So here at last is one of the two dissatisfying posts on capacitance. It is not very well edited, but if you come back to it next week, you may find it more clearly making some point or other.
Time dilation is most easily handled by having one spiral change at a rate separate from another which allows for the observed gradual transition.
Unfortunately, those type of pre NLC cheats while very effective don't work well with common pont changes.
Likewise having changes occur in one universe separate from another might give a similar effect. However, the points must intersect at a common location, the solution has to originate from a singularity.
1 bit
2x2bits
4x3bits
8x4bits
16x5bits
each change of the 1 bit is equal to 8 common changes of the 4 bit particles. As the 4 bits accelerate they begin to change not with just the 1 bit but with multiple other 1 bit points. Interacting with two separate 1 bit changes would cut the relative change of each one in half.
The "observed" capacitance (compression followed by discharge - sudden in the case of big bangs, gradual in the form of entropy or a combination of both) happens at intersections of spirals and hence there are several ways for this interaction to be effected. One obvious one is gravitational interaction. This is complicated by the fact that mass and distance are illusory and by the fact that distance should approach zero at the point of intersection. Another model is the frictional model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH1--T1g3wY
Friction is complicated because it involves all of the interactions between two intersecting bodies, unlike gravity which is a single force (in this case linearity). Force (measured)=mu times (mass of the object times acceleration due to gravity). This formula works poorly in the spiral model. If you have a spiral and an anti spiral intersecting, presumably the force would be something like gravitational acceleration^2, but gravitation is a function of mass and the effect of gravity incorporates mass and distance which in quantum terms doesn't exist. For this reason we need to replace gravity with the change in information and in this case we have information changing at the same rate in opposite directions. Presumably, this interaction peels off spirals and leaves them stacked up just like the friction of wind or water against sand making ripples or, as they are more fondly known, sand dunes.
Fortunately we exist in a time where everyone has done everything at least once, so we have some derivation models for sand dunes. http://eprints.maths.ox.ac.uk/764/1/cocks.pdf and others for fluids http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/yvonne.stokes/pdfFiles/AFMC.pdf or http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-89465-0_371#page-1 and my personal favorite ftp://ftp.math.ucla.edu/pub/camreport/cam13-51.pdf
The creepy nature of things provides that the formation of dunes occurs in a spiral fashion, but that is more a function of gravity than something otherwise indicative of the process.
The equation that first appears is c (rate of movement-or velocity as I understand it) = A(v^2-B)m/s where A and B are constants and hence not particularly relevant to our inquiry. (note the notation used of ms-1 in the paper a quaint english thing instead of m/s).
Other equations using two dimensional flow (two dimensions are all we need for intersecting spiral theory uses eddy viscosity and vorticity.
An interesting equation using s-the height of the bed relative to some reference height, n is the porosity of the substrate (in the case the spiral being intersected), q is the bedload transport rate and fs is the source function corresponding to the exchange of sediment between the fluid and the bed. Delta is a two dimensional (x and y) differential operator: Delta=(a/dx,a/dy) and the overall equation is (1-n)ds/dt+Delta*q=fs
This type of equation is of interest to us because if instead of a fluid and bed we were looking at grains of higher information concentration within a thin concentration of space. We are not going to find a matching model, but we are looking for the "type of equation" that works in an intersecting spiral capacitance/compression scenario. Fortunately, the compression is a relatively small part of the equation.
The major part is the compression of time followed by expansion which can only be explained where the algorithm for time moving together (53% of the way together) due to the collision of algorithms means that for that 53% of the time necessarily the intersected information states must be occupying the same place and must, therefore, be compressed. How in a point environment and this one in particular you get any compresession at all is important to determine, but is most likely a function, in the multiple universe model, of a sufficient number of the common time states of the different universes/spirals lining up to hit the magic number for stable compressive states. In this regard "stable" has several meanings because entropy (which is nothing more than the discharge of the capacitance) and radiation both show that even what we call "stable" compression is not very stable.
Likely the decompression of space then is the slow separation of the intersection and the slow change of common solutions to the algorithms which occurred as a result of the collision of oppositely moving spirals in this solution. There is also the possibility it results form spiral and anti spirals ct1 states cancelling each other out and then slowly separating so that they each can be effective which would simply be a spiral equation where ct1(tot) at any quantum point would be = ct1(+)+ct1(-) where plus and minus refer to which spiral the ct1 time states were in. The combining of diffferent spiral universes in conformity during the intersection of spirals is a cleaner solution, but either can be incorporated in an algorithm that would work at least some of the time.
So in answer to why this type of solution? Because we are interested in the accumulation of spirals and these perhaps correspond better to the movement of grains of sand then the forces that are generated by spirals which would have to be converted to spirals.
The math doesn't hold any immediate solutions to me. One can almost imagine the more compressed states (ct2, 3, 4 and 5 in our case) interacting with the spiral to create a disruption of the ct1 states causing them to spiral around the larger compressed state just as a wing passing through the air causes a disruption above the wing giving it lift the difference here is that the "friction" of the colliding states loads spirals onto the higher states. CT1 being dimensionless is affected differently from the other states, but the whole idea has to be driven by common algorithm solutions since quantum time states are not moving and dimension remains illusory regardless of how many dimensions are incorporated in the algorithm.
A side note about reactions:
The speed of reactions is very slow. Light speed reactions only occur at speeds that are significant. And yet, any talk of reactions is a discussion of time and time takes on unusual properties in AuT.
Even a discussion of light speed is irrelevant since that is a speed infinitely slow compared to the speed at which the algorithm works by definition which is the logical proof, if not the mathematical one, that light speed is only the distance between quantum changes. It is the difference between x=1 and x=2, nothing more or less. The difference between x=1 and x=3 is double light speed. Since all solutions exist simultaneously, you have the distance between infinitely distant solution simultaneously proven.
For example, looking at the direction of travel of the spirals and talking about our perception of time, you see our time as going in one direction. However, the algorithm solution of quantum moments means the direction of travel is irrelevant because there is no true "movement" in either direction. There is only a solution when x is larger or smaller.
What this means is that Algorithm theory, as it must if Einstein was close to right when he said the only reason for time was so everything didn't happen at once, then the algorithm solves for any time at any x. This means, that Einstein was not exactly right. Time doesn't exist for that purpose because time is only discreet solutions for x and the order that those appear does not affect the algorithm at all. You can solve for x = 1 or 5 zillion and get a relevant solution irregardless of any other solution.
In this way, AuT solves the problem of how you can have an infinite number of spirals and yet solve for any specific moment in any of the spirals which is the same as solving for them all at once since they exist outside of time.
The model includes several features that give us experience, but what we see as the direction of travel of time is not one of them.
The solution including capacitance does appear to be a part. Likewise, the energy of the big bang appears to be an instantaneous solution point where, for example, the direction of a curve changes or where a solution goes from positive to negative. These will be discussed in connection with the math on capacitance, but we do not have a true capacitor because while the energy is built during the frictional type of overlay of oppositely traveling arms of the primary spiral for our universe (understanding the next larger unvierse will have a different primary spiral but will incorporate ours in its solution) meetng at the 55% overlap, we know that during this process spiral arms are loaded onto each other as part of the solution and that certain sub-universes are alligned to create higher ct states (at least 5, probably 6 at the last 'big overlap bang') and that at the end of this process, all of the capacitance that had not achieved stability was released in the form recognized as cosmic background radiation. The solution to this release of energy may be gradual or it may be instantaneous (unlikely but consisten with big bang concepts and with critical point differences), but if the later, it provides a different solution. Either way, despite the huge amounts of energy inherent in such a release, clock time states would remain in tact to the extent they had reached stability, but the energy might provide a mechanism within its solution to split otherwise stable clock time states temporarily meaning that the forces of fusion that we see were necessary to bring them back together. That is, the solution of the algorithm at high energies might have different outcomes than the solution at later points along the spiral.
The big bang that we "think we see" (remember that a constant discharge could provide a similar background echo) does not mean that we exist outside of an overlap period although expansion suggests this to be the case. During the overlap period, the build up of capacitance would likely be reflected by large energies built around the overlap of spirals that is occuring as well as matter build ups, but there is so much more energy in this theory (and space) that the concentrations of matter of a very small fraction of the total amount of information in ct1, 2 and 3.
In such an event we might either be looking at a past big bang before the current discharge big bang occurs, or the big bang may not be a solution at all. What we see as the big bang could be nothing more than background raditiation reflecting this overlap of intersecting spirals. This would be a good solution for two reasons. First, it would allow that the background radiation that we observe could still have a solid explanation that gives it greater consistency during the period of overlap than even a big bang while also allow that at the end of the period of overlap we would have a more expected and gradual discharge.
The capacitance equations usually show a larger initial discharge that would be "big bang like". Expansion indicates a post discharge state, but it remains possible that the background radiation reflects the energy of the capacitance/frictional overlap state and that we are currently experiencing a gradual, not explosive, release of the capacitance which takes two forms. One is expansion through the degredation of partially compressed time and another is a steady return to a neutral state before the period of inactivity reflected in the spiral model before the universe begins to contract under the force of the inward moving spiral. The solution for the contraction period before overlap begins the build up of energy and further compression of space and other ct states to higher stable and unstable ct states would have unusual consequences, for example it could be reflected in features of space time that would consider "backwards" and would include a universe which was contracting due to forces that might not be easily recognizable to us, perhaps an opposite gravity.
In a prior post to, well you know who, I described it as a universe where tiny teacups broken in anguish might reassemble themselves. And perhaps hearts too would mend. Not bloody likely
No comments:
Post a Comment