BDTH 9 unsmartifying and em 1

4 more sets of footnotes.
The best argument against widespread acceptance of my irrefutable model is that  it would make me impossible to live with.
Who wants to create another pompus windbag merely by putting amore accuate spin on spin theory.
All the up and down nonsense that you see, the colored quarks, the questions of origin and end are such blase things compared to the windbag of accuracy that I 'fart in your general direction.'
Ignorance is a small price to pay.
The bonus is that the editors can torture the upstart who would rewrite physics in a way both more accurate and more depressing.  For AuT destroys all the beauty and art in the world in its specificity.  Indeed, my very obnoxiousness is a function of the underlying forces which direct me without random randomness.  I deartify, debeautify, and debauchify the world with my scientification, mathematicianism and explanoramus describifying.
Indeed, in my unromantification of the universe, I unsmartify my own geniusification.

If you read closeely the argument you had an idea of what is coming.
There are some really interesting features of the wave.  The one I want to talk about today is the even exponent photons (t6) on the odd exponent s-like t7 construct.
What I ask you is whether this is coincidence or whether the wavelike structure of the t7, once assembled on the t8 or perhaps the continual alignment, as the t8 on 9, t9 on 10 leads to the structures we see as waves due to their mathematical look.

Footnote 3 Electromagnetic and weak forces

A discussion of the “unmatched” weak and strong forces is worth examining.  A discussion of their range is given above and is considered adequate.

AuT does not take a definitive approach in what type of loading and unloading is responsible for these since there are several alternatives that are worth considering, but all are structural, particle pre-time physics as opposed to field theory physics.

When you convert 16^32 ct5 states to base 10 you get 3.4x10^38.

The weak force is 10^25 and can be theorized to roughly correspond to the electron (10^13) structural component coming off of the 10^38 ct5 component consistent with electron-proton loading along with neutrons on the ct5 information arms.

The scale of the electromagnetic force at 10^36 is only a factor of 100 off from the ct5 information arm loading (10^38).  The photon, theorized at 10^6 is a candidate, especially in light of the photo-electric effect; but the suggestion is that the resulting effect would be closer to 10^32.  One could use the ct4-t2 state to get this scale and perhaps that figures into the analysis.  What does appear clear is that electro-magnetism as it is “measured” as opposed to how it exists in a quantum state free of ct5 effects are two different features.

The observed role in electro-magnetism (and spew) of the pre-photon, the magnetic part of the equation in the standard model, suggests that the correct number would relate to the interaction between the ct3 component (scaled 1:10^16 with the neutron) which does not yield a satisfactory result.

There is also the relationship of the ct3 prephoton with the photon (6) or electron (10^13) which would make it more like the gravitational force than the ct5 arm loading observed.

Perhaps part of the explanation lies in the relative “size” of the features.  In AuT folding, one result is that the electron is “larger” than the proton even though the proton has more mass because of the increase in compression from t-6 to t-16.  For the same reason, the t16 proton is larger than the ct4(16) neutron.  This is why a core of multiple black holes with 16^32 neutrons worth of information appears smaller than the surrounding galaxy which might have less information. 

The function of the electron and black hole can be compared.  What does appear likely based on a fractal analysis is that the neutron “absorbs” ct1 and spews prephoton ct3 which when rotated yields an electromagnetic field observed on earth and very important to life on earth; just as a black hole, operating on a larger scale, absorbs ct1 and spews plasma thick photons.

Footnote 4 Gravity

The simplest and first step in compression is the creation of the first dimension and gravity.  There is a lot in this simple picture which shows the creation of gravity. The breakdown is dark energy and movement.  This is the one state where a simple hinge to compression state ratio may be mathematically derived as 256:27 using the sin equation for the numerator of pi going from -1 (the base number in the fpix equation) to 1 (the solution for n=0 in the fpix solution).

          The only place where we see hinge states with mathematical certainty is at the -1 to 1 transition.  This simple transition gets more complex as dimensions are added. To understand this, imagine that the number of places for pi corresponds to the amount of information involved.  Hence, for pi at the -1 and 1 stage, the denominator is essentially a single, non-dimensional place. 

          This model does not have infinite series, so there are a specific number of places for the denominator of pi.  For neutrons, it would be 10^16 places (or 4.3x10^24 if ct1 is the operational feature) and for a black hole it would be 16^32 places.  Hence the solution for pi we use varies between the neutron, the atomic state, the molecular state and the black hole.

          One feature of the model which is interesting is how it goes towards explaining why the universe is not filled with light and by the same logic why it is not filled with gravity.  If light existed for all of time, if gravity did, then it would eventually fill the universe.  Both have a lifespan, however long, tied to fpix compression and decompression due to changing values.