Was it hiding at least a little bit? Yes. It was...playful. The Fibonnacci series derives from -1 in this post and in a peculiar way tying durability to a form of curvature.
I was talking with my...my what? Inspiration? Well I was discussing the coy way the weather acts fine as if it were innocent of the brutality to man and I have since found a quote on this (same book):
"The morning broke through flying clouds, with a bitter, wet, west wind rasping the bleak highlands. There were spiteful showers with intervals of mocking sunshine; it was a mischievous and prankish bit of weather, no day for riding. But the Lady was indomitable, so we left the Patriarch in his tent, wrapped ourselves in garments..."
I supppose since it keeps most of us alive most of the time we should not complain too loudly about the weather when it gets interesting, but I dedicate this post to those trappen on highways in mocking sunshing tryying to escapte the terrifying bit of weather that appparently has nothing to do with climate change at least if you are one of those people who still believes climate change denyers.
This post took me a long time to derive, but only because I hve to work on this in my spare time, not because it is complicated. The geo function...I acted like this was some crazy difficult thing. It wasn't. It was sitting there, mischievious; so simple it was prankish in its subtlty. Indeed when I solved for pi it stared at me saying...well, here I am. What are you waiting for? It took several books from that point.
And yet, there is a nuance to it that I have yet to perfectly define. I no longer care very much, because it is now in plain sight. The 32/27, the 1:64, the logarithmic relationship screaming at the top of its lungs, here is your expression of vibrational relationship, cast away your intersecting spirals which troubled you so much, take me, I am your true destiny. Well, maybe I am thinking of something else.
It is staggering in its simplicity, but also in what it shows, entirely consistent with posts years before it, but especially, and quite frankly surprisingly with those which were more recent.
It is the proof that AuT is correct but it ialso the proof of the logic in teh mathematics.
One last note about this derivation. It is very difficult and has not yet been done except in the ct0-ct1 interface. That interface is the most important one and, being non-dimensional, can be solved for a single number in an infinite converging series which is not true of the other derivations. That is why it yields the answer it does, why the ratio is perfect and elegant, alone of all the other ratios and incidently it is why the speeed of light is consistent throughout the higher states in terms of the ratio of substitution.
Finally and again, I'll mention that other than these ramblings about the history, the basis, my reason for living, and quotes, this entire series of posts appears now in book 2 (second edition, please don't make me feel guilty by order the more or less obsolete first edition which I have to eliminate one way or the other) which on kindle is only 2.99 and therefore essentially free unless you are impoverished like me. Further, you can get outside in the holy land for free on Kindle! But that author is dead so he is not so much in need of his royalties as I am and he was both rich and his gods were not dead so I assume his death was not as painful as mine is turning out to be. Of course, he did not solve the basis of the universe as we experience and drag space time from it's hiding place naked and shivering into the light, so that is something.
DERIVATIONS OF SPACE AND MATTER
The
mass energy equation e=mc^2 is a scale equation that may be replaced with this
compression formula 2F(x)^(2^x) where F(x) is the Fibonacci number for x. Here x is 4 and the Fibonacci number for 4 is
2+3=5. The answer to the equation is
10^2^4 or 10^16 which is the scale observed for mass-energy conversions.
This
same formula can be found in the minimum size for a black hole (2(f(5))^(2^5).
The
obvious question answer by AuT is “what are the prior states.” Those states are 1) wave energy (x=3), 2)
photonic energy (x=2), 3) space (x=1).
There is an important pre-dimensional state that is observed
mathematically which is x=0 from which dimensional characteristics are
obtained.
AuT
says that the universe arises from alternating compressive and decompressive
mechanisms originating from a dual state form represented by -1^x in
Mathematics and one element is F(pluspix) (the number that gives you -3,+5,
etc) change converges as a percent change on -1. [-1^x] plus [2x(-1)^x-1].
Ratios
with higher states based around the related dimensional characteristics gives
rise to (1) first dimension and (2) dimensionally recognizable forces and
material manifestations.
The
first ratio is the dimensional definition comparison of Pre-space phenomena
with spatial phenomena. (Note that this is not the same chart as is in the book only because it shows more places).
Pi0 and Pi1 are
derivations of pi for different compression states of information and the
resulting ratio of 1:64 is a critical ratio reflected in higher information
states, such as photonic light, wave energy, matter and black holes.
Pi(x)
refers to pi for different values of the “place” in the F-series (1,11,111,1111,etc
representing one, two, three and four places).
Pi(x)
is defined as f(pluspix) Pi= N+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)] as defined in more
detail in the four books covering AuT.
The
conversion ratio for quantum phenomena (1.185 or 32/27) yields the subsequent
compression state for all future Compression states.
32
is 2^5. 27 is 3^3 so you get this
result:
N^(n+n+1)/(n+1)^(2+1)=ratio
of siny(pi1)/siny(pi0)
N^(2n+1)/(n+1)^(2+1)
This
can also be written:
n^(f(n))/((n+1)^(2+1))
for n=2
Using the logarithmic function (the opposite of
raising one number to the other) to get f(n) out:
Log(b)x/y=log(b)x-log(b)y
Log(b)(x^n)=n(log(b)x)
In
this case that yields f(n)(log(b)x for x=(n+1)^(2^1). In this example, obviously, 1 can be replaced
with n.
It’s worth considering the graph of log(x/y) which is the
picture of dimension being torn from non-dimension: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+logarithm+of+x%5Ey&oq=what+is+the+logarithm+of+x%5Ey&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l4.48886j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8You really should look at that google drawing, it is elegantly beautiful.
No comments:
Post a Comment