Sunday, July 29, 2018
Saturday, July 28, 2018
Thursday, July 26, 2018
another tequilla thursday
I find myself watching a live webcam in the middle of nowhere in rome where they are cleanin fountain. why?
it is interesting to see people filling water bottles (not from the fountain) and drinking which issort of a weird thing that modern science allows: brought to you by modern science, workman cleaning a fountain and peole drinking water and no privacy anywhere.
It looksrainy, but the picture is not so good that I can really tell.
I finished the 5th edition of book 5 but have not taken steps to publish it yet becxause it has the draft of the patent and I want to work on that a bit, file it and then do the pubication. There are 3 broad areas claimed, btw, one of which, of course, ishow to see into the future. What a wierd thing this is.
I am thinkingthat I am a week, maybe two from that. Will i put anything of substance out in the interim? i dont know, go ask your mother.
its weird because i see some people i might know, but i doubt it. statistically its as likely the guy with the broom is a friend of mine as that the blurry person is someone i know; both pretty remote. still i can watchin every free country in the world what is happening on a web cam somewherein the city. what is that all about?
There is a special on the hill towns of italy, that woudl be interesting. The is a camera on the colleseum, but it is too high up to see anything except in th edistance. it looks sunny adn their are pidgeonflying in and outof the archedopenings. And I click a button adn tehre is the brooklyn bridge, a cloudy day there for sure.
Why arent we in new york together today?
I know what you are thinking, where is the physics. There is none today.
it is early and i have been working on a complicaed problem. if you have not looked atit yet see the recent post marked edited. that one is pretty good.
I just came home early and swam 2000 yards and decided to see what rome looked like, then new york.
time get get back to things.
it is interesting to see people filling water bottles (not from the fountain) and drinking which issort of a weird thing that modern science allows: brought to you by modern science, workman cleaning a fountain and peole drinking water and no privacy anywhere.
It looksrainy, but the picture is not so good that I can really tell.
I finished the 5th edition of book 5 but have not taken steps to publish it yet becxause it has the draft of the patent and I want to work on that a bit, file it and then do the pubication. There are 3 broad areas claimed, btw, one of which, of course, ishow to see into the future. What a wierd thing this is.
I am thinkingthat I am a week, maybe two from that. Will i put anything of substance out in the interim? i dont know, go ask your mother.
its weird because i see some people i might know, but i doubt it. statistically its as likely the guy with the broom is a friend of mine as that the blurry person is someone i know; both pretty remote. still i can watchin every free country in the world what is happening on a web cam somewherein the city. what is that all about?
There is a special on the hill towns of italy, that woudl be interesting. The is a camera on the colleseum, but it is too high up to see anything except in th edistance. it looks sunny adn their are pidgeonflying in and outof the archedopenings. And I click a button adn tehre is the brooklyn bridge, a cloudy day there for sure.
Why arent we in new york together today?
I know what you are thinking, where is the physics. There is none today.
it is early and i have been working on a complicaed problem. if you have not looked atit yet see the recent post marked edited. that one is pretty good.
I just came home early and swam 2000 yards and decided to see what rome looked like, then new york.
time get get back to things.
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
the fortune tellers
the last posts on gravity was so very far ahead of its time i can tell you are not paying attention for lack of comment. it is disappointing. Of course, if you really understood it you would have dropped off in a dead faint, so maybe you haven't woken up yet.
I am getting back to writing again.
I decided to insert some of my notes below. Since I'm writing a polished version of nostradamus and moving it to new york, i decided to add several sections on palmistry or whatever the hell its called.
You'll get the idea from what follows.
I am suffering from a touch of tuberculosis this morning, or something that feels like it, not an cold-illness, something deeper and more permanent. But I feel pretty good about some things, not you and I, but some things. I always worry that in the middle of the breakthroughs represented by books 3 and 4 I will suddenly drop dead and it will all be lost, but they are both published now, at least in eletronic form, so I can relax a little.
love so strong b/c it has already withstood the test of time
cannot escape because it is built into the solution
REINCARNATION:
just as we scrape by on the surface so is that were recombination occurs because lower states happen on the outersurface of compressed states.
curse you to forget for not staying with me
marr-father of guy, alreadyknows he is coming along
FIRST FORTUNE TELLER GHOST
this one is no good she says noting the threadbear cloths
try i am running out of time'
the internet tycoon, he is the one for you
or the doctor
not this one
seduces
he rejects and she gets steadily uglier (could this be the last one? no)
three ghosts, to get him to redemption (past, present and future?) that might work well here.
skips ahead when they are separated to last one
We can do these through the eyes of an investigating police officer
From a list she produces. "We start with 1 and go to the end. This is number 1"
let's stop here.
there was a nice apartment, with beautiful red awnings
it was a rare three story stand alone
the pleasantness of the look, the fresh flowers in planters was offset by a garish sign. Madame Z, it read.
"A palm reader?"
"Are you afraid of fortune tellers?"
"No, but it's..." I was about to say 'ridiculous,' but looking at here it seemed like it was some sort of test. What was the right answer. The best answer was the one that worked either way, sarcastically I said, "such a good idea."
Inside it was a neat and polished as it was outside.
Comfortable couches, a receptionists desk and after a minute a a young girl dressed professionally except perhaps the ring through her left nostril, although perhaps that qualified as professional.
"Dike!" she almost skipped
"Hello Hellen. Is Madame Z in?"
"No, but she will be back shortly, can I get you some tea? Both of you?" She apparently had just noticed Miken.
Yes, we will wait.
The faint sound of a door opening in back and the receptionist disappeared.
We were ushered into a room in back, the feel was more like a spa, clean smelling in an antiseptic way, tissues, a chair and a sofa, like a psychiatrist's room than a medium's imagined darkened room, covers over the lamps, crystal, that would come later, along with the discomfort and half hidden fears that accompany looking into the dead past and the fearsome future. (see section on aging not being necessary). A woman was there, older, but very lovely. Her thick blond hair looked like she had just come from the hair dresser which she probably had. She was wearing a sleek black, fasionable dress with jewlry which, if large, would not have been out of place in an art museum, showing off surprisingly low cut dress design.
SECOND FOTUNE TELLE GHOST
One tries to seduce him and very nearly succeeds.
Then maybe she tries to kill them.
Notes ON FORTUNE TELLERS
less quack like as they degrade in quality, people do not like paying for what they do not want to hear.
united kingdom, pompus, a kingdom, the dominium of a king
there was the egyptian kingdom, the dominion of rome, even that of the russian dictators and yes, at one time of england itself, but now it clings to the title which no longer applies.
LAST GHOST
The last one shows him who he was, shows reincarnation as a part of reshuffling, maybe we can show that he was Marrr/lover character
SETTING NOTES
traditional crystal ball on a table
astonomer's lair, instruments which seemed to have no purpose
dingy room, dirty. either a cat or a large rat scurried past
a single candle and a bowl with water in it
Stay tuned that will all turn up in the rewrite of Nostradamus coming in August maybe.
More deleted stuff, the first paragraph I put into one of my books.
"The insult is inevitable death, but the knife twist is irony embodied in idle superstitions and demigods who plague us. The algorithm hides like monster clown who knows it can strike with impunity when it wishes rather than cowering like a scared child. It reserves that fate for us." c/r who know when, all right reserved.
This process involves a prearranged solution, an inevitable solution that uses the resulting ct1-ct2 carrier represented by 4 information arms which allow for offset positive and negative (presumably compression) ct1 states to combine. The first arm accepts a first ct1 state with each change in x. 4 of these ct1 states combine to make the second arm while continuing with each change in x to accept a new ct1 state on the first arm. This process continues on the third arm where 4 of the 4 ct1 unit arms comprised of 16 ct0 states forms the 64 and 64^4 state solutions. The final information arm built out at 256 represents a stable, but constantly changing ct2 state which is semi-neutral in that it is the state that doesn’t show the features of electromagnetism presumably shown in the transitional states. There is, necessarily one ct1 change from surrounding space for each second, although not necessarily for each value of x, which is seen as light speed velocity.
I am getting back to writing again.
I decided to insert some of my notes below. Since I'm writing a polished version of nostradamus and moving it to new york, i decided to add several sections on palmistry or whatever the hell its called.
You'll get the idea from what follows.
I am suffering from a touch of tuberculosis this morning, or something that feels like it, not an cold-illness, something deeper and more permanent. But I feel pretty good about some things, not you and I, but some things. I always worry that in the middle of the breakthroughs represented by books 3 and 4 I will suddenly drop dead and it will all be lost, but they are both published now, at least in eletronic form, so I can relax a little.
love so strong b/c it has already withstood the test of time
cannot escape because it is built into the solution
REINCARNATION:
just as we scrape by on the surface so is that were recombination occurs because lower states happen on the outersurface of compressed states.
curse you to forget for not staying with me
marr-father of guy, alreadyknows he is coming along
FIRST FORTUNE TELLER GHOST
this one is no good she says noting the threadbear cloths
try i am running out of time'
the internet tycoon, he is the one for you
or the doctor
not this one
seduces
he rejects and she gets steadily uglier (could this be the last one? no)
three ghosts, to get him to redemption (past, present and future?) that might work well here.
skips ahead when they are separated to last one
We can do these through the eyes of an investigating police officer
From a list she produces. "We start with 1 and go to the end. This is number 1"
let's stop here.
there was a nice apartment, with beautiful red awnings
it was a rare three story stand alone
the pleasantness of the look, the fresh flowers in planters was offset by a garish sign. Madame Z, it read.
"A palm reader?"
"Are you afraid of fortune tellers?"
"No, but it's..." I was about to say 'ridiculous,' but looking at here it seemed like it was some sort of test. What was the right answer. The best answer was the one that worked either way, sarcastically I said, "such a good idea."
Inside it was a neat and polished as it was outside.
Comfortable couches, a receptionists desk and after a minute a a young girl dressed professionally except perhaps the ring through her left nostril, although perhaps that qualified as professional.
"Dike!" she almost skipped
"Hello Hellen. Is Madame Z in?"
"No, but she will be back shortly, can I get you some tea? Both of you?" She apparently had just noticed Miken.
Yes, we will wait.
The faint sound of a door opening in back and the receptionist disappeared.
We were ushered into a room in back, the feel was more like a spa, clean smelling in an antiseptic way, tissues, a chair and a sofa, like a psychiatrist's room than a medium's imagined darkened room, covers over the lamps, crystal, that would come later, along with the discomfort and half hidden fears that accompany looking into the dead past and the fearsome future. (see section on aging not being necessary). A woman was there, older, but very lovely. Her thick blond hair looked like she had just come from the hair dresser which she probably had. She was wearing a sleek black, fasionable dress with jewlry which, if large, would not have been out of place in an art museum, showing off surprisingly low cut dress design.
SECOND FOTUNE TELLE GHOST
One tries to seduce him and very nearly succeeds.
Then maybe she tries to kill them.
Notes ON FORTUNE TELLERS
less quack like as they degrade in quality, people do not like paying for what they do not want to hear.
united kingdom, pompus, a kingdom, the dominium of a king
there was the egyptian kingdom, the dominion of rome, even that of the russian dictators and yes, at one time of england itself, but now it clings to the title which no longer applies.
LAST GHOST
The last one shows him who he was, shows reincarnation as a part of reshuffling, maybe we can show that he was Marrr/lover character
SETTING NOTES
traditional crystal ball on a table
astonomer's lair, instruments which seemed to have no purpose
dingy room, dirty. either a cat or a large rat scurried past
a single candle and a bowl with water in it
Stay tuned that will all turn up in the rewrite of Nostradamus coming in August maybe.
More deleted stuff, the first paragraph I put into one of my books.
"The insult is inevitable death, but the knife twist is irony embodied in idle superstitions and demigods who plague us. The algorithm hides like monster clown who knows it can strike with impunity when it wishes rather than cowering like a scared child. It reserves that fate for us." c/r who know when, all right reserved.
This process involves a prearranged solution, an inevitable solution that uses the resulting ct1-ct2 carrier represented by 4 information arms which allow for offset positive and negative (presumably compression) ct1 states to combine. The first arm accepts a first ct1 state with each change in x. 4 of these ct1 states combine to make the second arm while continuing with each change in x to accept a new ct1 state on the first arm. This process continues on the third arm where 4 of the 4 ct1 unit arms comprised of 16 ct0 states forms the 64 and 64^4 state solutions. The final information arm built out at 256 represents a stable, but constantly changing ct2 state which is semi-neutral in that it is the state that doesn’t show the features of electromagnetism presumably shown in the transitional states. There is, necessarily one ct1 change from surrounding space for each second, although not necessarily for each value of x, which is seen as light speed velocity.
It has long been understood that matter and energy are
exchangeable, but there is no prior model that shows energy to be
interchangeable with space or to describe space with such particularity that
its role in expansion and contraction, in positive and negative, in matter and
antimatter, gravity and dark energy with total clarity, even to the point of
explaining why the two exist and on what mathematical structure they rely.
Force, one of the holdouts of prior theories, what drives
the reactions and the universe itself is eliminated in favor of a system which
is unified, both delivering and rendering irrelevant the idea of a unified
field theory. That UFT is replaced with a symmetry that is so basic that
even entropy is eliminated from the system of thermodynamics. Indeed,
thermodynamics is eliminated except as an effect, not a cause.
One of the recent features to come into play is the one
that involves inflection points generated not by intersecting spirals, but by
shifts between positive and negative underlying carrier states represented as
ct1 carriers with lifespans built around the underlying building blocks to pi.
It has long been understood that matter and energy are
exchangeable, but there is no prior model that shows energy to be
interchangeable with space or to describe space with such particularity that
its role in expansion and contraction, in positive and negative, in matter and
antimatter, gravity and dark energy with total clarity, even to the point of
explaining why the two exist and on what mathematical structure they rely.
Force, one of the holdouts of prior theories, what drives
the reactions and the universe itself is eliminated in favor of a system which
is unified, both delivering and rendering irrelevant the idea of a unified
field theory. That UFT is replaced with a symmetry that is so basic that
even entropy is eliminated from the system of thermodynamics. Indeed,
thermodynamics is eliminated except as an effect, not a cause.
One of the recent features to come into play is the one
that involves inflection points generated not by intersecting spirals, but by
shifts between positive and negative underlying carrier states represented as
ct1 carriers with lifespans built around the underlying building blocks to pi.
If the
spirals are only offset by solution order at higher ct states (ct2,3,4,etc)
then you have a resting phase built into spiral solutions that are not built
into vibrational models, but this can be made up where balanced changes occur
in higher states so that the conversion to net positive is, over a period of
time, equal to conversion to net negative of other features.
A vibrational model can shift to an
informational model and an informational model can shift to a spiral model and
the number of spirals can shift.
Each length of space continues to
exist in a time free environment so that you have space with
expansion/contraction phases of 1, 11,111,11111 all existing together. The stacking of these can occur with various
half lives (designated as the number of points of overlap of common solution
type between positive and negative.
This can vary from 1 point of overlap (a half life of
stacking too short to have relevance) to extremely long half lives which are,
from our vantage point, forever, even though they are finite, presumably in the
range of 14 billion years worth of overlap from the viewpoint of a ct4 state.
In
this example of folding, the first spiral would occur when there was a 2^n
compression level of 256 ct1 states overlapping at once. This might start
when there were 256 “1” states leading to a first state of linearity which
would increase without dimension but would form ct2 states which could curve
until the next level of overlap,
The interplay of dimensional features (-1 driven) and
F-series features (f(N) driven) above the ct0-ct1 interface results in a
transitional result and leads to the tendency towards and away from
compression, gravity, quantum phenomena, and information growth at this initial
stage. The relationship between the F-series and dimensional features
arises immediately at this point. There is a beautiful moment here where
f(n) and -1 intersect and depart from one another that creates the entire
universe in a magnificent, but very minor transition based on the model of
converging and diverging infinite series that has so long been at the core of
AuT, and even intersecting spiral models of AuT. It is the point where god's
hand touches Adam's at the Sistine chapel.
It's worth looking at this, the famous
gap, because this moment in AuT has a gap in it. The transition between
these two is uneven, they do not quite join and yet the gap, 0', is where
everything springs from. One can imagine the artist, being so much closer
to Parmenides, seeing the failure of geometry at that point and realizing in
his art that there was something so much more important between o space and g
space and displaying it so cleverly, hidden in plain sight.
The
focus on converging spirals is not a driving feature, but there are resulting
gravitational and predict anti-gravitational spirals formed from non-linear pre-dimensional
“space” impacted by converging series.
Deleted stuff from book 3 (back to editing it down).
1. Time in a bottle 7 summary
2.
Time in a bottle 5 Imbalance
1.
Holograms
Deleted stuff from book 3 (back to editing it down).
1. Time in a bottle 7 summary
1) The dimensional aspects of
the universe universe is built on a Fibonacci 0,1,1,2 type base algorithm
on which are built on 0,1,1,0 cycle space type information designated at
ct1.
2) pi broken into its component parts is comprised of
positive and negative quantum solutions separated by solution order.
3) Force and matter are a reflection of and not cause of the algorithm. All secondary quantum are formed by adding
the prior quantum, then compressed states, together as an F-series with each
having a resulting carrier f-series. The
entire arrangement allows for the universe to vary according to a single variable.
4) Space is a dimensionless matrix known as ct1 separated by
time and dimension independent solution order.
All dimensional aspects including force result from relative solution order and solution density relative to the
nondimensionalize ct1 space.
5) At certain concentrations,
multiple lower ct states (here ct1) fold to form F-series stacked or compressed
states (11,11,22) which are initially photonic cells associated with two places
of solution at one time with different scales of compression or linearity for
each place/state.
6) This method of compression associated with a
reduced number of ct1 states 111,222,333 for ct3 (wave energy) and so on for
matter ct4 (2222,3333,555), black hole material ct5 (abreviated3+5+8) for f(n),
and so on.
7) Intermediate compression
forces are present which create transitional states having the effects of the
next higher state for the next lower state seen, for example, as magnetism for
ct2 transitioning to ct3; the weak magnetic force for ct3 transitioning to ct4,
and the strong nuclear force for ct4 transitioning to ct5.
8) Separation and Curvature of
space is defined by offsetting by solution order and by the defining series for
pi (fpix) which creates alternating positive and negative solutions which interact
to converge or diverge from solutions of near solution order common density.
9) To determine compression
and expansion of the entire universe inflection points are defined by net
expansion or compression at an inflection point changing with the continually
changing separation and curvature of space and its component higher ct states.
10)The universe does not
completely compress or expand but moves according to infinite converging or
diverging series represented by the changing value of pi for different ct states
and the f-series diverging growth of information and the F(n) function
compression of information.
11)One feature suggested is
that ct3 would have a universe that appeared two dimensional and ct2 would have
a one-dimensional view of things. CT1,
being the relative state of information would not have a dimensional time view
but would only “see things” from the changing value of x. There being no “stacking” at the ct1 state,
there would be no history at all.
History, like time and dimension is merely an illusion and the illusion
becomes more pronounced with increased compression.
12) The “length” of spiral changes necessary to
achieve the type of relativity that we observe is very high which is why
shorter-term universes either don’t have higher ct states or they don’t matter
much because they do not last long. The
series 1,1,2,3,5,etc gets large rather quickly, but to get a post inflection
point universe in the expansion stage that last 16 billion years at 1 change
every 1.07x10^-39th of a second (16b*1.07x10^39x60x60x24x365) you
have to have half that many expanding inflection points at the very end of the
universe (or it wouldn’t have kept expanding for so long) which means a value
of x at the termination of the universe with a stacking function that creates a
false sense of durability due to the enormous size of “our” post inflection
point universe at the point where the next post compression inflection point
solution begins to take the universe back to the big bang point of the
expansion inflection point. This doesn’t
change “age” but if the F-series expansion of information holds true, the
change is x is enormous. The conceptual
frame work of these enormous changes is that the % of space gradually decreases
towards but never reaching zero in an infinite converging series, while the
amount of space steadily increases, the difference being taken up in steadily
larger ct states in a infinite diverging series both based on the F-series and
giving the impression that we currently hold of size (even minimum size like
Planck length) and dimension (two sides of the same coin) and movement.
The "CT1"
that has to change to provide velocity and which changes to slow the
"aging process" observed when CT1 changes occur relative to higher
time states has to be positional in nature and not a function of the observed
absence of other things.
The obviousness of
this solution is observed in Newtonian physics.
Dx/dt is the definition of velocity. This dx we call
dimensional changes while dt is time. The higher dx, the slower the aging
and the faster the velocity. In relativity as dx approaches infinity or
dt approaches zero a phase change to energy is observed and the operational
limit of the relationship is the speed of light (e=mc^2 is the equation for the
relationship). In AuT this relationship
has to do with the number of ct1 changes or the amount of sharing of ct1 along
a carrier having an F-series length for any given ct3 change or along a ct3
carrier having an number of F-series lengths corresponding to the number of ct4
state changes per transition.
Dt in AuT is
closely related, being a change based on the number of ct1 changes or changes
along the F-series carrier for the next lower ct state which in turn is
governed by, but not equivalent to the changing value of x which is a quantum
variable in the algorithm, meaning it changes one unit at a time and is
observed by us as around 1.07X10^-39th of a second, the definition of an
instant.
AuT suggests that
this fraction of a second is more directly tied to 1 ct1 substitution per 256
ct2 states and is also reflected by the number of quantum lengths reflected by
this ratio along a ct3 F-series carrier before a change in the carrier causes
the aligned ct4 states to separate from the ct3 state carrier.
So dt is not true
time but derives from x, ct1 substitution, quantum changes along the ct2 carrier
(formed by f-series stacking of ct2 states), and quantum changes along several
ct3 carriers (formed in the same fashion).
Dx is not
dimensional in AuT. Instead it is a solution to algorithm for any quantum
unit of any ct space relative to lower ct solutions because they are added
together as an F-series so each informational bit for any value of x is that
bit's position compared to the lower states in one quantum state universe formed
from the combined prior quantum state universes using an f-series expansion.
Position at
x=solution at x-1 plus solution at x-2 for the algorithm.
Hence, the position for any solution to CT1 is achieved in
the same manner as the solution for ct4 so the emptiness in the bottle is
undergoing the same changes in position as the bottle itself. The space,
however, does not age while the ball in the bottle does. This means the
aging process is relative to the changing position solutions for the higher ct
state compared to the lower ct1 states.
CT1 in the bottle,
must change with every solution for x and that change is the same no matter how
fast the bottle is accelerated.
This means that ct1
is not space, whatever “space” is supposed to be. CT1 is a type of information generated by the
most basic solution for the matrix which when substituted for higher states
defines movement from one quantum instant to the next in terms of changing ct1
and the resultant higher changes between photons, waves and matter.
The idea of time
crystals (below) is absurd in AuT, but not because the idea is out of the
question, but because what they are looking at (according to AuT) is Ct1, a
time state free of thermodynamics, but they have not yet been able to release
thermodynamics so they continue to try to force their mathematics into a space
time phenomenon. In space time, ct1
change is constant, related to x and hence each point changes, whether within
the thermodynamic framework or outside of it.
2.
Time in a bottle 5 Imbalance
Aut shows
(1) the universe is not in balance, being based on converging and diverging
infinite series. (2) The closely related
reflection that we call thermodynamics is an illusion.
Entropy or
Disorder reflects a universe where ordered states exist in an imbalanced
environment, but the imbalance tends towards a greater order so that there is a
gradual move away from entropy over very large values of x.
1.
Holograms
The problem with Hologram theory was that it depended on
geometry and hence necessarily failed the Einstein and Parmenides tests, the
first dealing with the need to exclude time, the second needed to isolate
dimension.
The idea that two-dimensional
information creates the universe, so the words are their even though the use of
those words is incorrect. What this
really reflects is that as you move farther back towards quantum states, you
begin to eliminate dimensions in AuT because by definition, the number of
coordinates changing at once correlates directly with the number of dimensions
experienced.
The blanket acceptance of the big bang
as the beginning of the universe is rejected completely by AuT. AuT tells us that radiation sources dating
from the last inflection point reflects where things were at that inflection
point and should be examined not as evidence of a single big bang which is
essentially nonsense and instead should be studied to see what it shows us
about the inflection point at the beginning of the current expansion or
decompression phase of the universe.
Sunday, July 22, 2018
Sunday all over again, puppets, physics and I lost in time (edited)
This post has been substantially rewritten and added to the 5th edition of book 3
Am i really so out of touch that I am confusing saturday and sunday? obviously the answer is yes. It was a busy couple of days.
I have been thinking so much about you, it is something of a miracle that I haven't walked into more walls that I have. That, however, will have to wait.
AuT goes beyond prior theories in many ways, covered in the books in detail and one of the prior posts in 12 snippets. It eliminates the need for unifying principles although it shows how unification would occur.
It shows a world which is independent of time and with dimensions which vary according to the needs of the underlying mathematical solutions.
Now I have undertaken, having reached a point of some certainty as to the basic principles, where I am seeking to find a way of practical utilization of the science that operates below the level that we experience and which controls us as opposed to us controlling it. The whole idea is difficult to imagine, it is the idea of the puppet somehow manipulating the puppeteer.
A discussion of the plasma reaction:
Looking at articles like this one might hold some clues, but what is the issue here?
Phys.org: No more zigzags: Scientists uncover mechanism that stabilizes fusion plasmas. https://phys.org/news/2018-07-zigzags-scientists-uncover-mechanism-stabilizes.html
I did not get how the mixer works to maintain the flatness of the current and prevent the sawtooth instability
from forming.
Sawtooth refers to the plasma temperature and density zigzagging up and down.
The idea of preventing this ct3-ct4 event in check is much easier than any ct2 feature, but introducing a high amount of ct2-ct3 states into a system to maintain the fusuion temperatures in such a way as to offset the stablizing or destablizing features should be easier if the specific goals defined by AuT are understood.
The real issue is time or rather the absence of time.
If you look at any of the past genius of physics, Parmenides, Newton, Dirac, Lorentz, Einstein, Bohr and others leading up to me (not really a genius, but quite the hack) the one place they all erred in common was loading everything with dx/dt, the change with respect to time. Pure physics looked at static changes, levers fixed in place, architecture. The moment dynamics were introduced into the system it fell apart. Position in space is accurate, the orbits of positions is not.
In looking for a way to reconcile what is observed from what lies beneath, the results were blurred by this fascination with including something that does not even exist at the quantum level.
The idea of matter and anti-matter is a good example of where the confusion lies.
If you look at a solution to ct3-ct4 phenomena over time you come up with matter and anti-matter.
If you look at these same phenomena without time you get a set of solutions which are moving towards or away from compression. But what does it mean to be moving towards or away from compression. Without time, that means you have to look at the net change in ct1 states that affect the two different states. It is worth noting that in a quantum instant, there is no difference between matter and antimatter. They have the same weight, the same makeup, there is no charge difference because charge is the change in ct2-ct3 loading over changes in x and from our perspective over time although many of those changes can occur before time from an observer changes because time is a higher effect.
If you take Dirac's equation, before you can truly interpret the universe with it, you must remove one of its most fundamental features, not time, but dimension.
Dirac's equation actually makes a stab in this direction by separating space-time into coordinate sets, but it then tries to reconcile them into the dimension from which we experience things which is time and space together; space to reconcile the co-existing different dimensional mathematical results and time to give these shifting results perspective.
Worse still, Dirac's equation focuses on only one aspect of what is being examined, thereby confusing the other elements as part of this primary portion, the mass-wave relationship. I intend to say mass-wave and not mass-energy because mass-energy includes an examination of the two excluded element, photon-wave and space-photon interactions. They way that all physics from Newton forward deal with these pre-time elements is to ignore them, to attempt to wrap them into the gross equation which overshadows them (the polynomial highest factor approximation) and allows All those named physicsts to approximate their way from the correct solution with mathematical tools of varying complexity, in Dirac's case, the multi-dimensional matrix of varying complexity. The only significant problem with Dirac's equation is that it does not fully comprehend that the four matrix (three of dimension and one of time) solution recognized without admitting that the four different solutions co-exist independently.
Stay with me here. If you write out Dirac in this fashion (from Wikipedia) you get:
Ad(z) and Bd(y) obviously have time problems because they change, but that is a defect and not a point of convergence. What this version of Dirac says clearly is that the different dimensional states co-exist. The can be given properties over time that entangle them, but at quantum instances, they are separate parts of the whole.
The Dirac Sea and Electron Bundle are two ways of looking at the same thing and serve as a good example of where the two theories diverge (or converge).
In Dirac's case he is trapped with time and all of its accompanying features, momentum being primary among them. We also have Newton crop up, with his grossly misleading object at rest observations which are entirely applicable to the world of the puppet but which are erroneous from the view of the puppeteers. Why? Momentum is a feature of net entropy, unfolding of space. Since that can change based on the change in the underlying ct1 fuse states, it is not even right. Inflection points have to be dealt with and rather than eliminating time and dimension at that level, Newton, Dirac and the others merely created a new form of elements.
In the same way the Dirac Sea is an approximation over time of solutions. All these solution locations are given an equal weight to approximate the right answer. The electron bundle is a little different. There is no sum over time because there is no time. There is no dimension per say either although AuT like all other theories stumbles onto those hidden shoals far too often. Instead the electron bundle refers to specific quantum states folded together.
You have the atom's ct1 states, static but capable of movement in either direction (fusion or fission is not the result of this movement, instead it is towards or away from compression); you have the ct2 states of one dimension which give a charge over time to the system and have the effect of charge potential based on the constituent ct1 state make-up fuse wise, the ct3 states of two dimensions which are the first part recognized by Dirac and the third dimensional ct3-ct4 transition states. Note that I don't use ct4 pure states because Dirac uses our "perspective" and that includes time and that is part of the transition and not the flat ct4 neutron state except to the extent it is in transition. Since it is constantly in transition like everything else moving, may seem like an irrelevant distinction, but as long as time is a factor, ct4 states and ct5 states serve the primary purpose of concentration the ct3-ct4 states sufficiently so that they can exchange higher ct3 states instead of lower ct1 states to create the clouds of time (ct3 states changing with respect to ct1 movement based on net decompression presently) which allows for the more or less shared time experiences which so confused all of the physicists.
As can more or less readily be seen, the equation on the left embodies the mass-energy conversion, but in attempting to explain it has been broken out into the different dimensional features that co-exist. The offshoot of this is that if you ignore the time component, you are left with three dimensional coordinates which can be solved separately.
The next problem that has to be dealt with is the weighing of those dimensional features but they are folded together so that we see them as common features.
This brings us to QED and its problems with space which has the same problem as Dirac's equation. QED is the idea that space is potential and that particles can be formed from the transitions of this potential. This is frighteningly close to AuT and still wrong because of time in part and a misunderstanding of the potential in part. Let's jump into this stew. Both say that space is full, but not only AuT explains why.
QED requires time to work. You have to average solutions to get a result.
AuT says that space has potential, like QED, but it explains the potential using the features of the ether that makes up space.
QED makes equal amounts of particle and antiparticle because the potential is balanced. AuT makes either a particle or antiparticle in an unbalanced result based on the direction in which compression occurs and in a stepwise fashion which is invisible to QED because QED is trapped in time based phenomena and the changes from space to photon to wave are time independent.
The matter-antimatter are less about charge and more about pairing in AuT. If you have two solutions which do not pair properly they fail to compress. This feature is carried farther into higher states and ultimately drive the universe through folding and unfolding in the fashion that I mentioned should make you faint and from which I used a grossly out of date figure.
I pointed out in reference to this figure that if 13 decompressed, 8 and 34 would lose their continuity and go from, say, a pure neutron to a transitional state, electron and proton type.
Looking at the drawing above, this can be seen at the ct4 level as one of the ct3 states breaking down into ct2 and thereby increasing the amount of ct2 in the system. If one imagined a sea of unwinding (or winding if you'd like) ct1 states dragging two ct4 states together, if the result over many changes of x is to degrade these states which in their decomposed cloud versions (as electron/positron pairs for example) in such a way as to get a complete breakdown, energy is release, potentially photons and space are released and this unfolding is not an result, but is instead the driving force, the puppeteer's strings driving the movement of the atomic puppet and if it did not mention we would not move and Dirac's matter/antimatter exchange is movement and time. There is conversion (not annihilation) of matter and energy; but it is puppet conversion; AuT puppeteer changes are merely solutions where this "order" of underlying states varies gradually over values of x and the "quantum foam" of Dirac is a complete ct1 solid of such density that it cannot exist as spatially separated, but is, instead, a line of solutions folded to give the impression of dimension instead of the "solid" space of puppeteer reality.
The quantum of change inherent in every point being shown on the left as something that can be shown as fixed potential by the various folded dimensional states.
Most of the physicists who I know of that follow this initial group just further confused things. The problem is that AuT solutions allow for many different interactions along full and even partial information arms at various ct levels and describe why the idea of photons as light vs waves as light is at best confusing and misleading in the extreme, being two very different things whose connection is that they interchange through folding and unfolding and one can be viewed in terms of time and the other cannot. Indeed Gehlman and Feynman totally confused mathematics with estimation based on time creating the whole universe of Quarks where estimations of what would become AuT creates particles in place of mathematical solutions; the gross mistake of particle acceleration, that changes over time and with great velocity change what happens in quantum moments which is independent of those speeds.
It took AuT to show that what Descartes insight taught clearly over 400 years ago and which Einstein, Marley and Michelson accidentally derailed at the turn of the 18th to 19th century better reflects what is happening as long as you get rid of all the illusions that the puppets can somehow be in charge.
All of which brings us to where we want to be. How can a puppet change what happens via the strings. We can see and manipulate the ct1-2-3 interface. Our ability to conduct nuclear reactions shows that. It is a bio-feedback loop of sorts, the solutions (our ability to measure and predict results is embodied in AuT mathematics) force us to do things and in doing them we fulfill the requirements of the mathematical solutions.
The question is not whether we can rewrite the underlying math which we cannot, but does the underlying math direct us in such a way as to require that we manipulate it to our own ends, two-fold in this case, there being two parts to the equation.
Wherein lies the problem.
One is that the universe will not allow a paradox. It can stop this in several ways, none of which are necessarily pleasant to me and some of which may be unpleasant to others. This is the so-called paradox of free will which I will get to in due course.
Am i really so out of touch that I am confusing saturday and sunday? obviously the answer is yes. It was a busy couple of days.
I have been thinking so much about you, it is something of a miracle that I haven't walked into more walls that I have. That, however, will have to wait.
AuT goes beyond prior theories in many ways, covered in the books in detail and one of the prior posts in 12 snippets. It eliminates the need for unifying principles although it shows how unification would occur.
It shows a world which is independent of time and with dimensions which vary according to the needs of the underlying mathematical solutions.
Now I have undertaken, having reached a point of some certainty as to the basic principles, where I am seeking to find a way of practical utilization of the science that operates below the level that we experience and which controls us as opposed to us controlling it. The whole idea is difficult to imagine, it is the idea of the puppet somehow manipulating the puppeteer.
A discussion of the plasma reaction:
Looking at articles like this one might hold some clues, but what is the issue here?
Phys.org: No more zigzags: Scientists uncover mechanism that stabilizes fusion plasmas. https://phys.org/news/2018-07-zigzags-scientists-uncover-mechanism-stabilizes.html
Trying to reconcile this with AuT is not too difficult.
The drawing on the left above shows the source of the sawtooth gyrations. Since many ct1 states have long periods of stability, you'll have times when gyrations don't happen for a while (see a mechanism that has long puzzled physicists).
So these scientists see a result and call it: "magnetic flux
pumping."
The article discusses "light elements in the form
of plasma":
It forms a good platform for showing how pre-AuT theory and AuT differ.
Plasma is given features and this is important in understanding what is wrong with the analysis:
hot: Heat is movement. Hence in a quantum environment it does not exist. Over large values of x, changes such as those shown on the left are viewed as heat as structures lose their stability due to ct1 alignment degrading. This occurs at the ct3 state typically manifested in ct3-ct4 transition states although as they break down the do so as radiation, ct3 and some ct2 states. Figur 45 in Book 3 (fifth edition) shows this.
Element 1 charged: This is also a change over time towards compression or decompression but at the ct2-ct3 transition.
Element 2 free electrons: These are ct4 transitional states, currently considered odd stage states (ct4-7)
Element 3 atomic nuclei: These are primarily protons (ct4-8 states presumably)
and Element 4 "generates
massive amounts of energy" which is the radiation given off by the various states and indicates that whether fusion or fission the net effect is towards decompression.
The next part of this conceptually is the tie in between charge and structure. "Flux pumping"
The next part of this conceptually is the tie in between charge and structure. "Flux pumping"
1) limits the current in the core of the plasma - This is a change of element 1 relative to elements 2 and 3.
2) that
completes the magnetic field: this is part of the overall result with item 3 following that involves the change in the alligned vs unaligned ct2 and ct2-ct3 transition states over values in x. See the next item (3).
3) that confines the hot, charged gas: This is a case of the cart pulling the horse. While we see forces as controlling, this is where AuT refocuses and raises paradox questions. In essence, the solutions the the underlying ct1 states define the structure. in a destablized strucutre (Figure 45) this tends to wards something that will fall apart as reconstruction becomes haphazard as internal splits in the structure grow. Normally, you merely "age the structure" it slowly destablizes and reforms as a new, more folded structure; but in a plazma the number of states destablizing or coming unwound are magnified relative to the number that are stable so that the structure has less immediate sopportunity to restablize. This means that the vibration (left side of the drawing above) tends to fail in favor of a destablized structure, plasma. Nevertheless, as the article indicates, all structures tend towards a net vibrational state indicating (as shown in books 3 and 4) as below .1% destablized at the current stage of expansion of the universe.
4) that produces
the reactions. This is covered in the paragraph above.
The article discusses minimizing the current which AuT provides unique insights into how this can be done. The idea that high current triggers sawtooth instability is unlikely to get a good effect without looking to the overall structural problem for the AuT perspective. ("This development, found in some fusion plasmas, keeps the
current from becoming strong enough to trigger the sawtooth instability.")
The idea of a mixer formed by the molten iron core is interesting because that is what is missing from Venus in terms of sufficient spin and a sufficiently spinning molton iron core; the subject of my book Notes from Venus.
Sawtooth refers to the plasma temperature and density zigzagging up and down.
The idea of preventing this ct3-ct4 event in check is much easier than any ct2 feature, but introducing a high amount of ct2-ct3 states into a system to maintain the fusuion temperatures in such a way as to offset the stablizing or destablizing features should be easier if the specific goals defined by AuT are understood.
The real issue is time or rather the absence of time.
If you look at any of the past genius of physics, Parmenides, Newton, Dirac, Lorentz, Einstein, Bohr and others leading up to me (not really a genius, but quite the hack) the one place they all erred in common was loading everything with dx/dt, the change with respect to time. Pure physics looked at static changes, levers fixed in place, architecture. The moment dynamics were introduced into the system it fell apart. Position in space is accurate, the orbits of positions is not.
In looking for a way to reconcile what is observed from what lies beneath, the results were blurred by this fascination with including something that does not even exist at the quantum level.
The idea of matter and anti-matter is a good example of where the confusion lies.
If you look at a solution to ct3-ct4 phenomena over time you come up with matter and anti-matter.
If you look at these same phenomena without time you get a set of solutions which are moving towards or away from compression. But what does it mean to be moving towards or away from compression. Without time, that means you have to look at the net change in ct1 states that affect the two different states. It is worth noting that in a quantum instant, there is no difference between matter and antimatter. They have the same weight, the same makeup, there is no charge difference because charge is the change in ct2-ct3 loading over changes in x and from our perspective over time although many of those changes can occur before time from an observer changes because time is a higher effect.
If you take Dirac's equation, before you can truly interpret the universe with it, you must remove one of its most fundamental features, not time, but dimension.
Dirac's equation actually makes a stab in this direction by separating space-time into coordinate sets, but it then tries to reconcile them into the dimension from which we experience things which is time and space together; space to reconcile the co-existing different dimensional mathematical results and time to give these shifting results perspective.
Worse still, Dirac's equation focuses on only one aspect of what is being examined, thereby confusing the other elements as part of this primary portion, the mass-wave relationship. I intend to say mass-wave and not mass-energy because mass-energy includes an examination of the two excluded element, photon-wave and space-photon interactions. They way that all physics from Newton forward deal with these pre-time elements is to ignore them, to attempt to wrap them into the gross equation which overshadows them (the polynomial highest factor approximation) and allows All those named physicsts to approximate their way from the correct solution with mathematical tools of varying complexity, in Dirac's case, the multi-dimensional matrix of varying complexity. The only significant problem with Dirac's equation is that it does not fully comprehend that the four matrix (three of dimension and one of time) solution recognized without admitting that the four different solutions co-exist independently.
Stay with me here. If you write out Dirac in this fashion (from Wikipedia) you get:
Ad(z) and Bd(y) obviously have time problems because they change, but that is a defect and not a point of convergence. What this version of Dirac says clearly is that the different dimensional states co-exist. The can be given properties over time that entangle them, but at quantum instances, they are separate parts of the whole.
The Dirac Sea and Electron Bundle are two ways of looking at the same thing and serve as a good example of where the two theories diverge (or converge).
In Dirac's case he is trapped with time and all of its accompanying features, momentum being primary among them. We also have Newton crop up, with his grossly misleading object at rest observations which are entirely applicable to the world of the puppet but which are erroneous from the view of the puppeteers. Why? Momentum is a feature of net entropy, unfolding of space. Since that can change based on the change in the underlying ct1 fuse states, it is not even right. Inflection points have to be dealt with and rather than eliminating time and dimension at that level, Newton, Dirac and the others merely created a new form of elements.
In the same way the Dirac Sea is an approximation over time of solutions. All these solution locations are given an equal weight to approximate the right answer. The electron bundle is a little different. There is no sum over time because there is no time. There is no dimension per say either although AuT like all other theories stumbles onto those hidden shoals far too often. Instead the electron bundle refers to specific quantum states folded together.
You have the atom's ct1 states, static but capable of movement in either direction (fusion or fission is not the result of this movement, instead it is towards or away from compression); you have the ct2 states of one dimension which give a charge over time to the system and have the effect of charge potential based on the constituent ct1 state make-up fuse wise, the ct3 states of two dimensions which are the first part recognized by Dirac and the third dimensional ct3-ct4 transition states. Note that I don't use ct4 pure states because Dirac uses our "perspective" and that includes time and that is part of the transition and not the flat ct4 neutron state except to the extent it is in transition. Since it is constantly in transition like everything else moving, may seem like an irrelevant distinction, but as long as time is a factor, ct4 states and ct5 states serve the primary purpose of concentration the ct3-ct4 states sufficiently so that they can exchange higher ct3 states instead of lower ct1 states to create the clouds of time (ct3 states changing with respect to ct1 movement based on net decompression presently) which allows for the more or less shared time experiences which so confused all of the physicists.
As can more or less readily be seen, the equation on the left embodies the mass-energy conversion, but in attempting to explain it has been broken out into the different dimensional features that co-exist. The offshoot of this is that if you ignore the time component, you are left with three dimensional coordinates which can be solved separately.
The next problem that has to be dealt with is the weighing of those dimensional features but they are folded together so that we see them as common features.
This brings us to QED and its problems with space which has the same problem as Dirac's equation. QED is the idea that space is potential and that particles can be formed from the transitions of this potential. This is frighteningly close to AuT and still wrong because of time in part and a misunderstanding of the potential in part. Let's jump into this stew. Both say that space is full, but not only AuT explains why.
QED requires time to work. You have to average solutions to get a result.
AuT says that space has potential, like QED, but it explains the potential using the features of the ether that makes up space.
QED makes equal amounts of particle and antiparticle because the potential is balanced. AuT makes either a particle or antiparticle in an unbalanced result based on the direction in which compression occurs and in a stepwise fashion which is invisible to QED because QED is trapped in time based phenomena and the changes from space to photon to wave are time independent.
The matter-antimatter are less about charge and more about pairing in AuT. If you have two solutions which do not pair properly they fail to compress. This feature is carried farther into higher states and ultimately drive the universe through folding and unfolding in the fashion that I mentioned should make you faint and from which I used a grossly out of date figure.
Looking at the drawing above, this can be seen at the ct4 level as one of the ct3 states breaking down into ct2 and thereby increasing the amount of ct2 in the system. If one imagined a sea of unwinding (or winding if you'd like) ct1 states dragging two ct4 states together, if the result over many changes of x is to degrade these states which in their decomposed cloud versions (as electron/positron pairs for example) in such a way as to get a complete breakdown, energy is release, potentially photons and space are released and this unfolding is not an result, but is instead the driving force, the puppeteer's strings driving the movement of the atomic puppet and if it did not mention we would not move and Dirac's matter/antimatter exchange is movement and time. There is conversion (not annihilation) of matter and energy; but it is puppet conversion; AuT puppeteer changes are merely solutions where this "order" of underlying states varies gradually over values of x and the "quantum foam" of Dirac is a complete ct1 solid of such density that it cannot exist as spatially separated, but is, instead, a line of solutions folded to give the impression of dimension instead of the "solid" space of puppeteer reality.
From far out
Folding and unfolding
Most of the physicists who I know of that follow this initial group just further confused things. The problem is that AuT solutions allow for many different interactions along full and even partial information arms at various ct levels and describe why the idea of photons as light vs waves as light is at best confusing and misleading in the extreme, being two very different things whose connection is that they interchange through folding and unfolding and one can be viewed in terms of time and the other cannot. Indeed Gehlman and Feynman totally confused mathematics with estimation based on time creating the whole universe of Quarks where estimations of what would become AuT creates particles in place of mathematical solutions; the gross mistake of particle acceleration, that changes over time and with great velocity change what happens in quantum moments which is independent of those speeds.
It took AuT to show that what Descartes insight taught clearly over 400 years ago and which Einstein, Marley and Michelson accidentally derailed at the turn of the 18th to 19th century better reflects what is happening as long as you get rid of all the illusions that the puppets can somehow be in charge.
All of which brings us to where we want to be. How can a puppet change what happens via the strings. We can see and manipulate the ct1-2-3 interface. Our ability to conduct nuclear reactions shows that. It is a bio-feedback loop of sorts, the solutions (our ability to measure and predict results is embodied in AuT mathematics) force us to do things and in doing them we fulfill the requirements of the mathematical solutions.
The question is not whether we can rewrite the underlying math which we cannot, but does the underlying math direct us in such a way as to require that we manipulate it to our own ends, two-fold in this case, there being two parts to the equation.
Wherein lies the problem.
One is that the universe will not allow a paradox. It can stop this in several ways, none of which are necessarily pleasant to me and some of which may be unpleasant to others. This is the so-called paradox of free will which I will get to in due course.
Saturday, July 21, 2018
Sunday Morning
I am hungry. I starved for word from you.
Keep quiet, read this in your own self serving way, knowing how you fit into all of this and what you intend to do with it.
This post is a bit about what I'm thinking about doing with it.
But I'm still hungry.
I am reminded of the story in Benjamin Franklin's autobiography when he arrives in Philadelphia.
I have been working on my first patent from AuT. The Jetson's patent. I know what you are thinking, "he cannot do it" but I am not so sure. I may or may not be able to do it. I have been working through the problems and while they are weird and significant; conceptually it remains within the realm of conception, not just a fictional undertaking but a patent that starts like this:
A method of pre-acceleration or pre- movement generating either a winding or unwinding of space
If I can write it out and more importantly if I can show a way of making and using the method what would it mean?
Well, I have very little to lose in conjunction with this undertaking and a page of notes and 8 books that provide a theoretical basis for the undertaking. I wish I had something to eat.
Let me get to a strange and rather circular argument.
I can describe the basis for using certain features of AuT in order to practice the principles of a Jestonmobile or faster than light travel, even the whole idea of instant transmutation of what others would incorrectly call matter; except there is an element of the surreal because there is no self determination so it has to happen in the environment of non-self determination, independent of randomness, pre-programmed universe and at the same time if this standard is rejected for any reason it means that all other patents fail for about the same reason, that is because we don't do any of those things because we don't have the ability to actually do anything.
I have begun this patent, albeit a couple of paragraphs, a rough claim, a title.
Will I succeed or fail in drafting it?
I cannot even tell you that for sure.
There are weird things going on around me
and equally weird things going on in my head
But you who are reading this know that I have this thing figured out
So there is no telling what I can or cannot do
Particularly if you will help me a little.
So I have a joke
a man tells his brother who is out of town that his cat died
the brother says, "you should have sugar coated that."
What do you mean the man says.
Brother: "Well you could have said that the cat was stuck on the roof and would not come down. Then a day or two later you could have said 'the cat fell off and is at the vet,
Then you could tell me the cat didn't make it."
The man says, "I got it."
The brother asks, "So how is mom?"
The man says, "Mom is stuck on the roof."
Ok, maybe not so fun, but that's the joke.
Keep quiet, read this in your own self serving way, knowing how you fit into all of this and what you intend to do with it.
This post is a bit about what I'm thinking about doing with it.
But I'm still hungry.
I am reminded of the story in Benjamin Franklin's autobiography when he arrives in Philadelphia.
I have been working on my first patent from AuT. The Jetson's patent. I know what you are thinking, "he cannot do it" but I am not so sure. I may or may not be able to do it. I have been working through the problems and while they are weird and significant; conceptually it remains within the realm of conception, not just a fictional undertaking but a patent that starts like this:
A method of pre-acceleration or pre- movement generating either a winding or unwinding of space
If I can write it out and more importantly if I can show a way of making and using the method what would it mean?
Well, I have very little to lose in conjunction with this undertaking and a page of notes and 8 books that provide a theoretical basis for the undertaking. I wish I had something to eat.
Let me get to a strange and rather circular argument.
I can describe the basis for using certain features of AuT in order to practice the principles of a Jestonmobile or faster than light travel, even the whole idea of instant transmutation of what others would incorrectly call matter; except there is an element of the surreal because there is no self determination so it has to happen in the environment of non-self determination, independent of randomness, pre-programmed universe and at the same time if this standard is rejected for any reason it means that all other patents fail for about the same reason, that is because we don't do any of those things because we don't have the ability to actually do anything.
I have begun this patent, albeit a couple of paragraphs, a rough claim, a title.
Will I succeed or fail in drafting it?
I cannot even tell you that for sure.
There are weird things going on around me
and equally weird things going on in my head
But you who are reading this know that I have this thing figured out
So there is no telling what I can or cannot do
Particularly if you will help me a little.
So I have a joke
a man tells his brother who is out of town that his cat died
the brother says, "you should have sugar coated that."
What do you mean the man says.
Brother: "Well you could have said that the cat was stuck on the roof and would not come down. Then a day or two later you could have said 'the cat fell off and is at the vet,
Then you could tell me the cat didn't make it."
The man says, "I got it."
The brother asks, "So how is mom?"
Ok, maybe not so fun, but that's the joke.
Friday, July 20, 2018
graphs of polynomials and letricity
Those of you who understood the last post on where free states can come from in a fully compressed matrix should have fallen over in a dead faint. You should only now be getting up and recovering from the shock that the entire matrix of gravity and dark energy, the neutron, proton, electron transition and pre time movement was stripped bare ina couple of sentences and using some fairly out of date drawings, but with a clarity that surprises even me.
But we are going to plaly with some fairly simple math today, after i make a couple of minor deviations into the perspective world.
For those of you who did not faint reading the last post, I will try to tolerate you, appreciating that you are trying to endure my absurd pompasity and verbosity.
Understanding, for example, that ct5 is 2(fx)^2^x the polynomial system fits very well within the framework of AuT. The weirdness is thrown in because the constants (a-d) vary over changes of x and independently based on a function which is tied both to the fuse of each individual point and to where the points appear in the folded system under examination.
The new base (numerical base) based on f(x) and the exponential value of x based on 2 to the x complete the transition from pre-aut polynomical dimensional analysis and the more accurate one interms of how the universe compresses.
I have determined that I can file my first patent convering the practical application of this technology which I will likely publish in parts in this post and perhaps if i can figure out the one most complicated piece of all of this, i will give you the floating car i have promised, along with ftl travel and perhaps a new way of dealing with time.
The AuT universe is a very jerky and elasticly vibrational one.
Certain feature, however are averaged out which allow for predictability and other features are misinterpreted as randomness.
The AuT polynomial is as good a place as any to start.
G/ect1=act5+bct4+cct3+dct2
a, b, c and d set out factor of increase of slope of the line in question.
One interesting feature of the base equation f(x) ^2^x is that you can pick any point and have a simplified equation.
For example act5+bct4+c is a simplified binomial equation where the additional terms are folded into c since those number can be treated as part of the base equation. I will not wax eloquent on this here, but I will get into that later and if you are really looking deeply into this, you will see that this is actually how we (incorrectly) treat the universe when we ignore the pre-time features of ct1 and ct2 in examining the universe which is part of the reason why only AuT has the universe figured out.
Quadratic functions with gravity provide a trajectory based on this type of curve with gravity: h(x)=3.3-.4x^2
A separate time function giving the height at any point of -4.9t^2+6.1t+1.4 is also worth considering since both can be changed to be functions of x in AuT.
In this case we have varying constants (a,b, c,and d).
If we look at the only two dimensional features dct2 we get dct3=ax^2+bx+c. Ax^2 should be a function of dct2.
x=-b/2a and c is the intercept of the y axis. a defines the orientation (which can be positive or negative in line with the changes over time of the compression state) and the width or wave length.
The neutral stage of this can be defined by f(x)=a(x-p)(x-q) where x and q represent values of the solution yielding a zero times a result.
f(x)=a(x-r)^2+s where the vertex/inflection point is at the coordinate (r,s).
The 4 degree polynomial intersects (has a zero x value) no more than 4 times.
So what does this have to do with electricity?
The idea is that ct1 shifts occur as often as we like in a time free environment with a net result we see over time. What this means is a single ct2 loading and unloading onto ct3 before time becomes involved can give both sides of the current or magnetism along ct3 in a given situation providing the basis for what is observed, albeit the observation includes large multiples of changes of single ct2 states providing a shift net magnetic or electric current flow..
But we are going to plaly with some fairly simple math today, after i make a couple of minor deviations into the perspective world.
For those of you who did not faint reading the last post, I will try to tolerate you, appreciating that you are trying to endure my absurd pompasity and verbosity.
Understanding, for example, that ct5 is 2(fx)^2^x the polynomial system fits very well within the framework of AuT. The weirdness is thrown in because the constants (a-d) vary over changes of x and independently based on a function which is tied both to the fuse of each individual point and to where the points appear in the folded system under examination.
The new base (numerical base) based on f(x) and the exponential value of x based on 2 to the x complete the transition from pre-aut polynomical dimensional analysis and the more accurate one interms of how the universe compresses.
I have determined that I can file my first patent convering the practical application of this technology which I will likely publish in parts in this post and perhaps if i can figure out the one most complicated piece of all of this, i will give you the floating car i have promised, along with ftl travel and perhaps a new way of dealing with time.
The AuT universe is a very jerky and elasticly vibrational one.
Certain feature, however are averaged out which allow for predictability and other features are misinterpreted as randomness.
The AuT polynomial is as good a place as any to start.
G/ect1=act5+bct4+cct3+dct2
a, b, c and d set out factor of increase of slope of the line in question.
One interesting feature of the base equation f(x) ^2^x is that you can pick any point and have a simplified equation.
For example act5+bct4+c is a simplified binomial equation where the additional terms are folded into c since those number can be treated as part of the base equation. I will not wax eloquent on this here, but I will get into that later and if you are really looking deeply into this, you will see that this is actually how we (incorrectly) treat the universe when we ignore the pre-time features of ct1 and ct2 in examining the universe which is part of the reason why only AuT has the universe figured out.
Quadratic functions with gravity provide a trajectory based on this type of curve with gravity: h(x)=3.3-.4x^2
A separate time function giving the height at any point of -4.9t^2+6.1t+1.4 is also worth considering since both can be changed to be functions of x in AuT.
In this case we have varying constants (a,b, c,and d).
If we look at the only two dimensional features dct2 we get dct3=ax^2+bx+c. Ax^2 should be a function of dct2.
x=-b/2a and c is the intercept of the y axis. a defines the orientation (which can be positive or negative in line with the changes over time of the compression state) and the width or wave length.
The neutral stage of this can be defined by f(x)=a(x-p)(x-q) where x and q represent values of the solution yielding a zero times a result.
f(x)=a(x-r)^2+s where the vertex/inflection point is at the coordinate (r,s).
The 4 degree polynomial intersects (has a zero x value) no more than 4 times.
So what does this have to do with electricity?
The idea is that ct1 shifts occur as often as we like in a time free environment with a net result we see over time. What this means is a single ct2 loading and unloading onto ct3 before time becomes involved can give both sides of the current or magnetism along ct3 in a given situation providing the basis for what is observed, albeit the observation includes large multiples of changes of single ct2 states providing a shift net magnetic or electric current flow..
Thursday, July 19, 2018
the gravity equation without dimension* (5)
1. Another way of looking at the gravity equation
This non-dimensional equation leads to
the dimensional gravity equation (m1*m2)/d^2.
Mass can be eliminated in AuT as only a
manifestation of the dimension/non-dimension interaction.
Mass is replaced with individual states
at the quantum level:
Ct1
alignment=gravity.
Ct1-ct2
alignment=gravity
Ct1(1)-ct1(-1)
alignment (adjoining or within a range) is gravity (a positive and a negative
state
Distance
is not a feature of this interaction.
At the
ct3 and ct4 level distance is inserted into this with the idea being that the
number of intervening states reduces the concentration of alignment.
Ct2(1)-ct2(-1)
is exponential concentration of ct1-ct1 alignment.
The
increasing separation due to unfolded free states, discussed below, decreases the
effect of two groups of otherwise aligned states.
As the
unfolding occurs, additional space is put between these gravitationally aligned
states.
Free
states entrapped in folding can come from the later states, 8 or 13 or any
other intermediary sate in the Figure above, for example, coming unfolded and
thereby being trapped within matrix of folded states of which it was originally
a part.
The idea of folding gets
increasingly dimensional with compression.
This compression includes combining quantities as opposed to actual
states, but gets a similar result.
F-series compression is an effect
which combines prior states not to create a new state, but to create a
compression state made up of the lower compression states.
Folding allows states to be tied
together, to be shared by multiple spirals. But you can see if, for example, 13
unfolded, you would separate the compression of 8-13-34 interconnectivity.
This discussion from book 3 allows for gravity to be viewed without dimension for the first time, only possible with AuT.
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
Cosmic Rays as unwinding of space*
I am going to return to the posts on geometry, but first let me get to the first of the cosmic ray posts.
The article cited is used because it goes to the basic misunderstanding of velocity, time and dimension which AuT clears up.
Gizmodo: Can We Measure Our Own Galaxy Speeding Through Space?. https://gizmodo.com/can-we-measure-our-own-galaxy-speeding-through-space-1827577208
The simple answer is that we don't move, of course. Over values of x we are able to see how unfolding and transitional states exist.
But movement is important to us and high energy states confuse the whole "true physics" of AuT vs the symbolic standard model. I don't want to be negative to the SM because it makes me look petty, but let's face it, particles carrying forces is asinine compared to a pure mathematical model for forces can exist between quantum states because of the arrangement of compression against a non-dimensional matrix where dimensions are built and where all the prior mysteries are logical, like wave particle duality, time dilation (both kinds), black holes, the big bang and all the rest merely from dropping a tortured system and adopting one based entirely on logic and observations, albeit logic abandoned 2500 years ago and in the 1920s when the more or less correct idea on ether was rejected because of a misunderstanding of dimension which is now even in the standard model becoming more and more AuT oriented. But enough ranting.
The idea of muons is rejected by AuT but the idea of a proton carried separately from other ct3-ct4 transitionals states with ct1 states moving through our atmosphere and breaking down into other transitional states and having these transitional states play a role in the overall movement of the universe towards net decompression is entirely part of AuT. The idea that these particles do not interact is contraindicated in AuT since there are changes within the structure of both ct states defined as movement (dct1/dx).
The idea of "absorption" of other particles in not entirely accurate because of how interaction occurs; it can only be among ct states of different types.
However, because AuT is the new theory on the block we have to look at mesons.
Charge is one of the many issues that are defined only in terms of alternatives in AuT. If you want to see the choices, they are laid out in book 4.
For purposes of this post, it is enough that the underlying ct1 state changes can give rise to positive, negative and neutral net charges which appear to be based on transitional states (proton is a transitional state between ct3 and ct4). Indeed, the idea that the "balanced" pi meson (pions) in their neutral form decay into radiation (gamma rays=ct3 wave forms) is entirely consistent, but what about charged mesons?
The idea of decay into "2 gamma rays" indicates a value of balanced pion as a single information arm of ct4 before it breaks down:
Looking at the chart above, it can be seen as being as little as 10 ct1 states (effective 10 wave states) and still exist as a partial information arm noting that it is a transitional state in the proton/electron state.
The "weight" of the muon is heavier than the electron and therefore it appears to be a more complicated state, using the diagram above (one of two, the other being an equal arm analysis-see book 3) it would represent the partial filling of on of the two extra arms shown. As has been discussed, there are a number of transitional pairs possible which give us a wide range of stabilized particles (book 4) 1:15; 2;14...all the way to the 7:9 and possibly 8:8 discussed.
These interact with electrons to "lose energy" which is another way of saying that ct1 states carrying the ct3-ct4 transition states are redirected allowing more internal change of these relative to the speed of light or the maximum ct1 exchange for the period of net decompression in question.
We'll talk more about this.
The article cited is used because it goes to the basic misunderstanding of velocity, time and dimension which AuT clears up.
Gizmodo: Can We Measure Our Own Galaxy Speeding Through Space?. https://gizmodo.com/can-we-measure-our-own-galaxy-speeding-through-space-1827577208
The simple answer is that we don't move, of course. Over values of x we are able to see how unfolding and transitional states exist.
But movement is important to us and high energy states confuse the whole "true physics" of AuT vs the symbolic standard model. I don't want to be negative to the SM because it makes me look petty, but let's face it, particles carrying forces is asinine compared to a pure mathematical model for forces can exist between quantum states because of the arrangement of compression against a non-dimensional matrix where dimensions are built and where all the prior mysteries are logical, like wave particle duality, time dilation (both kinds), black holes, the big bang and all the rest merely from dropping a tortured system and adopting one based entirely on logic and observations, albeit logic abandoned 2500 years ago and in the 1920s when the more or less correct idea on ether was rejected because of a misunderstanding of dimension which is now even in the standard model becoming more and more AuT oriented. But enough ranting.
The idea of muons is rejected by AuT but the idea of a proton carried separately from other ct3-ct4 transitionals states with ct1 states moving through our atmosphere and breaking down into other transitional states and having these transitional states play a role in the overall movement of the universe towards net decompression is entirely part of AuT. The idea that these particles do not interact is contraindicated in AuT since there are changes within the structure of both ct states defined as movement (dct1/dx).
The idea of "absorption" of other particles in not entirely accurate because of how interaction occurs; it can only be among ct states of different types.
However, because AuT is the new theory on the block we have to look at mesons.
Charge is one of the many issues that are defined only in terms of alternatives in AuT. If you want to see the choices, they are laid out in book 4.
The idea of decay into "2 gamma rays" indicates a value of balanced pion as a single information arm of ct4 before it breaks down:
The "weight" of the muon is heavier than the electron and therefore it appears to be a more complicated state, using the diagram above (one of two, the other being an equal arm analysis-see book 3) it would represent the partial filling of on of the two extra arms shown. As has been discussed, there are a number of transitional pairs possible which give us a wide range of stabilized particles (book 4) 1:15; 2;14...all the way to the 7:9 and possibly 8:8 discussed.
These interact with electrons to "lose energy" which is another way of saying that ct1 states carrying the ct3-ct4 transition states are redirected allowing more internal change of these relative to the speed of light or the maximum ct1 exchange for the period of net decompression in question.
We'll talk more about this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)