nlc the cern

On of the late advances of NLC were the determinations: 1) That there were several big-bangs and 2) that standard clock time (time to those of you out there that don't really get it yet) is the result of higher and not lower compression states, higher and not lower clock times to the initiated, higher and not lower coordinate changes. This is not so much because the math dictates this result, but is instead a function of the gravity web holding the universe together and a failure to find a point of reference in a lower clock time.
While multiple big bangs representing the advance to higher and higher clock time states (if you're following gravity in that direction, otherwise looking in the opposite direction-the direction we call history-to lower and lower clock time states) seems more likely than not, tracking the origin of the illusion we call time is more complex and perhaps requires a bit more study.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2016/02/cern-lhc-recreates-the-billionths-of-a-second-after-the-big-bang.html
Of course, I don't have access to the cern and those who do are looking at the wrong things and coming up with the wrong answers.
The creation of something after the (latest) big bang (ct4-ct5 or, possible likely, ct5-ct6) isn't impossible however.  What they would accomplish in such a case to to create a bubble in which the highest ct state doesn't have linearity.  This is a difficult concept to get my hands around but the idea that a larger algorithm would effectively be nullified for a period of time while all of the other algorithms are scattered is not inconsistent with the model nor does it vary the idea that self determination is illusory, it only means that the algorithms defining our existence allows us to do this type of process.
I would assume that the CT4 bubble in a CT5 universe is unlikely, it would not require speeds sufficient to reverse the curve in a small pocket of the universe.  This is because the lower spirals (ct1-ct4) would not be eliminated.  This means a pre-big bang bubble is possible, but to see if it was accomplished you'd have to look for an absence of effect of the ct5 state binding the universe together, something I consider highly unlikely.
However, it is entirely likely that they would be able to change spiral speeds sufficiently within the narrow range of change allowed (under the speed of light) in such a way that most, if not all, of the spirals holding matter together would be unwound so that fundamental particles of matter would exist unconnected with other fundamental particles of matter and this almost certainly happens in fission reactions when matter spontaneously converts to energy.
While creating a interesting place to study NLC concepts, without using the NLC model to study the results, it's just going to cause more confusion.
My invitation to review the results (along with a plane ticket to Switzerland and First class accommodations) must be lost in the mail.  I wonder if the CERN covers ski rentals?