Pages

Monday, February 16, 2015

my road and on relationships and stepped transactions-some notes

STEPPED TRANSITIONS AND STEPPED RELATIONSHIPS

One question of linearity is why don't forces cancel out the corresponding dimensional aspects and take everything back to a non-linear state?  The best answer is that we exist in a non linear state, but we have linear states at quantum “points”, even if they are largely illusory.  This proposition assumes that at any point in time, we exist with a prepackaged past and future, and that all of these points in time (quantum points, of course) exist at once.

A longer discussion will follow where we see this type of stepped transition in irrational (or non-linear) numbers such as pi which can only be calculated by way of example.  4/1-4/3+4/4/5-4/7.  Nothing this transition is also a function of 2 (4/2^0-4/2^1*2+4/2^1*3 where the transition from 0 to 1 represents a phase transition.  Phase transitions are reflected in time dilation as will be discussed further.  Using the idea of phase transitions, you can arrive at pi being the sum from n=zero to infinity of 4/(2^n’)*n noting that there may also be a summation of n’ associated with certain changes in n, in this case n=0 to n=1.  There is no reason why there cannot be other phase changes before or after the n’0 to n’1.

One answer suggested by the math is that Forces (F) are from a lower dimensional state.  That is gravity, which effects CT1 dimensional characteristics is a CT0 force, Photonic energy which is a feature of CT2 is a CT1 force characteristic.  Following the model of Non linear numbers (irrational numbers) like pi this would yield an equation for any Point (P)=ct(0)-ct1+ct2-ct3 etc where each clock time represents a number which approaches, but never reaches a solution which is consistent with the approach previously derived by compression also using a factor of 2.  Instead of 4/(2^n’)*n; the equation is loosely seen at x^2^n as n increases from 0 to infinity.

Expanding the equation to take into account non-linear (or irrataional) numbers:
(x/n)*10^2^n-x/n*10^2^n+x/n*10^2^n.   If appropriate n may be replaced by 2 times n.  Likewise, you can have a phase change which would alter the equation.  One place where this could happen is where n=0 in the first part of the equation (x/0)*10^2^0.  In this case, there are two possible solutions present.  The first is that there is, for example, a reverse phase change (from 1 then to match the second n)  An alternative would use the alternate values for zero derived for non-linear time which are discussed below.

Likewise, it could mimic the pi equation:

((x/2^n’)*n)*10^2^n-(x/2^n’)*10^2^n+etc where x is some constant and n’ goes through a phase change at n’=0.  The same type of phase change in such a case is expected at the ct4-ct5 interface based on an analysis of time dilation as will be discussed in more detail later.

Does this make me wise or brilliant?  No, it only makes me inquisitive.  For it to seem brilliant, someone else has to accept it.  And that brings us to companionship.

Companionship, that is probably the foundation for any relationship.  This varies depending on the depth of the relationship.  The degree of the relationship, however, is not totally dependent on the companionship.  There are two versions of companionship, in such a judgement, that given by physical presence and that given by emotional fantasy, the idea of being together, of being joined in a common undertaking, in the most committed of relationships, an exclusive undertaking.  The best friend, the mate.

Consistency is a large part of the commonality portion of companionship. What is an inconsistent relationship other than a habitat for doubt and mistrust.  If you cannot trust the underpinnings of a relationship, it is hardly well grounded for the future.

Such a relationship provides no solice, no increase in the sense of security or self worth.  If you're constantly threatened with being cut off, put in an attic, or merely out to pasture, you cannot let yourself go.

What do we need from the relationship?  We need someone who gives advice and doesn't judge too harshly. Now judgments of harshness vary with the circumstances.  Someone involved in a betrayal should not expect to be judged lightly, but in the best of relationships, there is the ability to talk.

Every attorney needs another attorney they can talk to, for example.  And everyone who is not an attorney needs someone who they can talk to without being judged except for their own merit.
Then there is comfort.  This is a little different between measured judgement.  This is taking someone who is blameworthy or merely unfortunate, and providing them with a gentle ear, physical contact without expectation of any return.  

Everyone of my generation raised in the united states is haunted by the video of the baby monkey clinging to the fur covered wire framework, leaving only to eat.   Perhaps the psychologists who filmed this little bit of horror can be excused from hell for showing what mad and uncaring creatures we are, we wild apes whose teeth are not as ferocious because our brains are our teeth and are all the more horrible for being hidden from view.  The listening and the freely given touch of softness perhaps is the most important thing in any real relationship, more important than providing food and shelter, although I am free of that desire.

Motivation is another thing that is important in a relationship.  The ability to inspire one another with goals.  This is not essential to a relationship, but is essential to a good relationship.  What good is being with someone if they motivate you towards dispair if they leave you without the desire to accomplish things.  This translates into a positive life direction, mentally and physically. 

 To accomplish great things, to stay in shape, and to find joy in life, to find joy in each other.   To some extent, this means inspiring risk, and this brings us back to consistency, because how can we ask someone to risk everything on a relationship if it is not consistent, to risk anything of consequence on it?

The relationship you have with yourself is a big part of that.  This is what is the subject of self-help.  If you don't inspire yourself to grow, to exercise, to take chances.  And growing is as complicated as anything in definition.  It includes being daring, being inquisitive, being generous, being self depricating, modest and proud at the same time, it includes working towards intellectual achievement, not just education, it involves not being limited by artificial criteria like your current ability or your age or infirmities or...you past problems with relationships.  It involves being the person you would want to partner with whether it is yourself or someone else.  

A relationship should make you feel better about yourself.  If it someone else or yourself, it should point out your accomplishments and minimize your failures and perhaps point out that every moment is about living and not the past, perhaps the future has to play into it, despite the fact it is only a potential, but mostly about the present.   IT should give your expectations of greatness without requiring success.  It means balancing what you are told with what your values are.

A relationship should calm your fears.  Fear is the greatest harm in the world, the source of doubt.  Fear of change, fear to love given the dangers involved.  Fear is the opposite of companionship.  You can be with someone and scared of them and there is no value in it.  If the relationship doesn't calm your fears, it is the wire frame with the food, but without the reassurance.

So here is a checklist starter:
1) living life without fear
2) doing the right thing
3) 30/60/90
play a song on an instrument
tell someone you love them
accomplish an exercise goal
write something or make an oral history
act without fear
live life outside of work
find ways for work to be fulfilling

No comments:

Post a Comment