The age of the universe has no meaning

The Age of the universe has no meaning.
Thus starts book 6 with the most obvious of statements.

Time, it turns out, is a Saci (find that one without the internet), age is ageless, we are but wisps of solutions, begging for forgiveness in Puck's epilogue of any offense given.

I am not one of Shakespeare's shadows, and that Jewish Woman argued against the epilogue shortly before it, which I adopt.

THESEUS

No epilogue, I pray you; for your play needs no
excuse. Never excuse; for when the players are all
dead, there needs none to be blamed. Marry, if he
that writ it had played Pyramus and hanged himself
in Thisbe's garter, it would have been a fine
tragedy: and so it is, truly; and very notably
discharged. But come, your Bergomask: let your
epilogue alone.

But let me come down to a more pedestrian place.  What is to become of book 6?
First, I think it should be grouped in terms of time and dimension, not because those are easily separated, one being a consequence, the other a ratio; but because all that is book 6 is old, mileading and tainted with musings.  I include one such chapter below begging the question, why publish it at all?  It is not a bad question.

It is like the age of the universe in some ways.  Since time is not a measure of anything, it doesn't even exist at the ct1, 2 and barely at ct3, using it as a measure of the life of the universe is like measuring distance by how much it weightts.  When we talk about the "age of the universe," we are talking about its age in some absolute time that doesn't even meaure what we're looking for.   It can, fortunately be measured in terms of the amount of information, x; so there is a way to accomplish the goal of weighing the universe, but using the second to measure it is a bit conceited and inaccurate in so many ways.

And this is the hint to "why book 6?"  In doing so, let's talk about book 5.

In editing book 5, I came across this section (now renamed):

NEUTRON STARS with thin outer layers

          Neutron stars representing a thinning out of the intervening lower ct solutions between transitional ct5 states where you eventually arrive at pure ct5 compression.

          If you don't quite have the mass/gravity for that you get a bunch of bunched neutrons that have almost yielded to positive gravity/compression but not quite since there is still enough anti-gravity/decompression cycles to prevent the transition from ct4 to ct5.

When you are reading book 5 you will see this section.  However, what is important is not the section itself, sort of boring and out of date, but the part in Italics (which was added) because when you take AuT in its current form and apply it to what is already written, it sings the light fantastic.  In this case, it brought solution proximity into the realm of 

"indeed what is a collider?"  It is a proximity limiting machine.  It isn't a large hadron collider at all, it is merely a set of math solutions where a subset have the ct1, 2 and 3 minimized between two ct4ish states. 

Yes, you can order it now!, may be 3 days before the hard copy shows up

An amusing aside, while I sit his starving to death, 13 billion dollars was spent "finding" the Higgs Boson which doesn't even exist, lol.  As is explained in AuT book 5, irony is built into the system (just read it) and I am the height of it.  That collider, which can be useful if used correctly, cost 1 billion.  Any takers? Will work for food.

13 billion dollars would go a long way towards something useful, don't ask me what, I see through money, time and dimension.  I should starve, for I am an offending shadow.

Perhaps that is the theme of book 6, allow my personality to dictate how it is written.  A cynical, mean spirited, hungry and abandoned wraith slowly fading, just as your world and colors are fading from my vision, more irony.  I see better than all the scientists and yet I am blind.

Anyway, I've said this all before, except perhaps some of the shakespeare, saved by virtue of recombined ct3 and ct4 states no doubt.

Let's move on to some other, to use the technical term, "stuff."

Here is a type of section from the old book (Spirals 2nd) which I will, for my own amusement, edit for you the way I plan to edit it for book 6.  In this (using strike outs and all caps to show what is added) you can see the value of this otherwise useless geometry lesson and "why a book 6."

calculus 1 SHOWS AUT LOGIC IN OUR UNIVERSE.

tangent line at some point (x0,y0) solves this line.  Visualize at one point

Tangent line-y-y0=m(x-xo) where m is the l; y0=f(x0)

A point becomes (x0,f(x0)) which is pure logic for x0,y0 where y is a function of x and HERE y is F-series for ct2 relative to ct1.

slope of tangent line to y=f(x)=m=f'(x0) the derivative of x.

tangent=limit of secant lines p-q as q tends to p (p fixed, q varies)

dx to form slow; df other line

df/dx=slope of secant (not tangent)  Now you have to apply limit

limit as dx approaches zero of df/dx is slope of tangent.

From point P to point Q you get:

P=x0,F(x0); P=x0+Dx,F(x0+Dx)  Something happens HERE between x0 and x0+dX which is that the underlying geometry changes and in some cases the F-series changes although the may be according to a formula for stacking that can be applied across the board.  THE CURRENT MATH INDICATES THAT AS THE DISTANCE APPROACHES ZERO, THE NUMBER OF STATES BETWEEN HIGH CT STATE SOLUTIONS APPROACHES ZERO.

IN THE CT1 SOLUTION THE NUMBER OF NON-DIMENSIONAL CT0 SOLUTIONS GOES ESSENTIALLY TO ONE.

IN THE CT2 SOLUTIONS THE NUMBER OF CT1 SOLUTIONS GOES TO 1.  THERE IS NO APPROACH TO ZERO OR IF THERE BE A ZERO, THEN THE SOLUTION OF CT2 AT THAT POINT BECOMES CT3 WITH NO “LAYER OF CT1 FAT” AROUND IT.  WHETHER THIS IS POSSIBLE OR NOT REQURIES A BIT OF STUDY IN THE NEXT POST.

FOR CT3, BOTH CT2 AND ITS SURROUNING ORBIT OF CT1 MUST GO TOWARDS 1 (AND POSSIBLE THEN ZERO).

Derivative for a fixed point in the universe:NEXT HIGHER STATE IN THE UNIVERSE.

m=f'(x0)=limit as Dx-REPLACED WITH CT(NEXT LOWER)goesto0 of [f(x0+dx)-f(x0)]/dx-I STOPPED EDITING HERE, THE LESSON BEING MADE.

F(x)=Sum(geo(Fseries(x')^2^x)) where geo is solved for pi at the fundamental level to separate all points and for each carrier state and x' is the value for each x (for ct1 it is either 0,1 or 1) for each sum but the summation includes both the original state and the carrier state that is made of all the underlying states and rather than rotate between 0,1,1 it goes 0,1,1,2,3,etc so you have two numbers [1] one of which operates within the same range but [1a] changes the range for different states where each state represents a carrier formed by the lower state according to the 1,11,111 F-series exponential function and [2] the other steadily increases based on an F-series rate as the carrier of the underlying base rate based on the F-series function (1,1,2,3 etc).  While a set sum is derived, the individual parts of the sum define where things are in the universe and how fast they are moving.

The difference quotient df/dx=Sum(geo(Fseries(x'+dx)^2^(x+dx)-Sum(geo(Fseries(x'^2)^2^x/dx where x' and geo change in part according to [1] and [2] internally for each point in the solution.

At small value of x the geo function changes at a higher level since it is a function of pi (or more correctly it is a function that yields pi for any value of x or x' where x is the total value of x and x' is the effective value of x' for any point based on the amount of compression and both apply to different points in sum just as different [1] and [2] states apply as both states are made of fundamental points defined by [1] and carrier states defined by [2].

There is symmetry at any value of x, but the symmetry is destroyed as x changes because the solutions are offset by a converging series

The dq may be factored out.

A simple equation y=1/x gives a slope of -1/x^2 of the type we see here, a converging series.