Pages

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Easy time travel from defining nuclear reactions in terms of time coordinates changing

I previously left for a future blog entry will discuss what form matter takes in this interim stage where it is falling into the singularity, but has neither reached the singularity nor has it transitioned to energy.
We need to start by looking at whether e=mc^2 can be solved using EH-theory and the conversion of time coordinates.  In order to do this we need to correct the equation to show that it is a function of time and not of energy and matter which does appear earlier in this discussion.   That is, the conversion of mass and energy functions into functions of time has occurred and appears in the Einstein Hologram Universe.
We are now going to approach the same solution from a different direction.
We are going to take this equation and look at it from the change of dimension requirements and this is a function of the change in time from the dimension of clock to the dimension of movement.
If you walk backward, you'll see time moving backwards and it doesn't look to strange.  It is the easiest was to envision time recoiling.  But this blog is not about time moving backwards, it is about time conservation in a quantum environment and giving rise to the fundamental equation of energy and mass conservation.
e=time changing only along dimensional lines.
m=time changing along time lines and dimensional lines.  The rate of change fluctuates according to the amount of change along dimensional lines.  The greater the change in dimensional time, the slower the rate of time change.  This is established in traditional physics, and this is only the recognition that time is necessarily the foundation of dimension and that time is conserved.
The quantum aspects of time are clear from this equation.  The "size" of time quanta are also revealed.  If e=mc^2 we know that the minimal amount of time is tied to the minimal size of energy quanta.  For example, if a photon is the smallest amount of energy, then we know that 1photon/c^2 is the minimal quanta of matter, that is dimensional time.
The exact measurements  show that time only is involved in this analysis.  A photon has no known dimension (It does have features that prevent it from being "touched" in theory, at .5x10-15m, but this is less about size and more about having time coordinates combined at a quantum level.  This is why you can't get past the wave vs particle analysis of photons in traditional physics, although it does have changes in time coordinates at the speed of light. 
That is, wave-particle duality is a completely artificial construct necessary only if you insist that space time exists in place of time with changing coordinates.
Only when you add time changes and take away form the dimensional changes is it possible to define a size and this necessarily is a function of the square of the speed of light since that is the first point at which you can make a transition.  The Planck Length understands this relationship, but does not describe it as a function of time since Planck also saw space-time as a give as opposed to a mere impression given from time.  This takes us from the two dimensional foundation of String Hologram theory and eliminates dimension completely.
This means that the nuclear relationship necessarily involves the change of time coordinates in a conservation environment where time along one coordinate (that we observe as time) changes relative to those we experience as dimension.
What does this have with walking backwards?  Conceptually, it is apparent that time must be the same whether there is one dimension or three, but it is conserved across time or the other dimensions according to a set formula so that there should be some relationship, if not identity, between these different time streams.  We can move back and forth along all the other dimensions but not the time stream.  This means there may be different time streams along each of the other time dimensions which we cannot observe, but for those, presumably you could go backwards along our time strings.
I.E. it is suggested, although not necessarily required, that for each dimensional time string, there is an interchangeable clock time string that cannot be traversed in either direction along that dimensional time string but can be traversed in either direction when the point of reference is switched.
This means that anyone experience clock time along what we perceive as a dimensional time string could easily move back in time on our clock time string.  more on this later.


No comments:

Post a Comment