plans, impediments and love

When things are at the darkest, it is important to act
when everything is stacked against, when there is no future
you need to make a plan even if you don't feel hope
And if you don't have a good alternative
you need to stick with the plan
and when its working you need to stick with the plan
this applies to financial problems
it applies to personal problems
maybe it even applies to love
that thing which tries to defy all plans
Sometimes you plan together
sometimes you plan apart
sometimes you have to choose what to do
when your conspirators appear to abandon you
but if you don't have another alternative
and it seems to be working
you should stick with the plan
and if someone throws an impediment
but they don't offer an alternative
it doesn't behoove you to abandon the plan
and sometimes you may have to change the plan
so that someone can join you in it
and sometimes you have to stick with the plan
and hope someone will see the wisdom in it
Napoleon said "Courage isn't having the strength to go it
it's going on when you don't have strength"
so if you don't agree with my plan
don't be surprised if I go on without you
but don't assume because i follow my own plan
that i am not mindful of the plans we have together.

Thorns in our paws

I am dealing with a lot right now. Could you just slow down a little. Do you think controlling time is this important? Don't you think my time should have a little of me in it. I think you should have most of your time. How come if I come around to your way of thinking it's no longer good enough for you. Maybe every time things don't go just the way I want them I should dump on you. Its mort aux con (sp?) Not mort aux idiots but it means the same thing and is just as funny in context... why do you want to kill everyone. This isn't for you its for me you want to sleep in the rats nest you made you have to wait and see if it works I've got my own thorns and I need to find someone to pull them out not drive them in deeper and twist the blades, am I right? Are you?

Why there is rgb matter in T-space

merely merily merely?  Life is but a dream-time is the stuff dreams are made of.
Quantum Tunneling in the hologram universe:
This is a work in progress...
T-matter is time or tendency matter as used in this blog. T space is time space.  RGB is merely the designation given to the fact that matter comes in multiple varieties (multiple strings if you go that way, quarks and the like if you are more into fundamental particles, neither being a proper designation since matter and energy are only manifestations of a tendency to return from t-space to g-space.
Matter and energy are different methods of display and hence may have different tendencies but both must is some fashion be a tendency to return from time to the hologram universe under this conceptual framework.
Matter is displayed along three axis, that is there are tendencies to return to the singularity manifested in time along three dimensions; which do not exist except as movement along time.  Time is not the fourth dimension, it is entirely separate and is the thing on which the three dimensions take shape.  Each element or quantum of t-matter has its own time in one version of this universe and this time allows it to be observed along three dimensions.
Light has its own time, but its time is such that it can move between the times of different quanta of matter.  Radiations that move at light speed show this quality.  In addition the manifestation of the return to the singularity (gravity) is an additive quality that travels at a similar speed and is combinable as quantum of time are joined with the increase in matter.
In fact, gravity is such a powerful force of tendency that it pulls light radiation bending and defracting it which supports the theory that light time also has the tendency to return to the singularity; light being pulled into a black hole is pulled back to the singularity.  Radiation escaping from gravity shows an anti-tendency; it is carried in time despite the fact that all matter and therefore energy is a reflection of the tendency to escape time back to the singularity; but if reduced to a form which has no mass, it would have less tendency suggesting, for the next blog, a tendency to stick to time or travel within time.

World War C-Status update

World War C (The fictionalized version of "China's Weaponized Economy") is in the final editing stages and should be available by March.
I am attempting, in the face of absurd (perhaps warranted) difficulties to stay focused.
I have a couple of patents I need to draft, the light patent; and at least one other.
My todo list discusses the book outlined previously, it says-get amorous, then rabid which is funny and ironic under the circumstances.
The need to have manufacturing in place on a widespread basis in the even of economic collapse and especially given the weaponized Chinese economy means that I have to spend more time on this and how it will affect Europe.

The end of the world in debt-Not

http://moneymorning.com/ob/economist-richard-duncan-civilization-may-not-survive-death-spiral-3/

The question is improperly phrased.  The question is how can we survive a collapse of the current economic situation without manufacturing.
With manufacturing our banking system can collapse and be replaced with another.  Without manufacturing, we will not be able to buy from anyone else what we need to keep going nor will we be able to fight them off.
There are insurrmountable challenges out there (with todays limited technologies), but this is not one of them.

outlining online

The flu zombies
where are you now
adding rabies to vacine
why are we apart today
first they turn amorus
if time is made of little moments
then they are rabid
then why do we spend all of our time
the story is nothing more
worrying about the future
than a river to carry the story
and how do we get there
how do we deal with the collapse
of our lives, our love, our money
the answer is the same for all of these
we must live within our means
and we must be jurisdictionally consistent
or we must accept some things
don't rely on space

Difficulties of authoriship-poem

Writers write better when hungry
they must be treated like orchids
never too much light or they die
and they bloom only when starved
I live in a time of great disparity
There is abundance around me
but the economy is rotten
the people burdened by their sloth
I have a practice of great potential wealth
there is little with which to satisfy the immediate toll
The future is full of opportunity
my cases continue to settle
one book progresses to its formal publication
yet the past is full of misery and worry
my creditors fill the air with their lamentations
the future claims to yellow gold and sun
I am as strong and healthy as I have ever been
but am rotten in the core like the economy
I lift like Atlas, ride with the wind
inside, I feel the turning of a worm
My god has shown both interest and misery
as if to goad me to reject his existence
I quote science, but only as a necessity
to prove that it too exists only for something else
I seek to disprove the existence of a higher power
only by proving that the universe it too complex
to exist at all, whether by his will or not
Everything about me is juxtaposed
Even in my personal life
i have the best lover in the world
and yet i never have sex
she embodies beauty and contraditions
I love coffee dearly in the morning
and yet I continue to deny myself
without a clear reason I am tortured
and tonight I will sleep soundly
in a place that I hesitate to pay for
satisfied only that the quality of the deal
offsets the extravegance
that the future scoffs at
and the present abhors

moon and stars

It is cold and crisp outside tonight
The water in the air almost frozen
The moon is half, but the curve shows
in three dimensions, large on the horizon
facing upward and open towards the sky
like a giant silver bowl
into which all the stars
are being poured
bright and brilliant
sun and planet scatered on the funnel of the sky
The galaxy showing
as only it can in the freezing air
pouring into the open moon

coffee-the last day; the last days for presentment

I don't know about you, but I have "unofficially" gone 60 days without coffee.  Same as to tea.  I don't say that I'm going out and having a cup any time soon.  I may want to save that for something special, although I don't have any special plans as yet.

As the deadline approaches to file presentment claims against bp (The 20th is the official deadline) questions arise daily.  I saw an article about Mississippi Municipalities filing and the article was so badly written it made me cringe.  The article said that businesses and individuals were excused, which is wrong. Only those in the class are excused.

Fortunately, all of the presentments I had planned are behind me now.  There may be another one or two which come up, but I'm done as far as I'm concerned.  The next step in the process is to file suit.  There are rumblings out there that you can satisfy this with a short form joinder.  This is a high risk venture, I suppose, but not something that is out of the question for cases which are otherwise too difficult to pursue.

Note that while the 20th is the accepted deadline (receipt by the 20th, mind you); it is not necessarily a required deadline under the opa.

BP has been making "outrageous" demands for supplementary documentation, but those requests are not mandated by the opa and whether they will seriously consider the large claims filed by businesses and individuals who were affected by the spill remains to be seen.

Envisioning non-matter

In the hologram universe, where matter is only the tendency of time to drop back into the singularity (not a, but the), envisioning why there are multiple forms of tendency (quarks, photons and the like) has proved to be a more challenging item than the concept of matter as tendency.
I am working on it.
Should I chose to continue, in 4 days I will have gone the targeted 60 days without caffene (except that which you inhale just walking around in our hyped up society.  I have no celebration planned, perhaps a nice cup of tea.

to hold and hold not-poem

we both have our problems
so we agree not to talk
and then we agree to talk
but not to be in love
and then on sleepless nights
i hear your complaints
of what you want
and what you don't have
and i sit alone and panic
over what i do and don't
with no one to hold tight
and i realize to my dismay
that we do love afterall

One more journal entry

Spent yesterday in Mississippi dealing with property issues in wake of events collecting dues of life enjoying perks and money from fate which is never enough thinking that perhaps phone sex is not real sex but is the exercise of the mind and passion without the physical company and what is worse that or the nothing I enjoy in my exhausted state tonight. It has been 55days and this am I thought of a blog about how the last days might be the hardest but now coffee sounds bitter like being ignored by your lover

26 million unemployed-Europe joins the war with China

Wow! Has it really been 53 days since I drank coffee or tea?
For those of you who have read or looked at "China's Weaponized Economy" or earlier entries on this blog you know what I'm talking about.
The second edition of Trust-How we lost the war with china (the second edition is named World War C) remains only slightly behind schedule.
As China moves forward with its weaponized economy, Europe increasinly feels the sting and the concepts of "term intelligence" and "self supporting economies" and that we are at war with China become more important to the European audience daily.

longing without answers

It has been a busy morning
The variation in things constant
so many different obligations
a collection of infinite opposites
my thoughts always return to you
you help me think about bigger things
but they are small compared to you
and yet you are not there for me
at least not in the way that i need you
you are only there how you want to be
it has to be enough but it is not
and when everything else is gone
and all that is left is what we did not share
then will you be satisfied
then will it be enough for you
then will you know what is important
whehter it was what you held back
or what you gave to me completely

man in gods image: lights, action, bang

11 days till the 15th.
As mentioned before, without a clear understanding of g-space (authors have different nomenclature for g-space), a discussion of our space must always be theoretical.
Also, since this discussion (sort of) follows hologram theory, we have to have a projection theory.
This discussion will investigate the absence of a projector and assume instead that we remain in the singularity or just on the surface if you would (singularities, of course do not have a surface since they are a point).
Fundamentally, it assumes that matter does not exist in the sense that we experience it.  Instead matter is merely the tendency (reflected by gravity-as observed with intense gravitational fields in black holes) to return to the singularity.  Again, in review, there is only one singularity and black holes appearing far apart are in fact all returning to the same spot.  This single singularity is easily explained as follows.
First, every "tendency" (particle) has its own time. In fact, the unifying principle is time.  This can be proven theoretically with general relativity.  We "sort of" know and use this principle that if you cut off my hands and they continued typing as they went off at lightspeed relative to the rest of me, very little would be written before I died of old age.
Second, we know that as tendencies join together, their times merge and that if enough times merge they drop back into the singularity.
Third, if there is a singlularity that things appearing far apart drop back to, then space is an illusion. "Space Time" is really just time, or perhaps a large number (a very large number) of independent times which are not in sync.  Being in sync means that they appear spacially together and for whatever reason (we call it gravity) when enough are brought into sync then they collapse (appear to collapse if all of them are still a part of the singularity) back into the singularity.  While the idea of "sync" and "distance" can be considered the same-i.e. sync=space, the concept that all black holes drop to the same singularity requires a different visualization of distance (I use distance since it appears most often in math equations); having  a different name (snyc) seems to be justifiable, at least for theoretical purposes.
Experimental opportunities abound and in fact occur in this respect.  At cern and other super-colliders, particles are separated spacially and brought back together or made to go very close and not collide at high speed.  While the "observations" focused on in these locations is the generation of fundamental particles, it stands to reason that we are also observing objects being brought into sync very quickly and small tendencies with their own unique times being fairly rapidly separated from other tendencies which were previously in sync.  Whether anything important can be gained from this artificial separating and joining of synchronization in this theoretical model is a good question, but one would posit that the most important goal is to get to fundamental tendencies since one question that has not been answered very well is why these tendencies appear different.  If fundamental particles are in fact different "tendencies" to return to the singularity from which everything springs and if each fundamental particle has its own time, and if the times may be brought into sync (spacially joined if you must) and then return to the singularity en-mass then why do some fundamental particles appear different than others.  Using the hologram analogy, why do we have multiple colored tendencies.  Now, as long as there were only 3, the analogy I want to get to would be better, so I'm going to call these red, green and blue tendencies (rgb for tv mechanics).  And yes, there are other alleged fundamental particles, strings, what have you, but we're looking for a simplified model and the rgb model does for discussion purposes.
One thing this model suggests is a common, unified field...time.  That is, gravity (the visible tendency to return to g-space) is the expression of time and all the other "forces" are merely interaction of tendencies along their individual times.  Forces which are otherwise difficult to explain probably represent in one way or another, the tendency of times to line up or potentially the tendencies of time to get out of sync.
While this may sound a bit confusing, we accept this in every day life (at least at our current level of technology) quite matter of factly.  A cd playing on a cd player displays scenes hours apart even though they are esssentially joined on the disc and this in the inherent beauty of the hologram theory.
Dealing with particles out of sync is actually the same for us to experience as the idea of different colored rgb fundamental particles.
An understanding of why RGB exists and how times get out of sync (how tendencies are separated by what appears to be space) can be observed on the one hand in super-colliders if we know how to look for it and on the other at black holes if we accept the possibility that time is out of sync to create distance and that what we call particles (or strings, for example) are instead just tendencies to drop back to the singularity.  In this event, we are getting closer to g-space and maybe we are even in g-space with the caveat being that time gives g-space the appearance of not being a singularity when in fact it is.
Black holes are forever given the power to worm our way across vast distances and in this sense they accomplish that easily, there is no place which is anything other than a time amazingly out of sync with other times.  The beauty of this is that if you were able to determine how sync works fundamentally, you might be able to change the sync of any group of tendencies in order to move them about the universal chess board.  Now we do have a "gross" method of doing this-i.e. propellant.  But propellant is a poor method of movement if we're all at the same point and merely out of sync.  That being said, if we move within sync at high speed and then slow down to merge with the other tendencies we are able to bring tendencies together and sync time and the universe is nother more than the mirror image.
One aspect of this is that time is merely a way to prevent everything from happening at once.  We may, therefore, be predestined, every tendency carefully planned, specifically or in bulk, every synchonization of time put together carefully form a singulariy.  Put another way, let there be light, then the big bang of times and tendencies. In the grand theoretical scheme, times are started; apparently a finite (although very large number) of times are steadily brought out of sync creating the appearance of distance which appearance is belied by the occasional singularity where a sufficient number of times are brought into sync.
Future blogs require that tendencies to return to the singularity, the manifestation of this in gravity and times out of sync manifesting distance be joined into one common formula, but it can be seen that sync and tendency are likely two sides of the same coin as they must be with a unified theory.  Equally important is a discussion of why there are rgb tendencies instead of just r, g or b tendencies.
 For the moment I have to stop for I'm called by the great director to another scene; lights, action...Publish.

Time travel simplified as time combination for Matter, dark matter, anti-matter (and black holes) as manifestations of the return to the singularity

12 day countdown to the 15th.
One key to the hologram universe theory discussed here is that as a projection we can easily envision (well someone can easily envision) all matter as a tendency to retun to a signle singularity (as opposed to the multiple singularities envisioned in traditional black hole analysis.
As a recap, in this theoretical model, matter is not a series of vibrating strings or progressively smaller particles, but is instead the tendency of objects to return from their projection onto time to the singularity.  In fact, time need not exist outside of the singularity but for the fact that it gives the appearance of distance.  Note that if there is a single singularity, and all black holes (billions of light years apart) return to the same point, distance as percieved using time is not entirely relevant.
Matter and energy are convertable so that both represent a tendency
One possible corrolary is that matter points have their own time and that these times combine as matter approaches one another.  Space does not bend in this model (as in the space-time uinverse; this is, after all a time only universe, space being something that only appears to be there). Instead as matter approaches other matter, the times of the two matters (which are merely the tendency to return to the sinularigy) combine or become related to one another.  This manifests itself to our eyes as gravity and is represented by the well known newtonian formula relating the mass (the amount of tendency to return to the singularity) and the distance (as it increases the times get closer toether.
In a black hole (or where the accumulation of tendencies to return to the singularity is so great it actually succeeds) the distance goes to zero so that gravity appears to go to infinity.  I say appears, because gravity is only the tendency to return to the singularity which is borne out mathematically because mass (matter) is the source of gravity. 
A discussion of how to have gravity (a tendency to return to the singularity) without mass/energy is represented in part bythe so-called dark energy.  Likewise, anti-matter might be a reflection of the tendency of things to move along time and away from the singularity.  The use of anti-matter as a crutch to explain why things are projected out from the singularity in the first place, requires its own discussion.  Unfortunately, if anti-matter and dark energy have gravity (a tendency to merge their times together) they may well just be a different manifestation of matter and instead their "time" may be out of sync.  This would imply that there is a possibility of time and anti-time which, alas, also must be saved for a later discussion.
 Now, if you spin a black hole the singularity appears to be circular.  I say appears to be, because there cannot be anything but  a singularity.  A round singularity is a nonsense word.  The appearance can be explained in terms of time, however. The signularity is stationary as to all black holes (whether spinning or not) because there is only one, after all.  All those "apparently" separate black holes just go to the same point.  However, each particle has its own time which is pulling away from the black hole (or the singularity) and as they merge together, the tendency to return to the black hole may or may not merge, but their times do.  Time is an expanding appearance (whether it expands or not is irrelevant to this issue for the moment) but we experience time as something moving from a beginning to an end.  In a black hole, time is pulled back to the singularity and doesn't so much cease to exist as it becomes part of g-space (as mentioned in earlier discussions, we're all just scratching the backs of our necks until we get to g-space no matter how good our math is otherwise).  Obviously, however, until the "event horizon" is reached, time can go either way, towards or away from the singularity along with the matter/tendency to return which carries time with it.
In fact, the long and short of this all is that when a projection is made, it is the projection of time from the singularity and that each particle of time carries a particle of the tendency to return to the singularity with it.  A spinning black hole merely allows time  and the tendency to return that is associated with the time to return to the singularity along a rotatings slope so that what appears to be a circular singularity is just the funnel created by the return to a single poing in this theoretical model.  Times and associated tendencies(matter) are merely spread out over the mouth of the funnel.
Similarly the apparent curvature of space is a function of the same type.  Time is not curved and space is not curved necessarily by analogy.  The curvature is only a similar reflection of tendencies towards the singularity.
Note that if everything is merely the tendency to return to the singularity, the separation from the singularity being along an infinitely thin line represented by time which each individual tendency (oh no, quantum tendencies!) what has happened that gives all of the tendencies (particles if you must) such a broad separation (apparent) from each other.  This is merely the fact that their times are so far aparart that they appear far apart.  A poor analogy is a video burned on a compact disc.  The last scene appears (using time) far from the first scene, but they are on the exact same plane on the disc and separated by a very short distance.  In fact if read non-sequentially, they may appear far apart even though they are together which is the beauty of the projection theory, ie the hologram universe that started this discussion.
The only real departure from the model is the elimination of space (instead it is merely the separation of times) and the fact that each particle (or tendency to return to the singularity if you must) has its own time.  The "times" combine in some fashion (we'll discuss this later) as they approach one another to create stuff (block of energy for example) and the combination of times is seen as gravity and if enough of them combine you get a return to the singularity thereby, to some extent giving credence to the whole idea that separation of space is merely separations (or out of sync) times.  You sync your times together, you approach the singularity closer.  The fact that you can manipulate your times to bring them closer together (space travel as it were-even if you're just riding your trike down the road) is nothing more than merging times together.  More on this later.

The anomoly of space in a time only universe.

The anomoly of space in a time only universe.
Coffee 14/46 (really?). 
If space is merely a function of time, then how do two different people observing each other across a room explain the separation.
The answer comes from the projected nature of the universe  This projection is the opposite side of matter/energy being the tendency of matter to return to the singularity.  And if everything comes from a singluarity (by definition there is no space in a singularity) the two items appearing separated by time, both being from a singularity (from the same spot) are not separated.  However, two different people looking at each other must be projected apart from each other and hence space exists, or does it?  The alternative is that the space between the two people is a trick of time since they are projected from a singularity onto time.  If there is no space then it is possible that each observer, each particle (each tendency to return to the singularity) must be separated by space or perhaps each merely has its own time.  This raises the question of how the times interact, but it also allows that times may be moved differently (observed) and also that times allow for an object to be at a different place instantaneously from other objects without regard to the other object's time (also observed).
The ability of quantum matter to move through barriers is explained because the barriers represent space which does not exist.  Also the instanteous movement of particles is explainable if the times are not tied directly together. 

New years day

Coffee is coming off the headings. After 45 days I relegated it to the body of the emails. 15 is countdown but it is counting down to 1/15/13 past 1/3/13 and 1/13/13.  I expect this to be an eventful year so I have to finish editing wwc