How we deal with time

Time is a nothing.
You can say that since it is loosely tied to the quantum moments in the universe (x) that it is something, but it is not.
X doesn't dilate,gravity and velocity are irrelevant to it
History is different for x, but history is why we care about time.
There is much talk in pre-AuT physics about what happens to time when you change the point of reference repeatedly, but not enough talk centers around history.
The ability to run clocks at similar times anywhere within the middle space of the universe and to be able to correct for relative velocities (absolute velocities under AuT since there is not real velocity in super symmetry anymore than pictures in a movie film strip have velocity) leads to the superficial analysis that time is something consistent, but it doesn't even exist except for what we loosely call matter and what AuT calls the electron bundle, the ct3-ct4 transition.
I accidentally wrote a book about this, Notes from Venus.  (are you really plugging one of my books here?).
The idea behind that book is that Venus spins very slowly, maybe in a different direction. That is why it is so hot.

It's the lack of a magnetic field, generated by a liquid iron core spinning.  The clouds (remember nuclear winter) would otherwise keep Venus too cold for life, rather than too hot.  Or maybe not.
The book is about giving Venus a boost.
So lets talk about this time transition and what it means to us and why it is so important to us.
1) History is preserved from one value of x to the next in the ct4-ct4T.
2) The speed of transition depends on how much ct1 is trapped within the system relative to how much is being released from the system.
3) We experience history in the general sense at 790,000 mph so the rate of ct1 emissions are tied to that rate as well as the maximum rate of 1:256 embodied in the first dimension, the ratio of ct1 release to ct2 compression
4) There is a quantum maximum dilution rate tied directly to the sum(2-4)2f(n)^2^n and therefor discretely quantum in nature making time a quantum state (4.29x10^24 ct1 increments at the ct3-ct4 interface, but at the ct4-ct5 interface (molecular time, as it were) this number increases to 1.46x10^63 and a planck analysis yields something in the middle 1x10^42 changes per second which would yield the "second" value as 2/3 of the way to the maximum rate of exchange possible)
5) How these numbers are reconciled is something of a mystery, but part of it may be tied to the diffuse nature of the electron cloud in the ct5 information arm arena.  The proton-electron-neutron interaction along ct5 information arms gives rise to a diffuse history cloud and a diffuse ct1-ct2 exchange cloud the changes the atomic result into a regional result.
6) Interestingly, the average of this result is (24+63/2) between 43.5 (10^43.5) which is right where (hand grenade distance anyway)  planck says it should be.   This is as likely to be a coincidence as an actual feature, but it is worth thinking about since there is not enough information in an atomic cloud to pass on significant history, but in the larger grouping of information, much of the cloud is compressed out of existence into neutrons.  It would be worth looking at the 1:1 to 1:5 ratio of protons to neutrons in stable atomic structures in arriving at this average but it is complicated by the conceptual result that the higher compression states of ct5 eliminate history at the ct5 neutron star level and therefore the type of change that we refer to as time.
7) The point is that real time can be reconciled with the ratio time that AuT requires.