06/14/17: Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 3 aut-Proof-Pi is derived from spiral theory (included out of order)
Now every once in a while, this theory becomes self proving. That is every once in a while I prove to myself that I have come up with the true theory of everything, at least everything in o-space. These proofs tend to be tautologies, i.e. they are correct because they have to be correct, but that does not make them less important.
One example is that e=mc^2 fits with spiral compression theory (F(n)^(2^n); another is that the strong force matches scale of ct5 according to that same compression theory.
Now, one of the missing elements, until to day, was to directly tie F-series expansion to space curvature. I thought I had found this solution, but it was, sadly a math error (a visual error).
To understand a tautology, by way of example, so you'll understand that what you're seeing is of incredible importance, is that if 1 plus 1 equals 2 then 2-1 equals 1. Very simple, but if it were not true we'd have some real problems.
What you are going to see in this post, among other things, is this type of proof that F-series spirals lead to pi as a proof. Fibonacci numbers and space curvature are two completely unrelated concepts, but the relationship still has to be determined.
This theory is About the "Underlying symmetry to quantum mechanics and thermodynamics."
It is Interesting: This work is as exciting as the ancient Greeks, being a product of Parmenides, as rich as the Renaissance, the mathematician being the same one to lay the math that powered that rich time in Italy;
AuT answers virtually all the questions left unanswered by science except those that predate space time but even in failing in this regard, it gives a framework from which to discuss that pre-linear time. It defines the holy grail of physics, super symmetry and by extension things like 'what is dark matter' and 'what is the big bang' but it leaves those glasses broken and less important than the appeared at first. Almost all modern physics is headed toward AuT and as such it may be the most timely of inquiries in that field and in a sense in any field.
Now every once in a while, this theory becomes self proving. That is every once in a while I prove to myself that I have come up with the true theory of everything, at least everything in o-space. These proofs tend to be tautologies, i.e. they are correct because they have to be correct, but that does not make them less important.
One example is that e=mc^2 fits with spiral compression theory (F(n)^(2^n); another is that the strong force matches scale of ct5 according to that same compression theory.
Now, one of the missing elements, until to day, was to directly tie F-series expansion to space curvature. I thought I had found this solution, but it was, sadly a math error (a visual error).
To understand a tautology, by way of example, so you'll understand that what you're seeing is of incredible importance, is that if 1 plus 1 equals 2 then 2-1 equals 1. Very simple, but if it were not true we'd have some real problems.
What you are going to see in this post, among other things, is this type of proof that F-series spirals lead to pi as a proof. Fibonacci numbers and space curvature are two completely unrelated concepts, but the relationship still has to be determined.
This theory is About the "Underlying symmetry to quantum mechanics and thermodynamics."
It is Interesting: This work is as exciting as the ancient Greeks, being a product of Parmenides, as rich as the Renaissance, the mathematician being the same one to lay the math that powered that rich time in Italy;
AuT answers virtually all the questions left unanswered by science except those that predate space time but even in failing in this regard, it gives a framework from which to discuss that pre-linear time. It defines the holy grail of physics, super symmetry and by extension things like 'what is dark matter' and 'what is the big bang' but it leaves those glasses broken and less important than the appeared at first. Almost all modern physics is headed toward AuT and as such it may be the most timely of inquiries in that field and in a sense in any field.
(Specific formulas (f(x)=x^n, 1/x, etc
General Formulas if you have two and act on them you get a result
F(u+v)=u'+v'; (uc)'=u'*c where c is a constant
polynomials require both kinds)
Now we're doing everything in reverse of dimensional mathematics so lets look at another result for movement:
dy/dT=cosT where you're using quantum points together, but in F-series expansions you don't have exact equivalence the increase is between 38.1% and 38.2% in a converging series.
As you are aware pi is an evolving equation set forth with specificity as:
Pi= N+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)]
F(pix)=[(-1)^x]+[2x(-1)^x-1]
The solution to F(pix) converges on 1 from either side. What this equation allows is that you can change N to any number and get a resulting value for pi converging on a different value
| pi for u(2) | pi of N | |
| N for pi | 1 | converges on |
| 1 | % change | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.498402556 | 1.565 |
| 3 | 0.664543524 | 2.355 |
| 4 | 0.749522597 | 3.142 |
| 5 | 0.799491094 | 3.93 |
| 6 | 0.834394904 | 4.71 |
| 7 | 0.859489051 | 5.48 |
F-series expansions you don't have exact equivalence the increase is between 38.1% and 38.2% in a converging series.
The percentage change in the solution to pi more closely reflection N/F(pix) since you get a fraction and the % change of F(x) designated as (FS%) converges on 1 as x goes to infinity as does F(pix) but the rate of convergence of FS% is substantially faster because it results from exponential increases in relative values and F(pix) results from addition.
The growth of the denominator of Fpix is plus 2 (on either side of 1) while the growth in the denominator of FS% is the next number in the F-series.
An examination of these numbers is instructive
| f(pi) |
| n/(n+n/fx) |
| 1.5 |
| 0.833333333 |
| 1.166666667 |
| 0.9 |
| 1.1 |
| 0.928571429 |
| 1.071428571 |
| 0.944444444 |
| Perc ch |
| % FS incr |
| 1.5 |
| 0.833333333 |
| 1.066666667 |
| 0.975 |
| 1.009615385 |
| 0.996336996 |
| 1.00140056 |
| 0.999465241 |
The percentage change in the solution to the F-series converges on 38.2% more or less.
The F-series diverges from 1 to infinity.
F(pi) remains the same for any ct state (F(pi) is the same for 1-1/3 as for 4-4/3.
The Percentage difference (FS%) between sequential FS increases matches the change in f(pix) until x=4 when the FS% accelerates relative to F(pix).
While this is a trick of small numbers (2 and 3) this suggests a transition from F(series) to F(pix) in light of the F(series)
The arclength from p to q where theta (the angle) yields a length that is the sin of the right angle from q down to the baseline of theta.
F(x)^(2^x) or compression number=(f series (sum(n,n-1,n-2))^(2^n)
and
pi=n/[n+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)]
f(pix)=[(-1)^x]+[2x(-1)^x-1]
Pi= N+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)]
f(pix)=[(-1)^x]+[2x(-1)^x-1]
Int(from 0-x)(Ct(n))=Int(0-x)U![Geo(F(n)^(2^n)dx].
a. Dct(m1)*Dct(m2)/[average(ct1)
between m1 and m2]^2
linear-F-series spiral sin function (LFSSSF) which sequentially (as x changes sequentially) define all quantum
points in our universe at any quantum
moment for any value of x. The LFSSSF near present x value and levels
of concentrating being: sum xI(from 0 to
T)[(gsin(pi/2x)x(FseriesFunction)^2^x)+(-gsin(pi/2x(xFseriesFunction)^2^x)]dx
capacitance: V=I(tot(ctx))(1-e^t/rc) where rc represents the forces leading to compression, the limits on
carrier stacking and the ability to maintain carrier stacking between carrier
state changes (as opposed to resistance and capacitance) and ctx is related to the total amount of
information available for compression at any quantum point
Compression can be modeled with the rough general formula C(t)=E(1-e^-t/RC) and decompression is defined by D(t)=QRCe^-t/RC.
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/
We have been looking a derivation of forces from spiral changes, mostly focused on ct1 exchange in the presence of other forces. It continues to be hard to "not say" things like "the strong nuclear force" is the effect of ct5 on ct4 states even though that statement is largely true from our perspective. The problem is that the strong nuclear force is the resulting force observed from high concentrations of ct4 overlap comparable to the ct2 states formed by ct1 in the presencese of ct4 type concentration states. There is a single variable algorithm, solutions are relative, that is concentration is effected by the proximity (solution order) relative to the point in question and at very high concentrations you not only get ct5 but you also get intermediary, active pre-ct5 concentrations. Active in this case means that they change more rapidly and having a different ct1 sharing proportion than the next higher state they mimic but don't fully achieve.
Velocity is ct1 exchange between a system on the ambient information matrix of ct1.
Gravity is the purest form of ct1 exchange, being that exchange that occurs between two ct1 abosrbing bodies. The greater the density (e.g. mass vs photon) the greater the ct1 exchange and the greater relative effect over free ct1 exchange (velocity) but it remains the effect of sharing a common pool of ct1 whether locally or over the universe as a whole.
Heat is ct1 exchange within a system and differentiates from velocity only due to the sharing between common higher states, primarily ct4 and higher, of ct1 within a matrix formed by this exchange. Heat is radiated, so ct1 exchanges of this type can occur over distances. Heat is wave oriented so it must involve ct2 exchange between ct3 states within the ct2 matrix. Photons within a ct4 matrix allow for this rate to increase.
Electromagnatism reflect ct1 exchange within the presence of ct4 and ct1 converts to a temporary ct2 transitional state just as ct4 tranforms to the transitional states of protons and neutrons, proton/electron pairs being the high speed exchange form of neutrons, i.e. the strong force plus heat type exchanges.
There was a break, in the answer, that break has been mended in the second book of the Algorithm Universe series.
We have the model that creates the spirals, the model that compresses and decompresses the spirals and, now, the method by which forces are generated by changes within the spiral solution either for compressed states alone (gravity) or compressed states relative to one another (the other forces).
The assembly of these pieces provides a unique view of the universe, not obtainable by any other analysis.
what we refer to as spirals are really point solutions to spiral equations separated based on order and as we move from on point at a time to two or more the separation of simultaneous solutions adds dimension especially regarding solutions at the same level of the matrix relative to points on a different branch
imagine a current passing through a wire, this is wave length.
if the exchanging ct1 states are to keep up with it, the average travel would be the observed straight line through the middle. While each change is a quantum change is small, the average curvature is exactly what you expect.
you can figure out the way that the forces drive these equations, then look at them in a mirror (backwards) and you're seeing the equations that give rise to the results we experience as reality.
PART 2 The magnetic, strong and weak forces
Prior art from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction
Interaction
|
Current theory
|
Mediators
|
Long-distance behavior
| ||
1038
|
10−15
| ||||
1036
|
1/r^2
|
∞
| |||
Electroweak Theory (EWT)
|
1025
|
e^(-mw,zr)/r
|
10−18
| ||
gravitons (hypothetical)
|
1
|
1/r^2
|
∞
|
The modern (perturbative) quantum mechanical view of the fundamental forces other than gravity is that particles of matter (fermions) do not directly interact with each other, but rather carry a charge, and exchange virtual particles (gauge bosons), which are the interaction carriers or force mediators. For example, photons mediate the interaction of electric charges, and gluons mediate the interaction of color charges.
This focuses primarily on gravity, but since we want to discuss the full effect of ct1 exchange on higher states we must visit these two forces.
If you imagine a coiled wire with a current passing through it, you see the electromagnetic force. This is a strong indicator that the weak force/electromagnetic force is acting on CT3, wave energy.
The “magnetism” is merely the chain of shared ct1 states keeping up with the moving waves as x changes or, if you must, over time.
The “merger” of the weak and electromagnetic forces can be seen (at high energies) of the substitution rate drawing the ct1 states from the surrounding environment to a more proximate location. AuT suggests that at strong energies or high speeds (both are speed, one being vibrational the other ‘straight line movement’) ct1 exchanges are more or less instantaneous and have less of an effect on an extended area in AuT.
The strong force is harder to deal with. As with the electromagnetic force, we get completely away from the boson nonsense. Instead we stick with information theory and the distance (r) effects are based on relative position of the solution which we’ll talk about more related to gravity.
Conversion rates are seductive. The fact that a second is 1.07x10^-39th of a second is suggestive. But the better suggestion is that this is tied to the compression overlap ratio of 3.40x10^38 to one for black holes. This does not mean that every atom is a black hole, it merely means that the algorithm solutions that give rise to compressed ct4 states, matter, generate the same compression ratios as are experienced with black holes. This suggests that while the fundamental state of ct4 states have 4 coordinates changing at a time (1111,2222, etc) that within the algorithm the solutions have 5 coordinates changing at once where multiple fundamental ct4 states are joined together. This would be a type of wave, particle duality but would, instead, be matter, black hole duality. It boggles the mind a little bit but explains the disappearance of ct5 compression outside of the nucleus of the atom.
It is critical to this understanding that we are NOT talking about a force. Force is pre-AuT. We’re talking about a math solution that yields the force. For a nucleus, the solution is yields compression up to five coordinates changing at once. Once the nucleus dimension is breached, that solution hits the inflection point and drops to the ct4 solution. It’s important to note that ct4 solutions need not cease to exist, but they become independent of one another.
PART 3 CT1 substitutions-the Gravity example
Movement and distance, it must be remembered, do not exist in ct1, but in ct2 or any spiral state, you have the necessary relative changes to give rise to space and time. For two masses, we’ll use m1 and m2.
m1=yct1 changes per change in x, m2=zct1 changes per ct1 change and r=n1 where n1 is the number of ct1 changes between m1 and m2 if their locations remain fixed. These are the variable giving rise to the equation above which looks like:
dct1/dx=yct1*zct1/n1^2=y*z/n1^2 for gravity for a fixed system. Now dct1 represents the changes in the center as well as on either side.
d[F(ct1)]/dx=y*z/n1^2
This assumes every other element is equal in the exchange of information since, under the rules of super symmetry, all features affecting the two masses are part of the overall solution. This analysis is the difference between AuT and forces.
integrating gravity over time is a force.
In the quantum end of things integration is not relevant and mainly comes into play if you are looking at a gravitational change which is not immediately instructive of anything.
Differentiation requires that something changes in little bits, quantum mathematics being more or less perfect for this.
In this case what we are doing is not measuring the change in the force of gravity, which isn't a thing anyway, except to the extent that a shadow or reflection is something. Instead, what we are looking at is how, as x changes at the quantum level how ct1, the quantum backbone of the universe, changes relative to higher ct states in a given scenario. This is both simple and not as simple as it sounds.
The ct1 absorption rate for a given system is affected by the entire system. In localized areas, such as our solar system, the rate change varies tremendously, as on the surface of the sun or deep solar system space. But between any two higher states within the system, the exchange rate between them becomes less independent on the remaining portions of the system as they get closer together.
Gravity reflects the ct1 substitution rate and for stable orbits or accumulations (planets or asteroids, for example) the substitution rates are fairly constant. But gravity is affected by the stability or lack thereof of the other substitution rates (ct3,ct2,ct4) that lead to forces, but these rates are substitution rates of the same type, often acting in concert with other substitution rates especially at stable relationships.
The overall substitution rate is heavily dependent on ct1 replacement rates, either shared, creating connectivity, or surrounding, creating movement.
For shared replacement rates, the total ct1 change for a “closed” system creates a gravitational effect for the system and in this way the relative position of a higher ct state has shared ct1 states reflected in connectivity and exchanged ct1 states indicating movement and together, this constant rate change gives the system gravity.
When you look at the gravity equation in this light while you have a constant force of gravity (equal to one ct1 change per change in x), the way that exchange happens can yield a vastly different effect on the mass which is subject to the substitution.
One thing this says is that the gravity function of linearity is directly tied to the exchange of ct1 states with higher ct states. Space has no gravity because it doesn't substitute for itself.
It also says that gravity is only one effect of the information exchange that is always going on for everything. But it also says that gravity is tied to the other manifestations of information change at the quantum level.
The higher state exchanges, for waves, matter and black holes work the same generally but change relative to the scale of the exchange of information.
Hence we have an initial "force" which is actually a reflection of the math solution. The reflection is implied in the AuT definition of force, matter, or anything else. The initial force is ct1 exchange and we see that as gravity. These exchanges occur even with individual quantum ct2,3 and 4 states as a part of the change in the value in x in the underlying algorithm.
In wave forms this is complicated, but not replaced, by the addition of ct2 exchange which occurs less frequently and therefore gives photons and waves the appearance of having the qualities of both when it is clear that they are as distinct as any other things, except that the change from 11 solutions to 111 solution and the resulting continuity of information provides a relative slowing along an access of the ct1 exchange with other ct1 states. Waves "spread out" as a result and different non-photonic results are experienced.
Seriously, you aren't ordering the books?
Seriously, you aren't ordering the books?
No comments:
Post a Comment