60817 Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 5

I have stripped the human gods bare.  I see through the false premises of existence to the supersymetry beyond.  Tonight as I struggled through 2500 yards, maybe a little less as I was swimming for time and may have gone slower than I thought, but the thousand yards IM wasn't missed; there was much that occurred and much which did not occur and I thought of how I was negatively impacted by events, how the universe teased me with everything I wanted but made it hard to reach for reasons I know to be irrelevant.
And I see everything and you know that I see it, but though I see further into truth than anyone alive, I have nothing.

We were talking about this article: 
60817 Quantum information theory and traditional physics vs Aut part 5

http://trendintech.com/2017/05/21/unsolved-mysteries-that-scientists-just-cant-get-to-the-bottom-of/

Let's talk about dark matter in terms of matter that isn't matter and gravity that isn't gravity.
First, in AuT there is no dimension, much less matter or force.
Force is a result.  For example, it is speculated that when compression results in long period of ct4 super compression in the presence of ct5.  This is solution based, in high compression states, ct5, you get super-compression 1111 to 11111 coordinate solutions and these last as the ct4 states move away leaving them as compressed ct4 which we experience as neutrons and electrons.
Likewise when you get ct1 linearity in the presence of massive overlaps of ct1 state you get comparative states between ct1 and ct2 and the result of these separation states, you experience gravity which is more pronounced as there is ct1 sharing between higher compression states; but it is still based on solutons resulting in ct1 substitution and not a separate force.
So when we talk about dark matter being something, what we have to remember is that it is information expressed in some solution and not a thing.
Dark energy is the easier solution because a decompression result is easier to envision than a matter which isn't solid.
Space and the effects of space affected over long periods of time in the presence of high compression may easily account for dark matter but this is only necessary to the extent that dark matter is compressed in certain circumstances.
The idea that light is bent in areas where we believe there to be concentrations of dark matter may just be due to the presence in solution order of ct6 states.  The fact that it may be a super compressed ct1 or space resulting from earlier compression in the presence of a high ct state is also expected.  Let's talk briefly about this in terms of a big bang (note that anyone who is still thinking there is a single big bang needs to buy the book) or read some of the other posts).  In these circumsances during very high compressive states (whether localized or during a big bang) super compression of ct states appears to occur and these compressive states continue and continue to circulate as atomic pairs and as as magnetism and similar mathematical solutions as the combined high compression spirals begin to dispurse during the phases of decompression that we exist in which we also see as dark energy but is merely net decompression which will eventually change to net compression lest the universe continue to expand exponentially.
To call dark matter a particle is nonsense just as looking for bozons is nonsense.  It is attempting to force non dimensional mathematical solutions into dimensional particles.
While we see dimension, it has nothing to do with dark energy except that this decompression state is a result of decompression of spirals and exponential growth of F-series solutions of ct1 without offsetting higher state compression.  When the higher state comrpession is greater than the F-series growth, you get a compressing universe which approaches the big bang inflection point.
Since the “length” measured in quantum states between these “turns” at each carrier state is exponentially higher (almost but not quite double) at each change, the carrier lengths between turns have epoc type lengths and that intersections between intersecting spirals and not turns can play a role in “reversing” the compression/decompression solution theorized in the primary model discussed immediately below.

Substitution becomes a replacement for velocity.  1:256 is light speed.  It is noted that in a slow changing ct4 state, the rate of ct1 substitution remains at 1:256 for the ct1 states that make up the slower carriers at the remove of 3 steps (ct1 substitutions, ct1-ct2, ct2-ct3, ct3-ct4) 
We see the rate of change of ct2 as energy and we see ct1 as having more energy than ct2, but the truth remains that these things are just different forms of information, more specifically different solutions with different substitution rates, the substitution rate for space having not context in time or dimension and therefore difficult for us to understand until it reacts with higher ct states to give a spacetime relevant result.  To say that means that space has "more energy" than anything else is inaccurate.  To say there is more of ct1 than anything else is a tautology because everything else is made of ct1.

The mathematical solution or algorithm solution for the 256 states aligned by one ct1 carrier define a quantum photon or ct2 state.  At first glance it appears that the one ct1 carrier state is added to 255 “carried” states to reach the 256 magic number and that as x changes, each time x changes, there is a substitution so that ct1 is always changing at light speed although other solutions are suggested by the mesh created when higher states are formed.  It can be noted here that ct1 has nothing to substitute with so it does not experience velocity as we understand it, hence the mathematical solutions for space do not include space moving.
Likewise space does not make more of itself, but as x (the single variable) changes the amount of information increases exponentially due to f-series addition.
The idea of virtual particles existing is both accurate and not, because we see these changes as temporary compressive states that give the impression of forces, whether gravitational, electro-magnetic (moreso with magnetic), and the strong force, but this is not dark energy except to the extent that expansion is a result of decompression versus compression as a net effect in the solutions.

Since ct1 (space) is predicted to change based on F-series expansion, one suggestion of higher ct states (ct2, 3, 4) is that the expansion is reflected not with more space but with a higher number of coordinates changing at once (1,11,111,etc.).
While these aspects of the universe are covered in more detail in books 1 or 2, teh imporatnce of these in this context is that the answers to the question raised are not truly answers, but merely a different way of looking at the data.  The AuT way.