AUT-randomness in a crystallizing universe

One problem with the absence of randomness is that there is no corresponding homogeneity.   This is not strictly true since at the final state of compression envisioned the universe would be either homogeneous or "almost" homogeneous.  The "almost" version, might have a single quantum of information unbalancing perfect equality between two equal spirals.
The problem is quite different from the problem of why no two snowflakes are commonly the same (the possibility of identity exists, whether it occurs or not).  An explanation of this is that no two snowflakes can form during the same instant or they'd be the same snow flake.  AuT actually provides a better explanation because if you assume a relatively static universe, the two flakes can form in the same location, essentially in a controlled space.  Linearity requires that the space necessarily changes in one direction (if you're just tuning in you have to buy the book of go hunting through the past blogs, I can't do that for you).
The same type of explanation is required in order to determine the lack of homogeneity in the universe as a whole.  In this blog I use the word "crystallizing" for the idea of successive compression states.  This is OK, because macro states should correspond to or at least reflect quantum phenomena. In fact one of the nice things about AuT is that it works the same way at the quantum and macro levels.
The process of intersecting spirals actually looks a lot like crystallization although the actual process is somewhat different in appearance given the intersection of common points.  One of the graphical representations from the book will make it's first appearance now.  The graphical representation of intersecting spirals leading to exponentially higher compression states actually looks like crystallization.:

We'll call this (p54) the snowflake algorithm

And somehow we must get from here:

to here

by way of this snowflake algorithm which is observed

Illusory Randomness is apparent perhaps because the system is non-final (the middle drawing).  That is, the continuing nature of the algorithm means that while there may be a solution at any one point, the growth of information (presumably forever-an equation isn't subject to time) means that the overall solution defining any point in the universe may be subject to irregularities of the type observed.  That is, the failure to have a specific solution overall might be the source of the aberrations which provide for the level of complexity observed.
But AuT rejects of necessity true randomness just as physics must, and the universe is spiraling down to a point where aberrations such as those which create the universe we observe do not exist and to a place where the disorder in our universe can be understood where everything happens essentially at once.

And if the universe ends up back where it begins, why can't I find my way home?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN1J5sMv28Q&ebc=ANyPxKqg0XEySWDgsJuBzBytbCb1WrytIeGLufhx4192qkhsusJ51G8hNbEi-YqHiS5i3h_aib6APracUrYZSx_XQqMlQL9_rw