The changing face of AuT part dos-how big is space

Unlike you, there is little I will do this weekend other than write and work on my life.  It is a very noisy, unpleasant exercise, the life work, not the writing.  I have decided, however, I must take radical steps, just as AuT is radical, so let's take about radical changes in AuT
Another early theory that appears to have lost its place is the idea that there is an actual spiraling down to two infinitely dense states, one positive and one negative where the two have no separation of space.  What is unique about the correction is that the same result occurs.  The problem with the original one was that spiraling down meant the spirals had to stay in existence and what is observed is that the spirals are solved for each point but that there is no spiral that remains which is a "primary" or "carrying spiral" for all the other spirals to get to this result.  Worse still, that solution would require that the universe actually follow rules of dimension and dimension doesn't exist.
It turns out the way to deal with this is by having the same result, but that it be obtained with solutions to increasing numbers of spirals which end up giving the same result but not by any one spiral spiraling down independent of the others, but only because there is a solution point at compression as x gets larger where at each compression state you get closer to this fully compressed result, but, of course, you'd never get there because if you did there would be a final x.
This brings us to another stupid pre AuT question:
 What is beyond the universe?  This is another stupid pre AuT question.  It is completely wasted here, but it serves a purpose in continuing to support AuT over every other theory.
The idea that the universe ends is such a primitive idea the fact that it took AuT to completely invalidate the concept borders on the bizarre.
The answer, of course, is that distance doesn't exist so neither does space.
The amount of "space" in the universe is simply a measure of CT1 information state in the universe.  There is a set amount at any solution of x and that defines the perceived size of the universe.
One of the concepts that is hardest to understand it the infinite series towards a universe where there is only two totally dense states, one defined by one spiral equation, the other defined by the negative of the first.  It is important to remember that the "spiral" is only the closest model derived so far and intersecting spirals only the most simple version of that.  We are hopelessly far from the solution where we are even approaching this infinitely dense solution to be able to actually see it begin to form, but we can envision this solution from the fact that the spiral methodology itself suggests this end result and since there appears to be no other solution or final solution to the universe that is more logical than this one which returns the universe to non-linearity.

The Changing face of AuT: Part Uno

As this theory became more defined, it became more predictive.  When it accurately predicted the scale of black holes (the base number replaced with a fibrucci series (n-2,n-1,n) sum) I knew the theory had merit, when it solved the expansion/compression problem of the universe and explained the big bang with relative certainty, it was clear that it was an accurate enough theory to be able to reject any conflicting theories.  But that doesn't mean it was clean or perfect.  In a discussion of the theory I recently gave (a small speech-don't miss your chance, book early) I focused on wrong terms, things which were initially fundamental to the theory but which I was forced to rethink in light of observation or testing.  So here now is part 1 of:
"Abandoned ideas in the name of AuT"
So here are some of the main ideas that were abandoned and what has taken their place
1) There is a fixed amount of information in the universe.  This derived from the idea that everything happened at once in the singularity, a mistake adopted from Einsten.  Instead of everything happening at once in the singularity, there is merely an algorithm which may be solved for any quantum instant, instead of a fixed amount of information, it constantly changes, increasing with the value of a single variable (x)
2) Compressed information states change at exponentially slower rates or at different rates at least. Instead, each quanum point must change at the exact same rate and some other feature (examples appear in the book, but I haven't picked the exact relative view point) provides a relative point from which compressed matter changes at a rate relative to the amout of compression or the number of lower states involved in the solution at any point (i.e. based on the difference in the number of lower states experienced in any change which is also defined in the macro universe over a length of the spiral as speed).  This is time dilation's effect on AuT.
3) Closely related to part 1: Everything happened at once in the absence of time in a singularity, replaced with a changing solution to an algorithm.
4) There is a single spiral, instead there are averaged spirals which increase for each increase in the size of x each quantum moment being thereby defined having a distinct beginning and end built on top of the prior spirals and in particular the prior two states.
5) Closely related to 4: The spiral arms go from one which is fully uncompressed to one which is fully compressed.  Instead, the most outward state is the least organized and the ratio of outward to inward compression at the state of total compression approaches identity, but never reaches it as x approaches infinity.
As you can see from this, many of the fundamental feature is the first volumes (The Einstein Hologram Universe and Non Linear Time Theory) had to give way in a more developed theory.
One of the big areas where growth of the theory will come is in the discussion of time dilation and the definition of what speed is and the closely related question of what changes occur in compressed states over long periods of time and how compressed states interact to give the forces and reactions that we experience on the macro level of matter.

a background of terrorism

One of the largest and safest airports in the world is bombed, 28 people die before midnight.  The stock market barely notices it.  It is plastered on the news, but it has become like wallpaper.  It colors the wall but how often do you really look at it?  The news says all the same things.   From it's just terrorism to the terrorists are trying to enforce their will on the rest of us.  Islam, Radical Islam, Subdivisions of Islam, in this case Kurds or perhaps it is Russians or the CIA, who really knows anymore.
The USA is overseeing more killings every week than any other group at present, and while muslims are killed by day, at night the president says we are not at war with Islam.  It is confusing, it speaks to a chaos and randomness that suggests that for all of our information and insight, we have no real civilization.
That most of believe in one or more fairy tale religions (if yours isn't the fairy tale than everyone else's is) and that we fight and kill and allow others to fight and kill in the name of them are two sides of the same coin.  We are, on average, a stupid, superstitious people.  
I like the beauty of religion, I'm saddened by the beautiful country churches of France that are slowly destroyed by the gentle breezes that make them such comfortable places to sit and contemplate the world.  But a wiser civilization hasn't figured out a way to save the good from the bad.  The bad boils over and kills randomly or on purpose. Die infidel, die Moor, speed the inevitable death in the name of whatever god demands we kill.  And those who have no superstitions, at least for man-made religions, have to kill to protect or avenge themselves, to have freedom from the dominance of crazed fanatics.  And at night their leaders confirm we are not at war with Islam, but we'll kill them to protect our right to not be Muslims anyway, we'll just call it something else.
AuT's weak link, apparent not actual mind you, is our feelings of self determination, our concentration of understanding, our ability to see so far into the fundamental origin of the universe.  Certainly that means we are something other than the outcome of the application of a single variable into an algorithm.  It sounds like a strong argument, but one of those random bits of shrapnel from one of our bombs or one of our enemies bombs should have killed me at one time or another, and yet here I sit.   We are stupid, little things.  We are no crown of creation, we are crowns of destruction.  We are proof that at its very highest achievement the universe is self destructive.  We know what we need to do and yet like the most ignorant of savages, we kill each other and subjugate each other in the name of random religious doctrines which make absolutely no sense.  In almost every case, there are those who would stone (or bomb) disbelievers for questioning obedience to ignorance.
We cannot make the case that self determination invalidates mathematical certainty unless we can control our own emotions and compartmentalize our superstitions.
There is no reason not to kill one another over these stupid fantasies with which we indoctrinate those too uneducated to defend themselves.  We don't have sufficient value to justify saving ourselves.  Well, maybe you don't.   I feel pretty good about my values.

AuT leading the world

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/string-theory-co-founder-sub-atomic-particles-are-evidence-0#.V2XUN8BYmDw.facebook

This kind of nonsense is out there because the mainstream hasn't had access to AuT yet.  I'm working on it.  This isn't to say that "Nothing" in this universe, the one that we see, is a reflection of god, the whole universe is a reflection of sorts, more of a solution than a reflection, but being presentably as a solution means there is a matrix in the background on which a solution may be solved.
The article contains this quote:
“We need a theory that goes before the Big Bang, and that’s String Theory. String Theory says that perhaps two universes collided to create our universe, or maybe our universe is butted from another universe leaving an umbilical cord…."
No, that part is just silly.  I explained what the big bang was and addressed all the issues raised relative to the most recent big "inflection point" and why there is supersymetry (it's because its a simple equation with a recurring type of solution, recurring in the sense that it is a infinite converging series in response to the solution based on a single variable.
So some of what this author derives is almost AuT worthy, the "evidentiary nature" but since the author (not the scientist) is talking about "sub-atomic" particles is just misinterpretation of the "evidence" since the idea that the sub-atomic (smaller than atoms) particles are actually particulate in the fundamental structure or even "made" of something is just...It's frustrating.  Millions, nay Billions, are being spent on physics projects and research that are looking in the wrong direction.  I know some of you haven't read everything here and are thinking this is nonsense, and I feel the same way about this nonsense.
If a theory not only explains the big bang but goes trillions of years before it, shouldn't it have some of the support given to theories that are still guessing what the big bang was or that assume it has something to do with god?
If a theory not only explains quantum particles but explains why a minimum size is both possible and non-existent shouldn't it get some of the support that all these particle accelerators get?
There is more potential for understanding and at least illusory manipulation of the universe in AuT than...well perhaps it's the fact that it shatters the illusion that makes it so hard to accept.
But we all know that the illusion is important.
There is 90% humidity this morning, the sun which I greeted has not yet lighted the lower reaches of the yard and that is important.  All our humanly concerns are important, but go doesn't lie in anything other than the matrix, which is not space or time, in which the algorithm can be solved, all that we hold important lies in this place and our ability to seize, illusory or not, renders our inaction and mistakes intolerable.

I stand with britain on the brink

I should have decided to base my future on what happened with this.
I'm just kidding about this, the factors that inevitably point to leaving have very little to do with the events of Britain which is, in truth, voting for its survival, not realizing that it will probably not survive whichever way the vote goes.
I understand this too well myself.  I see my own future reflected in the future.  Prior decisions have destroyed us both, and what we're left with is merely a choice of which way to die.
And now I have to ask the same question, the question that the one of me that I killed already knew.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMaE6toi4mk

the AuT capacitor part IV

The book is published, but the research goes on.
As I prepare to leave this sad but pleasant place behind me, I am working tirelessly to find someone to work tirelessly to get me speaking engagements.  What is going to happen next is anyone's guess, but if I'm on my way that's a damn good start.
This is some old post stuff, but worth printing just to get it out of my waiting to post stack.
So we're going to go a little further into this capacitor theory of spiral intersection.  What we're doing here is adding to the algorithm that defines the intersection to include what happens at the intersection in certain circumstances.  We're also going to discuss why this happens the way it does to some extent and the models in three dimensional space that define 'inflection points' where the intersection yields to non-intersection which are not necessarily the equivalent of the very different places where the sin function changes the direction of the algorithm.

We have defined lengths of these overlaps and these defined lengths will give us a definition of "time" for the capacitor equations between t=0 and t=end of the overlap but we can solve for any quantum moment thereby allowing us to predict the future or the past at any point.

To understand this, we have the equivalent of time which is the length along the point of intersection.  This generates a stacking of spirals which we're going to compare to current over a capacitor. Don't mistake this for actual current because we're not going to have the same effect.  What differences?
Well for one thing, we're going to achieve stable higher states, not necessarily in every spiral intersection, but in the big bangs we're going to have the next higher time state as well as some significant discharge.

So let's take this analogy down the road a little ways and bear with me, because we're going to be do lots and lots of substitutions to get from the real world power source, to the algorithm power source of AuT.

Charging circuit-V/t is a time (here length) equation starts charging quickly that slows down gradually until it never quite reaches the charge of the power source.  This type of equation is a good hint that it's driven by the quantum type features that otherwise define the universe.

V(t)=E(1-e^-t/RC) where E is the maximum voltage.  This is how the intersection of two spirals look coming together.
When the intersection stops you get a discharge circuit which looks like:
I vs t; current starts out at the E/Re^-t/RC)
E is the power source.  t is replaced with length and since we're solving for points we can pick one anywhere along this equation and solve it for a quantum moment.
RC is the time constant and is approximately .63 for the charging and .37 for the discharging circuit.
when t=rc then e^-1 is 1/e.  e=(1+1/n)n as n approached infinity (in our case the maximum information in the universe.
Where R is the Resistence and C is the capacitance.  We're not worried about actual electricity, we're only interested in the "building" of this type capacity so while we use Voltage, we're actually collecting spirals and they will, at some point in time (when you get to the non-overlap point [where overlap ends and which is an inflection point in the equation where charging of spirals leads to the dicharge of spirals EXCEPT where they have become stable due to the equation for stability which is essenitally F(n-2,n-1,n-adding those)^2^n for those accumulations of spirals where stability is attained.
So you derive the charging as V(t)=E(1-e^-t/RC) and I(0)=E/R(e^-t/RC) and discharging is
V(t)=QRCe^-t/RC and I(t)=Q/RCe^-t/RC but you don't fully discharge on one end and you discharge more than you would on the other end. At the ct3-4 interface, this 'discharge' to the extent there is a discharge, is our friend e=mc^2 but, of course, we have the other constant previously derived for ct4-5 where the factor (of course being F(n-2,n-1,n) is M(matter)=BH(blackhole stuff)x(times)q13^2^5 where q is a constant that makes up for the difference between the constant for the speed of light and this new constant
Q=EC(1-e^-t/RC)
The capacitor begins to push back against the power source when it begins to b

We're going to need some information for e so let's talk about why it is important to our spiral universe.
e=sum(from n=0 to n=infinity (or the total information in the universe)1/n(factorial) or sum1/n!=1+1/1+1/1*2+1/1*2*3
1,1,1/2,1/6,1/24.
The importance here has to do with probability theory which in a fixed environment becomes certainty theory.  IF you have something happen 1 time out of n times then the probability of it happening is 1 time out of e (from 0 to n) or 1/e where e is summed calculated from 0 to n (and one can presume in AuT from 0 down to -n).  n changes as universes build so that probability decreases steadily which allows for the combination of universes.
for the first universe 1 positive and 1 negative spiral the answer is 1, for the second univese it is 2, for the third it is 2.2 and so on.  These changing probabilities, especially when n is the amount of bits of information in our universe (10^100 plus for any quantum) leads to a probability which is very close to the limits of e, but still not solved exactly allowing for minor variation.
Likewise it defines distribution (d(x)=1/sqr(2pi)*e^-1/2x^2) which again is solved for each universe starting with x=1 (technically the pre-universe has the solution 1/sqr(2pi)).  Why important to consider?  Because the solution for the distribution equation has inflection points (1, 2, 3, -1,-2,-3) where the direction changes (the undulating of a sin wave) which is the analogy of intersecting spirals (see the prior definition of the spiral using sin which can be replaced with a similar function to this one for distribution or, potentially, points of charge and discharge of our capacitors.
There are many ways to derive this.  One is the first derivative shows a sin wave (y=f(x)), the first derivative y=f'(x) yielding a u-shaped curve, the second derivative shows the inflection point where this solution goes from positive to negative (y=f"(x)).  These many ways to skin the cat don't change the outcome we are looking for which is a change in direction at a quantum point only solvable by having a finite amount of information (a finite e, a finite x)
Likewise we can solve for i (i^2=-1) in an information universe because you can have positive or negative information for the opposite spiral.  For positive information 1*1=1, for negative information 1*1=-1.  It doesn't work in our non-quantum view of  the universe but might work perfectly well along the opposite spiral.

We're not using capacitors, of course, but the equations are derived below and the derivation is the same but not the results because of stable compression

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVBNzJ-jRWw
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/differential-calculus/derivative-applications/concavity-inflection-points/v/calculus-graphing-using-derivatives
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVBNzJ-jRWw

AuT the building blocks of F-series Part 2...and pi

Nothing in life is to be feared.  It is only to be understood.

Now here is the bizarre part of the build out of the F-series.

11	112	123		112	1123	1235
112	123	235		1123	1235	2358
123	235	358		1235	2358	3593
235	358	593		2358	3593	5951
358	593	951		3593	5951	9544
593	951	1544		5951	9544	15495
11	22	33		111	222	333
22	33	55		222	333	555
33	55	88		333	555	888
55	88	143		555	888	1443
88	143	231		888	1443	2331
143	231	374		1443	2331	3774

What the chart above shows is that this pattern works no matter how far out you take it.  Now, this isn't really bizarre, it is just simple mathematics.  Note that I"m not solving this for the non base 10 number system, if you count using sticks it works, that all that matters to the universe.
If AuT has taught us anything, it's that the truth gets hidden behind our math prejudices.
One feature which is obvious from math is that the the first number in the series is independent of the others.
In order to understand how this builds out a universe we take the two ways and fill in a two dimensional matrix (later we'll have to go in as many dimensions as there are simultaneous coordinates which, thankfully, is believed to be no more than 5 where we are now.

0 as a center

1 as a center

1 surrounded by 2 ones initially.  Then each of these will pick up another at each change.Building only from zero, only from initial 1 only from any one or from each.

This is important because this build out is the creation of curvature in space.  While this only goes out a a very short distance and is restricted to only two dimensions it shows how complex the two systems can get and why an origin with zero might make more sense.
The build out from zero also provides a mechanism for gravity to be differentiated from other forces because you only have two numbers to get to gravity and three for other force systems:
Space/Gravity: 0,1,1 understanding that this is built over three different states for all points in the universe. 2^2^0
Photonic 1,1,2 same understanding 4^2^1 compression
Wave 1,2,3 same understanding 6^2^2 compression
Matter 2,3,5 same  understanding 10^2^4
BH 3,5,8 ---16^2^8
etc.
The transition for forces:
Gravity: (special case) 0,0,0,0,0,1;0,1,1
Photon forces 0,1,1; 0,1,1; 1,1,2 (three states required to define any quantum moment built on prior two)
Wave forces: 0,1,1; 1,1,2; 1,2,3
Matter forces 1,1,2; 1,2,3; 2,3,5 (beginning here a great deal more variety is possible due to the lack of a zero starting point.)
BH forces 1,2,3;2,3,5;3,5,8