Time Passages

The very last chapter which I may have to break into parts is too daunting for me to pick up.
I feel like I can see into the future.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa89bt0GZvQ
I should be able to control the future, but it seems when I try change it, I find myself merely fit into what I saw before I acted.  Moreover I find myself unwilling to act no matter how obvious the path before me seems to be.  I attempt to find logic in my actions, and all I find are justifications fixed by someone else holding me in place.
As I have mentioned repeatedly, dimensions are static and every dimension moves in only one direction along the spiral.  This is obvious, even in pre NLC theories, but no one spotted it before me, apparently.  This is not because of any genius, instead the universe fits these items into my vision through your eyes.  I am like a wrench, I am used to turn a screw for reasons that were decided at a point on thermodynamic static line when the universe was designed.
I whose power should be able to do whatever I want am instead hamstrung from making the smallest changes, the changes that would bring me closesr to where I know that I need to be.
I can see the future as clearly as the past.  My vision of the future is not unique, but is instead representative of what everyone possesses and, indeed this common in the extreme.  My volume "China's Weaponized Economy" most recently enforced by China's taking over the spot for the most Billionares in the world by country is not so important to show genius on my part, but is instead proof that the future is as visible as the past to one with sufficient information, for it is consistent with what hundreds said before or at least thought and has now risen to the mainstream.  We can tell as much about the future as we can tell about the past and in many cases more.  But that is no reason not to change it, so why am I here tonight.  What causes me to hesitate, why isn't desire inevitable.
I cannot bear it.
I am wearing my joints down, I am going to continue swimming until it becomes unbearable because it is the only way that I can live in opposition to myself.  There are two of me.  One is in the intersecting spiral that comes back from the future, who knows what will happen and knows what to do to save us and then there is me, equally knowledgable but unable to act.
I reach out and I can almost touch it, the future I can make for myself, the future that I need and past that I cling to.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm6TsYypBpY

NLC-The Static Model and the F series

I'm currently reading about a polar expedition after the civil war during Grant's time in the presidency.  I also continue to swim outside in an increasingly cold pool.  I'm sore because I have to swim so much so that my mind is cleared, so that I'm too tired to think, to tired to stay awake so I can sleep till 4.  It is little enough to ask.
I will come back to the F-series in detail, but I want to take a minute to reflect and to discuss the dried sealing wax of the universe.
The spiral model would tend to look like a method for building a universe and mathematics (inconsistencies solved by NLC-lists are available in this post and in the published volumes although they are not updated), predict-abilities and observed phenomena (see prior volumes/posts especially the observations of black holes pre NLC) as well as Einstein suggest that the universe is fixed.  As has been pointed out there is no legitimate difference between a totally pre-ordained universe (i.e. one governed by rules of physics) and one where everything happens at once except in the durability of the fabric.  Since NLC requires that there is no true dimension and especially no true time, the idea of a dimension or time based failure of durability is nonsensical at worst and at best contraindicated.  You can, of course, argue the universe is contraindicated, but I'm typing this so we have to work from there although I would be the first to volunteer that I don't exist, but perhaps I should save that for another post.
In an information based universe where time is clearly ruled out a time based universe is asinine, much as you'd like to think differently. Similarly, dimension is a phenomena of the data and is almost as meaningless as time which is what led to the spiral model to begin with.  That is the F series is a method of expressing fixed data with dimensional qualities which vary based on a formula.  The data is not carved into a pattern by the F-series, instead, it can be thought of more as a hologram where, depending on where you look at the fixed data it appears to have a different layout or even varies over time.  The hologram universe theory is actually the basis for a non-linear, non-dimensional, non-time based universe for this very reason.  For those who haven't read EHT, it shows how the combination of hologram theory and Einstein's reflections on time yield a universe where everything happens at once which requires an absence of time and this in turn prevents a dimension which you can look along to view time.  So, the obvious question becomes, who uses spirals to view the dimensionless information.  One answer is that we do.  At any given point, we have enough of a connection to the spiral to have information from the past and the future.  While some of you might believe our grasp of the past is better, I would disagree.  Our opinion of what happened before is largely illusory and often times incorrect (what did you dream two night ago?  did you dream about me?)  whereas we can predict with some certainty what will happen next, we even believe intuitively (if incorrectly) that we can control what happens next.  I can type "I want to hear from you" and having typed it be fairly certain that I wrote that only by looking back and seeing it, but before I wrote it I knew it would happen if I wanted it.  Which is the better connection?  NLC says neither is better since at any point along quantum lines the past and future are fixed and the knowledge of the past and future are fixed.
Let's look at this quantum instant which even the stupidist reader (i.e. the one who believes the least in NLC in my example) will admit is likely.  That is there is some length beyond which there is no division (I calculated this with some specificity earlier, although in terms of length since an instant has very little significance if there is no time).  During this quantum instant there is a past and a future.  But there is no ability to "process" the past or future.  Someone who exists in a series of quantum instances, our idiot for example (who is probably a nobel prize winning physicist) cannot during any one instant comprehend anything since comprehension requires that electrons move about in his linear brain.  Non-liinearity means that he has to be able to comprehend without movement based on the fact that the knowledge of past and future exists in that quantum instant which is a unity with the past, present and future quantum points.  If you take a moment to think about it, how can a series of instances where you cannot comprehend be strung together to form a series of instance where you can?  While there are a million ways to try to explain this, they are all a bunch of hooey.  The only logical answer is that in any quantum instant without movement there is sufficient knowledge to make that moment complete.
We can spend interminable time discussing this, the argument can be made that without change thought is impossible and therefore there must be movement in the universe, but this requires that thought be "original".  If thought is a series of steps in physics then you should be able to take the thought and describe it in terms of mathematically defined states at quantum points.  No movement is required.  Our "perception of the thought," longing for example, we feel going on interminably, we imagine all sorts of solutions and wait impatiently for it to be relieved, but at the quantum level it is not such a thing. It is a series of electric-chemical reactions which at any moment are static unless there is no quantum length of time and there is some flow.  The Nobel prize winning idiot says there is a maximum speed limit (also an illusion) but no minimum because if he accepts that there is a minimum amount of time he has to accept that there is no thought at quantum moments and if there is no thought at quantum moments, the thought that exists by stringing them together is an illusion.  But then he has to admit that the information theory of NLC provides a solution  because there is information in the universe and because information must have a minimum amount (yes/no, +/-, forward/back etc) and hence there is a minimum speed marked by the difference between one informational state and the next.
I'm headed to Las Vegas.  I hope to spend some time (alone) in the mountains.  I will be surrounded by people happily gambling away.  I cannot enjoy this, because it is the height of hypocrisy in an NLC universe where chance does not exist.  Even counting cards is irrelevant since the outcome of hard work (easy work for some) is pre-ordained and hence irrelevant.  The time in the mountains will be hard won and as irrelevant as the time in the dice table, but I can bring my small tea cup and I can boil water on an alcohol stove or over some dried brush and drink tea and think of longing and wanting to talk to someone to give my views and listen to theirs. I can wonder if anyone out there understands what I am trying to say here and why the universe sees fit to make me describe the universe and why anyone else listens and if I am lost to the world, then it is only because the world is lost to me.  How will I find it again?

mightware 4

If I loath myself, how must I feel about everyone else?  It matters so little to me what effect the contempt anyone besides you feels towards me.  There is no more care in me to support a regard for anyone else.
There are so many different ways to approach the nightmares I have, those sleeping and those awake, those real and those in my imagination. Sometimes the eye drops help, other times not so much.  One good thing about not being around me is not having to deal with this blindness.  It is, inconvenient.
But, perhaps, not as inconvenient as the end of the universe as we know it.

Gravity spiral goes back towards non-linearity.  The existence of this feature of NLC is well documented in last posts.  The spiral movement towards gravity wells is one of the primary indications of the validity of including a spiral equation in the definition of the universe and is also the origin of spiral features within the universe on spatial scales.

The existence of gravity within the current state of the universe indicates an inward movement towards greater compression, but the universe is expanding indicating that the spiral is overcome by some other force, or by some initial acceleration.  The part of the universe where we find ourselves is moving outward against the forces attempting to return it to non-linearity.  This indicates that aspects of both expansion and compression are experienced by us.  This indicates that we exist in a state where both are present.

If the area of intersection corresponds to the big bang, then perhaps then the big bang itself, that moment when the compressed universe at the ct5 or ct6 state (certain 5 if there is logarithmic compression) is the initial point where there is a meeting of an inward and outward spiral.  This makes it possible that we are not in a position post overlap, but that we are actually within the overlap.

In such a scenario, there is not an abrupt 90 degree turn in physics, but as soon as we leave this overlap/collision area of the intersecting spirals, the universe as we know it ends just as abruptly; but in a fashion which might allow us to continue.  For example, this may end the forces acting against gravity and allow the universe to start contracting which would be a very mild change in the universe and would tell us that we have a period where there is no overlap in which to contemplate the 90 degree turn leading up to the next compression state, the next big bang, to contemplate the end of a livable universe perhaps..

In the next section we will look back at time dilation.  Thinking in terms of time dilation if we look at four coordinates moving together, they move along at the speed of light but as you slow down one it begins to move along the spirals intersecting the primary spiral.  This spiral must either merge back into line  with the primary spiral or must change at some quantum rate which is not the same rate as the movement of the primary spiral.  This means that those intersecting spirals either stop their machine gun belt movement or collapse against the main spiral completely or that the first two spirals remain at the same rate which would leave all spirals off of intersecting spirals capable of changing at different rates, absorbing, as it were, all changes in rate.  As the points acting independent of the primary spiral cease to move at the same quantum rate, they would experience a state independent of thermodynamics directly since there would be no change along with the thermodynamic primary line which the intersect.  As they are accelerated towards the speed of light, becoming energy in the case of ct4, those points (consistent with the idea of things stretching out) should begin to collapse against or at least to change at the same rate as the primary spiral.  In this way, what we are left with is energy moving at the speed of light and the slow down allowing matter to exist occurs when the intersecting spiral at the ct4 level change at a rate less than the rate of the spirals which are tied in rate change to the primary, thermodynamic spiral thereby answering one of the great questions related to the spiral model.
Using CT1 as the main non-linear aspect, this indicates that both ct2 and ct3 spirals come directly off and vary directly with ct1 using the machine gun feed shown previously.  CT4 functions quite differently.  Given the much higher compression state (10^8 vs 10^4) a large number of spirals must intersect with each of the ct2 and ct3 spirals (graphically shown before).  In order to maintain the rate of change as a constant, even allowing for variation and without increasing the rate past the speed of light one concept put forward is to vary the rate change between prior states and current states.  This would mean that "accelerating" rate change to the speed of light is synonymous to bringing all change states to one time.  Another possibility is that the rate change being spread out over multiple spiral lines allows it to be decreased (e.g. the rate change intersecting two spirals can be 1/2 the speed of light, over 3 1/3, etc).  How these achieve the apparent variable speed from a single quantum change to light speed can be debated, just at the variety of method in which a static model (a now very complicated static model) can give rise to observed rate variations can be debated, but the outcome is no more complicated in concept than the recording of live action onto a cd and then taking the data and replaying it in order to recreate the variety that was originally recorded.   It must be understood that the static universe is only information and the spiral is merely one potential model for how the information is organized.
The force expanding the universe in this model is the injection of material from one deflating sprial into another inflating one.
But you knew that, didn't you.

troubled sleep

If ever a man was driven mad by the thought of a woman

careful not to say by the woman herself

that person would lie awake at 4 am

all their actions in one way or another

to one extent or another

would be about her since the day they met
whether a day or half their lives
directed by forces deep inside 

it would neither fade nor sleep.
alone but still feeling the hand
and tasting the breath of the other
death would have felt different.
loneliness requires being alone
perhaps one day to be free
to suffer alone
a life forever dedicated
against the conscious mind

NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 8I

In the excitement of the last few days this post was omitted.  It is short, but it is, perhaps, the most important post of all.  Conflict seems to have given way to a common purpose which creates a conflict of an entirely larger magnitude.  Conflict rails against, common purpose seeks a compromise.  I should stop writing and leave everyone following this to their own devices so that they might eventually reach the same point, but to what purpose?
I will go on, with great trepidation, since god seems to delight in posing a barrier to me; I will delve a little deeper into its realm with whatever impunity or problems relate.
What becomes possible with a fixed universe, as opposed to one which is built, is that "bridges" can be built between the present and past.  Theoretically they can be built to the future also.  Why they are not remains to be seen, but we will address this in detail to some extent later.
In a bridge you come up with a mathematical analysis of this general form:
F(tot)=F(past)+F(present) where F is the composite of applicable time states.  If, for example, we are dealing with photonic phenomena, the easiest to deal with, we come up with a formula something like this:
F(tot)=Ct(1)pa+ct(1)pr+ct(2)pa+ct(2)pr where pa=past and pr=present.  While a future coordinate is possible it is not observed so it will not be addressed.  CT are informational states of time and in this case there we assume ct1 corresponds to 2^0=1 and ct2 to 2^1=2  As will be seen in the following two posts, it is likely that at the point where spirals go off of ct1 that they return within no more than two quantum moments to ct1 to insersect but then leave ct1 in their entirety.  Where spirals come off of the intersecting spirals, two spirals can be connected.

Figure 5

There is shown above an initial f series intersecting spiral formed at the overlap of spirals 1 and 2 off of a main spiral (line A) which is coming out of the page so that only a point (or circle in this case) is visible.  For the sake of creating a richer model, "thermodynamics" only occurs at the insersectionof a spiral coming off of and therefore connecting spirals 1 and 2 away from line A where they originate.  Here one of these spirals is further advanced than the other so that one is in the past relative to the other.  Where they meet at the overlap (at overlap spiral 1 and 2) another f-series intersecting spiral comes off of the point of overlap, part of which is in the past and part in the present and this is regenerated or moves, according to the model which works, down the line of thermodynamics with the intersecting spirals in the fashion shown.

In this way the there is a tie in between two different fixed time points which allows someone experiencing this perspective to appreciate the movement between the less advanced spiral and the more advanced spiral so that even though the model is fixed, there is the appearance of time.

This model is hardly adequate, it is the equivalent of imagining the effect of jumping into a freezing cold swimming pool (which I did earlier) by dipping the end of a toe into it (which I used an entire foot to get a better measurement).

However, this is one mechanism for explaining the perception of time and there you have it.  It doesn't solve the bigger problems I referred to, but it makes for an interesting model.  Ponder the dangers of continuing down this path; and yet I am drawn to its dark, even haunted depths.

playing games

how strange I feel tonight
hearing the siren song
drawn like the moth

forced to remember
we like the same music
move to the same rhythm

made together
for each other
and always apart

I thought you had won
the game called loved
if it were a game

they say the last one to love
is the loser of the game
I thought I had to lose

but today I find out
I have not lost after all
may not, for a thousand years

I would have gladly lost
because that is what love is
to want to be the loser

or to never have a loser
but sometimes the game
only has losers

let me be last
give me my love
worth not winning

NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 9 (with drawings)

Graphic representation of spirals Tying into other spirals

I consider it very unlikely that you will understand what transpires because you are being unnecessarily pig-headed.  I may be psychotic, but I'm willing to accept what is real and what is not.  Actually, if I'm psychotic, then I can't accept what is real and what is not.  Whatever.

As I indicated there is an enormous variety and complexity in addressing this process of compressed intersecting spirals although the math remains fairly simple.  The proof lies in using the principles to define a single operation in nature. This does not mean that this model plays in role in nature, only that some model is required as indicated above for explaining unique NLC operations (especially compression associated with information theory) and intersecting spirals provides a fairly consistent model tending towards observed phenomena as has been observed in the past with non-intersecting logarithmic spirals.

As will be seen from the lengthy discussion of the drawings to follow it is easy to tie intersecting F-series spiral theory in with information theory.  It is also easy to see how a relatively simple system can increase exponentially (2^n) in complexity with some rather simple foundations.

The first drawing below  shows intersecting spirals and after each intersection, the change in either spiral is shown.

Figure 1

To view the drawing above in another way we can look at the two intersecting spirals as if they are tubes.  In this case, we're going to deal with a very simple model, a 4 coordinate spiral intersecting with a one coordinate model (our view of the universe intersecting with space if you would).  As can be seen, at the first intersection you have ct1-ct2 where "space" picks up a single spiral and ct4 goes to ct3.  While this shows one coordinate around another, it would be the same if it was shown a four dots together, the dimension is only used for understanding the graphic.  At the second intersection, ct2 goes to ct4 and ct3 (the remnant of ct4 originally) goes to ct1.  This would describe a pre-black hole type of spacial interaction along to intersecting spiral lines.

Figure 2

In order to give some perspective, in the drawing below on the right is an f-series intersecting two spirals like the model at the top of the page.  As can be seen by the model on the left, the ability to extend the spiral outward without affecting in inward moving spirals is shown.  This same interaction can be seen to a lesser extent with curved spirals but the discussion of the election between these has been covered sufficiently and the use of one as opposed to the other is merely a matter of selection since the universe contains aspects of both.  This model is important because without a fixed amount of information certain numbers like pi remain unsolvable and in an information based universe, at least for a fixed sent of spirals (such as the limited number shown on the right) you can get a practical answer for sequential equations like pi or e (euler).

The discussion of the drawing on the left is much more complex because a single drawing is used to show several different potential phenomena, although curved spirals are avoided despite the fact that they can, at least in theory, be substituted for linear spirals.

What is seen on the right side of the f(8) spiral (see figure 1 above) is the "machine gun" type feed of one spiral into an intersecting spiral.  There are many features of this interaction that are worth noting, perhaps the most significant of which is that at some point in the spirals are properly aligned, the downward (or upward) turn of the intersecting spiral will overlap with the downward (at least according to the drawing) of the intersected spiral.  One potential in this phenomena is that for the loose (1 to 1) interaction of photonic ct1 to wave (ct2) compression states these overlaps could change the observable simultaneous data change from 1 (non-overlapped) to 2 (overlapped) which would provide a handy (if coincidental) explanation for the duplicatas personality of energy (wave and particle characteristics).  It should be noted that the place where you would observe this is not at this outer spiral arm, but the positioning was not used for the purpose of illuminating any particular aspect of NLC.

Looking to the left side of the left figure, there is a non-intersecting spiral shown coming off of the main  ct8 spiral and below this is an intersecting spiral coming off of the same main spiral.  I have intentionally positioned these two spiral to show another intersecting spiral joining the two F-13 arms of this spiral together.  I could have joined any other arms together, of course and I could have joined them using other offsets, such as having them offset from the same quantum point from the main ct8 spiral arm.  The reason for this may make more sense for a view of the next drawing.

A single spiral coming off of the main spiral would make a first time orbit, but it would not be stabilized until it was secured exponentially in place, as by one (at least) intersecting spiral holding the exponential number of spirals together and preferably by the number of quantum points where intersection occurs divided by two spirals holding them together (a spiral with an overlap of 8 would have 4).  An unstable number of spiral overlaps would generate a clock time state that would, over time, spontaneously degrade which could explain radioactive systems.  

Figure 3

The drawing below shows spiral arms coming off (at right angles) from a single point on the main spiral A (in this case it can be off of any point on A (at 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, etc) and at any stage of compression.  The drawing on the left shows two spirals, neither of which is intersecting, although they intersect each other at the overlap shown.  This overlap forms a surface from which an intersecting spiral may spiral off based on the amount of overlap  As can be seen, unless this overlap is "broken off" it serves to fix the position of spiral 1 to spiral 2 at the F5 position and the F3 position respectively.  Going into the significance of each aspect of this exceeds the scope of this graphic analysis.  

It's important to note that the length of any spiral off of the main spiral should be defined by the length of time during which the compressed state exists.  Referring to the second figure 2 the process of compression can be reversed along the main spiral but this requires movement in a single direction so that the machine gun type movement shown in Figure 3 would have to end and the aspect of the spiral at this point would be unique and might correspond to an overlap of the spirals and if that were the case, then the spirals might have to remain offset unless a decompression event occurs.  This is not required. 

The Figure on the right shows that these types of overlaps can occur off of a central spiral A where the F series is not changed.  One can imagine, in the example shown below, how one or more intersecting f-sprials coming more or less out of (or into) the page could (by coming off of the intersection of the spirals coming off of line a) join the operation of any two or more of the spirals in the same fashion as shown in the right.  This provides a mechanism for explaining, using F-series intersecting spirals why certain point times change only with others (if they didn't we would fly apart).  By carrying this out for successive layers, you get a multi-dimensional framework of interlocking points.  The nature of the overlap is not self evident from what is shown below, but should correspond to compression states (2^n) of the type represented by overlaps of intersecting lines such as are shown in the second figure above.

Figure 4

That should give you something to think about while waiting for the next post.  I have a lot to think about.  When I vomit over all this, something comes out besides blood, but I am certainly bleeding.  While the thought of abandoning this line of inquiry completely crossed my mind, you can imagine based on what you know why I decided that I needed to continue it to its conclusion.  It hardly seems fair what I have to go through in order to put this before you.