The case for morality in the einstein hologram universe

http://www.amazon.com/The-Einstein-Hologram-Universe-ebook/dp/B00F4FL9OW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1379211605&sr=8-1&keywords=einstein+hologram+universe

The E-H-U theory corollary that linearity is caused by thought in an uncomfortable circular argument provides a basis for morality that is profound.

If the good and evil of the universe result from our thoughts, and their existence all at once (without separating time or dimension) in the singularity; then the good or bad you think; therefore the good and bad that you do; that which you are sincere about most particularly, affects those around you, those who existed before you, those who come after you. 

And this is not an earthly concern.  The moral love and compassion affect the alien in a galaxy that without E-H-U theory you could never hope to reach.  And yet in E-H-U theory, you reach it constantly.  If you don't know how, you have to read it.

Early in the discussion, I discussed the creation of a device that would allow delving into the singularity to allow reaching across the "non-existent" void that separates us.  I even said that if 20 physicists commented on the theory from 20 different countries I would provide the foundation for this.  Much of that appears in the book now, but not all of it.

In truth, the physicist contest is over, no one having won.  It would seem that we are not ready for these types of secrets unless we understand the potential power of our hate as well as our compassion.

Can we expect a more benevolent universe when we are evolved for survival and where we have never risen above the need to take from one another, from avarice, from genocide?  And what good
would the power to change the universe, to traverse it instantly since the space is but an illusion, if we set its parameters with our consciousness and if our consciousness is unconscionable.

There is, it seems, a moral imperative in the Einstein Hologram Universe.  We must both master it to survive, and master ourselves to make it worthwhile.  And if this theory were possible, the most unlikely of circular arguments, "Time is linear because those of us who live in linear time think it is" and if the linearity results from the concentrated consciousness of all intelligence, past present and future concentrated in a singularity without space or time then does this not suggest a moral imperative.

It suggests that all of the intelligence in the universe is what we perceive as god, we represent the smallest fraction of this concentrated intelligence, diluted by our past, our future and the past, present and future of intelligences within time that we can only consider as statistical probabilities.  But the very linearity of time in this example, suggest they exist, that they co-exist; at least in the singularity where they necessarily all come together.

So when you consider your obligations to your neighbor, your friends, you lover, even yourself; remember that the universe requires a certain amount of  hostility to exist, we are able to consider these esoteric ideas because our ancestors wielded spears, stones, guns and missiles.  But for all of that and for the continued need for that, what does the morality of a shared consciousness require of us.