Cosmic Rays as unwinding of space*

I am going to return to the posts on geometry, but first let me get to the first of the cosmic ray posts.

The article cited is used because it goes to the basic misunderstanding of velocity, time and dimension which AuT clears up.

Gizmodo: Can We Measure Our Own Galaxy Speeding Through Space?. https://gizmodo.com/can-we-measure-our-own-galaxy-speeding-through-space-1827577208

The simple answer is that we don't move, of course.  Over values of x we are able to see how unfolding and transitional states exist.

But movement is important to us and high energy states confuse the whole "true physics" of AuT vs the symbolic standard model.  I don't want to be negative to the SM because it makes me look petty, but let's face it, particles carrying forces is asinine compared to a pure mathematical model for forces can exist between quantum states because of the arrangement of compression against a non-dimensional matrix where dimensions are built and where all the prior mysteries are logical, like wave particle duality, time dilation (both kinds), black holes, the big bang and all the rest merely from dropping a tortured system and adopting one based entirely on logic and observations, albeit logic abandoned 2500 years ago and in the 1920s when the more or less correct idea on ether was rejected because of a misunderstanding of dimension which is now even in the standard model becoming more and more AuT oriented.  But enough ranting.

The idea of muons is rejected by AuT but the idea of a proton carried separately from other ct3-ct4 transitionals states with ct1 states moving through our atmosphere and breaking down into other transitional states and having these transitional states play a role in the overall movement of the universe towards net decompression is entirely part of AuT. The idea that these particles do not interact is contraindicated in AuT since there are changes within the structure of both ct states defined as movement (dct1/dx).
The idea of "absorption" of other particles in not entirely accurate because of how interaction occurs; it can only be among ct states of different types.
However, because AuT is the new theory on the block we have to look at mesons.
Charge is one of the many issues that are defined only in terms of alternatives in AuT.  If you want to see the choices, they are laid out in book 4.

For purposes of this post, it is enough that the underlying ct1 state changes can give rise to positive, negative and neutral net charges which appear to be based on transitional states (proton is a transitional state between ct3 and ct4).  Indeed, the idea that the "balanced" pi meson (pions) in their neutral form decay into radiation (gamma rays=ct3 wave forms) is entirely consistent, but what about charged mesons?
The idea of decay into "2 gamma rays" indicates a value of balanced pion as a single information arm of ct4 before it breaks down:

Looking at the chart above, it can be seen as being as little as 10 ct1 states (effective 10 wave states) and still exist as a partial information arm noting that it is a transitional state in the proton/electron state.

The "weight" of the muon is heavier than the electron and therefore it appears to be a more complicated state, using the diagram above (one of two, the other being an equal arm analysis-see book 3) it would represent the partial filling of on of the two extra arms shown.  As has been discussed, there are a number of transitional pairs possible which give us a wide range of stabilized particles (book 4) 1:15; 2;14...all the way to the 7:9 and possibly 8:8 discussed.
These interact with electrons to "lose energy" which is another way of saying that ct1 states carrying the ct3-ct4 transition states are redirected allowing more internal change of these relative to the speed of light or the maximum ct1 exchange for the period of net decompression in question.

We'll talk more about this.