The theory is brilliant. It is so intuitive. As I edit the book, A spiral in Amber, I realize how much it is intuitive and how it came to be, not by my act, but because of the inevitability.
The algorithm of spirals off of spirals provide the forces that bind the universe in sequence, one more off of each spiral
Figure 7 in the book shows it better, but in solving the equations, one can see the first spiral yields the force of gravity. The second yields the force that binds space and changes it to photonic energy. The third binds waves, The fourth binds energy to matter. So why do mulitple forces occur. If you look at the drawing on page 107 of the book it is obvious. Each spiral on each collision picks up additional spirals. This is reflected in the length of the various overlaps in this figure so that the number of each line of each length increases exponentially with each collision where each original spiral picks up another spiral. So there are not only spirals off of spirals but there are spirals off of secondary spirals that correspond with new spirals off of the original spiral as the compression equation takes place. The exponential number reflected in the drawing by the length of each and the comparison with the earlier Figures, Figure 2 showing them together.
The spirals do not yield forces, instead the forces we perceive are the result of the directional, intersectional and compressive elements of the algorithms that define space as data points. The forces are not forces because of physics, but are instead the expressions of predetermined changes in data from one quantum moment to the next, all tied together by a common point of origin, capable of creating an entire universe and allowing each separate change because it is not constrained by time as we only experience it at higher compression states.
It is elegant, simple, intuitive, by pre-NLC standards brilliant.
So how come no one figured NLC out before me? It is so obvious, so intuitive. The quotes and theories fall all around it.
Yes and no have been around, perhaps the first human speech. But it had to wait for computers to understand the fundamental nature of the informational building block. Perhaps that is the key, the element that was missing.
The obvious answer is that in a fixed continuum (not space time continuum of course) universe, if I'm the first, I have to be. It's just that way.
You don't have to like that reasoning, there is neither pride nor modesty in the Fixed Spiral Model.
And yet, as I edit it, I realize that there is a lot missing in the definition. While we can define the forces fairly easy at the intersections of the F4 series because they are the forces that hold matter, the later forces of F5 and the earlier forces of F3 and F2, those forces defined by those prior spirals off of spirals, remain elusive.
All this comes to me, but it is just the illusion of self determination. I have done nothing in fact, it is just there, it was before and it will be after. There is nothing but modesty in fixed spirals. Even so, there is much missing.
It is almost as if I was still seeing the theory in black and while as if there were a lack of color.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vYNyBmn6LE
No comments:
Post a Comment