Day 320 of the apocalypse, 7 years ahead of mit, now princeton too and still being spoon fed

I got some disturbing news today.  I'm not going into it.  It has been a while since I've been here.  My time is limited.

The screen is hard to read, my eyes have gotten much worse just lately.

I am going through withdrawals.  Alright, that is spelled wrong but even when I get close and try to read it it looks right to me.  By the time you get it it will be right.   There will be other mistakes.

Where to start.   I have reached out to get help, but I am not sure what that means, there are some conditions where the cure is worse than the disease.  I know what I want for help, but what will be given to me?  Will it come at all?  I reach for things and they disappear like ghosts.

I don't want to be cured from the pain, I want to be cured from the things that keep me from feeling it.

I am falling apart.  I feel my body separating into pieces because of what is going on in my mind.

I figured out the proton election interface.  It was, like all things in the model, obvious once I saw it, although I will admit to a great amount of discomfort with the solution.  If you ever see it you will understand.  And yet, yet ... the universe spoon fed it to me, like it has done with some many of the complex answers, so many of the things I could never have done on my own.

The paradox issue, the fractal issue, the atom design and now this thing.  All things I could have never done on my own, but the answer was given to me.  Why?

I swam again tonight.   I had no choice.  I did not swim yesterday so I did not even have the broken sleep that passes for my nights.  I was at my office at 530 in the morning, Id had coffee, breakfast such as it was and I cleared out the weeks built up emails, and I wrote down what I had been given in the night and then I drew it out and now I'll edit the drawing.  I don't have enough time.

I have seven days, a handful of working days left.  I don't know whether to do this by halves or try to do it right or not at all, but I think I have no choice but to try for something, and  halves are all I have to work with.  There is only half a life left, only half of me, I'm am more than half blind but I passed my last physical, they don't care if you're blind as long as you don't have a high white count.

The mental pain turns me to physical pain, the physical pain turns me to exercise, the exercise gives me low blood pressure.

I am alone.  I have the answers to the issues raised in this article:

https://scitechdaily.com/quirky-response-to-magnetism-presents-quantum-physics-mystery-there-must-be-some-exotic-physics-going-on/

I had the rough answer before, but the detailed answer was spoon fed to me after I had a rough edged version which I had some time ago.

On the curvature of space, there is this: "... “space-time tells matter how to move; matter tells space-time how to curve.” How this relationship plays out at the quantum scale is not known."

This article is from Princeton:  https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/s114

It is frustrating because I know exactly how this happens and I have written it out.  I have a 10 or 12 line summary, I will post it soon.  It is all in the book, or most of it, the reconciliation of the black hole is not anywhere except in an unpublished video and it will appear in the next patent.  Then underlying science is all there, the universe did not spoon feed it to me, at least not in the same way.  I was in the hot tub and the solution came to me and I tested it and it was good, but it was not spoon fed, except to the extent it was spoon fed into my brain.

So I am 7 years ahead of MIT and Princeton, but I have no support.  Perhaps it is my attitude, why doesn't the universe spoon feed that to me, or happiness.

Day 314 of the apocalypse, true quantum mechanics and the big bang

I am stuck between 172 and 173 pounds, although I am not trying very hard.  I have been exercising every day, but many days, like eight days ago, the exercise was not strenuous.  A 30 minute bike ride without excessive pushing it and a walk which had no cardiovascular elements.

I realized that my 11/24 deadline was actually 10/31, the october surprise.  I have had to throw myself bodily into this thing which I was by no means ready for.  You might say 2 weeks is plenty of time and it is for anyone normal doing anything normal.  I am not.

The frustrating thing about being 7 years ahead of everyone else is that I'm too far ahead to be recognized, but not so far ahead that I don't see these articles where other scientists are slowly catching up.

Published articles on AuT cover both of these issues.  What is the difference between the AuT articles and these other than AuT was first?

https://phys.org/news/2020-10-quantum-mechanics-reality-person.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8820671/Another-universe-existed-Big-Bang-black-holes-hold-proof-existence.html

The difference is that AuT provides a specific model.  The difference is that AuT and I mandate these results.

The difference is that everyone else has a different job, a different life, whatever.

AuT explains in detail how time can be eliminated as a dimensional result and how information can be fixed by observation causing the cloud-like electron to a point, a net charge location by watching it, effectively fixing the charge in place and dropping out the wave qualities.

The vibrational effects of ct1  change based on memorized results to fpix clearly define an expanding and contracting universe, perhaps one which expands on either side of a next compressed state.  this explains hundreds of things, like earlier than expected galaxies and black holes and larger than expected amounts of heavy elements.

I've been effectively black listed to protect their turf from someone who has the answers but they don't want them coming from a non member of the tribe as it were.  How long can they silence the science remains to be see when you have articles like these where others are coming up with the same results, while not the same models, as AuT.

Recently I was trapped by a puzzle on the observed vrs calculated black hole which solved itself using the math of AuT in a spectacular form, totally predictable in hindsight.  It was fantastic both in terms of how it happened and that it happened and that I did it myself.

I'm not unhappy with my team, but neither do they inspire me in the least.  I'm hardly a giant among mortals, I'm just directed, under the control of the universe in every way; waiting for my break, which never seems to come, always just out of reach.

I am tired, I'm at the end of my tether, but i only have two weeks and to the extent that I don't get where I need to be next week, the pressure will begin to exert an undue influence over the work that needs to be done.

And every day, there is more, not less.

Day 289 of the covid apocalypse Support for AuT undermining the standard model

I weighed in at 171 today after having this for dinner, cleaning out the last of the food that "survived" the power outage.  None of it looked very good before I cooked it, not sure what it looks like now.  It was not a terrible meal.

That song post from the last blog might be seen as insulting, but what if I'm the girl?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjzXO4ixrsE

The question becomes what happens when you have done everything that can possilbly be done to answer the universe.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3azqq3/unexplained-phenomena-keep-suggesting-the-universe-isnt-what-we-thought

What a load of bunk.  Of course it isn't and if the APS had an ounce of editorial courage and integrity you could read my stuff there, but you can see a video of it on my youtube page and there are lots of hidden pages and, of course, the books which are terribly out of date but still 7 years ahead of the bunk you read in the APS.

You can even listen to it.

These guys don't even have an inkling of the real timeline, but its in those books.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/m7ja9a/a-mysterious-ancient-galaxy-just-rewrote-the-universes-timeline?utm_source=stylizedembed_vice.com&utm_campaign=3azqq3&site=vice

Finally, something funny, I hope.

Day 288 of the apocalypse More proof of AuT and the black hole reconciliation

Today has been an odd day, but all days seem odd during a pandemic and it would be weird at the cutting edge of science where I live anyway.

I've been as disoriented as I ever get when my inner ear makes me hallucinate.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DwuYqXre1w

I weighed in at 172, but I seem to be stuck between there and 175, which is still better than the 185 where I'd drifted before the current apocalypse.

What I did was ride my bike in the rain to lift weights and in that way put my life in the universe's hands but it had more important things to do.

The complexity of the paper I am working on is difficult to express.  I'd say impossible, but since it is a paper, it will ultimately express itself, therefore becoming possible.

The side issues would be worth papers, defining electricity and electromagnetic phenomena using the dimensional model of AuT in terms of pre-time features.  It is a very strange astrolabe world of interlocking gears, not the fluid world we perceive.

I have not seen the sun in some time, the last time I saw it was in the morning as the sun was beginning to rise, I had a 30 minute walk from the shop to my office, because it was so early that i was able to avoid most of the sun which is a blow torch this time of year and the cold front made it well.  After that, my car was ready for the expected expedition, if I can only figure out where it will be.

Had to mix some decaf high end instant with low end caffeinated to get flavor plus cheap instant to get the caffeine.  Not sure if it will be drinkable after it cools, but the first few minutes of it are bearable and I need to drop back to my half cup per day.

https://www.salon.com/2020/09/06/physics-is-stuck--and-needs-another-einstein-to-revolutionize-it-physicist-avi-loeb-says/

This is me, lol.  An idiot in charge of the largest advance in physics.  Only in this universe.

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/why-is-there-a-normal-galaxy-sitting-at-the-edge-of-the-universe

Big bang theory renders this article impossible, AuT requires it.

That is where I am at as my world crumbles around me.

How severe was the Beirut blast as compared to the atomic blast?

Assuming all of the 2,750 tons of highly purified ammonium nitrate stored in the warehouse decomposed in the principal blast, that blast was very roughly the equivalent of 1 kiloton of TNT detonation, or about 1/15th the power of the Little Boy bomb dropped on Japan.Of course, the blast was at ground level, so much of the energy was expended destroying nearby buildings and excavating a 125 meter crater.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mystery-object-blurs-line-between-neutron-stars-and-black-holes/

Nevertheless, there is nothing comparable to a good friend; no slave is so affectionate to our person or interest; no horse can render us so great service; in a word, nothing is so useful to us in all occasions. For a true friend supplies all the wants and answers all the demands of another, either in the conduct of his private affairs or in the management of the public. If, for instance, his friend be obliged to do a kindness to any man, he puts him in the way of it; if he be assaulted with any danger he immediately flies to his relief. At one time he gives him part of his estate, at another he assists him with the labour of his hands; sometimes he helps him to persuade, sometimes he aids him to compel; in prosperity he heightens his delight by rejoicing with him; in adversity he diminisheth his sorrows by bearing a share of them. The use a man may make of his hands, his eyes, his ears, his feet, is nothing at all when compared with the service one friend may render another. Socrates 

Day 283 of the Apocalypse and going off topic

So I try to avoid politics, but got this image in my head and had to turn it into a post.

 

Day 274 (9/6) of the apocalypse and the smoking gun

I hate the universe.  Before getting into the more specific reasons, let me say that i weighed in at 171.8, the first time under 172 this morning.  Then took a shower, shaved (losing more weight) and came back at 173.  WTF?

my coffee has turned this ugly brown color, muddy.  it is not working so well.  I am taking massive amounts of vitamin e, my "che" is increasing and you are nowhere to help with it.  I am frustratd, but you want to see what is really frustrating, read on.

SPD orbitals are so not AuT, but it is only recently that I have gotten there.  I got to chemistry in a big way in the last 60 days when I figured out the origin of the periodic table of the elements.

I could say if I get 1000 subscribers maybe I'll post the video here, but I'm not sure that is my target.  I have another book to publish, just have too much to do to get started on that.

https://scitechdaily.com/nsf-announces-mit-led-institute-for-artificial-intelligence-and-fundamental-interactions/

This is paying 100 million dollars to do what AuT has already done which is a pretty regular thing.   FTU.  Eventually, I suppose someone in the institute will read one of my papers or patents and then claim to have figured it out thereby justifying the expense.

Speaking of abuse, today's lesson will be lookng at the "traditional physics version of things" from Quora and saying bad things about it:

A simplified model says that they have 3 quarks, but a more realistic model shows that that's the net result after adding up all the mess of crap that is popping into and out of existence at any given time inside them :up, down, anti-up, anti-down, gluons attaching to the quarks, gluons attaching to other gluons, etc.

Up to this point physics is confused, but at least on the right track.  Then they get completely lost, talking about undulating and have waves and using the vague concept of quarks instead of the more specific ct state and transitional ct state model, but other than getting everything wrong, they do have a certain version of compression and decompression which would get them a 5 out of 100 on a test.

Now when we get to larger scales, like nuclei, or otherwise thought of as collections of nucleons, we see funny things happening. The nucleons like to bunch up in groups of 4 with two protons and two neutrons. These are basically helium nuclei, and nuclear physicists call them alpha particles (because historically they were the first particle ever discovered in radioactive materials, along with the second which are beta particles or electrons, and the third which are gamma particles or photons).

Ok, here is where the video, if you had a link to it would add a little light but even the old versions of aut focused on the nucleus as something fairly different, a backbone of neutrons sharing absorption and spew and pulling in two protons which in turn pull intwo electrons.  The whole idea of photons and or rays (gamma particles) is not so far off since at least they are calling them particles, although they have zero idea of pretime change as energy.  They also having pairing which is critical to stability and is, again, something shown even at the neutron number 77 level which to the uneducated looks like an odd number.  I bet you would like to see the math on that one!

You know how electrons form orbital shells around atoms, well nucleons can do it too. The alpha particles can actually group together in orbitals just like electrons, and can form halos orbiting around the central nucleus. If the protons and the neutrons are close to the magic numbers, and their shells are filled, they tend to be more stable, and don't want to decay. So the nuclei with shells on and around these magic numbers will form lots of halos similar to what we see electrons doing for atoms.

This paragraph is not so terrible either, it almost, but does not, get to the fractal nature of things.

If the nuclei have excess energy, like if a nucleus was just impacted with a neutron or a high energy photon, they can also take on nonspherical shapes, undulating with excess energy as waves move throughout the body and along the surface of the nucleus.

Oh help, the old science lost in a total misunderstanding of energy and matter, movement and time.

Moving further out into the atomic scale, we see beautiful patterns in electron orbital that follow the various patterns of the spherical bessel functions. We see interesting overlaps when orbitals hybridize, such as in the case with carbon, taking on a tetrahedral shape with it's four SP-3 electron orbitals. We can actually look at methane molecules and see this tetrahedral shape. But atoms tend to gravitate toward spherical shapes as you start to overlap all of the orbital patterns on top of each other. And the larger the atom gets, the more orbitals you stack, the more those begin to fill out a generally spherical shape.

the 21 and higher are argon-1 and higher; these d orbitals are the result of the expansion of the neutron core outward.

Now we have gotten to a place where the new model of the neutron core becomes critical to understanding what is really going on.   Unfortunately, we are not giving any of thata detail out, suffice it to say if you seek the smoking gun article, you will find it.

To answer your question, how do we know they're spherical? They're not, at least technically most of the time. There is structure to them, and there are oscillations to consider that travel through the center and along the surface if you want to really think about how one would actually look and behave. But like the water droplets, they tend to have a generally spherical shape. In the case of water, it's because of surface tension and van der Waals forces. With atoms, it's the Electromagnetic force. With nuclei and nucleons, it's the strong and weak forces. They tend to fall into spherical shapes because the sphere is the shape that minimizes the potential energy in the system.

There is about 10% truth to this.  Yes, not spherical, but not orbital in this sense, remember fractals?  Yeah, think about it, you will get it eventually.

In regards to your question, its kind of similar to how most of the time, we don't need to consider special relativity when checking the time. We are moving so much slower than the speed of light that the difference in your time versus my time is basically zero. Most of the time the excess energy that causes the deformations in the surface isn't really worth considering unless you're doing really really precise calculations and these imperfections become relevant. For most things though, it's easier to just start with a simpler system, and get a good enough answer to continue on to other things.

Relativity is a time based phenomena and time merely reflects pre time dimensional changes giving a form of stop frame animation to the universe (and see as space) so lets just say that this paragraph is just a confused example of the misdirection of relativity and be done with that?

I am going to publish this and then go back and clean it up.  You're welcome.

Day 239: Specter-introduction

Day 239, 94 days to the next election, the apocalypse continues.

This post begins the next paper from:

www.specterscientific.com

I have consistently weighed in around 173 pounds, essentially 15 pounds under my pre-covid weight, although most of that was lost before covid. I continue to less scrupulously follow the regimen of exercise, portion control and diet which I expect will get me down to my second target weight of 170 pounds and which has rendered my comfortable clothes too large and the once abandoned clothes comfortable. There isn't much need to dress up these days, but at least I am there.

My situation continues to be complicated. I have built my initial science team, done some incredibly significant work in the Covid arena and rewritten the NSF grant and resubmitted it along with letters of commendation; but I have a long way to go to monetize any of these; although the science is well secured for at least the next 90 days and probably until January if April of 2021 when some level of funding should be forthcoming. I realize I am more of an unrecognized Edison than a Ford and I need a Ford to recognize the potential of the project to myself; but there are areas where I ahead of the curve and areas where I am behind and this post includes the beginnings of the next assault on the recognition end of things; there are other undertakings on the monetizing end of things.

The introduction

AuT continues to accurately predict results based on the fractal model that was originally submitted and refused, without reason, to the APS.

The purpose of this article is twofold. One is to expose the institutional prejudice at the APS, the other is to update the articles previously submitted.

In the defense of the APS, the original submissions were of a very theoretical construct. The math was not clearly laid out and it was more of a concept piece, largely in the vein of the better known work of Max Nathan. The defense stops there.

The later article set out the math at the core of the pre-thermodynamic universe. While many of the critical features were not defined until later, and while it was a rough theory without all of the subsequent verification, AuT did reconcile and correlate gravity with the other forces, define the big bang and black holes and any one of these or the other solutions provided including the rough definition of space, time and quantum change alone would have made it worthy of publication and extensive recognition.

Why didn't the editorial board approve the article or even respond to requests that the promised critique of the article be made? The answer is obvious, institutional prejudice. The article was not submitted by an "insider" one of the "race" of PhD level physicists who were members of the APS. For this reason the first in a series of the most important physics papers ever written was published in the "Journal of Physical Mathematics." September 4, 2018 DOI 10.4172/2090-0902.10.00290 as Algorithm Model Defining Dimensional Features.

A more accurate version, but still reflecting the underlying math appeared in:

"Advances in Theoretical & Coputational Physics ISSN 2639-0108 May 3, 2019 based on an article submitted 2/2/19 and accepted on the 21rst. Space is the Same thing as Energy-The Underlying Structure of the Observed Universe Review Article Friedlander GM Clean Water, Inc, Attn: Gregory Friedlander, 11 S Florida St, Mobile, AL 36606, USA Corresponding author Friedlander GM, Clean Water, Inc, Attn: Gregory Friedlander, 11 S Florida St, Mobile, AL 36606, USA; E-Mail: gmfpc1@gmail.com Submitted: 02 Feb 2019; Accepted: 21 Feb 2019; Published: 03 May 2019

AuT is radical and while easily confirmed, it is so obvious that it shows the inability of the aristocracy of physics to consider anything which does not follow their preconceived and to a large extent brainwashed models. AuT eviscerates 100 years of Nobel prize theories including the work of Einstein on whose work it is based. This is important. It isnt' that AuT does not go far beyond the work of these other physicsts, it does. It is that AuT depends on the work of the last 100 years for its proof and providing an adequate basis for what it teaches. That does not mean that the other work survives AuT.

150 years of chemistry and 100 years of physics are doomed to be replaced by AuT and the paper which is the subject of this introduction is the proof of this assertion. It is impossible to "prove" the assertions against APS, those are implied. The only defense of the APS to what is otherwise clear prejudice; is that in the AuT universe, no one is guilty of their crimes in the traditional sense.

Science continues to pursue dead ends, despite coming close by accident; only AuT points us in the right direction for the next revolution. The other attempts are the equivalent of chickens pecking at the ground; so it is only right they are worried about chirping.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a33396352/nuclear-fusion-tokamaks-chirping-problem/