I swam 2500 yards, but 1200 of it was IM and the rates were no slow and they were back to back.
And I figured out what the speed of light was, not that it wasn't implied in what was written, but I knew it at last.
That was not all, I also solved Schrodinger's Equation for relativistic features.
And I figured out how to make a faster than light engine although technically I had done this already in the book below, the difference is that it is more clear in my head and as part of my speech.
Something like this: "Are any of you fans of StarTrek? The orville? In this speech I will tell you how to build a faster than light engine. Ask yourself this. Do you doubt my ability to do so? If you do and I change you mind, you should buy me dinner because I will not only do that but I will give two examples in nature (don't believe me, order the book at the bottom of this post).
But let's talk about the speed of light.
Do I start with the answer? No, let's start somewhere else.
We start with dx/dt.
That is not right because there is neither dx nor dt at the quantum level.
Funny right?
So then we get to dct1/dx.
That is not the speed of light, it is the beginning of a limit equation, but there is nothing that says light in it.
So where is light?
Light is a ct3-4 transition light, really nothing at all. Worse still it is made of a lot of transition states changing together, although primarily we can say it is the photon state, because of its stability, and that is probably ct4T6 as we call it, 10^6 ct3 states in some fashion just as the electron is 10^12 in some fashioni.
If you want to see these particles as waves, well that is in Algorithm Universe Model. Particle science does not change this and doesn't answer the specific question which has such an easy answer, that I will get to in due course.
It doesn't matter too much although it is, after a fashion, associated with this whole speed of light thing.
Let us talk a little longer about this before we get tot he answer.
Light has to do with dct1 between ct4t6 or higher/dx observed from a time independent fixed matrix of ct3-4 states which occur based on the dct1 within the matrix over the same dx.
Now you might say, but Mr Math, how about the ct2, 3 and lower ct3-4 changes that you are always mentioning.
That is a good point, but they can be ignored now because of the advances you can see in that same book which is what I'd call the reverse polynomial approximation of AuM, that is dimension increases exponential with a decrease in compression meaning the changes in the lower ct states become largely irrelevant to the observed changes over x.
While x changes in a way that is time independent, we observe the net changes over appreciable changes in the ct3-4 matrix (over ct5 arm load to be sure) which means that while the number of changes in x can exceed the speed of light, the change in relative positions of ct3 cannot because they are a part of the time matrix for regions that contain the ct3 states. Again this is covered in the book.
We are almost at the speed of light which must come from something that is not a speed, nor a time at all.
Speed of light is a maximum change in ct1 state including some hihger ct states by reverse polynomial approximation, they do not effect this signficantly (dimension increases exponentially for ct1 vrs ct2 and higher states even as the amount of information decreases per factal state).
Look at the Maximum change of ct1 for a region, the maximum decompression for ct2 to ct1 in particular for a regions based on the average fuse length in that region. This shows the separation and is therefore part of the answer.
You may, incorrectly say, "between observable (therefore ct3-4 transition state and higher)
over a range of x?" That is not a terrible guess, but it misses the mark
How about when time: defined by the number of ct1-ct4 changes within the appropriate time matrix over the same range of x? That is a little closer.
Since the average ct1 changes are outside of the time matrix in question (because it is moving relative to some outside ct1 increase) the ratio of ct1 state change to internal ct1-4 change (convertible to just ct1 change) affects the rate.
But as mentioned above, time is only concerned with changes where there is enough information , in the ct3 and ct4 states; and where it is not so concentrated that if becomes an after-effect at ct4 neutrons and beyond.
So the answer becomes this ratio:
The average ct1 decompression in the affected matrix to the ct3-4 change within the time bubble.
It is that much and that simple.
https://my.sendinblue.com/users/subscribe/js_id/3ur2i/id/1
The link above allows you to be added to my subscription list.
It is easy to opt in, easy to opt out.
You will get updates, links to information and discounts to published books. Well, you'll get discounts if I ever figure out how.
As a free initial gift, you will be directed to a link where you can view for Free the PDF drawings for the latest edition of Algorithm Universe Model! Sweet!
No comments:
Post a Comment