Part II
Before getting to the section that I call, the Universe in
a nutshell, it is important to note that the concepts behind an algorithm
driven universe are the only ones that matter. Getting specific with the model at this point
in time is not pointless, but the modelling will require comparing theory to observation.
There are key elements to the models:
1) The models are based on the concept that an
algorithm must self generate to produce enough information and complexity to
define a universe as diverse as ours. This
implies a surprising simplicity as well as a combination of simple states to
arrive at something supremely complex, indeed infinitely complex in the
infinite universe spirals envisioned. This
does not rule out intelligent design, it merely states that from our
perspective the most likely way for a universe to arise is from some
spontaneous event. The very existence of
some state that precedes linearity (dimension and apparent time) and the ability
of that state (g-space) to serve as a chalkboard for the algorithm is the mathematical
equivalent of a god saying “let there be light” because the ability to support
the algorithm is creationistic and god-like even if it is a god without
intelligence as we envision it. Indeed
any being that occupied g-space would have to think in a non-linear way which would
defy our intellect.
2) The models must reflect what we observe and must
drive physics as we observe them. The
algorithms must define all the states of clock time that we observe (space,
photonic and wave energy, matter, black hole material) and their interactions
as we observe them and as they are predicted to have functioned in the past.
3) I take shortcuts and make assumptions that do
not necessarily hold even on a superficial level to make a point. The idea of defining what happens at
intersecting spirals using a capacitance or Bernoulli/wave type analysis only
because a similar model can be found somewhere in our observation of the
universe is a good example. We predict
there is build up and discharge because we observe it and this is a model of
compression and discharge. That the math might work well or might not, it is
one of many attempts to smooth out a very rough conceptual model as opposed to
a smooth mathematical model.
4) The gradual change between multiple linear
universes envisioned in AuT as opposed to the single change of a single linear
spiral, might yield, as they are totaled, a curved solution which works better
for some observations than others. It is another way of “smoothing out”
what would otherwise be a rough model. For
example, at the "big bang" and at transitions between inflection
points, our universe may not have to change as abruptly (and tragically) if the
transitions overall define curves due to the stacked universes that are combined
in order to obtain a solution. In the
linear to “smoothed out” curved model, we’d have a gradual transition but there
would still be a single inflection point where the universe would go from
expanding to contracting with little expansions and contractions within the sum
total of space becoming compressed again.
5) Choices are made, often at random. For example, I have decided to build on
smaller to larger spirals instead of spirals which all change in the same way.
In this way you’d have a spiral with one overlap, one with two, one with 3 and
then you’d have these of different amounts of information, two bits, three
bits, six bits a dollar. The idea that
we have our universe spiral with over 10^100 bits and other universes that
might have less than 10 bits in the entire spiral is a way of designing a
changing model only. There is no reason
why at any solution to x each of the universes is not identically the same
length. In such a case, the only thing
that would change is where the solution is occurring along the length of
each. Deciding that a single x solves
for all the universes giving rise to solutions “at a point” is also a choice. Solving these algorithms different ways or
even having evolutions in the algorithm(s) remains as likely as not. Volume II will have to deal with changes in
the algorithms.
Capacitance and
compression
When we look at
capacitance, we are only looking for a mathematical model and not electrical
capacitance. So we're going to go a little further into
this capacitor theory of spiral intersection. What we're doing here is
adding to the algorithm that defines the intersection to include what happens
at the intersection in certain circumstances. We're also going to discuss
why this happens the way it does to some extent and the models in three
dimensional space that define 'inflection points' where the intersection yields
to non-intersection which are not necessarily the equivalent of the very
different places where the sin function changes the direction of the algorithm.
We have defined lengths
of these overlaps and these defined lengths will give us a definition of
"time" for the capacitor equations between t=0 and t=end of the
overlap but we can solve for any quantum moment thereby allowing us to predict
the future or the past at any point.
To understand this, we have
the equivalent of time which is the length along the point of intersection.
This generates a stacking of spirals which we're going to compare to
current over a capacitor. Don't mistake this for actual current because we're
not going to have the same effect. What differences?
Well for one thing,
we're going to achieve stable higher states, not necessarily in every spiral
intersection, but in the big bangs we're going to have the next higher time
state as well as some significant discharge.
So let's take this
analogy down the road a little ways and bear with me, because we're going to be
do lots and lots of substitutions to get from the real world power source, to
the algorithm power source of AuT.
Charging circuit-V/t is
a time (here length) equation starts charging quickly that slows down gradually
until it never quite reaches the charge of the power source. This type of
equation is a good hint that it's driven by the quantum type features that
otherwise define the universe.
V(t)=E(1-e^-t/RC) where E
is the maximum voltage. If you replace voltage with the amount of the
prior information state, This type of formula could reflect how the
intersection of two spirals look coming together.
When the intersection
stops you get a discharge circuit which looks like:
I vs t; current starts
out at the E/Re^-t/RC)
To understand the obvious
differences between the models, it is helpful to look at the capacitor equations
as capacitors.
E is the power source.
t is replaced with length and since we're solving for points we can pick
one anywhere along this equation and solve it for a quantum moment.
RC is the time constant
and is approximately .63 for the charging and .37 for the discharging circuit.
when t=rc then e^-1 is
1/e. e=(1+1/n)n as n approached infinity (in our case the maximum
information in the universe.
Where R is the
Resistence and C is the capacitance. We're not worried about actual
electricity, we're only interested in the "building" of this type
capacity so while we use Voltage, we're actually collecting spirals and they
will, at some point in time (when you get to the non-overlap point [where
overlap ends and which is an inflection point in the equation where charging of
spirals leads to the dicharge of spirals EXCEPT where they have become stable
due to the equation for stability which is essenitally F(n-2,n-1,n-adding
those)^2^n for those accumulations of spirals where stability is attained.
So you derive the
charging as V(t)=E(1-e^-t/RC) and I(0)=E/R(e^-t/RC) and discharging is
V(t)=QRCe^-t/RC and
I(t)=Q/RCe^-t/RC but you don't fully discharge on one end and you discharge
more than you would on the other end. At the ct3-4 interface, this 'discharge'
to the extent there is a discharge, is our friend e=mc^2 but, of course, we
have the other constant previously derived for ct4-5 where the factor (of
course being F(n-2,n-1,n) is M(matter)=BH(blackhole stuff)x(times)q13^2^5 where
q is a constant that makes up for the difference between the constant for the
speed of light and this new constant
Q=EC(1-e^-t/RC)
The capacitor begins to
push back against the power source when it begins to charge.
We're going to need some
information in place of V or Q.
According to the exponential building of exponential amounts of information.
I=sum(from n=0 to
n=infinity (or the total information in the universe)n(factorial) or sum
n!=1+1+2+1*2*3+ etc to n
The next post will include:The Universe in a Nutshell
1
No comments:
Post a Comment