electron 4 the obit

The periodic table evolves, even under AuT it is not complete.
I mean under AuT what is going on is set out, but it is still pretty complicated in its applications and permutations.
What is AuT?  It is not a clever application or product.
AuT is the most fundamental science ever, at least here on earth.
In 5 minutes I can show you why no one can create exothermic fusion reactions, in 10 minutes I can show you how to address those problems.  I only have 3 mintues, so go buy a book if you're interested in the science of fusion, quantum computing, perhaps flying saucers.
It is not the ultimate science, because it opens the curtains that hide the ultimate science.  Will it get there in the natural course of events, is there enough of that ultimate science so that it can be claimed to be a  part of AuT because AuT recognizes it for what it is?
These are questions for the future.
When AuT is applied, as to the atom, to fusion, to quantum computing, to energy, to charge it explains them in ways that were not clear before but which become clear.
In five minutes (or less) I can explain why fusion reactors do not work.  In 10 minutes (or less) I can explain how to address the problem (hopefully).  Indeed with the electron drawing that I have given you the problem and the solution are obvious and I have not even mentioned the proton!  It is just that obvious and that simple once you realize that the universe is a multi-dimensional, multi-fractional mathematical quantum result.
And yet, without prior observations, AuT would be a theory.  Indeed the transition from a base 10 model to a model with multiple base numbering was the result of attempting to match the base 10 results with observations.
If pi was not known to be something, it would have been impossible to figure out the role of pi, the two very distinct parts, the denominator first and numerator second, in the build out of the universe.
And yet, the entrenched view of the universe drags at AuT, clinging and pulling it backwards like the chains of Marley, but perhaps worse.
So who died and made me a genius.  That wouldn't be Murray Gell-Mann, but he died.
I have a lot on the periodic table in the books and maybe some historical stuff in this blog.  Worth looking at.
Murray started down the right path, but because he started too far down the periodic table vrs having a decent model and seeing how the periodic table fits into it, he got lost like everyone else.  Because Murray did not have AuT to work with, he ended up saddling us with Quarks.
He followed things like string theory but he also considered particles more fundamental than quarks and if quarks were a thing and not a wrong turn, he'd be a fan of AuT; perhaps he have invented it instead of me.
Like me, he felt that the universe reflected simple laws of physics and AuT shows even more simple rules which give rise to the laws of physics which sounds a lot less like an obit and a plug for AuT, but there it is.
Unlike me, Murray was a really smart guy and not just lucky.  As my friend Alan always says, it's better to be lucky than good.
We're all lucky after a fashion.
So, I'm wondering what to get to next.  There is so much and there is so little to do and I have patent claims to edit, close to 100 of them that I have to get down to 20.  Pretty outrageous, but then I am the old person who still lives.
If I can get to the next step, does that mean I get my life back?
It doesn't have to be that way, but that is the way it is headed.
Tomorrow is another day.

the electron 3

swam 2,000 yards, lifted weights and did the stair machine, but it was not as dramatic as I'd have liked then took a day off which is always a terrible idea, then swam 2000 yards again yesterday.
This morning I weighed in at 174.4 eatting three pretty big meals yesterday.  I think that gravity must be messed up.  If that is not the case, I am now in the 1% under my target weight range as well as 1% over so i  can feel pretty good that diet and exercise is still working.
I am going to continue talking about just the first electron drawing, because it is a drawing of the proton, galaxy and pre-photon to some example, and why this is or is not is going to be discussed a little along with the periodic table of the elements.
As those of you who have read one of the books:

are aware, the periodic table is reflected by the model, but by line 3 it begins to fall apart a little.  In my obituary post (not mine) which is coming up I am going to get into the other comparisons, of course not as good, since the periodic table is what it is.
But for the moment, we will stick with just the accurate version put forth by AuT and the less accurate versions which predate it will be discussed later.
I note people continue to  just get the science from this blog which is a bit silly, like getting ready for a test on moby dick by just reading the cliff notes.  Its a funny book, you should read it, then again AuT books tend to be a bit dry and I have to suggest if you are not a scientist that you stick with the audio book.  It is technical, but it can be listened to while you walk the dog, jog, drive or do any other activity where you can listen to quantum mechanics in the background (do not operate heavy machinery while reading this blog).
Where was I...
There are two drawings of the electron below, one the actual drawing we have been discussing and the other is god's version; but his version is off for the same reason the periodic table is off and that is  why I want to discuss co-existing dimensions and the periodic table.
The problem with AuT is that you have to have the lower dimensional states to get the fractal results for the higher states.  This is both the nature of iterated equations but in this case it is because of the limit equations giving rise to the higher compression states.  This co-existence, obviously, becomes less important with the higher ct4-5 compression states...why obvious...because you are using lower ct4-5 states in place of the ct3-4 states and hence between said the radioactives and the neutron star you do not see a lot of new elements.  You just dont need the protons and electrons as building block ct states.   Think about it, maybe while jogging and listening to the audio book and you will get it.  It is worth noting that this all means you never see black holes in the absence of a near galactic cloud around it, although you can get those clouds before you get a black hole just as hydrogen is a proton with an electron of the type shown below and it requires the electron be there which is part of the point of this whole series of blog posts and has importance far beyond scientific, being the crux of the first target for commercialization of AuT and saving the world by coincidence.
Back to the failings of the periodic table and whether they are failings at all.
I have not, I will be honest, done any of the calculations yet.  You might say, correctly, that this makes this post a theoretical post, and I would agree.  I do have a fair amount of confidence, however, because AuT always works better than what came before, logically and mathematically, so you may be worried, but I fart in your general direction if you are skeptical.  Yes, in a universe governed by irony (proven mathematically in the books) the most brilliant mind in physics in history quotes monte python).
Anyway....
where does this inconsistency beginning around line 3 in the periodic table of the elements come from.
It comes from this, The periodic table is based on 2-3 dimension base 6-10 interactions between ct3 and ct4 which is only the outer shell of the atom.  Indeed the silliness of including hydrogen in the table which is otherwise a ct4-5 hybrid relies on this.
On the other hand, the neutron portion is based on ct4-5 3-4 dimensional compression.  You can see from this that inconsistency is therefore built into the system and explained generally by AuT even if not specifically (yet) and I will get to that in due course and you will oo and ahh about it or if you want you can make a stab at it in the comments.

The example I want to point out has to do with where this is all going, but today, even though this is not about electrons, it is about something much bigger.
What?

Are you beginning to see why this is so important?
I may never hit you over the head or not, the patents are filed, go ahead and make some guesses.

It is time to talk about books too.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PQX9GH7

This book is now available!
The edited version, the third edition.  I will tell you that it certainly could use one more edit, but it is in pretty good shape and I would invite you to read and review it, discussing as it does many of the characters who are raised from history in this blog.

the electron 2 of ....

So, i did end up swimming 2200 yards in the morning.
It was warm to the foot, cold to the body, delightful when finished and even after the warm up.
Today, well, it is 9 am and getting warmer.  I have not swam, but I have made all the edits, within a handfull of  chapters to the end of the science of nostradamus.  Yes, i still have a page of notes to deal with, but it is better and the end is in site, those last pages have been crudly edited.
Here are some of the notes:
See pieces of who he is, he suddenly saw himself at the various places between where he sat and 1.5 trillion, trillion miles ago, because while the earth remained largely stable from the perspective of the surface, it moved in elipses embedded within elipses to form fibonacci curves and it was distance and not time that governed what was happening.
We cannot build everyting from nothing.  There is no real difference between times.  we are all built, reassembeld from stuff one day a billionaire, the next a bum.  He witnessed Christ and understood for the first time what was meant when he said whatever is done to the lesat of us is done to all of us.
But enough of that, and on to the subject at hand.  You are not ready, yet, for the next drawing, so we will talk about this one a little longer.

The 'lectron
Where is the spiral of movement hidden?  This is the earth circling the sun and the sun circling the black hole and the black hole circling the rest all defining when combined a very strange spiral as, even at this stage, the dimensional states vary.
Indeed, ifyou were to shrink to the size of an atom, you would still have a hard time seeing the electron because if is 10^4 times smaller and dimensionally more two dimensional than 3.  Imagine looking for mister photon who is even less three dimensional and which is 10^10th smaller.
You think you can see it still, perhaps, at leastt the electron.
But then you have to realize what you are looking for is not a thing, not the bull shit divisible but somehow fundamental particle of the standard model, but a thing of elegant fractal beauty defined by AuT with such specificity.
Indeed even the movement of these vary with their dimensional qualities, as the shrink in size, dimensionally they move less in concert with the higher spirals since they exist outside of them, the reason that light travels in approximately a straight line despite the spiraling nature especially of the larger sized objects following the winding and unwinding of the universe along what are, when combined, along spiral lines.
Space has the most bizarre movement of all for while it unwinds according to the fseries, it unwinds from a one dimensional framework of ct2 and unwound it moves not in any way dimensionally.  Ahhh, the magic of the true universe.
Do you see how this electron spins around the proton?  Do you understand the critical relationship between the two?  Share your comments and I will see if you are ready for the next drawing or not.

the electron one of....

 I weighed in at 175 this morning.   That, of course, is my target weight although I am eying 170 from a great distance, another 3% of my weight.  That was after what was admittedly a fairly mediocre workout where i slogged through 30 minutes on the stair machine, barely making it even reducing my normal resistance and then only 2 sets of weights and barely getting through those.  But it was enough, even after some fairly significant but healthy meals.

There is cause to  celebrate beyond achieving my target weight the first time this week after several sporadic weighings around the 176 mark.

At last I am in a position to cover those things as yet uncovered in this blog.  My next paper will be on the shape of the electon.  I am sharing another nonsense article from the physics press, but I am going to give you the actual shape of the electron and, of course, it is nothing like what you are expecting.

These drawings come out of the most recent patent.

Sadly it appears I will be in this on my own since my accelerator search has largely been sidelined in favor of more important endeavors, getting this information ready in advance of August, work and writing generally.  Moreover, in truth I was in the process of designing fusion reactors and figuring out how to apply this to generating qbits and determinging geometries and underlying science to the extent necessary to intelligently pursue money.

The sad truth is that some of these  accelerators are governed by idiots.  Rich idiots, but people who are literally incapable of understsanding what AuT is.  I understand that.  Even the greater physics community is unable to comprehend what is going on here.  Before we get to the 'lectron its worth discussing this because it applies to the electtron of pre AuT physics in a very big way.

When I start talking `bout this nowhere near fundamental particle all your childhood visions will be crumpled up and tossed away as they should be.

Like all things AuT, it is completely different.

Illogical? No.  Mathematically unsound? Certainly not, indeed the thought of leaving logic or math would be to abandon the keystones of AuT.  AuT rejects the standard model, string theory, hologram theory, etc theories of nonsense in favor of strict mathematics and logic.

You can find 100% of the math in the existing books, well 100% less the application math which we are going to begin to discuss relative to the 'lectron and such this morning.

Therein lies the problem with pre AuT physicists and the yahoos who run the accelerators.  To the extent they get past the question of whether I am some crackpot or not, they go to the neighborhood physicst store and check out someone with a masters or phd and ask, what about this?  And what is the answer?

The answer is that it does not comport with the absurdities that are preAuT physics, the quarks  and such.  It does go to the heart of hidden variable theory, but it so soundly rejects all false gods (even Einstein and Hawkin) of physics that it is labled blasphemy.

It turn out science is as blind as politics, and yet scientists wonder why climate change deniers and antivaxers are everywhere.  Its because the world is run by morons.  The all important money is controlled by people who earned it without thinking deeply, they made or invested in clever ideas and received billions because money flows downhill like all human endeavor and AuT is on top of a scientific mountain.

But I have gone on enough, you tuned in to talk about  `lectrons and I want to rant for a few more hours, but the sun is coming up soon and I have obligations to keep. 

Before I get too far into the details, I want to share some reminders.  Different dimensional states, gradually transitioning leaves us with a great deal of uncertainty and not a small amount of weirdness even though the math is high school calculus.

That fact that higher dimensional states must be wrapped in lower dimensional states is counter intuitive (like force being an effect for all the whinny little preAuT physicists quivering lest they be proved wrong in their bizarre, almost idolotric beliefs); but once you realize we are looking at the universe from behind a mirror it gets a little more clear because everything is a little backwards.

Indeed, when you realize what energy really is, later in this series of posts you are going to throw your computer against the wall and scream, no it is impossible, I cannot accept that...except that you cannot unsee it once it is seen.  It is like walking in on your great grandfather after a shower, i suppose.   Thankfully i have never done that, but i suspect if i had it would be hard to get the image out of my mind.

Where was I?  Ah yes, the 'lec-er-on.

In converting these things to representative drawings,  whole new subworlds become apparent, and these are not easy to protray or envision, but lets start with the "electron."

There are two drawings of this thing we call the electron tthat i planned  on discussing today, but i rambled on too far, my half cup of coffee is half gone and grown cold.

What you are thnkig is that this does not look much like a fundamental particle, it does not look much alike a particle at all.  It looks a little like an unfolding galaxy (see the books) but it is not something that seems like it could easily fly around a nucleus, and indeed it cannot.

The mainstream press provides you a bullshit alternative.  Maybe you are not ready for reality, maybe you should stick with this nonsense.

Phys.org: The geometry of an electron determined for the first time. https://phys.org/news/2019-05-geometry-electron.html

If you are brave, or if you are one of those people who would like to see your great grandfather after a shower, stay tuned.

A short update

Another short 2200 yard workout after yesterday as the first day off in a couple of weeks.  The pool temperature has hit 84 and now the hard parts of the workout are almost too hot.  Ah, the joys of early summer.  First it is too cold, then too hot.

I have been on a technological posting pause as the next patent approaches a filing date.  The continuing redesign of the electron and atom along with the application to the new way of approaching quantum computing inherent in the one place at a value of x design is also moving forward.

The design of the fusion reactor and process have been even more clear and precise.  Will it work...that is an interesting question.  The short answer is that there is more technical design work to be done,  but it should work.  The disclosure covers in some detail the how and why.

I dont know how much will reach this post.  The new design of the atom is too good not to include.  The fusion generator design, well, I am largely holding out to build one.  There are some easy targets and some technical hurdles, but time will have to wait for that.  The idea is that the books cover enough of the technology to protect if something should happen to stop me from posting this and if nothing happens those designs will come out in due course.  There are some very clever aspects, but the most clever one is that they seek to mimic nature and to exploit a new science.

I continue to have a decreasing number of followers who get all their news from this blog which is just me rambling.  The books and the articles are much more specific, the articles being much more a summary view.  I do plan to do an article on the appearance of the electron and perhaps I will cover the applicability to quantum computing in that article, but this is not as easy as you might assume.

Think about it, its getting close to 7 years and single handedly i not only figured out how the universe functions below the level of thermodynamics, the so called hidden variable concept but taken to an entirely new level, the multi-dimensional interaction and no-time model; but then I have developed also alone the application to a couple of the big problems.

When I look at what they are doing to build qbit quantum models with superconductivity and look at what is available in the new atomic design it is like looking at cavemen trying to build an automobile, but building an automobile would be tough for anyone from scratch.

While it will not be all I want it to be, there is a pretty good chance the next patent will be filed before Tuesday of next week and if it is, then this blog will be set to continue again in earnest.

Stay tuned and bear with me.

Sunday aftermorning

I have perhaps 10 articles partially written, but I am focused on getting the next patent filed where the electron, already remodeled, is more specifically described and where the details of fusion are covered in a more direct fashion.
I swam four days in a row, yesterday being the short 2,000 yard workout; but this is not good since I should have been varying my workout more but have elected for what is easy and cool.  The water temperature is up to 82 degrees, still fine regardless of the sun angle; but noticably increasing towards being too warm when it was only weeks ago that it was marginally warm enough.
I feel pretty good about the fusion solution.  The details may require some thought, but the general model is solid now, the drawings good enough although there will be a few edits.
My original thought was to file it the first of next week, but I am calmer after the weekend, despite sleeping past 630, almost to 7 today.
I have also outlined the grant application in some detail although I seem to have misplaced my pen in the process.
Nature.com: A struggle for the soul of theoretical physics. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01171-0
This article is laughable.  It shows everything wrong with physics...and Nature magazine, those pompous jackasses (you can decide if I am talking about characters in physics or the magazine, you would probably be right in either case).
They talk about it being a math vs observation battle, then the subtle error..."without spin of the electron the periodic table of the elements does not make sense."  This is where the true battle is.  Entrenched theories vrs more elegant and predictive theories.
If you buy any of the books, the audio book or Alg. Univ. Model, at least; the periodic table is a necessary result not of electron spin bullshit, but fractal mathematics. Alright, briefly the Nature article drones about the battle between math fantasy and observational reality; but they miss the point that needs to be made.  Trying to use old math to explain new observations is as stupid as thrying to make new math explain old observations if you are not flexible in your approach.
The old math is just that, old.  Worn out and inaccurate.  It explains a periodic table based on fanciful and unrealistic time features that are not observed in nature.  If it is not observed as part of the base math of the universe, then it probably is not right.  This is why AuT was able to fix the time problem, because faster than light travel was a thing, observed in nature (not just old galactic movement or, as pre AuT calls it Newer galactic movement; but also gravity which changes in a pre-time and therefor faster than light travel).
It is the new version of the electron, which however poorly is set out in the prior books and the fractal periodic table which is more clearly set out in the prior books that bridges the gap between math and physics because they are both observed and creatures of the math, not the forced, if brilliant, math of nature magazine, feyman, einsein, schrodinger and the like; but real concrete math that fixes problems and which, when applied to complex models, like the periodic table curls up around it like a kitten a purrs.

I recently had to deal with some of the bull shit when I showed how the new math was more preditive.  The reviewer could not deny the math, this is the most recent force and range chart for those of you following along in the books.  Sputtering for lack of fact; no attempt was made to question the predictiveness of the model, instad the reviewer resorted to procedural objections which had nothing to do withphysics or math.  What does this tell us?
The world of physics, including the clowns at Nature, is so mired in trying to force the old math into the new physics that they no longer see the world around them and their work in increasingly worthless and, as shown by the absurdly expensive super colliders, wasteful.  Physics has become a garbage heep of misunderstanding mirroring, just as AuT suggests it would, the pollluted world around them, it has become one more plastic bag at the bottom on the ocean and, sadly, I am the only hope for the future.
Quite a bit of responsibility for the villiage idiot, but also foreseeable.

Gravity, waves and straight line travel in a curved universe

I am going to start this with what I wrote to you because I like clever turns of phrases.
I slept last night despite not breathing and the headache I woke with as a result, despite being away from my lover and doing harm to others.  So much for the adage, no rest for wicked, sometimes they sleep just fine.
I will use that in a book, the truth is often the best source of fiction.
My characters always have a sense of the original sin about them, coated with additional sin in layers like a cake, thick frosting with wafers of crust.
It is early and cool outside, but i am sitting out here drinking my coffee because it is pleasant and i would rather have the discomfort of the temperature, than lose this time alone.
I am going to talk about the shape of the universe and how it reflects what is and why it proves there was no big bang (hint, if you look up you dont see a flash of light, but  there are other matters.  I weighed under 175 this morning, i suppose it is because i only ate half of my sandwitch and because it was one of those things with no bread and because despite the 4 small oatmeal cookies for desert my dinner was something that looked more like rations than what you would see someone affluent eat.
My vision is blury this morning so it is hard to write.  With exercising outside, swimming, the not yet intense summer sun and perhaps the monk like non-sex life I have have conspired to make me feel healthy, but my eyes mock the rest of me.  If I live a long life, the last of it will be in darkness.
Lets start with the big bang and the shape of the universe.  The universe is a disc because as it has moved 2 thirds of the way from maximum compression before the last inflecction point it is tending towards being the straight line that it is at the most quantum level.  The calculations for this can be found in the books.  The stupid physics press, that is all physics that does not include my work but does include the big bang (a subset of the physics press which admittedly covers a broad if exclusive amount of theory on thing which AuT explains) says if we could see far enough we would see the light of the bang and that is stupid, because we can see the top ofthe universe even though the edges aretooo far away. AuT gives a coupleof reasons why  the comment was stupid.  One is t hat light doesnt last forever, read thebooks; the other is that we cansee far enough..looking up but there was no big bang and the universe does not work that way.
Why does gravity and wave type energy appear to travel in straight lines?  Question 2
Because they are one and two dimensional to a greater or lesser extent, in gravity even less than two dimensional.  Just as photons have elements that are two diemsnional and are more wavelike than electrons (neither of these things are more than fractal representations, but I will get to that in a couple of weeks although you can see it in the books also) because they have more two dimensioanl elements.
It is simple and brilliant and if it is true what hawkins said (if we understand it we can control it) then the keys to the car i am giving you will allow you to drive the universe. Hawkins was wrong, of course; like einstein he did not know what time was, we do whcih is why our car is in the ditch.

see the coiling drawing
https://youtu.be/YNEBhwimJWs

The second article this week and an annoying day comes to an end

I have been consistently working out for several days.  weights and stair, swimming short but passable workouts and repeat.  Yesterday I swam 2200 yards and again today.  the water temp was down slightly to 78 and up slightly from the 75 or 6.
I did an imprompt review of my weight fluctuations and came up with 1 or 2 percent.  at 175 that is 2-4 pounds, roughly, but it mostly fluctuates up which is annoyinng, although I am at a good weight given all the weight lifting and the resulting bulking up.  while i can fit in what were preveiously tight pants, the legs are filled out with muscle and my arms have always been gangly, uncontrolled things.
I have too much to do.
An important thought came to me yesterday and another this morning and I have lost both of them. I dont know why.  The rewrite of nostradamus is approaching the halfway point.
There is a silly article out there:
NBC News: What is gravity?. https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/what-gravity-ncna1004506
which is answered with the two most recent articles (two different versions of the same thing).
Here is the second of the two:
Thank you for your outstanding paper, here your paper has been published, here is the online link and printable copy for you. https://nessapublishers.com/view-article.php?id=344/Space-as-the-building-block-of-dimension-An-applied-overview We welcome you for more outstanding manuscripts to publish in our Journal.
I not only define gravity, but also time.
The nbcnews article is nonsense, but with 4 articles out there it is only a matter of time.
I am glad of the nosense, it confirms how far ahead I am and I hope I am making progress with the acceleration towards the applications.
Today waa full of stress, you did not help things with your ultimatums, one more among many, but I suppose I desesrve everything that happens because the universe decides I deserve it, the most innocent are always the first to be punished.  That sound good.

the elaborate dinner and the next big thing

i was up at midnight today.   I managed to lay back down but I did not sleep.
AuT is about fusion because that is the reach of the average investor.
It is about fusion because it teaches how fusion occurs in nature and therefore how to replicate it.
Aut is about quantum computing because it correctly identifies the smallest particles and how they interact.

An article, only a few months old technically, published today.

Thanks for submitting your valuable article to our journal. We are pleased to inform you that your article has been uploaded in the Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics. Kindly go through the link https://www.opastonline.com/current-issue-atcp/. To find your article. 

AuT is the biggest thing you will see in your lifetime.  Well, the biggest thing in physics.
I am slogging through the next version of the patent which brings together some far distant pieces and brings a great deal of focus into things like spew and absorption which power the neutron role in the molecular structure and the fractal features which have an enormous impact on how  the universe functions to generate such complicated results.
I am still waiting for the appeal.  The appeal takes observations and math and puts them together in such a way that you have to either accept the model, at least as far as bridging gravity to the other forces or you have to say, it does not matter that it is mathematically irrefutable, we deny it because it is what we want to do.
Don't believe me, read that article.  It is close to up to date.
AuT fusion is the tip of a very big iceberg, because AuT is starwars science, it is making energy from nothing (if you can call prephoton states nothing), antigravity and faster than light travel.
It is mathematically sound, if you find a way that it does not fit in, it is only because you are making something up or leaving something out.
AuT defines what electromagnetism is as a part of what the electron is.  It redefines the electron as something far different from a fundamental particle in that it is not a single particle at all.  Indeed the new patent defines the electron in this way with much more specificity.  It redefines substantial the energy compoent in electrons in a way which is both obvious in light of the disclosure and surprising to me.  I am shocked, somewhat, to see how simple energy is to manipulate.  In my lifetime, based on this science, we will end the energy crisis, if stupidity does not kill us or if the pursuit of this is not sidetracked by smaller minds first. 
It redefines what is quantum and is critical to quantum  computing for that reason.
But that is only the part of the iceberg that is above the surface, because AuT defines what dimension is and separates time, as an effect, from change which is the most powerful quantum force.
While prior physics showed the relationship between energy and matter, AuT takes this relationship forward to black holes and backward to space, defining gravity and dark energy in the process.
There are 4 articles published on the science, but the scope of science increases every week and has increased in scope since August of 2018 when it was first defined sufficently to appreciate what it taught.  Indeed, the first article, published in October of that year, while providing the fundamental features, is already hopelessly out of date.  So it is new, and to understand how new it is, the details of the fusion reaction were only fully developed in the middle of 2019, where we are as this is written.
If you are looking for a smart thermostat or the next big application and that is the extent of your imagination, thank you for your time.  If you are intested in the survival of man, in conquering space it is me you are looking for.
https://youtu.be/PXNGKehL-xo

physics terrorists and the 80,000

I am zeroing in on 80,000 views.
No signs of life from funding my project with a T-shirt:
https://www.bonfire.com/aut/
With the average number of views, a T-shirt promotion is unlikely to generate much, but 80,000 is still a lot of views. I will hit that this summer.
The end of some of civilization is inevitable and probably within our lifetimes.
I wrote about it many years ago in World War C which was published a few times and awaits updating.
It is the continuation of the trade war which was also covered in my book Chinas weaponized economy published way back in 2010 or 12.  It is one of the few areas where I agree with current us policy.  War is inevitable.  AI will be decisive in that the war will be fought with pilotless weapons and the current weapons systems will be irrelevant to the outcome of the conflict.  At best they might buffer continents, but they will be a shortlived buffer because they are too big to fight autonomous weapons whose sole purpose is to explode in the right place.
AuT, if it is developed soon enough will be a part of this, but it is unlikely to be decisive since that will lie with the Chinese and South Koreans who do most of the related manufacturing.  The permise of world war c and chinas weaponized economy is that if you outsource the manufacture of the weapons of war, you will be hard pressed to participate in a meaningful way when war breaks out.
I am going to discuss some picture below.

This is the very first pictre posted in this blog, probably in 2010, maybe before.  One element is that it forsaw the current crisis in government, pointing out that without term limits self preservation would win out against good sense government.

Shortly after I finished the first draft of world war c, I decided the ideas were worth promoting separately and here is the book, still in print that sets them out in large part.

 I shot for an edited version and this rampant failure of a book was the result.  It needs editing.

This was an early advert which probably has not changed much.  You can find these pictures if you go through the blog but the truth is that while they are important books, they all need to be updated and that is not in my current wheelhouse timewise.

I do need to put some scripts together and submit them to the various production outlets and see if i can generate some interest there.  If there are any agents or producers listening, your next horror based hit is waiting for you here.

Before 5am Dark Matter all around us

5 am is a long way off.
I have read over this post and it drones on about nothing.
It is not funny or entertaining and while there are snippets here and there, you might want to just wait for the next post.
I wrote a missive today about how i am living the second life as much as I can or perhaps working towards the second life.  you only live twice is the nancy sinatra song i refer to.  One time for yourself and once for your dreams.
The for myself part was in my case so i could eat and feed others.
The for my dreams part is following my heart, writing and science and sometimes the two together.  And perhaps love if I decide I deserve it.
There is another post ready for today but it is too horrible to put up, without a warning.  I often write parts of posts a day ahead of time and that terrifying postis written, but not this morning.
a morning of storms.
it is early but i cannot sleep. It is dark outside.  I have to type this with the screen turned away from me.  There is only a glimmer of light in the clouds, probably not dawn, reflecte light climbing weakly throughtherain.
the next post is too terrible to give withoutu an introduction.
It talks about the next inevitable war which is on our doorsteps.  The machine war which will so comletely change things and expose the idiocy of our government and is the reason why i first wrote wwc, then called who we lost the war with china, although it did not help.  for a while perhaps i could sleep, but not now.
a flash of lightening.  the warning is there, i should talk of physics.
I need to calm myself.
5:15 now.  I have fed all the animals here and taken the old cat into the yard before the rain gets too intense again.  I feel better having done that.  Acts of giving always make us feel better, I sacrificed my first life, one life for myself?  I need to use the one for my dreams.
I am getting hungry.
I have not  been weighing myself online.  My weight is in the target range, whether a little less or more I do not know this morning.  It is easy to imagine gaining some back if I go to my old ways of eating or dropping if I show more discipline.  Neither is happening at this early hour.  That awful breakfast will not make a difference one way or the other, the delicious but simple dinner (from a youtube video) was the dream breakfast, the one I ate was....efficient; soylent green.
I am finished with the science mostly and have moved on, for now, to the practical applications.
There are additional insights, of course, so there is more science.  A lot of it appears in the last few posts.  The better vision of the electron as an averaged charged in a cloud which was given before, but now is more specifically laid out.
Even so, I have all the scientific small pieces.  The foundation is there.  The new science is there.  The new model waiting only for others to come...behind me.  They will always be behind me now.  The most recent articles which are not yet all published but will be by the end of next month, the patents, the emails.  All of it assures me, at least, that I am first.
How many years did I work in the fear that I would stumble onto someone who was ahead of me?  The fear of being robbed remains, but not the idea of being beaten.
It begins to lightening more, to rain harder.  count the seconds, half miles away.  Now it is 4 or 5, soon it will be right over me, the dispersion array will get a work out this morning.
We manipulate the forcess, therein lies the problem.
it bothers me, more than a little.
Electromagnetisim, free will, why there are not visible negative gravity planets; perhaps not in that order.  Free will is a thing for little children to talk about.
more lightening and more rain.
It is the transition from pre force to force that bothers me most.  Forces seem to control us while it is obvious they originate according the the underlyng math, but somehow they portray themselves as force.
The double helix reflects and contains quantum change and just as it controls life, the quantum change controls the formation of the helix which must reflect in some way the underlying math, just as the vitruvean man so clearly reflects the spiral model.  it is a subtle type of control, we are alive because of the helix, but the helix controls us.
Therein lies the potential, becaue we can controlt the helix, so why not an underlying counter, if not space, at least pre charge or pre photons.
While i figured out how graavity works, the solution suggests anti gravity planets does it not.  I know the break down of gravity is movement and that things can move fast enough to be a net dark energy universe, but when we look at the stars why dont we see more antigravity since it predominates.  Somehow, force as a resut becomes force as a driving feature.  In this point lies the ability to manipulate the univeirse, the introduction of time secondary to change. 
Perhaps looking at planetary spew, the word is actually a net negative, that is the most likely answer.  We see what we want, gravity, but the energy level spew riding on ct1 changes emanating from the planets is the negative gravity that i keep looking for.  it is all around us, hiding in plain sight.
A smarter person than me would ask, where are the positive energy planets; and perhaps those are dark matter planets, those where the spew is less than the folding.  It makes a great deal of sense.
I am not sure that I buy that.  I have a great explanation, supported by math, for primary forces and interactions and traditional analysis ties these observations together.  But something about it is confusing and I can put my finger on the symptoms, but not all of the reasons why it bothers me so much.  Worse, once you understand time and the scale, base, exponent, fractal side of things, the universe resorts to a newtonian pre relativistic model, albeit with a few different layers of math.
The sky is lit for a full second.
I stopped again, this time to feed myself.
I wanted to eat something more solid than cereal, but it was dark and early and i ended up grazing.
It is a little after 6 and now there is enough light to look at my screen.
this post should come as a warning, "I am not going anywhere with this post"
And yet it describes a dark matter universe wtihin our matter universe very well and perhaps that is enough.
Menioned in this blog:

Physics Terrorist and the 'lectron

Before swimming 2500 yards yesterday, the pool temperature had dropped 4 degrees,  the result of rain and clouds.  Fortunately not even close to a deal killer, it still had a psychological effect before I dove in.
I am glad I did, for even though the weather is supposed to be good later today, more rain means a lower temperature and it is done.  Swimming provides balance against weight lifting just as yoga would.
It is thundering in the distance while a large bubble storm moves over the county where I life.  It will be gone soon and today will be another sunny to partly cloudy day.  For now it is so clammy that the air feels different and my skin feels like it is covered in grease.
Even though it is relatively late in the morning, hours since I woke up, well two is a plural, it is dark and as you know my vision is not so good and the bright light of summer is unbearable.
It is cool and wet outside, I had to put on a jacket but it is so wet that the papers around me have taken on a slightly wrinkled appearance and have the same greasy feel as my face, the ink edits smear.
I have been trying to move on, but so far I continue to meet resistance.
I had some expected, but still inconvenient economic setbacks.  I will deal with those, but I dont have to be happy about it.
The scientific financial setbacks tied to my science are almost as significant.  Indeed, come August they will be high; but fortunately, I have been working hard on the patent months in advance of the deadline, producing a solid document and tighter claims.  It will present challenges, but for at least 12 months I should be able to meet them and thereafter I will just have to get selective.
The article of the day is this nonsense:
Phys.org: Computing faster with quasi-particles. https://phys.org/news/2019-05-faster-quasi-particles.html
This example of not knowing what they are working with leading to ineffective results is what AuT is all about.  When you are looking at this and wondering why its important, look at this article and ask yourself, if they knew what the fuck they were working with,might their work be effective instead of experimental?
More like quasi physics, but whatever.
I am not here to whine or perhaps I am.  It is my blog.  The books...well the books have most stuff.
After the next patent is filed I will present a much more in depth view of the 'lectron.  That is not a mis-spelling, because it is vastly different from the thing which these .org physicists talk about. It is both more certain and vastly different, it exists as a necessary counterpart to the pre-collapse ct4t16 proton which itself is not totally a thing, but is close enough to the neutron to achieve a type of stability, of consistency that controls the consistency of the 'lectron just as the black hole controls the consistency of the galaxy.  The fractal version of the circle of life, a non-circle.
These dot org people are not even trying to find the right science, they are just looking for papers which allow them to stroke their own ego.  In its own way, it is the Salem Witch Trials.  Burn the witch.  I care, but I do not have my own army.
Of course the only readers I care about are the ones from Greece, but aren't all scientists Greeks after a fashion, just as we are all Sumarians?  We are the modern embodiment of those who looked beyond what was obvious and what they had been indoctrinated with and went in search for truth.
Only they are my people, the other witches.
I am the poster child for going beyond what I was taught and looked for truth, because I found it.
You do not need new theory or tests for AuT because everything fits within it.  It is a little weird, but not when you think about it.  Of course, the .org people who are only interested in stroking their own members (egos) are too fearful to admit that they have a 2.8 trillion dollar economic impact based on inaccurate science or that the billions spent on their supercolliders is wasted.
I swam 2500 yards since it looked like it was going to storm the rest of the weekend.
It left me more relaxed, but still dissatisfied and irritable.
It is raining even harder now, but it will be gone soon, even the rain which so matches my dark mood will abandon  me.

a whole new world...of cats

Well, i weighed in at 176.2 today.
The conditions were not particularly bad, but I think I can lay the whole thing to one meal where I at more red meat than I normally do a couple of days ago.
That may not be fair, but its my blog so I can say stuff about my weight.  That is a 2.2 pound increase however, a cat?  well, at least a very small cat, anyway.
I am busy pounding away at the patent and as I do, as I always do when I dig down deep, there are insights.
Most of them, maybe all of them, were there before, but the detail with which they are set out increases.
I had a picture in the last patent that showed the ct4t13 electron and months ago, it seems like an eternity now, I had largely defined them in such a way. of t12 states adn clouds.   I have added the inherent net features, but those were essentially set out if not with the amount of eureka.
I should not use that word, I may be accused of being grandiose.  Oh Aristotle, Socrates, my people, our people.  How grand we all used to be, before being intellectually thousands of years ahead of everyone else was considered a good thing, not Grandiose, but...what?  clever?
Where was I...electrons,  I had certainly defined the actual fractal structure of nested doll-like structures creating the nucleus which is so important to the first commercial use I see here.  The Grandiosity of it all.
It is so much weirder.  Increasing dimensions with nesting inside lower dimensions.  It is really weird, accurate, but weird.
You see we tend to think of added dimensions and increasing when they are both increasing and decreasing.
It is like the space-energy thing (which is really space-precharge-perphotons (maybe neutrinos?)-neutrons-black holes.   It is like way over the top obvious...and yet...the transitional nature of the universe is not so obvious and the odd/even exponential transitions is jumping out of the tub naked and running down the streets naked insightful.  You want to be close to your target weight when you do that.
  More importantly, the base change in dimension and folding is not so obvious.  Nor, I will admit, is it a particularly grand in concept; even though it is grand in effect.
It is like I droned on in the last post.  I really apologize for droning on.  This is not really my fault.  It is your fault.  If we were together, I doubt I would even pick this up.  I would spend all my time waiting to see you, if I couldnt spend it with you.  Last night, well I wish I could tell you everything in this blog, but its called a world in amber, not as the world turns.  Its about physics and the other nonsense I decide to write in it, like about my weight.  You have to admit for an old guy I work out pretty hard and I have lost quite a bit of weight.  A mid sized cat as it were.
I suppose that is what this blog should be about.  Measuring the world in terms of cats.
10^-50 cats is a...what?
That is sort of the points, however.  Because 10^-16 cats is a two dimensional cat (more or less).  10^-20 or so cats is one dimensional and both those very small cats are below the state where there is effective time or energy.  And yet, the cat that is eating my breakfast is within the hypothetical transitional collection of lower cat states.  The nucleous of the cat are surrounded  by transitionally smalller cat states, 10-12 cats with clouds of smaller, dimensionally less cats folded about the denser, almost 3 dimesnional cat protons and 3 dimensional cat neutrons.  That is really what it is, in their numbers, folded around the dense cats, the achieve a greater dimensional framework, individually they are...smaller.
But that is not the end of the cat story.
Indeed, the smaller the cat, the longer the cat appears until space appears to stretch out forever, not because it has more length or dimension, but because it is in so many places before it is subject to time.  That is something to wrap you head around and try to touch it until it begins to purr in your brain.
We see these very long cats in between the 10^-16 and and 10-12 cat size as wave lengths and then they steadily begin to coallesce into the cats that are subject to time before they begin to grow, first into mollecular 10^16*16^2-4 cats and they get bigger and bigger, until suddenly, the get smaller and smaller as they turn into 16^20, 30, even 32 type cats with a fourth dimension and a much smaller 3 dimensional aspect even as their fourth dimensional aspect grows and another, denser time takes hold where our earthly cats become the wave lengths, being in multiple places at once, dead and alive to these giant, small, 4 dimensional black (hole) cats.  Our cats actually become Schrodinger's cats at last.

Grandios

 It is raining as if it will never stop.
Perhaps one day that will happen.
Before he died, Hawkins said earth would likely end up like Venus.
I have the solution to that and perhaps the solution to the problem that Venus has.
But will it ever leave me?
It may easily die with me.
Death would be easier than living.
Life is contraindicated.  The universe is so terribly hostile to everything.
And yet we live and I have the opportunity to extend life.
To what end?

I swam a measely 1500, I was on my third im when thunder struck and I was forced out.
I have started the massive job of beginning to renumber in light of the new structures in AuT.
An electron is not a fundamental particle, it is not even a thing.
It is a net result having so many parts that they can only be numbered because numbering is possible as a matter of course in the model..
Like everything else in AuT it is both obvious and counter-intuitive.
It is productive but shows that productive has little value.
When you indicate an electron, you are pointing to a net feature of a roundish thing, striving to move from two dimensions to the 3 that reside in its core..
Worse still in a 3 dimensional form, it is around, but does not include the nucleus of an atom.
It is difficult to put in context, difficult to number, but it is so certain in AuT that it is.

I was told tonight that to get funding I might want to tone things down.
My application sounded "grandious."
As I cry, I am laughing, because I have seen further into the universe than anyone alive.
I see how we will die and how to keep us alive until then.
I have seen the unlimited potential in the universe and the limits that bring us back to our knees.
Grandios?  The most significant advance in physics in human history, the secret to the beginning and the end of our universe, the quantum features of the universe down to individual bits of information, the answer to virtually every, single major mystery of the universe in modern physics.
Grandios?  Is that word worthy of what is taught in AuT?
I don't think so.
The right word is nothing like grandios.  It is humbling.  It is a word for dispicable and depression that reflects the futility of life.
Sponser this?  Accept it?  Have it accepted?  To what end?  When you tear back the curtain, you want to see something noble, something timeless, important.  Grandiose, peerhaps. What other words describe what you hope to see?  Perhaps god, purpose, love, poetry.
None of that is behind the universe curtain.
The universe as we know it is summed up in a single equation driven by a number that we do not even consider to be real.

There it is, the top row, second slide from the left, the first equation.
That is everything, the god equation, one frigging variable.
What would Parmenides have done if he had figured it out?  Perhaps his grand student Socrates had the answer to that question.  Give me the hemlock, don't be selfish, is there not a drop for me?  That is Shakespeare.  All the genius, all the dust.
There is something Grandios, it is the grand illusion, the illusion that the universe holds some secret beyond this simplisity.
So why go on?
There is a reason to go on.  Perhaps it can be the grand thing.
We go on, because there is something about space defined by this simple equation that is not logical.  How can something that is nothing remember its value from one change in x to the next, how can it change its informational quality from plus to minus?  Space is a counter, the likes of which we could never make, even in its simplicity it mocks our supercomputers.
Tick, x changes, and all of space advances one fuse lenght, but each bit of space has a slightly different fuse, a fuse which changes in size towards infinity, already points in space have time stamps that can be written, but which are beyond comprehension..
Therein lies the reason for existence.
The purpose of our lives.
Our salvation if there is one.
To figure out what makes space tick and to change it.
For if we can do that, we have the power of god.

So what do you suggest I do?
Do I write back, "well, it is a model which tells us how to create a usable form of  fusion?"
That sounds a little grand, but it is not as grand as figuring out the purpose behind our existence.
How about this, "a clever bit of blockchain math?"  Why mention that it powers the entire universe?
Yes, avoid being grandious.
Bah, Humbug!
I am in a universe governed by irony, because it is built on that one equation and that one equation is an infinite series, the most ironic thing of all, it approaches but never reaches a solution.
Behold I am Ozminides, King of Kings.
No, I am not Gradios,
Shelly understood, the traveller's secret tells us everything.

I met a traveller from an antique land,

Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,

Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;

And on the pedestal, these words appear:

My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46565/ozymandias

And perhaps the answer to my question lies with what is believed to be the original inscription:
Diodorus reports the inscription on the statue, which he claims was the largest in Egypt, as follows: “King of Kings Ozymandias am I. If any want to know how great I am and where I lie, let him outdo me in my work.”

Funding options, force and false neutrinos

I have looked at a lot of goofy stuff.
Sometimes I have to step back:
Why did ct1 become fpix?
It did not just happen, by the way.  I did not randomly pick that because we observe pi.
No, the reason is that the Fibonacci series is derived from pi.

This drawing shows the relationship between teh two.
So, I decided I would look at funding my project with a T-shirt:
https://www.bonfire.com/aut/
I really did that but you should not buy a t-shirt.  that would just be silly.
I would need to sell 100,000 of them to even get close to where I want to go.  I intend to make a few locally because I think they are cool and it will help my trademark.
However if you want to order 500,000 t shirts go ahead.
Where was I?

I swam 2250 after what was perhaps my hardest stair workout ever yesterday (except for real hiking in the mountains) followed by three pretty good sets of weights.  I was drenched.  Didn't lose any more weight.  I was back at 175 this morning after not really eating anything yesterday, I assume it is something about drinking too much water.

The post yesterday was pretty awe inspiring in scope, I dont know if any of you picked up on it.  Yesterday I wrote up the first sufficiently specific patent claims on fusion.  I still have some issues on quantum computing to deal with although "using this definition of quantum phenomena is quantum computing" would be pretty adequate given the disclosure.

I have developed some additional graphics showing the relationship of the electron to the arms of galactic scale fractals, but they are merely modifications and additional explanation of this very old drawing you can find in prior posts and in the books and which are the bottom right drawings below showing spew and absorption which explains electromag.

And then there is the fiction of other stuff

Gizmodo: Dark Matter Detector Makes Incredible Neutrino Observation. 1834270148 https://gizmodo.com/dark-matter-detector-makes-incredible-neutrino-observat-1834270148
So in this, they claim to have 126 two-neutrino double electron captures.
First let us look at a simple example from the article: 
"no-neutrino, or neutrinoless double electron capture, an even rarer event in which, after the double neutrino electron capture event, the two neutrinos collide and emit a gamma ray."
Let us translate this from nonsense to AuT.
First, what this means is that the neutrino compressoin state, which is not defined, otherwise they'd have mass, is something where two of them can contain a gamma ray which makes them around the size of photon, best theorized as a ct4T6 state (see Algorithm Universe Model 2nd if you want to understand how this happens).  So we can define these in terms of what they are and their small size shows why we don't measure their mass wtih absurdly large measurement techniques.
Here is another bit of nonsense to unravel:
"This would demonstrate that neutrinos are their own antiparticles, and would allow scientists to put a number to the neutrinos’s mass. It’s also a complimentary search to a reaction called neutrinoless double beta decay—sort of like the opposite of neutrinoless double electron capture, where two neutrons spontaneously and simultaneously turn into protons, emitting electrons and a pair of neutrinos that annihilate one another."
Its hard to break down something that is gobble-d-goop (to use the technical terms) but we know what happens when neutrons break down, because of the collection of ct states that make them up.  We know that the proton collapse to get to the neutron invovles T-13 state compression into a T16 marix.  We also know that the "electron" is actually a cloud of states and there is a post a day or so ago which covers this in more detail, and this cloud can contain T6 range neutrinos in abundance.
And one last quote:
"We don’t know if these “neutrinoless” reactions would really happen, but it’s an important question to particle physicists. If neutrinos really are their own antiparticle, it would help explain why neutrinos are so low-mass and maybe why there’s so much more matter than antimatter in the Universe. "
We know why neutrinos are low mass, because they are in the range of T6 states and part of the cloud of T12-T13 electrons.
It is agonizing to have to read this.