Perhaps in the next two weeks I'll have published the second edition of book 1, with new drawings and much cleared up language.
But for the moment, let's talk about those who are close. Tne information theorists who are not AuT theorists are the subject of this article.
They are open, let's be fair, but the difference is that information theorists tend to look at information as a part of the universe, instead of the result of a very specific underlying design.
I attribute their failure to be on board with AuT the result of two things. The first is that they've never seen it. Reasonable enough. The second might be because the design, being so obvious and simple, is considered at first glance too simple. The beauty to the extent that there is any, in AuT is that it yields a "non-divine" randomly generated universe. This neither rejects nor disproves the idea of god, since the body of pre-existence that holds the algorithm and feeds the single variable is largely consistent with an unfeeling god-like quality.
It neither cares nor controls us, but it does allow for the aspects of the universe that create us.
Anyway, the purpose of this blog is to improve the understanding of ... well everything, and since we're going to use this article for that purpose, let's look at some quotes:
"... that energy spreads to cold objects from hot ones because of the way information spreads between particles."
This is accurate and inaccurate (under AuT for purposes of this post). It is true because the results of the algorithm govern all things, including heat transfer which, of necessity, happens along ct1 exchanges, fundamentally and relative to relative solution order (you have to look at books 1 and 2 for this, although it's covered with some additional pictures for book 1 as amended). It's also covered pretty well in Spirals, 2nd edition.
"According to quantum theory, the physical properties of particles are probabilistic; instead of being representable as 1 or 0, they can have some probability of being 1 and some probability of being 0 at the same time."
Wrong. There is no probability, there is only a solution. Probability just means the non-AuT information theorists see information as something that is part of things, instead of things being the result of information.
Entanglement-This is a troubling aspect of AuT. Matched spiral sets seem to cover some of this, but it isn't true entanglement.
"A central pillar of quantum theory is that the information—the probabilistic 1s and 0s representing particles’ states—is never lost."
Absolutely correct, but still wrong! Of necessity under F-series definitions, the present state of the universe preserves all information about the past, although its relevance becomes less important and the ability to follow it backwards is very difficult because of the offsets inherent and because of how the information is buried and outweighed. Moreover, for any quantum state, the information building it changes as the spirals making it up change. Only fundamental space remains unaffected in this analysis and that is a very small part of what is looked at..
AuT explains exactly how this is accomplished with sequential quantum states.
"Over time, however, as particles interact and become increasingly entangled, information about their individual states spreads and becomes shuffled and shared among more and more particles."
Tue and false. There is a very dense amount of overlap at successively compressed states, but this varies quite a bit, especially since there is compression, what they are talking about and decompression, the opposite result. Moreover, we are actually in a decompression phase and later, only later, with compression of the type they are talking about become the greater force.
There is a lot to come on this article, but this is where we'll stop tonight.
No comments:
Post a Comment