A better view of time

Time is sort of a weird thing.
It is so important but it is an effect and affects our view of the other forces.
So how does time happen?
It just so happens that in book 4 this was already covered fairly well. There was a problem, however, that I had with how the F-series changes occurred.  Even though the write up was right the drawing did not seem so accurate.
There are two aspects to history.  One is the "fixed" history that does not change.  This is the history of rocks and such.  Pretty boring stuff, it ages, which is another topic altogether, the chemical reactions and entropy side of things (how a net anti-entropy universe ages is a topic for another day); the other is the active history, the one that slows down and speeds up according to ct1 unraveling compared to ct3-ct4 transition states.
While this second may have active and inactive parts and while it does not always change, in terms of the ct3 area, there is an apparent constant change; because the ct1 and 2 changes giving rise to it are in a time free environment and hence they always have already happened before the seconds tic off..

All this is "complicated" and yes it's overused in too many ways to cover here, this is a physics post of time.

If "experienced time" requires that a current moment is made up of prior histories as is theorized, then that process is a special one.  The first part of what appears below is general; but it specifically addresses this issue after the drawing.

To show how history builds, a figure of higher state compression is used.

          At ct1:ct0 the base information growth is replaced with compression.

          Compression puts positive and negative states together to form carrier arms.  This type of information growth remains during the remainder of the observable universe.

          The basic sequence is: 1,1,2,3,5,7, etc. which allows for history to be created during the compression stage and anti-history or entropy at later negative compression stages.

          When one state is compressed to the next when ct2 goes to ct3 or ct3 to ct4 there if f-series compression. When it unwinds there is f-series decompression.  These features give shape to galaxies and sunflowers.

          The same thing happens in time.  When time compresses from ct2 to ct3 as history, it does so with f-series compression and when it unwinds it does the opposite. This is the way that history builds from prior results!

          The basic sequence varies to increase the number of places or coordinates changing together which, for ct1 to ct2 looks like this: 1,1,2,3…to 11,11,22,33,55,77.  These can exist as either positive or negative solutions transitioning at inflection points.
The Old view:

Figure 28-Higher state compression-OLD VERSION

The figure above shows the old version of looking at this where one state involves the combining of two prior states.

However, in AuT, f-series change is compression, not addition, meaning the two combined states already exist, they are just added together to compress according to our old friend 2f(n)^2^n.

So the more accurate figure appears below, conceptually.

The top circle shows the view of two different states combining to form a third state, basically the figure above.

The part below shows, from left to right the conceptual compression of ct3 (waves); a more modeled drawing; a model of how the ct3 states fit within and around the transitional proton and electron ct4 states.  In this case, ct3 states are made up of clouds of ct2 and ct1 states, the electron and proton are made up of clouds of ct3, 2 and 1 aligned by positive and negative sides folded together with some additional free states trapped in the folding.

For purposes of this discussion we do not have to talk about which ct3 states change (matched/folded/compressed or free/cloud).

For time to survive between quantum states history must be made up of the prior time states and the idea here is to come up with a mechanism consistent with AuT for the survival of history.

In the first box two free ct3 states are used as a representative state.  In this case, the fluidity of the constant change shows where ct1 states carrying ct2 states alter the ct3 states under examination making alterations in the ct3 states being examined.  This is shown with two ct3 states, but it presumably involves large groups of ct3 states (if not all of them) and 10^44 changes per second, but in a single electron/proton pair the number would be very large.  In any given change in the value of x, ct3 states might remain the same and the change in any one ct3 would be almost inconsequential alone.  The change from the original state to this transition is labeled as decompression.

           The final box at the bottom shows where the history contained in the ct3 states has combined through f-series compression (either of ct2 states to ct3 states or as ct3 states to transitional ct3-ct4 states) to carry the time forward by combining two lower order results.

          It is more likely that the transition is from ct3 to ct3-ct4 transition states because that is how compression works and if the transitions are of ct2, it is likely that not enough information is passed forward.  What this indicates, however, is that the breakdown of the ct3 transitional states before they recombine with other free or now-free ct3 states to form a new combination is an integral part of the time phenomena.

If the entire ct3 state moves with the ct1, there is no relative change in position of the components and the lack of change is replaced with velocity relative to either the still or the compression form of the universe.

Figure 29

            One feature of this universe is elements follow sequentially and that history is created when two or more prior states combine to form a new state, F-series compression.  But here, we are not talking about two or more time states, but two or more ct3 states combining in f-series compression.  Straight f-series building is replaced with combinations of the next lower state and the f-series addition that we experience reflects this similar, but not identical process.