Carrying dimension with us

I want to wax eloquent (complain) for a moment.

I struggled through 2200 yards swimming tonight so I could use the shower without too much guilt to shower and shave given the frozen pipes.  The 1000 im included two breaks in my much weakened condition, but I feel less guilty about the pound cake that cost me an extra 2 sheckles that will be sorely missed as I deal with the economic realities of a very expensive December.

I am making some passable progress in editing 4 books, dealing with one chapter per day in the Nostradamus science book, editing one chapter in the second romance book and moving between the various physics texts.

Nothing is happening fast enough because of problems at home.

It should be easier to deal with these, but my big plan seems to be unraveling which affects me less perhaps than the others involved, but it is nevertheless an irritant, affecting not only my plans to address the more serious aspects in my personal life, but also would have given some immediate financial purpose, apparently unavailable to the person who figured out the true symmetry of the universe.  

Of course, physicists have always been mistreated as a group, no less than one who having scooped the others now puts on airs that are not qualified, taking such a position, for example.  But I cannot help that, what is done is done and if none saw what I saw first, it is because none have suffered as much, or so I'd tell you.

Here is one of my favorite feeds, its just like sitting in your second floor room looking out the window and tomorrow it may snow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-F4CeVsWHA

Tonight we take a chapter out of book 6

The lumpy nature of time

You might ask, correctly, if space is ct1 and a ship goes out into space, does it carry its four-dimensional presence with it?

We imagine space as four dimensional because we are four dimensional and we see space around us, but AuT suggests that the dimensional aspects of space break down outside of the higher ct state framework.

The reason the breakdown is incomplete is that the space we experience is all a part of the spatial cloud controlled or more correctly affected by the surrounding higher ct states.  The farther you get from a higher ct state, the less dimensional space should become.

If we could look at space at very low values of x, we would see it is as non-dimensional because there would be no dimensional features to affect it.

Once dimensional features are added this changes.  While the mind repels this kind of thinking, Einsteinian physics has no problem saying that we each take our own time into space. 

Hence, it is hypocritical to say we cannot take other dimensions with us.

Of course, time isn't what Einstein thought it was, but neither is space.

While Einstein and AuT have two entirely different views of what space is, space-time is something of a misnomer in AuT, both recognize that features of compressed states carry features that are not present in adjoining lower ct states.

This theory is a new way of looking at the universe free from thermodynamics.  It provides a model for how the universe operates on a fundamental level, below supersymmetry.

What is time?  It is not a dimension, it is an effect of combined prior quantum states of the universe based on a single variable controlling the entire universe. 

In the absence of time and thermodynamics, how do we examine the fundamental universe?  The footprints of the creation of the universe are fossilized within the math we use to interpret the universe.  In doing so, it will answer where forces arise, what the big bang was, why the universe expands and when it will contract.

While hard to accept initially, this paper will show how the footprints of the creation of the universe are fossilized within the mathematical models which we use to interpret the universe as we see it.  In doing so, it will answer where forces arise, what the big bang was, why the universe expands and when it will contract.

Here's a bit of audio book for those who tire of reading what I write.
https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/book5autlogic

So that's the audio-which includes some edits, for the chapter on logic.  I want to encourage you to listen if you want to get some context to these posts, i.e. to hear me whining out loud instead of in my writing.

Jupiter

It is beyond idiotic how this country is run right now.

Of course, I have my complaints, you have yours..

I have not published anything in a few days, but even god rested after creating the universe, which he did in a much different way than that version.
Let me tell you why I don't have to do more, although I will continue to post stuff of interest to me.
First, I define specifically the universe before the big bang, no big deal in hindsight, but a pretty big deal.
Secondly I define what time is and what it isn't, how velocity is just a primitive version of time.  Fairly monumental.
Thirdly, I show specifically how the universe exists in quantum moments and how these morphed into the 3 dimensions that we experience via a single variable for the whole universe.
Why my door isn't being broken down by science reporters begging for a story is beyond me, but I assume this is punishment for me having exposed the universe.  I'm certainly not getting any of the things I want out of this universe.
Truthfully, those 3 things are just the proverbial tip of the iceberg, but the world appears to be managed in an idiotic fashion, perhaps I am the idiot.

Anyway, this post will include Chapter AuT Summary Presentation from Book 5 (which you can order if you want to see it) which is a nice short paragraph that may have been added to the second edition, I don't know.
Enjoy, or don't.

You may be asking, "why is this post named jupiter?"  Jupiter has nothing to do with this post, but there was a link, no longer valid, about Jupiter which I was going to share, but the link was broken, alas.  If the world can be run by idiots, I can give idiotic names to my posts.

In Aut what we look for is how from our logic, a post g-space logic, begins to have cause and effect.  It remains possible, even likely from our logical perspective, that in g-space other logics apply. 

Parmenides is referred to as the father of AuT because of two philosophical similarities.  1) Everything came from a single being and (2) Logic governed the determination of the makeup of the universe.

1)     Let us start with g-space as a holding source and ask, what is the first thing that is held.

2)     This first thing is -1, from our logic it is “not nothing.”  The idea is that from our logic, before this point there is non-logic based g-space.  After this there is -1, a durable result using our logic.

3)     The next step is the counter is added, x which can be imagined as keeping track of the number of -1’s being generated as each is preserved.  This is the quantum counter, but is distinguished from time which is the difference between higher state sharing and low state (ct1) substitution.  Where -1 and x combine we find our logic arise based on -1^x which is based on the durability of the solution that generates -1 (not nothing) and 1(not-not nothing) or -1^2.

4)     This process which generates mathematically -1 and 1:  -1 is not nothing, 1 is the number of -1’s for x^2.  -1 of -1 is 1, the second ratio, nothing to not nothing to 1 nothing to not-nothing.

This process of changing based on the “result” of the prior solution is carried forward in the evolution of the algorithm.

5)     The next step of the process is carrying this forward to create the next transition and the first step in defining dimension.

For this we transition using this first -1 to 1 transition to the same model:

From 0 to -1 is a separation of 1 which in this result based model allows 1 to be derived. Carrying this model forward:

-1 to 1 is 2 apart.  Direction is important.

Utilizing this “2 apart” we go from 1 to -2 which is -3 (direction negative and distance between 1 and -2)

This process continues (-2 to 3, 3 to -4, etc) to yield 5, -7, 9, etc.  This is represented in the solution of (origin of) pi by fpluspix which can be defined several ways (e.g. the fpluspix equation) reflect the preservation of the result type building.

The next transition appears to occur from a higher sin perspective where the pi numbers are applied to a broader matrix.  In this case the beginning ration appears to be 32/27 which when frozen in place corresponds to a variety of f(x)^2^n frozen in place.

This transition is discussed in prior volumes and is carried forward from this point into the observable universe at least through ct5.

The underlying feature, fpluspix controls gravity and dark energy and hence whether the universe as a whole is expanding or contracting and in more compressed information types whether the forces controlling the state are positive or negative.

This “pulse” is reflected over all subsequent states above ct1 and is reflected in the movement and forces resulting from the base equations of the universe and the affairs of man, pulsing along with the steady progress towards a solution point.

The initial universe pulses rapidly.  After a time the pulse begins to slow as the larger numbers begin to outweigh the smaller numbers from -3,5,-7 toes to numbers like 1.6…(38)….1x10^39 where seconds become important.  Conceptually, we are looking for ½ second pulses between big bangs at this higher number, although time as we define it does not exist at this point because only low ct states exist and time is a function of ct4 and higher states, although at ct3 it exists after a fashion.

If the universe is 13.8 billion years old, then x is 13.8billionx1.6x10^39x(the number of seconds in a year) at least, maybe double that number, to give it the 13.8 billion dollar half life.  Since the universe is expected to last another 7 billion years before contracting, the 13.8 number should be replaced with a number closer to 20 billion.

Based on observations of 1) dark energy and 2) “changing” (theorized) expansion rates, it is estimated that at around 20 billion years (+/-) the universe will hit an inflection point and compress for 20billion years till the next inflection/big bang point.

However, the big bang itself is suspect.  When we accept 13.5 billion years as the age of the universe, we’re falling into the trap of pre-AuT observations.  The idea that the universe was completely compressed before it started to decompress is contraindicated.

I

A progression of representations

I sat watching the cold front passing, first in the dark, then in the gray light of dawn.  I had eaten nothing but an apple for dinner, despite swimming 2500 yards I had no appetite.  Events yet to come terrifying me, a scrooge before the ghosts of Christmases yet to come.

My meager rationed coffee grew cold as I contemplated all the horrors that awaited me, old age the final insult, perhaps after blindness, perhaps my eyes would go dark after my mind, confusing whatever thought processes remained, the fate of all of us.

What a cold, grey morning outside.  Those introductory paragraphs are part of the science of nostradamus which is now a pretty well developed outline of 39,000 words.  It could masquerade as a novel on a kindle already, although it is not sufficiently polished to share.

On the other hand, Algorithm Universe Theory, Book 5, 2nd edition, is now available in print.  If you bought the first edition and feel cheated, you can come by and I'll sign your first edition and give you a second.  1-4 need to be rewritten, book 5 is hardly written, but it has these key element that convince me I have an understanding laid out fairly well, many the product of the posts just written.

For those of you waiting for the "oral version," I apologize for not having dictated much, the needs of the flesh and all of that.

I thought last night as I lay awake about individual photons, not some phantasmagorical wave function, but ct2 quantum waves and how they must, due to linearity, explode during phase transitions, wondering if this is where their power above the non dimensional plane of super-symmetry  might lie, could they recombine after such a tragic end and is there some mathematical requirement that they do so or not built into the sub-formula of supper-symmetry?
I started reading and was saddened by how much there was that is not yet in AuT, that may never be there.
I went back to some of the drawings that reflected how these things were held together that might prevent them from breaking apart and decided to put them together.  This is all a reflection of quantum math, the actual drawings of a single ct2  quantum state is not outside of the artist's expertise, there is only so much information represented there in the shells, the four boxes below giving some hint to the interaction of a ct4 state, imagine how much easier a ct2 state would be to draw.  Indeed, the drawing below it, the large one, not the tiny snowman, is not the worst of starts.
None of these drawings is intended to be "right."  Each one represents some element of the mathematics that I wanted to picture for a better understanding of what was going on.  There is too much dimension in them.
Even the drawing on the right which represents so much more than what it appears and which suggests so much that is not yet written and which appears, at least so far, only in the second edition of book 5, is merely a tool.

But tools are what I have.  The equations I have also, but they appear so trivial, because compression occurs by accident, because the only compression I have been able to determine yet comes not from some dimensional element by form the order of the solutions and how those ordered solutions combine.
The triangle drawing, which is such a poor representation of anything, is not the worse of drawings.  This order shifts in an outer layer, maintaining the inner layer and we live in the line of solutions at the very top, the amount of information increasing even as it breathes in and out through compression, an event that is reflected in the very breath that we breath, for so short a time.

If exchanges happen in a linear fashion, so then a "state" (+/-) transition during a carrier arm will disrupt the carrier on which the change occurs like an exploding rail-car in the middle of a long train speeding on a train track.
Perhaps the drawing below best explains why this does not always result in some terminal event, even rarely so.  Remember that each ct2 is surrounded by a cloud of solutions, going to one, of ct1 so that at the ct2 level it is ct1-ct2-ct1-ct2 or nearly so.
We have this "mystery" of the 22 to 256 which might mean, in some fashion, that there are 22 intervening solutions of ct1 even though the substitution rate may be less or even more.
Note that we show the ct0 building which is the pre-space element but equally important because it shows the first pairing to get to a compressed state of fpluspix, the solution for which is that discussion of the strange triangle model above and to the right.

The two drawings above reflect the built in durability of ct2 states given the density and the bottom of the two shows how substitution is expected to occur within the carrier arm type solution.  Carrier arms are likely the result of the linear form as well as "pairing" which is only a theoretical concept, but one which makes sense given our sense of logic, although how that is reflected in an equation without force is, itself, forced.

This drawing showing how states can be shared has to be looked at in light of all the activity and linearity of solution in all the prior drawings.
There is no predicted way for higher ct states to be put merely put on an adjoining track, but that is the effect of multiple place solutions that we see with the ct1 to ct2 transition.  The reason we can have quantum moments is because the transitions and solution order aspects occur in a non-linear environment so that they can occur together even though they are adjacent and linear one to the next in that other environment.
In these pre-linear transitions you get minor train wrecks like this:
abab (plus/minus ct0)
baba (minus/plus ct0)
abab
baba
These four together in this order create ct0, but these have fpluspix transitions of each letter (a or b) although only one of these has irregular transitions at a time.  Behind this, something goes -1,1 creating the "pairings" and back while this ct0  has fpluspix explosive changes which take the alignment out of the 4 states.
The first dimension which to some extent must allow the first side-train track is ct2 which is 256 double aligned (ct0, ct1) state.
While there are explosive changes in the middle, there is presumably some durability due to the amount of stacking and the possibility of interchanging states.  Moreover, the constant transitions of ct1 within the ct2 and those without the ct2 give rise to the SOL transitions that we associate with light.
The more tracks, the higher the chance for sharing, although how this "fixes" trainwrecks in the middle is easier to envision with a 2nd dimension which may be required (ct3) to do that.  You can see that we do not live very far into this compression cycle, yet we have so much internal velocity (high ct state exchange relative to lower ct state exchanges).

In looking over this and considering transitional states a number of thoughts come to mind and I began to get articles which I thought might be of some value in seeing how this is reflected in higher state adn it would be worthwhile to spend time reconciling these observations with AuT.

https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Photonics-for-Energy/volume-5/issue-01/050997/The-role-of-photonics-in-energy/10.1117/1.JPE.5.050997.full?SSO=1

https://nanoscalereslett.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s11671-016-1357-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmon

http://nanoscale.blogspot.com/2009/02/what-is-plasmon.html

Did I mention that book 5 was ready?  For those waiting for more audio, it is coming, I hope.

Shuster, Dirac and I

Enough was clarified by the last couple of posts that I decided to publish a second edition of book 5 with a new sub-title (state, dimension time) even though it steps on book 6 a bit.  There were only one or two editions of book 5 ordered, so those will be real collector's items and you have most of the supplementary material in these posts.

This diagram and the explanation of it is a big part of why I decided to make this change, but it was also the short summary which covers so much with so few words, it's now in Book 5, 2nd edition.  It should be available on all platforms by the end of the week.  The blurry part is 2f(x)^(2^x) which should be familiar to you by now.

I've also added the next audio chapter from the second edition, thus proving that likes will get you whatever you want, up to a point.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/book5wheredoestheuniversebegin3

Anyway, where was this post going?

Shuster came up with the term anti-matter.  He understood the concept of the concentration of space, but not the idea that space was just part of a larger symmetry defined by a mathematical result.
On this point I must digress.
When I say the universe is an algorithm with a sequential quantum count applied to it, words underplay the importance of what we are talking about.  I use the term g-space which should carry more weight, but knowing only that it is an environment which can support the algorithm and supply the count is hardly adequate.  It is more complicated than the actual universe, hence the designation of g (or god) space.  That fact that it is free of time and dimensional constraints just makes it more powerful.  It does not, however, complicate our universe as a result bases system, nor does it provide the least bit of support for any particular man-made religion.  It does provide a pretty hefty support for some sort of god, but to think that this god cares what we think is to insert a layer of randomness that is not present in AuT.  The algorithm defines how we think and if it amuses the denizen of g-space to watch the solution to the algorithm play out, it is the same amusement that a cartoonist experiences when he sees one of his cartoons and is amused.  The belief system of the cartoon characters is generated by the cartoonist and being his it can be whatever he wants it to be.
Dirac came up with the misleading idea of "paired particles."  Every plus has a minus, a quantum love story, separated just when things were getting interesting; I can relate.  A little stupid in light of what we experience and AuT theory generally, but not a bad starting point.
The difference in AuT is merely that he saw them existing together instead of transitioning back and forth.
His equations showed the time between transitions or on either side without inflection points to effective intersecting spiral outcomes, his coincidence idea of why plus and not minus flies in the face of true supersymmetry and shws he missed the mathematical foundational boat.
Honestly, this is the state of the art of determining the structure of the universe and I'm starving trapped down in a well.  Oh the irony of it all.

#writerslife
#AUT
#physics
#quantummechanics
#space
#time

Am I really all alone out here? The AuT lecture

I show where the 4th dimension comes from in AuT but everyone is shocked when there is evidence of it?
It continues to frustrate me.  I feel like I'm in a wreck in the middle of the ocean and there are planes all around me and no one can see me.
https://www.morningticker.com/2018/01/4th-dimension-discovery-shocks-scientists-around-the-world/

So, none of this is going to help me, but let me help you as I lay this out in a simple fashion.  In 10 minutes I will give you the origin of space, time, the big bang, black holes and just about anything else you need to know about the universe.
And you will not even comment on it!

1) Dimension is defined by a series of related formula which are memorialized in the definition of pi:

Looking at the spreadsheet above you see the derivation of pi.  Note this is pi for 4, but pi for 1, 2, 3 or 4 works the same way (the numerator) and if you ignore the numerator, you can get pi0 which is important as set out below.  -1^x and fpluspix are numerator independent denominator ratio generators.
First you have -1^x, this is ct0.  It's important so watch for it later.
The next number of import is fpluspix which is ct1, you know it as space.  Up to this point there is no dimension, all there is is potential for positive and negative results and in the case of fpluspix, the ability to achieve inflection point life spans on the scale that we see with big bangs and big contractions, currently around 20 billion years apart.  If you need to understand the specifics of this, read book 5 or read 1-5 better still.
2.  To get from positive and negative results to observed curvature you have to compare results for different values of the numerator of pi which gives rise to place as one state is compressed to the next.

This shows the derivation of sin. You get the same result no matter which measure of curvature you have and it doesn't work past the first number anyway because the calculation requires a recalculation of pi, but what you see is that where you go from -1 to 1 you get a ratio of 32/27/8-its the .148148 highlighted.
The 8 comes in as 256 (32*8)/27 from whence the compression required (256:27) to get from ct1 to ct2 is derived just as to get to fpluspix you preserved the distance between -1 and 1, then 1 to -2 and so on (book 5).  This 256 being f(x)^2^x is preserved as the ratio from which compression is derived, presumably with certain permutations just as the initial permutations occurred through remember the result of the prior solution.
3.  All of these solution grow from the prior solution.  -1 to 1, the source for 32/27 in the sin equation comparison between ct0 and ct1 is the first fpluspix change and if you want to see why, read book 5.
4.  The next solution is f(x)^2^x where f(x) is 2 times the fibonacci number for x and this is derived from 32/27 because that ratio is the ratio of f(x)^2^x for a limited case which is covered in book 5.
5.  What this shows is that space is the source for the derivation of photons (x=2) and as you follow this upward for x=4 you get the scale equation w(wave energy)=f(4)^2^4 which is e=mc^2 in terms of scale.  The next scale increase (f5)^2^5 happens to the the minimum size of a black hole, it's not a coincidence read book 5.
6.  At each of the scale changes, you have the ratio between the prior state and the new state which appears as a dimension so obviously you have the beginnings of a 4th dimension when you have ct5 which appears transitionally as protons and neutrons, at least that is the indication by the forces which can see in books 2-4.

7.  In the top right hand corner you can see the build out of dimension at various stages of compression and you can see compression up to ct5 along with substitution of different states in the boat looking things.  The first one (sol) is one ct1 and one ct1 out which we call the speed of light.  Note there is no actual speed, its just a substitution of adjacent states.  Again, see books 4 and 5 for the details.
8. The higher substitutions ct2, 3, and 4 are what we call time.  Time doesn't exist, per se, it's just the ratio of ct1 substitutions to these higher substitutions.  If you're thinking that this means that time doesn't exist in space, you are correct, it doesn't; even Einstein knew that although he didn't know why just like he knew energy and mass were convertible but he didn't have this detail which explained it in terms of compressed "information" where information is a lot more complicated than what we think of as information.
This short summary provides more information on the makeup of the universe and dimension than is in all of physics up till the publication of books 1-5 of AuT.  You are welcome.

Irrefutable logic that ct1 (space) makes up ct4-5 matter and audio?

On of the great things about AuT at this point in time (upon the publication of book 5) is that book 6 only needs editing to give those insights that have been included so far.  There is still a great deal of math, which I am working with now, a new way of looking at limits where you reach one and change state, but this is something that a good high school student could do as well as I can.

What has been done, pretty conclusively, is to prove that space is the same stuff that black holes are (and everything in between) and that there is a dimension/time free environment which controls what we experience (spoiler alert-thermodynamics free).  Even time turns out to be something different that what it was considered in other theories.  I've changed the entire world of physics and it is read all over the world, even though it has yet to be published for peer review-working on that.

I claim to you that I have figured out super symmetry of the universe and this post will discuss that somewhat.  And yet, what is really important, though I know what it is, though it is well within my grasp, is denied to me.
I want to claim some intellectual or at least clever accomplishment, even though it largely would fly in the face of my theory, and yet that has nothing to do with what is important and my inability to get what is important when it is within my grasp indicates some sort of mental retardation.
Anyway, you're reading the posts of a retard, what am I worried about?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ghost-galaxy-dark-matter-dragonfly-44-invisible-milky-way-a7209881.html

As I was looking at this relatively mundane, but interesting article, it occurred to me that there might be more to what is in plain site than what is hidden in the "yawn" dark matter galaxy.
Where is the evidence that ct1 is the same stuff as you and I?
In the article above, there is a quote:

"We found many times more mass indicated by the motions of the stars than there is mass in the stars themselves."  That made me start wondering about the blatantly obvious.

Mass and motion are interchangeable if ct1 is correct, but how do we show it?

According to Newtonian Physics: Inertia is the property of mass that resists change.  It is directly related to the momentum, the kinetic energy which is the same feature that shows the interchangeability of mass and energy, namely e=mc^2, or the energy is equal to the mass with a velocity (ct1 exchange) of the speed of light (1:256 at the ct2 level).

  

Mass and velocity are both directly proportional to the momentum, its kinetic energy, so...

If you increase either mass or velocity, the momentum of the object increases proportionally.  Both mass and velocity change the same thing the same way, proportionately: (If y is directly proportional to x, then the graph of y as a function of x is a straight line passing through the origin with the slope of the line equal to the constant of proportionality: it corresponds to linear growth, the x and y axis are mass and velocity, the bisecting line is momentum.), hence Einstein's equation.  

Somewhere a mathematician is saying, one line on a graph, how does that show anything?  You can, for example, have an axis of x which is desert and y which is the spread of the plague (everyone dies before it gets across the desert).  You can take such disparate things and get proportionality.

But this is a little different, because this is a conversion equation, e=mc^2 is the function, not just of portionality, but of conversion.

How can two things that are totally different be the same?  Einstein said that energy and mass were the same thing, but Friedlander says that mass and velocity are the same (and does a pretty lengthy job of explaining it).  The thing about AuT is that it gets rid of nonsense distinguishing features, to some extent this means that all units are units of the same thing, supersymmetric solutions to equations, even the camels and miles of desert.

If an increase in mass or velocity increase momentum, then both must be convertible into each other just as mass and energy are on some fundamental level, even if not on the level of thermodynamics.  

So, AuT holds:

If a given mass encounters 5 external ct1 exchanges along a ct1-2, 2-3 or 3-4 axis, then it goes 1/5 the speed of one that encounters 25 such exchanges along the same axis.  The reason that more can be encountered is presumably because, for example, a ct4 particle has 1x10^16 possible ct3 exchanges along the ct3-4 axis.  This equates velocity directly to mass.

The other, simpler way is just to point out that 1:256 ct1 substitution in ct2 is the SOL and that ct2,3,4 and 5 are all pretty much shown by observation to be convertible into one another merely by removing the number of intervening lesser ct states.  

It's hiding in plain sight.

Moreover, AuT has held, since the very beginning in EHT, that space was dark matter.  If you look at space as potential velocity and the interchangeability of Mass, you come to the only possible conclusion.  That I am right, of course, but also that ct1 is the stuff of ct4 and 5, that space and mass are the same.

And here is an initial attempt at audio-fying this book:

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/sets/aut-prefaceintroduction

I would highly recommend getting a copy of books 1-5 and reading them first, but then I would.

Coming in 2018, book 6.

AuT and Time dilation and anti-matter

AuT is a relatively simple solution to a complex problem.

For Every Complex Problem, There Is a Clear, Simple, solution and it is Wrong. So almost said H.L. Mencken as part of a longer aphorism. 
The whole quote is, “Explanations exist; they have existed for all time; there is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.

AuT, however, is not wrong.  It is supported by observed evidence, but it predicts those observations and explains them.

A plume of antimatter coming from the black hole, exactly what AuT predicts as there is a massive change in states, even though one at a time, within the black hole.
These can leave because of anti-gravity characteristics, they are untrapped by the gravitational well.
Not so easily explained are thunderstom electric strike anti-matter, but they can be accounted for in the quick generation and destruction of ct2 and ct3 states.

A Time to define time.  If AuT teaches us anything, it is that velocity is a form of time and we can see that in the picture below.

The idea behind this is that the number of places for a ct1 interaction (in place of another interaction) increases in place and dimension at each state of compression.  Whether a positive or negative result from ct0 changes the ct1 value changes with each value of x, although the change only occurs when the net value of the composite 4 in space changes.

CT1 can only experience one transition, from positive to negative.
CT2 can experience two, positive to negative and c1 substitution.  The ct1 substitution is the first time state which we call velocity.
CT3 can experience 3; positive to negative and c1 substitution and ct2 substitution.  The larger time transitions t1 and t2 in place of just t1 are what we call clock time and the more t1 substitutions in a given transition between given concentrated states, the less higher state transitions.

We had this older version which shows the same thing with a passage of a higher state through the surrounding clouds showing how time can be bisected in huge chunks by virtue of the size of the surrounding states that it has to transition one point at a time although ultimately in a quantum number of steps.

And one still older focusing on the transition between ct1-ct2 carriers showing the changes of the photons relative to the ct1 carrier creating Velocity or t1.  T0, of course, is the transition from positive or negative to fpluspix.

And for what it's worth, the relativity drawing showing how the different ct states compare in terms of compression.

In the real world environment, the anti-matter transition can be thought of like this (yes, it is a pun)

The Antimatter "kicked out" of protons occurs a couple of ways that we visualize, 1) spontaneous decomposition and 2) violent destruction of the larger transitional state but both are the same thing under supersymmetry, the solutions of combined positive and negative making up a higher ct state separate into their component parts in the next lower state through the introduction of intermediate lower ct states, e.g. inserting intermediate ct1 solutions between ct2 solutions in a ct3 environment.

#writerslife
#aut
#quantummechanics
#physics