What I have started and what I will finish over 5 or 6 posts is a view of g-space, building from nothing to a universe with the complexity and lack of conformity of ours utilizing a fairly simple algorithm. I've already hinted largely to this later concept. You get exponential layers of complexity by beginning with one F-series and at each point of change you start a new F-series and off of the new you repeat the process. The intersection process which involves changing the "spin" or "direction" of opposite moving F-series spirals has to provide the apparent randomness that gives rise to the various post ct1 states observed. While "true" randomness is a seductive concept, there is no place for it in an algorithm based fixed universe of the type observed on the quantum level.
If you insist on true randomness in order to arrive at a universe as richly diverse as ours then you should stop reading this blog, crawl into a metaphorical cave and pray to something. I don't say that would be the wrong decision, but it would mean that quantum logic failed. It would have reprecussions to the entire methodology of an algorithm based universe where without time everything happens at once. The fact that the entire universe must be a simultaneous construct of some formula eliminates randomness in the fashion that we have come to think of it.
However, the complexity inherent with a universe having sequentially different groupings of 10^100+ quantum points in any quantum moment in the universe creates of model of sufficient complexity especially given the intersecting lines creating compression model that a universe with the types of seemingly infinite variety observed on the macro level almost a given. We know the data is not random, because physics and math dictate that there is some underlying formulation, even if it changes based on the number of points changing at once within different states of compression.
For the first time ever, technically I've pretty much fully covered it in the book and prior posts, I will discuss what g-space is.
You should find a place where you will find it memorable so that you can say, yes I remember right where I was when I first heard about the nature of g-space. But it isn't so you can be positioned correctly that I digress before the presentation. Instead, it is because to understand g-space, you have to look at what is o-space (the universe). The fact that I will shortly go where no mortal man has gone before and provide a mathematical model (of sorts, albeit) of the precursor to our universe, to the land (in the parlance of old phasioned fysics) before the big bang (as if there were only one).
But first, we have to look at o-space so we can understand what its not.
We live in a pre-assembled universe, It's past, present and future all exist together. The illusions (proven dis positively in A-spiral in amber) of time and dimension notwithstanding, physics dictates that the universe is pre-ordained and NLC dictates that everything happens at once.
It is a strange thing to do, like a character in a stop motion movie defining the environment that the movie makers live in. Relatively speaking, the stop screen character is a mindless puppet, and we are the mindless puppets of g-space. Well, we're something special, me, for example, a puppet who has been instructed to instruct other puppets, but maybe everyone is still a mindless puppet except that we have defined a mind to be whatever mindless puppets have.
I believe the old song is something about "what will we be when we are not what we are now." Step through the looking glass with me if you dare!
No comments:
Post a Comment