NLC-Physics as randomness

I'm leaning towards the first volume being closer to 200 pages than the 100 I originally estimated, although I want to get something published.
The problem is that I have to reset so much wrong thinking.  It is tough when you're dealing with trying to re-educate a painting to let it know it's just a painting when its so used to thinking its something more.  The crown of creation, lol.
You physicists are the worst, because we should have figured it out sooner.  Well, the Greeks had a pretty good handle on it given their level of science, so perhaps it is your failure to recognize it and even I had to have it given to me, the Greek Muse.
Buy you haven't learned anything, you cling to your old physics, not even knowing that Randomness is physics.
I know what you are thinking.  You poor pre-NLC physiscist, you are thinking that physics is opposed to randomness.  You are right, but, of course, you are wrong.  Physics reflects the "illusory" randomness in a non-random, fixed universe.
NLC requires that an algorithm must define the universe in its entirety from the point of origin, when one bit of g-space takes on the parameters or, more correctly, allows for the illusion of o-space.
There is no randomness to this transition, but the absence of a homogeneus g-space environment means that the aberrations in a simple equation must be enormous to allow the appearance of randomness and the richness of the illusion.
To understand how this is possible, it is important to take one blog step back and look at the question of how the algorithm is put together.  With a single spiral, the illusion of randomness would be impossible.  But even if the + spiral is only one step off from the -spiral there would be a great deal of intersectional inconsistency.  If the initial g-space bit generates a spiral which generates additional spirals, as indicated by the number of bits experienced in the universe and the size that it represents, then the amount of inconsistency if each spiral is off in size by one length as a result of being generated subsequent to the first then the existence of randomness past the space spirals is even greater, the space spirals having all be generated together, there is much less ability for them to achieve any randomness or difference relative to one another hence the amount of homogency of space compared to all the other states (photons, waves, matter, black hole material, etc) compared to space and the reason why physics seems to apply more completely to non-space states even though it must apply to all states since all information is related and space compresses to other states eventually under the model.
Indeed, the gravity web that binds the universe together is likely a resulting shadow which results from the last or perhaps even the first spiral intersection if not the first conversion of non-linearity to linearity.  But there is another more fundamental shadow and that is physics.  While we can say that physics reflects the algorithm, it also reflects the underlying randomness that I attribute to our ignorance of the theory, well, your ignorance.
And you want to put my theory aside, you want to say I'm wrong, but you can't forget me for some reason, it comes back to your attention despite your best intentions to forget it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H202k7KfZL0