Before finishing up with the Force section, which is largely finished and intuitively complete anyway, I want to chat about some observations in AuT vs Pre-AuT physics. I won't necessarily answer any questions, but I'll deal with some issues presented from an AuT perspective. AuT has now essentially covered the transition, although the equations giving rise to that coverage are primarily dealt with from the mirror and not the image.
The three parts of AuT developed, the building of information, the compression of information and the derivation of forces of information present a unique view of the universe and the goal at this point is to reconcile this view to the point where we can use the results more effectively.
The first article deals with quantum entanglement.
https://skullsinthestars.com/2017/05/06/what-is-quantum-entanglement-part-3-entanglement-at-last/
When we look at "discrete bits of matter" and see the wave qualities, we are seeing what AuT and Einsteinian physics says matter is, wave energy. The difference is that AuT describes this process in terms of information theory alone, while Einsteinian physics looks at it in terms of space time.
The wave elements of matter do exist at the same time as the non-wave elements.
Moreover there is a regular substitution of states meaning that ct3 and ct4 exist togeter especially over the long periods of time in which they are observed.
What we see with magnetism, is that this features of sharing extends around the perceived perimeter. This is not a "probability" matter, but is instead a calculable feature of algorithm solutions. We know that in AuT every point at a quantum moment has a specific place it has to be, just as we know that every point changes at the same rate at the ct1 level since there is onlh one variable. The failure of space time at the ct1 level does not mean that spacetime doesn't exist at the other levels, but it does mean that the very fast changes when time is in place, the 10-37th of a second change, mean that no matter how fast we've looked at change in the past, we're forced to accept an average value of time merely because we can't look at it fast enough (except mathematically) to see anything other than an integrated view of chnge over a high value of x which leads to misleading results.
The problem is that pre-aut, we're stuck with probable outcomes because we are not looking at how the specific outcomes are determined. We are saying, they are force driven and our understanding of forces is limited. In Aut we are saying that forces are the results of mathematical calculations and while based on converging infinite series, they are capable of specific results, at least in theory, impractical because it requires a calculation that is too large to determine with specificity with the technology we are liable to have.
The problem with pre AuT analysis is that quantum analysis fails to recognize that at a short enough time frame, time and space cease to exist.
So on to spin. "Spin of quantum particles is a fixed quantity, based on h-bar (planck's constant) that does not vary but may be positive or negative.
Trying to fit these very large conglomerations of ct4 into some sort of organization begs the question, does spin relate to positive vs negative spirals, compression vs decompression or something totally different? The same analysis applies to what is a positron vrs an election.
Quantum entanglement looking at the relationship between a P/E pair from a single pion fails under AuT analysis, only to the extent that the derivation of states varies according to the prior information giving rise to both the negative and positive states in a spiral pairing, shown in a simplied version below.
A common result in this situation can be coincidental.
Instantaneous change is a necessity since change occurs independent of space time, but why should two ends of the math solution be tied together.
No comments:
Post a Comment