NLT the next step Part 10-Creation

NLT began its life as a commentary.   Then Einstein stepped in and asked questions that the underlying work could not answer.  First is was merely string hologram theory with predestination based on everything happening at once.  Then a deeper analysis forced an abandonment of hologram theory and its dimension analysis as observed phenomena, namely the ever smaller distance between points and quantum tunneling caused a complete breakdown in geometry.
A big part of this was the opposite side of the equation, the bigness of super-massive black holes.  And for a while we were done with black holes.
But as a mathematical analysis of sequential acceleration of the different clock times failed to accept the tremendous drops in size required by a consistent application of the scale of 10^16 to successive stages of movement towards quantum coordinate change.  Mathematics offered several acceptable alternatives.  Then, the black hole came back with its own explanation, what I call scale mathematics of Non-linear time.
As deep as your eyes, as remorseless a destroyer of space as my feelings for you are of my soul.  But is it destruction of space, or the creation of something so much bigger, is it part of a straight line or is it a circle, the black hole being the mouth of the universal snake eating itself?
We arrive at page 7 of the paper and The Scale and Black hole of Non-linear time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBb-J0hcBQA

THE SCALE MATHEMATICS: While we are only seeking “scale” at this point, standard intergration of a point (int(x^n)dx=1/(n+1)x^(n+1) doesn't work to give the result in question. The suggestion is more along the lines of a higher power rule, namely integration over time of (t^x^2)dt. Since there are multiple time coordinates, the suggestion is (t^x^2,t^y^2,etc)dt along different per-determined lines corresponding to NLT. Since there are multiple coordinate sets, it might look more like (t^x^2^(y^2)^(z^2) or t^1/(x^2)^(1/y^z),etc depending on whether you are building or dissembling time when it is displayed. Dissembling makes sense since NLT assumes an assembled time and linear time could well have the effect of dissembling.

To get better functionality you need annular calculations using pi and you need double integration (or higher-i.e. int(int(P)pi where P is a radial or spherical function yielding exponential growth) to cover the changes in multidimensional coordinate changes. These solutions are within the scope of the grant application.

Critically, at the last stage in this process, we can observe that the total amount of time is conserved so that we can theorize that the rate of change as we move from CT1 to CT4 is conserved. In this way, as Clock Time 4 goes positive, that is when our watches start to move at sub-light speeds, the rate of change has to change for CT1-CT3. Fortunately this is observed. As the rate of change of those coordinates increases (as we accelerate back towards light speed) the rate of clock time slows.

It is likely that there are intermediary steps (intermediary types of clock time) along the way, but the changes appear to be quantum changes at each stage. That is, any set of time coordinates (represented by CT1-CT4) is either linear or non-linear.

5) CT(5) is relevant and will be discussed below with sequential acceleration of t^32. Does this elimination of coordinates represent a new clock time (CT(5) with a new scale of compression or is it the end of the circle, time destroying its linearity, the far end of an endless loop?