psychotic, but I'm willing to accept what is real and what is not. Actually, if I'm psychotic, then I can't accept what is real and what is not. Whatever.
As I indicated there is an enormous variety and complexity in addressing this process of compressed intersecting spirals although the math remains fairly simple. The proof lies in using the principles to define a single operation in nature. This does not mean that this model plays in role in nature, only that some model is required as indicated above for explaining unique NLC operations (especially compression associated with information theory) and intersecting spirals provides a fairly consistent model tending towards observed phenomena as has been observed in the past with non-intersecting logarithmic spirals.
As will be seen from the lengthy discussion of the drawings to follow it is easy to tie intersecting F-series spiral theory in with information theory. It is also easy to see how a relatively simple system can increase exponentially (2^n) in complexity with some rather simple foundations.
The first drawing below shows intersecting spirals and after each intersection, the change in either spiral is shown.
Figure 1
To view the drawing above in another way we can look at the two intersecting spirals as if they are tubes. In this case, we're going to deal with a very simple model, a 4 coordinate spiral intersecting with a one coordinate model (our view of the universe intersecting with space if you would). As can be seen, at the first intersection you have ct1-ct2 where "space" picks up a single spiral and ct4 goes to ct3. While this shows one coordinate around another, it would be the same if it was shown a four dots together, the dimension is only used for understanding the graphic. At the second intersection, ct2 goes to ct4 and ct3 (the remnant of ct4 originally) goes to ct1. This would describe a pre-black hole type of spacial interaction along to intersecting spiral lines.
Figure 2
In order to give some perspective, in the drawing below on the right is an f-series intersecting two spirals like the model at the top of the page. As can be seen by the model on the left, the ability to extend the spiral outward without affecting in inward moving spirals is shown. This same interaction can be seen to a lesser extent with curved spirals but the discussion of the election between these has been covered sufficiently and the use of one as opposed to the other is merely a matter of selection since the universe contains aspects of both. This model is important because without a fixed amount of information certain numbers like pi remain unsolvable and in an information based universe, at least for a fixed sent of spirals (such as the limited number shown on the right) you can get a practical answer for sequential equations like pi or e (euler).
The discussion of the drawing on the left is much more complex because a single drawing is used to show several different potential phenomena, although curved spirals are avoided despite the fact that they can, at least in theory, be substituted for linear spirals.
What is seen on the right side of the f(8) spiral (see figure 1 above) is the "machine gun" type feed of one spiral into an intersecting spiral. There are many features of this interaction that are worth noting, perhaps the most significant of which is that at some point in the spirals are properly aligned, the downward (or upward) turn of the intersecting spiral will overlap with the downward (at least according to the drawing) of the intersected spiral. One potential in this phenomena is that for the loose (1 to 1) interaction of photonic ct1 to wave (ct2) compression states these overlaps could change the observable simultaneous data change from 1 (non-overlapped) to 2 (overlapped) which would provide a handy (if coincidental) explanation for the duplicatas personality of energy (wave and particle characteristics). It should be noted that the place where you would observe this is not at this outer spiral arm, but the positioning was not used for the purpose of illuminating any particular aspect of NLC.
Looking to the left side of the left figure, there is a non-intersecting spiral shown coming off of the main ct8 spiral and below this is an intersecting spiral coming off of the same main spiral. I have intentionally positioned these two spiral to show another intersecting spiral joining the two F-13 arms of this spiral together. I could have joined any other arms together, of course and I could have joined them using other offsets, such as having them offset from the same quantum point from the main ct8 spiral arm. The reason for this may make more sense for a view of the next drawing.
A single spiral coming off of the main spiral would make a first time orbit, but it would not be stabilized until it was secured exponentially in place, as by one (at least) intersecting spiral holding the exponential number of spirals together and preferably by the number of quantum points where intersection occurs divided by two spirals holding them together (a spiral with an overlap of 8 would have 4). An unstable number of spiral overlaps would generate a clock time state that would, over time, spontaneously degrade which could explain radioactive systems.
Figure 3
The drawing below shows spiral arms coming off (at right angles) from a single point on the main spiral A (in this case it can be off of any point on A (at 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, etc) and at any stage of compression. The drawing on the left shows two spirals, neither of which is intersecting, although they intersect each other at the overlap shown. This overlap forms a surface from which an intersecting spiral may spiral off based on the amount of overlap As can be seen, unless this overlap is "broken off" it serves to fix the position of spiral 1 to spiral 2 at the F5 position and the F3 position respectively. Going into the significance of each aspect of this exceeds the scope of this graphic analysis.
It's important to note that the length of any spiral off of the main spiral should be defined by the length of time during which the compressed state exists. Referring to the second figure 2 the process of compression can be reversed along the main spiral but this requires movement in a single direction so that the machine gun type movement shown in Figure 3 would have to end and the aspect of the spiral at this point would be unique and might correspond to an overlap of the spirals and if that were the case, then the spirals might have to remain offset unless a decompression event occurs. This is not required.
The Figure on the right shows that these types of overlaps can occur off of a central spiral A where the F series is not changed. One can imagine, in the example shown below, how one or more intersecting f-sprials coming more or less out of (or into) the page could (by coming off of the intersection of the spirals coming off of line a) join the operation of any two or more of the spirals in the same fashion as shown in the right. This provides a mechanism for explaining, using F-series intersecting spirals why certain point times change only with others (if they didn't we would fly apart). By carrying this out for successive layers, you get a multi-dimensional framework of interlocking points. The nature of the overlap is not self evident from what is shown below, but should correspond to compression states (2^n) of the type represented by overlaps of intersecting lines such as are shown in the second figure above.
Figure 4
That should give you something to think about while waiting for the next post. I have a lot to think about. When I vomit over all this, something comes out besides blood, but I am certainly bleeding. While the thought of abandoning this line of inquiry completely crossed my mind, you can imagine based on what you know why I decided that I needed to continue it to its conclusion. It hardly seems fair what I have to go through in order to put this before you.
No comments:
Post a Comment