Shuster, Dirac and I

Enough was clarified by the last couple of posts that I decided to publish a second edition of book 5 with a new sub-title (state, dimension time) even though it steps on book 6 a bit.  There were only one or two editions of book 5 ordered, so those will be real collector's items and you have most of the supplementary material in these posts.

This diagram and the explanation of it is a big part of why I decided to make this change, but it was also the short summary which covers so much with so few words, it's now in Book 5, 2nd edition.  It should be available on all platforms by the end of the week.  The blurry part is 2f(x)^(2^x) which should be familiar to you by now.

I've also added the next audio chapter from the second edition, thus proving that likes will get you whatever you want, up to a point.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/book5wheredoestheuniversebegin3

Anyway, where was this post going?

Shuster came up with the term anti-matter.  He understood the concept of the concentration of space, but not the idea that space was just part of a larger symmetry defined by a mathematical result.
On this point I must digress.
When I say the universe is an algorithm with a sequential quantum count applied to it, words underplay the importance of what we are talking about.  I use the term g-space which should carry more weight, but knowing only that it is an environment which can support the algorithm and supply the count is hardly adequate.  It is more complicated than the actual universe, hence the designation of g (or god) space.  That fact that it is free of time and dimensional constraints just makes it more powerful.  It does not, however, complicate our universe as a result bases system, nor does it provide the least bit of support for any particular man-made religion.  It does provide a pretty hefty support for some sort of god, but to think that this god cares what we think is to insert a layer of randomness that is not present in AuT.  The algorithm defines how we think and if it amuses the denizen of g-space to watch the solution to the algorithm play out, it is the same amusement that a cartoonist experiences when he sees one of his cartoons and is amused.  The belief system of the cartoon characters is generated by the cartoonist and being his it can be whatever he wants it to be.
Dirac came up with the misleading idea of "paired particles."  Every plus has a minus, a quantum love story, separated just when things were getting interesting; I can relate.  A little stupid in light of what we experience and AuT theory generally, but not a bad starting point.
The difference in AuT is merely that he saw them existing together instead of transitioning back and forth.
His equations showed the time between transitions or on either side without inflection points to effective intersecting spiral outcomes, his coincidence idea of why plus and not minus flies in the face of true supersymmetry and shws he missed the mathematical foundational boat.
Honestly, this is the state of the art of determining the structure of the universe and I'm starving trapped down in a well.  Oh the irony of it all.

#writerslife
#AUT
#physics
#quantummechanics
#space
#time