I have been given the task of presenting e-h-theory without math or a chalkboard proving: 1) that the universe does not have dimension, that dimension is only a function of time, I will identify one person who will be in the audience who controls the universe (not me), and that there is a moral imperative to the actions of everyone in the room in 20 minutes or less.
I wrote that presentation tonight and I'm worried I won't need the whole 20 minutes.
Time dimension refers to the fact that the amount of time assigned to matter which gives space its feeling.
The effect of having time applied to generate all matter/energy types throughout the universe, provides dimension to the universe which would otherwise show no time and therefore no dimension which is observed.
We experience this directly. You do not move from point a to point b without the expenditure of time. You move at so many meters per minute, so many miles per hour. You eye sees light moving at...well, the speed of light. Even light must have its own time because it may be slowed and stopped. It is effected by gravity (bent) so it must be a tendency to return to the singularity.
Light is a type of energy so it is covertable to matter and while the conversion is a function of time (mc^2 is the popular estimation) the speed of light being distance/time allowing for both mass and energy to be solved as derivatives of time in terms of dimension:
d/sqr(e/m)=time. While an approximation, the derivation is haunting in its simplicity.
Note that mass is defined in terms of gravity and gravity is shown (by black holes) to be nothing more than the tendency to return to the hologram, that is the tendency of time to become non-linear where it all happens at once without dimension.
This is the reason that the entire universe boils down to tendency and time, not space time and mass and energy which is only important because it is what we experience as projections.
Now time with tendency would not necessarily result in space. This is much like the question of "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around does it make sound?" Now, of course the tree makes noise unless it falls in a vacuum. But we cannot assume time without tendency would have the same effect because without tendency time might only exist in g-space. That is, the illusion which is o-space may only be a result of the combination of singularity with time to yield tendency plus time.
This universe is much simpler than string theory universe conceptually, but it boggles the mind and eventually, we must ask the question of what types of dimensions exist in g-space which allow things like time and singularity to be combined. That is, if they both exist together in a singularity why would they combine one moment and not the next. This means there may be another layer and now we have an onion and not just a signularity.
Of course, the singularity is not a simple thing. It is as complex as our universe, at least, since it is basically a projector of our universe. One has to hope that there is not some species that turns our universe on and off through the application of time to a singularity; but then that is where g-space gets its name, so where does that leave us?
There will be more on this later and this isn't the speech, you have to come to New Orleans to hear that in December.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Monday, November 4, 2013
where do you look when you're lost
I know you disappear and I deserve it
I find myself alone
We all feel lost some times
Health must overshadow other problems
good health seems like enough to a sick person
but sometimes it seems like the emotional issues
are more than I can handle alone
I can't ask you to be there for my issues
if I'm not there for yours
All I can do is to tell you
that when things seem overwhelming to me
I look to you
like a drowning man reaches for air
like a falling man grasps for the sky
like a religious man might turn to god
and i undestand how they feel
when there is nothing reaching back
I find myself alone
We all feel lost some times
Health must overshadow other problems
good health seems like enough to a sick person
but sometimes it seems like the emotional issues
are more than I can handle alone
I can't ask you to be there for my issues
if I'm not there for yours
All I can do is to tell you
that when things seem overwhelming to me
I look to you
like a drowning man reaches for air
like a falling man grasps for the sky
like a religious man might turn to god
and i undestand how they feel
when there is nothing reaching back
Sunday, November 3, 2013
The power of 1 in the e-hologram universe
We have discussed the various infinite series in the Einstein Hologram Universe novel. For purposes of this entry, we're going to concentrate on one. Assume you are in the audience, front row. The infinite series is that if I cross half way to you and then continue to cross half way I will never reach you. I'll get awfully close, but never reach you. Essentially I will approach the Planck length and pass into the distances of the singularity.
Each step requires what? Time, correct!
When this equation is solved (in the E-H-T book) it proves that time is quantum time and by consequent analysis (also in EHT) as we approach quantum time we find ourselves within the singularity. As time is cut into smaller and smaller pieces (like the person trying to approach someone with a half step at a time, we find ourselves at a point where time is not changing at all.
When we look at black holes, we see this process. Time eventually rewinds and becomes non-linear with everything happening at once.
Earlier I pointed out that with all the intelligences in the universe concentrated into one second as we approached the singularity (non-linear time) the amount of intelligence (with no dimension or time) approaches infinity (1/(1-x) as x approaches 1). However, if this is true of all the intelligences in the universe, it is no less true of a single intelligence. If we take just your life, no matter how short or long, as time as we make time non-linear, as all the time of your life and all the distances approaches a single event, it goes to infinity.
Since it has been shown (in EHT) that we are actually in the singularity and that linear time only makes it appear that we are not in a singularity; this means that each of us has the ability to influence the universe because we all have infinite intelligence and the power that goes with it.
We can change our futures, we can change our very universe. Wise men have attributed this to religious doctrine and it is a spiritual concept, that each of us, through the concentration of our intelligence in the singularity. Of course, you cannot change my universe, because I control it. My infinite intelligence gives me the ability to create my own universe and you, I am afraid, are only a figment of my imagination.
Each step requires what? Time, correct!
When this equation is solved (in the E-H-T book) it proves that time is quantum time and by consequent analysis (also in EHT) as we approach quantum time we find ourselves within the singularity. As time is cut into smaller and smaller pieces (like the person trying to approach someone with a half step at a time, we find ourselves at a point where time is not changing at all.
When we look at black holes, we see this process. Time eventually rewinds and becomes non-linear with everything happening at once.
Earlier I pointed out that with all the intelligences in the universe concentrated into one second as we approached the singularity (non-linear time) the amount of intelligence (with no dimension or time) approaches infinity (1/(1-x) as x approaches 1). However, if this is true of all the intelligences in the universe, it is no less true of a single intelligence. If we take just your life, no matter how short or long, as time as we make time non-linear, as all the time of your life and all the distances approaches a single event, it goes to infinity.
Since it has been shown (in EHT) that we are actually in the singularity and that linear time only makes it appear that we are not in a singularity; this means that each of us has the ability to influence the universe because we all have infinite intelligence and the power that goes with it.
We can change our futures, we can change our very universe. Wise men have attributed this to religious doctrine and it is a spiritual concept, that each of us, through the concentration of our intelligence in the singularity. Of course, you cannot change my universe, because I control it. My infinite intelligence gives me the ability to create my own universe and you, I am afraid, are only a figment of my imagination.
Government gone mad: Domestic spying-even snowden has it wrong
Everyone is excited about domestic and partner spying. In CWE and prior blogs I cover this topic, but it's time to address this topic again.
Even Snowden has this one wrong. As you may recall, much of the NSA related hand wringing over this topic dates from Snowden's telling the public something they already knew. This idea of government over-reaching was covered in amazingly clear detail in "The President's Analyst", a movie perhaps 40 years ahead of its time. That movie is being redone as a history of Snowden today as opposed to the work of comic-fiction that it was when it was first made. Aside from disclosing this type of spying, it also contained the famous quote "Every year the US gets more like Russian and Russians get more like the US so one day they'll meet in the middle."
In The president's analyst, the enemy ended up being AT&T, the company that carried the phone lines and built the phones. Who is the right enemy to be concerned with today. Clearly the government in general and NSA in particular need to be considered. Unfortunately, they are too incompetent to be a serious threat to anyone but themselves and that problem needs to be solved with Term Limits as set out herein (terms equal to the average of the first 25 congresses; no seeking money while in term, etc-see CWE). The real enemy today is the company making the equipment and that is China.
But it's sunny, in Sunday and we can deal with the problems of the world in more detail next week.
Even Snowden has this one wrong. As you may recall, much of the NSA related hand wringing over this topic dates from Snowden's telling the public something they already knew. This idea of government over-reaching was covered in amazingly clear detail in "The President's Analyst", a movie perhaps 40 years ahead of its time. That movie is being redone as a history of Snowden today as opposed to the work of comic-fiction that it was when it was first made. Aside from disclosing this type of spying, it also contained the famous quote "Every year the US gets more like Russian and Russians get more like the US so one day they'll meet in the middle."
In The president's analyst, the enemy ended up being AT&T, the company that carried the phone lines and built the phones. Who is the right enemy to be concerned with today. Clearly the government in general and NSA in particular need to be considered. Unfortunately, they are too incompetent to be a serious threat to anyone but themselves and that problem needs to be solved with Term Limits as set out herein (terms equal to the average of the first 25 congresses; no seeking money while in term, etc-see CWE). The real enemy today is the company making the equipment and that is China.
But it's sunny, in Sunday and we can deal with the problems of the world in more detail next week.
Saturday, November 2, 2013
words and music-A strange speech on the Einstein Hologram Universe
So, sometime between December 4-8 I get to present the Einstein Hologram Universe complements of Wordsandmusic.org New Orleans, Louisiana
They came up with the clever title; The Moral Implications of the Time-Space Continuum: Which I readily accepted with enthusiasm and the tag line:
The only reason for time is so everything doesn’t happen at once.
—Albert Einstein
The only problem is that I could lecture for a week on this topic and I'll only have a short 30 minute window to touch on a very narrow portion of a very complex and far reaching conceptual issue. Still, it will be fun. I seem doomed to be the comic relief at every presentation of ideas; but I can't say that bothers me this late in life, I'm getting used to the universe's perversions when it comes to my life.
My own comic touch will be to suggest that it is like going to hear a lecture from Newton on the theory of gravity, but that sounds a bit conceited. Perhaps it would be more applicable to say it is like getting a lecture from the worm in the apple that fell on his head.
They came up with the clever title; The Moral Implications of the Time-Space Continuum: Which I readily accepted with enthusiasm and the tag line:
The only reason for time is so everything doesn’t happen at once.
—Albert Einstein
The only problem is that I could lecture for a week on this topic and I'll only have a short 30 minute window to touch on a very narrow portion of a very complex and far reaching conceptual issue. Still, it will be fun. I seem doomed to be the comic relief at every presentation of ideas; but I can't say that bothers me this late in life, I'm getting used to the universe's perversions when it comes to my life.
My own comic touch will be to suggest that it is like going to hear a lecture from Newton on the theory of gravity, but that sounds a bit conceited. Perhaps it would be more applicable to say it is like getting a lecture from the worm in the apple that fell on his head.
Congress goes mad, starves their own population for no purpose
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/01/food-stamp-cut_n_4191975.html
You may ask how can someone be for benefits and against our current system of entitlements at the same time.
Anyone logical, understands that for moral reasons and for purely logical reasons you don't want the population to starve. Likewise, for identical reasons you do not want to have a population supported by the government. Yet our government seeks to do both of these undesirable acts. It creates a reliant poor maintained without skills at the government expense and then cuts their benefits, essentially starving their families.
There is no "balance" between these two positions, entitlements and hunger. But balance has nothing to do with it. That is merely the lazy corrupt, pandering politician's approach to the problem of how to deal with the poor. It sounds good, the word balance, but it's idiotic in this case. The solution is not about feeding or not-feeding people. Instead it is about coming up with policies that pass the test of short term, intermediate term and long term intelligence.
Surprise! This quote is attributed to the Chinese: "Give a man a fish and he won't starve for a day. Teach a man how to fish and he won't starve for his entire life."
We are dealing with a government that passes laws for two reasons: 1) To pander to get re-elected and 2) to deal with economic panic. It that how we want to feed our people?
There are logical solutions, you can see some conceptual ideas in China's Weaponized Economy.
The key is to have goals and test the policies against these goals against various time frames.
Our government, unfortunately, is criminally incompetent.
As you might expect, my goals are to make the country competitive. That might mean using benefits in order to provide low cost workers to companies that compete with China in key areas while training those receiving the benefits. It involves providing additional benefits, child care and family planning, during this work and training period. But w're really talking about two things, one is teaching people to fish, the other is stocking the ponds in the USA, the Chinese long ago, to the detriment of USA manufacturing, figured out that you needed to stock the ponds as well as teaching fishing. The idiots in congress have yet to see this even as they become increasingly isolated by their need to protect themselves from the crumbling economy which these practices of China have brought about.
Want more? There will be a speech in New Orleans, not on this topic, but on the E-Hologram Universe Theory in December covering moral concepts embodied in that theory which provides some underpinnings to this.
You may ask how can someone be for benefits and against our current system of entitlements at the same time.
Anyone logical, understands that for moral reasons and for purely logical reasons you don't want the population to starve. Likewise, for identical reasons you do not want to have a population supported by the government. Yet our government seeks to do both of these undesirable acts. It creates a reliant poor maintained without skills at the government expense and then cuts their benefits, essentially starving their families.
There is no "balance" between these two positions, entitlements and hunger. But balance has nothing to do with it. That is merely the lazy corrupt, pandering politician's approach to the problem of how to deal with the poor. It sounds good, the word balance, but it's idiotic in this case. The solution is not about feeding or not-feeding people. Instead it is about coming up with policies that pass the test of short term, intermediate term and long term intelligence.
Surprise! This quote is attributed to the Chinese: "Give a man a fish and he won't starve for a day. Teach a man how to fish and he won't starve for his entire life."
We are dealing with a government that passes laws for two reasons: 1) To pander to get re-elected and 2) to deal with economic panic. It that how we want to feed our people?
There are logical solutions, you can see some conceptual ideas in China's Weaponized Economy.
The key is to have goals and test the policies against these goals against various time frames.
Our government, unfortunately, is criminally incompetent.
As you might expect, my goals are to make the country competitive. That might mean using benefits in order to provide low cost workers to companies that compete with China in key areas while training those receiving the benefits. It involves providing additional benefits, child care and family planning, during this work and training period. But w're really talking about two things, one is teaching people to fish, the other is stocking the ponds in the USA, the Chinese long ago, to the detriment of USA manufacturing, figured out that you needed to stock the ponds as well as teaching fishing. The idiots in congress have yet to see this even as they become increasingly isolated by their need to protect themselves from the crumbling economy which these practices of China have brought about.
Want more? There will be a speech in New Orleans, not on this topic, but on the E-Hologram Universe Theory in December covering moral concepts embodied in that theory which provides some underpinnings to this.
Friday, November 1, 2013
Humans as sheep-triggers revisited after the government shutdown and the ongoing war with china and the internet
One of the problems with quantum movement of political, economic and military situations is the existence of triggers.
When those are pulled makes a difference in how any event, any disaster plays out.
You can never tell what is going to be a trigger, a blog (the Arab spring was brought about by facebook), a book (Stowe may not have started the civil war, but she galvanized the country). What about desirable available at moftheg.com are designed to be triggers, although when and if they will be effective remains to be seen. Uncle Tom's Cabin is evidence that a book can act as a trigger.
Facebook showed where a "system" could trigger political change.
Isolated events can be triggers for the change of history. The battle of thermopole was a timing trigger, the assassination of arch duke Ferdinand was an initiating trigger.
The war with china was triggered by many things. One trigger was the opening of china by Nixon. The weakening of the US under Johnson who initiated the big society and the expansion of the US military to increasingly substitute military might for economic might. The consolidation of sales in big box stores initially, and to an even greater extent by the internet allowed for the exportation of cost. Weaponizing the Chinese economy by keeping prices artificially low and controlling importation of competing products was a country controlling their triggers. They are creating their own triggers.
The Chinese weaponized economy led the way to two far reaching problems. It created a government supported political block and it provided an alternative to minimal wage and piecemeal work which was not only viable but in some ways superior, such as providing free or heavily subsidized health care, housing and food and opening income opportunities in the black market by paying people to have hidden income streams, essentially supplementing criminal income undertakings like gangs, drugs, and the like since those people could work and be paid by the government only for un-reported income.
In addition, this created an opposite group that made a fortune giving away the jobs of the manufacturers in the USA and they want to maintain this economic situation because they cannot see the long term results or they are too busy making a fortune to care.
These two blocks require a lot of pandering to; this leads to a congress which, to keep their safe jobs in the face of an economy collapsing from the center out, doesn't think of anything past pandering to get to the next election. Worse still, the longer lifespans today has allowed this type of congress to stagnate.
The war, when it is recognized, must include making difficult choices which will effect this vulnerable block and the shift which will be necessary to create work but also opportunity for this artificial voting block. If it isn't too late, what is required to motivate a public that has individual intelligence, but moves in a group like sheep.
Understanding these triggers is something that we can be sure our enemies will concentrate on. They already know that people are sheep for cheap prices, politicians in particular; without regard for long term consequences (e.g. eviscerating our ability to compete economically or militarily). We need term limits and a new focus on the effects of legislation in order to learn how to deal with human sheep syndrome triggers.
How is that for irrigated?
When those are pulled makes a difference in how any event, any disaster plays out.
You can never tell what is going to be a trigger, a blog (the Arab spring was brought about by facebook), a book (Stowe may not have started the civil war, but she galvanized the country). What about desirable available at moftheg.com are designed to be triggers, although when and if they will be effective remains to be seen. Uncle Tom's Cabin is evidence that a book can act as a trigger.
Facebook showed where a "system" could trigger political change.
Isolated events can be triggers for the change of history. The battle of thermopole was a timing trigger, the assassination of arch duke Ferdinand was an initiating trigger.
The war with china was triggered by many things. One trigger was the opening of china by Nixon. The weakening of the US under Johnson who initiated the big society and the expansion of the US military to increasingly substitute military might for economic might. The consolidation of sales in big box stores initially, and to an even greater extent by the internet allowed for the exportation of cost. Weaponizing the Chinese economy by keeping prices artificially low and controlling importation of competing products was a country controlling their triggers. They are creating their own triggers.
The Chinese weaponized economy led the way to two far reaching problems. It created a government supported political block and it provided an alternative to minimal wage and piecemeal work which was not only viable but in some ways superior, such as providing free or heavily subsidized health care, housing and food and opening income opportunities in the black market by paying people to have hidden income streams, essentially supplementing criminal income undertakings like gangs, drugs, and the like since those people could work and be paid by the government only for un-reported income.
In addition, this created an opposite group that made a fortune giving away the jobs of the manufacturers in the USA and they want to maintain this economic situation because they cannot see the long term results or they are too busy making a fortune to care.
These two blocks require a lot of pandering to; this leads to a congress which, to keep their safe jobs in the face of an economy collapsing from the center out, doesn't think of anything past pandering to get to the next election. Worse still, the longer lifespans today has allowed this type of congress to stagnate.
The war, when it is recognized, must include making difficult choices which will effect this vulnerable block and the shift which will be necessary to create work but also opportunity for this artificial voting block. If it isn't too late, what is required to motivate a public that has individual intelligence, but moves in a group like sheep.
Understanding these triggers is something that we can be sure our enemies will concentrate on. They already know that people are sheep for cheap prices, politicians in particular; without regard for long term consequences (e.g. eviscerating our ability to compete economically or militarily). We need term limits and a new focus on the effects of legislation in order to learn how to deal with human sheep syndrome triggers.
How is that for irrigated?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)