I have achieved a small upward result in swimming also, at the end of my im workouts I have enough left to swim 1 third of the way underwater using a fairly strong butterfly kick and I am actually enjoying the anerobic phase of being able to stay down without breathing even after a pretty hard workout.
There is a four pound differential, however, and I am at almost 182 pounds one night and then back to 178 and change the next morning. Atmospheric changes? I think not. So what do I weight? 180?
This brings us to the post here which is about averaging and which, of course, can be found in more detail in the books although there are a couple of drawings, you saw them here first, that go towards what the universe acts like and covers some of that dark matter stuff that AuT renders simple while other physics flouders around trying to come up with explanations where they can somehow ignore me getting there first.
Paranoid? Probably, but that does not mean you are not out to get me.
I have done the accelerator thing although I have probably only explored a few percent of the possible options. A lot of these are no appropriate. I accidently started an application for a program in China, but it makes a lot of sense to take this where it would be appreciated, China, Russia, Israel, maybe South Korea; those are all probably better targets than the morabound united states. There are other options overseas, I think Germany might be a decent target.
The meat of this remains in the book but what you see below on the right is simple integration represented, a method of limit approximations (see the prior post) with a twist, because you are integrating to get compression and decompression along a two dimensional line.
The left hand side shows something a little different. At a jump in compression (and this may well represent a transitional jump) what you get is a three dimensional integration which is rendered even more complicated by the "actual relative change" shown so you have this to deal with:
1) averaging the width x height with the width x -height; the compressive and decompressive two dimensional view;
2) the irregular wave form over a third dimension (due to the actual relative change) along with averaged cubes of compression and decompression.
The results are easily seen on the left as regional pluses and minuses along with a net result although the simplifications inherent in this are obvious when you look not only at the 5 dimensional features, but also transitional features and the fact that the actual relative change at any point will itself vary for any value of x while there are 10^39 changes in x every second thereby throwing the entire array into a chaotic mess.
We tend to work in an environment where we can maintain states for extended periods of time by working with stable ct states (molecular states) but this shows the limits of quantum computing because at this level you have to be able to determine the life of compression (fuse length) for the quantum parts to know what your results will be.
What does this allow quantum computing on a level we have never had before? simply because we live in the middle of the universe with 10^150 fuse states that are essentially stable. If we average these, since we cannot possibly see something on the level shown below, within the visible range we can still get right rates of stability along with positive or minus net results which we can vary on a quantum level to get the results we are looking for in a new and I say unobvious way to use the vernacular.
It is worth considering the dual fractal nature of what we are looking at here over changing exponents of compression.
Likewise the alternating positive and negative exponent results yield something along these lines intenally to the transition states which may correspond to the hinge states
This figure is being replaced
with this one which is complicated to explain.
However one can see both the origin of the ruleof3's (or 4's) as well as the scales of relative compression which each change a little more clearly than in the replaced drawing. For ease of drawing the portions are not filled in but you can see the interaction more clear of both 2^n and f(n) in these drawings. Scales are impossible to show which is indicated by the first few figures.
Alaternating Fractal and non-fractal forms result.
This article is part of the process of spiritual growth.
https://upliftconnect.com/a-multi-dimensional-theory-mind/
I'm not sure that AuT is consistent with spiritual growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment