AuT and hidden variable theory

I swam 2200 yards and weighed 174.4 pounds today.
I am vanishing.
Back when Einsein and Heisenberg were having their moment; while schrodinger was beginning to launch his brilliant, but misguided diversion into wave mechanics; there was a moment when a search was made for hidden variables  that would bring LaPlace's concept (you can determine the location of every particle in the future if you know its position and speed at a moment in the past-note to LaPlace, the speed is always zero at the quantum level and the position is not in a dimension, but in a series of non-dimensional folds) back over the Heisenberg fence which said you can know where are particle is or how fast it is going, but not both; because of the misguided concept that shining wave-photons on it was the way to determine position which to some extent Schrodinger proved accurate by propertly defining the averaging process at work without addressing the variables that main underly randomness.
Hidden Variable theory occupies the same lofty place as Zeno's paradox except Zenos paradox survived logically whlie HVT did not, even though conceptually both Einstein and HVT were right.
The problem was the same one that Marely & Michelson missed.   The variable was hiding in plain sight, in the mathematics and in concept.  The math of curvature held the secret to dimension and the math of time separated time into its two components, true quantum change and the effect of certain dimensional changes on perception.
I am fighting the battle back to Einstein, to HVT and to Parmenides and Zeno; but turning the clock back is a challenge because small minds reject logic in favor of perception and the world is governed by small minds.  Whether a large enough mind will come forward in the interim or not is anyone's guess; I doubt I will live to see it.  I have litte confidence in men or chance.

BDTH 12 and the last of em

I have reached the end of this series at last.  What is it, 12 of 10?
A mathematics of a special fractal sort.
I thought i would not reach 10, instead I reached 12.
Who wouldn't be willing to make minor sacrifices to provide me with some minimal support?  Who am I to deny that to myself?
These questions interact with irony, but that is a different discussion.
I continue to wonder, crazy or brilliant.   Both seem to apply.
The model that defies logic in a way that is entirely logical.
Why are you there and not hear?
Where is the logic in life and death?

In the books I spend some time talking about general electro-magnetics and their interaction with ct3-ct6.  The question of the relationship between ct2 and 3 is complicated somewhat by a lack of theory.
In the footnotes, some of that theory is discussed.
The dog model, indicating how a dog is a larger model of an electron was given in the prior post and is really more instructive than you might think; indeed the relationship of man and his environment is a study in electro dynamics.
The question of theory in the prior slides shows how little ct3 is directly related to charge and calling it pre-proton is probably misleading although the em state of the ct3-4 transition remains largely theoretical despite the modeling done in the slides.
You have t6, t12 and t16 to work with immediately and the strong inclination to see em as a function of the area between t6 and t12 is almost insurmountable once you eliminate the standard pre AUT field type charge model which so unlikely to be accurate and you also have plenty of time independent and near sol results within that area, which brings us to the time ladder drawing.
Anchored on one side with ct3 and on the other with a neutron is a ladder showing the stepwise building of time in 16 exponential steps of the "heavier" time we experience between ct3 and 4 and which is at least a 10^35 type divisible time, ignoring the smaller steps reflected by averaging the changes in dimension from compression to decompression.
It is complicated somewhat because each step is a function of 10 from the other and the up step is, for example, even, while the parallel step is odd changing the parameters  within which the stepwise change is displayed.
We could even say that you effectively have fields of time as well as fields of charge because the summation of these changes in both directions is far too comlicated, transitioning within different time frames and dimensional stages to have any real predictability.  Indeed the staircase can be seen to be formed of broken steps traveling Escher style, in every direction and with every conceivable display of dimension, but even more complicated  by adding every conceivable exponential amount of compression, the steps are not only in every orientation, but in every size, of proportions impossible to draw except as fractals going larger and smaller in every direction from some randomly selected center.
The complication increases.  There is electromagnetic effects between t6 and t12 within a ct3-4-5 matrix; the dog in the room with people; and those free of the matrix, the dog running free over green hills, shedding hairs of ct2 and 3, beads of ct1 as he cavorts; and then the mixed environment of space with dog coming across the occasional tree or copse; and everything in between.  Let Escher draw that picture from the grave; which can hardly be painted with words.
We should not abandon completely this impossible task, because it is the true solution to quantum computing rather than the absurdly randomized methods being attempted without AuT.  We cannot get perfect, but we can get enough averaged accuracy once the concepts of net effect are properly understood to get acceptable results in a  blockchain type environment whre the checks and balances are sufficiently understood and accounted for, at least where speed is as important as accuracy.
There are other places where this is critical. There is the place where terraforming comes in, the manipulation of the electromagnetic fields of all sizes from the very small absorption and spew to the fields which protect us from the suns radiation.
The suggestion of antimatter is anti-spew states, where the type of absorption and spew net features reverse at some inflection point of net compression to decompression and back again, something that appears fairly subtle but which reflects an acceleration where lightening and similar imbalances in charge are present.  Knowing what these affects are render them capable of control and utilization in a way not possible using the crude and wildly inaccurate standard model.  Indeed, the country that adopts AuT militarily, perhaps even funding me first,will potentially achieve results which could not otherwise be imagined, be it a small or large environmennt.
Anti-matter, different aspects of charge, quantumchangeat all the levels of ct3-4 is all of energy that we work with, smoothed out over ct4-5 changes.  That is just the tip of the iceberg as we consider what lies underneath at the ct3 and lower stages where the ability to build time and reality exist.

Footnote 7 Summary Slides

This chart shows a well-known method of waves being generated by movement along different dimensional values of time as ct4-t6 photon particles rotated around the more stationary higher compression features encountered in a pre-time environment.  Another slide below shows this feature in more detail.

Below that is the change between net positive and negative results of fused changes plotted for the first 32 changes in the quantum count.

At the bottom right is an important feature of compression, which is that dimensionally compression states get smaller as compression increases so that a shell of lower information dense transition states surround the next higher transition state which makes the lower dimensional states appear to have the same dimensional density as the higher compression state.  Hence, around the ct5-6 universe, non-dimensional space appears 3 dimensional from the ct4-5 transitional state that we make our observations.

The partially compressing, ever growing (informationally), bouncing universe that is described much better mirrors the irregularities of the background microwave radiation than other theories.  The regional compression and decompression require the type of result which is observed.

This slide shows the more complete view of how the photon 56 transitions to a wave form of varying lengths depending on how many changes in x occur before time is applied.

The universe turns out to represent a string of data which is folded.  Each force can be seen in terms of effect as shown by compression tables

Relative fractal speeds (ct3 compared to ct4, ct4t12 vs ct4t16, the electron vs the Proton, etc) reflect the lesser effects of time on lower ct states.

AUMC35

BDTH 11-electromag 2

The attraction between two people who are matched charges are the same in their own way as the other charges, or perhaps they are a reflection of some type of that.  It is something I would like to write about, perhaps I should say maybe dishonesty is part of the antimatter element.   I get that.
How does one look at electromagnetism is the quantum sense.  This is discussed in the footnotes already posted, but there are some other elements worth considering.
Take for example a macro example.  An overly friendly dog in a room filled with people.  The dog will with apparent randomness bounce between all of the people, spending a little more or less time with each depending on the reaction it gets.  What are the pre-time type elements at play?  First there is the way the dog thinks about the people, then there is the way that each person reacts to the dog, does the person pet the dog, shy away, hit the dog?  You look at this and say, ok, these are all overt acts, but you know deep inside that it has a lot to do with the makeup of the people.  Are they alergic, do they like the dog; does the dog smell something or exect  something?  There is a knock on the door, a killer enters the room.  How does the dog react?
The dog is a manefestation of the electrons that make it up, but also  the myriad lower ct states and transition states all operating together.  The dog has fewer psychological inputs than the electron has quantum effects, but both are pushed by features which are relatively consistent while appearing on close examination as not consistent at all.  The electrons are usually moving with the flow of the universe, at least where we are, at 790,000 mph due to net unwinding.
I have some drawings for the electromag discussion and the antimatter portion that ties these to the absorption and spew experienced between electrons and protons and I am going to tell a bit about those as I handle the discussion
ct3--t6--t12--t16(-t13)
prep-pho-elec-prot
5 wings coming off a t16, each a 12 with a netting of 6-3 between them reflecting the absorption towards the 16 another 16 across from the first and below them two absorbing n's then the staircase of f series anchored on one end with ct3 and on the other with a neutron and the quantum packets these represent going in both places; then the equations explaining each of these theoretical stesp:
1:10^6 (6); 10^6:10^12 (6); 10^12:10^16 (4).
Where the t12 wings connect to the t16 there is a web of t6 and t3 which also clouds up around and between the t12 states.
There is a flow of ct1 which is invisbile between the lower t states, take t12 for example, and the t16.  But what is invisible?  Things turn out to have varying degrees of invisibility just as they have varying degrees of time and in a very related sense.
The t1-5 are invisible, the ct3 certainly is, the ct2 and 1.
The invisibilty is part of the reason we mistake the processes.  It comes down to time and visibiilty, we attribute randomness to what is invisible and magic to what is pre-time.  Well, we did anyway.
There are two more pages of notes on electromagnetism; but there is one more post...

FOOTNOTE 6 Time

            Time like the other forces arises as a result and not a cause of the changing dimensional results of basic math equations regionally and for the universe.  It arises gradually and the number of changes in x for each second using a Planck scale analysis, appropriate for the ct3-4 transition state where time arises in bulk, indicates there are 10^44 changes in x each second.  Any single change will be long in coming in the middle of the universe, but adjoining spots in space change a mere 2 change in x apart from one another giving rise to both the durability and continuity that we experience.

This slide makes it appear like ct1f moves fairly quickly to ct1h.  In truth, the number of changes of x in even this short movement would be over an excruciatingly long number of changes in x. Time results from the quantum snapshots of dimension just as a movie arises from quantum slides in a series.

BDTH 10

1800 yards, 1000 im.  a weird workout.
revolutionaries revolutionize.
I am waiting, but I am also working hard.
I am eviserating and improving the patent, something I hope to finish this month giving me several months to decide where to go with it and perhaps to get some assistance in that regard.  I am not impressed with the accelerators which are looking for the easy strike, and who can blame them. I am working, however to find a deeper connection elsewhere.
I am misunderstood because I am outside of tune with reality but the only one way to get in tune seems to be more out first.   Tears and fears that bruise the mind and  cliffs to sail off in the interim and apparently there is not one I can turn to and only the mirror man to blame.  I thought we were part that for now but we are back again and I am fighting the tar baby

I did some work on electrical charge over the post days part is in these footnotes but some appear in notes I haven't typed yet.

FOOTNOTE 5 Equations

There are three slides in this footnote.  The first one shows the three specific governing iterated functions and their relationship, the second shows the function of these equations in terms of a domain and operator equation and the third shows the resulting scales of compression (without showing intervening compression states.

            There are 3 iterated equations give rise to dimensions.

            The first is fpix which is better known as the denominator of pi.  (this generates a line data in response to a quantum count the line being separated only by solution order)

            The other two are 2 times the Fibonacci number of n (generating a base numbering system for each dimension; and 2^n stating how many times each dimension folds to get to the next one).

            The second two derive from the first and all other equations result from these three.  In the original article published in September of 2018 the mathematical cover of the relationship of pi to the Fibonacci number is set out, but it can be visualized in the picture to the right.

            Fractals depend on the Fibonacci base number for their design and folding results in even building of dimension on odd exponent rotational structures.  Hence galaxies, shells and Vitruvian man reflect the universe tearing apart and coming together along compression lines in response to the net compression vs decompression of space.    Curvature and Fibonacci features result from fpix solutions and Fibonacci folding and unfolding.

            Perhaps the most interesting evidence in favor of this model lies in the application to observed Fibonacci ratios in the universe, shells, flowers, spiral galaxies all reflect the tearing apart of one fractal state to the next lower state. 

            The Vitruvian man also reflects this fact as shown in the scale drawing applying the fractal-pi relationship to that drawing:

Dimension and force result from folding.  As can be seen in this graphic, a quantum count “powers” the universe.  Each count creates a fused quantum of information which are separated only by solution order.  These quantum bits are space.  Space being separated only by solution order is too dense to move through.  Instead the folding and unfolding of space pushes everything else around, part of the reason for the failure of the Marely Michelson results, the other error being a misunderstanding of time.  Quantum space is not only logical in light of the mass-energy relationship, but it also allows for a simple explanation of Zeno’s paradox.  Rather than two things moving together through infinite space, the amount of quantum space between two objects decreases pulling the objects together.  In the case of the arrow and target, two ct4-5 transitional states are brought together as the ct1 space between them is reduced.

The final drawing just shows how the iterated functions yields the results observed in the graphical representation of iterated functions.

BDTH 9 unsmartifying and em 1

4 more sets of footnotes.
The best argument against widespread acceptance of my irrefutable model is that  it would make me impossible to live with.
Who wants to create another pompus windbag merely by putting amore accuate spin on spin theory.
All the up and down nonsense that you see, the colored quarks, the questions of origin and end are such blase things compared to the windbag of accuracy that I 'fart in your general direction.'
Ignorance is a small price to pay.
The bonus is that the editors can torture the upstart who would rewrite physics in a way both more accurate and more depressing.  For AuT destroys all the beauty and art in the world in its specificity.  Indeed, my very obnoxiousness is a function of the underlying forces which direct me without random randomness.  I deartify, debeautify, and debauchify the world with my scientification, mathematicianism and explanoramus describifying.
Indeed, in my unromantification of the universe, I unsmartify my own geniusification.

If you read closeely the argument you had an idea of what is coming.
There are some really interesting features of the wave.  The one I want to talk about today is the even exponent photons (t6) on the odd exponent s-like t7 construct.
What I ask you is whether this is coincidence or whether the wavelike structure of the t7, once assembled on the t8 or perhaps the continual alignment, as the t8 on 9, t9 on 10 leads to the structures we see as waves due to their mathematical look.

Footnote 3 Electromagnetic and weak forces

A discussion of the “unmatched” weak and strong forces is worth examining.  A discussion of their range is given above and is considered adequate.

AuT does not take a definitive approach in what type of loading and unloading is responsible for these since there are several alternatives that are worth considering, but all are structural, particle pre-time physics as opposed to field theory physics.

When you convert 16^32 ct5 states to base 10 you get 3.4x10^38.

The weak force is 10^25 and can be theorized to roughly correspond to the electron (10^13) structural component coming off of the 10^38 ct5 component consistent with electron-proton loading along with neutrons on the ct5 information arms.

The scale of the electromagnetic force at 10^36 is only a factor of 100 off from the ct5 information arm loading (10^38).  The photon, theorized at 10^6 is a candidate, especially in light of the photo-electric effect; but the suggestion is that the resulting effect would be closer to 10^32.  One could use the ct4-t2 state to get this scale and perhaps that figures into the analysis.  What does appear clear is that electro-magnetism as it is “measured” as opposed to how it exists in a quantum state free of ct5 effects are two different features.

The observed role in electro-magnetism (and spew) of the pre-photon, the magnetic part of the equation in the standard model, suggests that the correct number would relate to the interaction between the ct3 component (scaled 1:10^16 with the neutron) which does not yield a satisfactory result.

There is also the relationship of the ct3 prephoton with the photon (6) or electron (10^13) which would make it more like the gravitational force than the ct5 arm loading observed.

Perhaps part of the explanation lies in the relative “size” of the features.  In AuT folding, one result is that the electron is “larger” than the proton even though the proton has more mass because of the increase in compression from t-6 to t-16.  For the same reason, the t16 proton is larger than the ct4(16) neutron.  This is why a core of multiple black holes with 16^32 neutrons worth of information appears smaller than the surrounding galaxy which might have less information. 

The function of the electron and black hole can be compared.  What does appear likely based on a fractal analysis is that the neutron “absorbs” ct1 and spews prephoton ct3 which when rotated yields an electromagnetic field observed on earth and very important to life on earth; just as a black hole, operating on a larger scale, absorbs ct1 and spews plasma thick photons.

Footnote 4 Gravity

The simplest and first step in compression is the creation of the first dimension and gravity.  There is a lot in this simple picture which shows the creation of gravity. The breakdown is dark energy and movement.  This is the one state where a simple hinge to compression state ratio may be mathematically derived as 256:27 using the sin equation for the numerator of pi going from -1 (the base number in the fpix equation) to 1 (the solution for n=0 in the fpix solution).

          The only place where we see hinge states with mathematical certainty is at the -1 to 1 transition.  This simple transition gets more complex as dimensions are added. To understand this, imagine that the number of places for pi corresponds to the amount of information involved.  Hence, for pi at the -1 and 1 stage, the denominator is essentially a single, non-dimensional place. 

          This model does not have infinite series, so there are a specific number of places for the denominator of pi.  For neutrons, it would be 10^16 places (or 4.3x10^24 if ct1 is the operational feature) and for a black hole it would be 16^32 places.  Hence the solution for pi we use varies between the neutron, the atomic state, the molecular state and the black hole.

          One feature of the model which is interesting is how it goes towards explaining why the universe is not filled with light and by the same logic why it is not filled with gravity.  If light existed for all of time, if gravity did, then it would eventually fill the universe.  Both have a lifespan, however long, tied to fpix compression and decompression due to changing values.

BDTH 8 how the quantum wave combines to become observed waves

Two days in a row without exercise.  What a tragedy!
I still have time to swim but I doubt I will adn tomorrow is not looking good for it.
I have lost focus.
I am watching smokelike clouds move low in the sky.  Bells are ringing in the distance, it is midway between hours.
I should exercise while I can, but I am at a low point for some reason so I will be satisfied with the walk I took and the stetches for my back, and this very weird progress that I have made, finally solving the last of the dual slit anomallies.

There is a bit of math, but it is only the combination of pre-changed ct4t6 states to get the wave qualities combining along t7 arms (and possibly those combining over t8, etc) but where you end up is weird enough and it is set out below.

I needed to do a set of drawings of how feynman particles work together and I have a series of old drawings leading to the new one which appears in this morass below, but even the new one suggests one that has not been drawn yet.
While you can say that this figure:

or these:

and even this one

teach how these work together.  It is noteworthy that the right hand side is the stick on which the t7 state is built, being an odd exponent.
Before we finish we need to look at another drawing which is the earlier version of this stripping process, but with less detail:

and it must be viewed in light of this one discussing the pre-time changes due to the rotation of ct6 states giving it the multiple location and multiple state features:

But even that is not enough, you really need to combine these plus the ct3-4 compression chart...
To get here:

58c shows how the observation of a wavelike photon (t6) can collapse a t7 wave (box) by removing and freezing the photon whose pre-time features combine with similar pre-time waves to form the observed wavelength and where the removal so destablizes the odd exponent t7 arm so as to destroy the strong wave form that is built with these shrodinger photons, thereby yielding the particulate form through observation.
and, of course, we are not done since up to t12 these wave based structures are possible in advance of the electron and it appears that because of the makeup of wve strucutres even post time structures like the neutron have wave qualities.

It is a very odd and not entirely simple process, but it is defined within the model, even suggested to be necessarily the result.

And on to the second footnote, of perhaps 5 or six.  I forget.

Footnote 2: Force Scales

The charts which follow cover the specific primary forces and their derivation as well as showing the relative ranges of each.  It is worth noting that the limited effect of time on gravity and electromagnetic features (features at the electron and lower) that these appear to have infinite range.  In fact, we observe “net” gravity for this reason.  This explains dark energy as the net folding of higher ct states to ct1 space.

The modeling using Gravity as 1, but you can also look at gravity the other way; Gravity 6x10^-39th range infinite.  Gravity has a lifespan defined by folding vs unfolding, but we only observe the net effect because the changes occur (1) outside of dimension (at least partially) and (2) in a pre-time environment.

Electro-mag 1/137 range infinite-Again, electromagnetic effects have finite life spans, but ct3 changes are essentially outside of time and even electrons are largely time independent changes because the dimensional changes giving rise to time are governed by polynomial approximation for the higher exponent time changes tend to hind the lower time changes although the relative speed of the electron to the photon largely reflect the increased effects of time.

It is worth a discussion of how billion-year-old photons reach the earth.  The amount of information in just the observed universe is close to 10^153 bits of information based on the universe being close to a single ct6 state. What this means is that the average lifespan of a change in the middle of the universe where we live may be on the scale of 10^100 changes in x. This would be 10^56 seconds, allowing for an extremely long lifespan for both gravity and photons, but still short enough so that the universe does not fill with light or gravity.

Weak: 10^-6 Range 10^-18:  The strength matches proton-wave phenomena applied to a ct5 matrix.  The force felt at electron-proton: range matches location as fully collapsed neutron.

Strong force: strength 1 range 10^-15. At first glance, the range seems like it should be closer than the collapsed neutron; but since this is only a partially compressed ct5 state, it is less compressed than the fully compressed ct4.  The Range matches partially collapsed black hole.

          There is at 3.6x10^90 an unobserved force/compression state that may exist in the presence or resulting from ct6 arm compression and which may play a role in massive black holes which would, in turn, suggest a ct6 transitional state of “atomic black holes.”

Note this list does not include the energy to mass scale; e=mc^2 or in terms of AuT 2(4)^2^4=10^16.

The e=mc^2 can be seen explosively as releasing ct3-4 transitional states upon achieving ct4 isolation surrounded by ct1 primarily thereby creating the next dimension.

BDTH 7, collapsing waveforms and the Feynman particle

The genius of slide 43 in light of the chart of slide 34.  Is is not a coincidence that these are mirror image numbers.  Indeed, this is the last little bit of the dual slit experiment exposed to the the pre light of the collection of changes in x that we call a day.
You see, I am not the smart one, the slides are the real genius (geni? geniuses?)
So what is the Feynman particle (or perhaps the Heisman particle?  the Schrodinger particle? leave it to history, the genius charts say).
Waves share space in the sense that they compress towards matter along t7 information arms (assuming they are t6).  In this way they merge and change together while maintaining their independence as quantum transitional states.
when isolated, the wave generated by a single photon becomes an averaged particle having the features of all the places where it existed as generated pre-time, but separated from the other wave states of the otehr particles which were spread out in a pre-plasma state over a t7 information arm (assuming t6 as the photon).
Collapsing the waveform merely means peeling one photon off of the transitional t7 where it is in concert with the others and viewing the particle with all of its pre-time duplicity as an average placed quantum state from the standpoint of time, a Feynman particle instead of having all of the averages of all of the particles.  This is the last of the double slit anomally.
Once pulled off it can, in theory, be put back onto the t7 arm, but the t7 arm might be destroyed by pulling it off, shattering it into a plurality of these Feynman photons, collapsing the waveform.  Likewise, the rest may continue on wavelike leaving only the single Feynman particle alone, collapsed by pulling it off of its t7 roller coaster catepillar.

Speaking of separating particles 175.2 this morning, a little high; but not unduly especially since I did not exercise.

Footnotes for printed copy

Footnote 1 Omitted transition states

The most important feature, quantum change vs force is covered in Footnote 5. 

To keep the argument short the critical analysis of transitional states is omitted. Since almost all our physics derives from observations of the ct3-4 transitions, it is worth mentioning those here.

This first slide shows where we expect specific features to arise as fractals of the ct3-4 transition.  The electron is “five” ct4t12 states along with lesser clouds of lower ct states.  The muon, being 100 times the size of the electron appears to be a t14 state.  As can be seen t (transition) represents the value of the exponent in the 10^x compression.

This second graphic represents the 2^n compression arms. From space to precharge there are only 4 (2^2).  In this way, the first arm is merely 4 space states, then 16, then 64, then 256.  This is because 2(f(n) for n=2 is equal to 4.  Compare this to base 10 transitions for photons, electrons, muons, protons and neutrons in the first chart.  For ct4 you have 10 ct3 prephoton states for the first “arm” of ct4 or ct4t1.  Then 100, then 1000, etc up to 10^16.  As can be seen in this chart forces arise from where specific changes occur to these compression states.  One can think of the e=mc^2 as the point at which the neutron breaks free from the attached transitional states and releases them as a 10^16 cloud of energy.

You can also see that the first two arms of ct5 compression states defines the entire stable periodic table as up to 16 ct4 neutrons in the first arm and up to 265 neutrons in the compression of the second arm.  Since each pair of neutrons carries with it a cloud of lower ct states molecular forces follow.

As can be seen from the transitions for ct3-4 you have odd and even exponent type changes which in the base 10 numbering system yields the structural display of dimensions set out above.  Because lower and higher transitions involve a different “base “numbering system, the resulting structural features vary.

BDTH 6 of 10

So here we are wtih the final argument.

I changed it to narrow view from small minds, but that is the problem with being a genius, you are surrounded by smaller minds.  Nothing personal here, I am not a genius and in my refusal to find fault with my model, i have a small mind; knowing how the uiverse controls me I find it difficult to wrest the controls from the unseen hands of mathematics.

Several following posts will give the footnotes (you will have to view the youtube videos to see the slides). you will get the idea.

This has been submitted, for better or worse.  Articles are published, of course, but this is the mainstream.  if this happens i would say my nobel prize is in the bag, but if not the battle will continue in the secondary press.

Argument

Part 1 Compression as a source of dimension and force

1.     Overview of argument in favor of the Article:

I.                   Significantly advance

a.      This is a model of the universe below the level of thermodynamics

          The key aspects of this are (1) A specific equation (not a theory) yields sequential dimensions from a non-dimensional space, force, and time (2) change and time are separate, change being the only operative force and being quantum.  Time is an effect of dimensional change like force, (3) All the different dimensions (1-5) exist together.

A single equation model of force and dimension

          The model redefines force and matter in terms of a specific mathematical model so that force is a result of the application of the model, dimension is a result of the mathematical model.  Quantum change is the driving force in the universe, force is a result.

See Footnote 1 Omitted transition states

         

II.                Scientifically sound proof of the model

a.      Force strength, range and Compression State

This one chart shows how the model yields results which are backed up by observed results.

The ratio in terms of scale of all the forces work out well.  To understand how this works, you must forget about force being a driver and instead see force for what it is below the level of thermodynamics, an effect.  This means that what forces have been attributed to before is slightly different than what force is.  Saying things like "the weak force holds together.." is inaccurate when in fact the weak force is a “result” of the transition from one fractal state to the next.  For the higher forces, the cause vs effect is blurred, but the scale and range are instructive, and the precision of the results is high.

CT	2f(n)^2n	Dim State	Force	AuT Force		change	PreAuT
State	Compres- sion state			Spew	Aut Strength	range	recorded
1	4	Space-0					strength	range
	256	1	Gravity	G/AG		ct1-2-1	1	inf-g
2	1679616	1		PreCharge
		ct2-3	Charge	net sum precharge	variable	ct3-4-3		inf-EM1
3		2		Prephoton		ct2-3-2
	10^12-10^13	ct3-4	P-E interact	net compression	4.5*10^12-10^16	P-N	Prot/Elec:abs
4	1E+16	ct3-4	Energy//time	Atomic Prot/Neut abs	e=mc^2 (10^16)	N-P	10^16
	Transitional	ct4-5	PostAtom	N-P-N weak	10^25	N-N	10^25	10^-15
	Transitional	ct3-4-5	Forced molecular	N-P-e-P-N:EM	10^36	N-P	10^36	Inf-EM3
			strong	N-N 2 arms	10^38	N-P-E	10^38	10^-18
5	3.4028E+38	ct5	Very Strong	ct5 collapse	10^96	N-BH
6	2.136E+96	ct5-6	Non-Weak	ct5toct6	10^96<	BH-U

In looking at this chart, it is worth looking at a summary of the multiplication table showing the “full” or non-transitional results of compression of one state to the next for 2f(x)^2^x:

n	f(n)	2^n	Compression 2f(n)^2^n	ct1 states
1	1	2	4	4	space
2	2	4	256	256	precharge
3	3	8	1679616	4.30E+08	prephoton
4	5	16	1E+16	4.29982E+24	neutron
5	8	32	3.40282E+38	1.46315E+63	black hole
6	13	64	3.61655E+90	5.2916E+153	Uparticle

What you see here is the following:

Three “scale” ratios are clear: 1) Gravity=1; 2) e=mc^ corresponds to 10^16; 3) the strong force corresponds 3.4x10^38 corresponding to ct4-5 transitions.  These are precise observed ratios.

See FOOTNOTE 2 Force Scales

The weak force corresponds to a transitional force between 10^16 and 10^38, the loading of the first two information arms of ct5.  Similarly, electromagnetism corresponds to ct3 transitions within a ct4-5 matrix.  These are theoretical results but derived from a precise particle mathematical relationship.  Any shortcomings in the precision for the weak and electromagnetic forces are made up by the accuracy in resulting range solutions.

See FOOTNOTE 3 Electromagnetic and weak forces

It is logical that moving from non-dimensional space to dimensional ct2, you would generate gravity.  That other forces arise the same way is equally logical.  Moreover, the discussion of absorption and spew which ties the function of the Neutron to the Quasar (spewing black hole) is logical. 

          No other model is so clear in tying gravity to other forces and explaining the source of all forces from a common origin.

         

See FOOTNOTE 4 Gravity

Range

The second corresponding feature is the range observed.  Gravity and electromagnetic forces have perceived “unlimited range” because they are net pre-time forces.

The other forces correspond to the range over which compression applies them.  Compression of atoms or molecules will be restricted in range to the information arms over which they are applied, and these ranges are reflected in the observations and in the increasing compression of dimension reflected in the chart.

Underlying equations

The simplicity of the underlying model is the application of two iterated functions: 2f(n) and 2^n

When combined, it can be seen from the chart above that both the relative mass, force strength and range are defined by the model with such specificity as to demand further investigation.

The first slide under the first footnote in the attached argument shows how these fractal states are applied from ct3 (prephotons) to ct4 (neutrons) to accurately define Photons, electrons, Protons, Muons as transitional states (without quarks).  Similarly, the periodic table is essentially the filling of the first two arms of ct5 (black hole compression) between the ct4 neutron and the ct5 black hole.

Force, energy and other dimensional features result from the folding or unfolding of space in the form of “information arm” folding where the base increases by 2f(n) and the number of folds (information arms) by 2^n to get increased compression (ct) states.  The resulting mass of all sub-atomic and post atomic particles and forces correspond perfectly to these equations.   This chart appears complex, but it merely shows that forces, relative strength and observed range of forces follow the theoretical results of the model.

The most telling proofs are that all of the forces except for electromagnetism line up with compression results, it describes gravity with specificity and the scale of the e=mc^2 equation is reflected by 2f(n)^2^n for n=4 as expected.

See Footnote 5 equations

Part 2 Separation of Time and Change

            The second part is to separate time from change where time results from the same dimensional changes that give rise to force.

          The results of the first example and table are enough to carry the paper; but there is an important secondary result. Change is quantum (1,2,3, etc) and is unrelated to time even though time arises because of quantum change. Every point changes at exactly the same rate and with each change in the same x, but fused quantum information changes based on the fpix number for the point in question separate them and folding puts remote solution points in proximity.

          This is superficially covered by slides 4 and 6 in the short Denver slide show and in the appealed article in more detail.

          Time is not a dimension but is an effect of dimensional change, ct1 changes within the matrix of a ct3-4 transition state (between the photon and the neutron).

See Footnote 6 time

            This requires a more nuanced view of how the conclusion explains otherwise complex phenomena:

          Phenomena 1: Time dilation: results from the number of these changes that can occur within a ct3-4 regional matrix compared to ct1 changes outside the matrix.  Gravitational time dilation reflects that an increase in gravity squeezes those lower ct changes out and the less compressed information states become more compressed.

          Phenomena 2 and 3: Waves (2) and Schrodinger type observations (3) arise from pre-time changes viewed from the standpoint of time. 

          Pre-time changes are net changes.

          Wave:  A wave results from a point photon being rotated for many changes in x when viewed from the standpoint of time just as a wave form is generated by rotating a circle against the movement of a sheet of paper.  When the pre-time changes in x are viewed from the standpoint of time, the point appears to exist over all the points of the wave.

          Therefore, a point photon for any value of x is still a point. In a dual slit experiment, one of two things occur (a) The pre-time structure of waves are collapsed by observation or (b) the pretime rotation is stopped by observation.  Hence, an otherwise mysterious wave-particle duality is easily defined by having pre-time and post time results for change.

         

Summary

          Why are you inclined to reject a model which has this high degree of predictability?  Perhaps the answer lies in the movement of physics back 100 years.

          Marley and Michelson’s work is proved defected because instead of “empty space” space turns out to be the most dense dimensional feature and instead of things moving through space, space either pushes higher compression states, folds into them, or unfolds from them.

          Quark theory is rejected in favor of fractal geometry. 

          Feynman and Heisenberg calculations are reduced to irrelevance by the certainty of true quantum fundamental features.

          Schrodinger and twin slit results are explained; for any value of x, while being in multiple places over time. Schrodinger’s cat is only at one place for any value of x, but once time is applied, the cat appears to occupy many locations.

          This is too radical for a narrow view of the universe, but it can engage a broader view and it is mathematically specific and predictive.  On the other hand, Peter Haggni’s “universe is an information processor,” and Max Nathan’s “fundamental equations for the operation of the universe” are fully supported by this model.

III.             It is important: A new predictive model of the universe is important

IV.            It is accessible to readers: The videos as well as the article are complete summaries.

V.             It has reproducibility and is verified and even required by existing observations.

          The math is both clear, complete and easily applied to existing observations of force for confirmation, even with a hand calculator.

See Footnote 7 summary slides