11 days till the 15th.
As mentioned before, without a clear understanding of g-space (authors have different nomenclature for g-space), a discussion of our space must always be theoretical.
Also, since this discussion (sort of) follows hologram theory, we have to have a projection theory.
This discussion will investigate the absence of a projector and assume instead that we remain in the singularity or just on the surface if you would (singularities, of course do not have a surface since they are a point).
Fundamentally, it assumes that matter does not exist in the sense that we experience it. Instead matter is merely the tendency (reflected by gravity-as observed with intense gravitational fields in black holes) to return to the singularity. Again, in review, there is only one singularity and black holes appearing far apart are in fact all returning to the same spot. This single singularity is easily explained as follows.
First, every "tendency" (particle) has its own time. In fact, the unifying principle is time. This can be proven theoretically with general relativity. We "sort of" know and use this principle that if you cut off my hands and they continued typing as they went off at lightspeed relative to the rest of me, very little would be written before I died of old age.
Second, we know that as tendencies join together, their times merge and that if enough times merge they drop back into the singularity.
Third, if there is a singlularity that things appearing far apart drop back to, then space is an illusion. "Space Time" is really just time, or perhaps a large number (a very large number) of independent times which are not in sync. Being in sync means that they appear spacially together and for whatever reason (we call it gravity) when enough are brought into sync then they collapse (appear to collapse if all of them are still a part of the singularity) back into the singularity. While the idea of "sync" and "distance" can be considered the same-i.e. sync=space, the concept that all black holes drop to the same singularity requires a different visualization of distance (I use distance since it appears most often in math equations); having a different name (snyc) seems to be justifiable, at least for theoretical purposes.
Experimental opportunities abound and in fact occur in this respect. At cern and other super-colliders, particles are separated spacially and brought back together or made to go very close and not collide at high speed. While the "observations" focused on in these locations is the generation of fundamental particles, it stands to reason that we are also observing objects being brought into sync very quickly and small tendencies with their own unique times being fairly rapidly separated from other tendencies which were previously in sync. Whether anything important can be gained from this artificial separating and joining of synchronization in this theoretical model is a good question, but one would posit that the most important goal is to get to fundamental tendencies since one question that has not been answered very well is why these tendencies appear different. If fundamental particles are in fact different "tendencies" to return to the singularity from which everything springs and if each fundamental particle has its own time, and if the times may be brought into sync (spacially joined if you must) and then return to the singularity en-mass then why do some fundamental particles appear different than others. Using the hologram analogy, why do we have multiple colored tendencies. Now, as long as there were only 3, the analogy I want to get to would be better, so I'm going to call these red, green and blue tendencies (rgb for tv mechanics). And yes, there are other alleged fundamental particles, strings, what have you, but we're looking for a simplified model and the rgb model does for discussion purposes.
One thing this model suggests is a common, unified field...time. That is, gravity (the visible tendency to return to g-space) is the expression of time and all the other "forces" are merely interaction of tendencies along their individual times. Forces which are otherwise difficult to explain probably represent in one way or another, the tendency of times to line up or potentially the tendencies of time to get out of sync.
While this may sound a bit confusing, we accept this in every day life (at least at our current level of technology) quite matter of factly. A cd playing on a cd player displays scenes hours apart even though they are esssentially joined on the disc and this in the inherent beauty of the hologram theory.
Dealing with particles out of sync is actually the same for us to experience as the idea of different colored rgb fundamental particles.
An understanding of why RGB exists and how times get out of sync (how tendencies are separated by what appears to be space) can be observed on the one hand in super-colliders if we know how to look for it and on the other at black holes if we accept the possibility that time is out of sync to create distance and that what we call particles (or strings, for example) are instead just tendencies to drop back to the singularity. In this event, we are getting closer to g-space and maybe we are even in g-space with the caveat being that time gives g-space the appearance of not being a singularity when in fact it is.
Black holes are forever given the power to worm our way across vast distances and in this sense they accomplish that easily, there is no place which is anything other than a time amazingly out of sync with other times. The beauty of this is that if you were able to determine how sync works fundamentally, you might be able to change the sync of any group of tendencies in order to move them about the universal chess board. Now we do have a "gross" method of doing this-i.e. propellant. But propellant is a poor method of movement if we're all at the same point and merely out of sync. That being said, if we move within sync at high speed and then slow down to merge with the other tendencies we are able to bring tendencies together and sync time and the universe is nother more than the mirror image.
One aspect of this is that time is merely a way to prevent everything from happening at once. We may, therefore, be predestined, every tendency carefully planned, specifically or in bulk, every synchonization of time put together carefully form a singulariy. Put another way, let there be light, then the big bang of times and tendencies. In the grand theoretical scheme, times are started; apparently a finite (although very large number) of times are steadily brought out of sync creating the appearance of distance which appearance is belied by the occasional singularity where a sufficient number of times are brought into sync.
Future blogs require that tendencies to return to the singularity, the manifestation of this in gravity and times out of sync manifesting distance be joined into one common formula, but it can be seen that sync and tendency are likely two sides of the same coin as they must be with a unified theory. Equally important is a discussion of why there are rgb tendencies instead of just r, g or b tendencies.
For the moment I have to stop for I'm called by the great director to another scene; lights, action...Publish.
No comments:
Post a Comment